An impossible
right hand holding
the rubic cube is no less
possible in 3D, only two images
identical, placed side by side, then
focused together, are more than enough
to show the scan (which by principle
cannot be binoccular) is stereo

HOW REAL CAN IT GET

How real can it get. The tail of Quasar the dog wags behind the dog, the
Gatineau Hills across the Ottawa River are blue in the distance
between houses. How real can it get. One mono photo by
a cheap 100mm camera. Note the car in garage at
end of street, you can see car detail
in virtual stereo, hardly see
car at all in mono




QUASAR COMES HOME


Next is
a quick test
(obviously one had
to be done to check a torqued
stereo effect for authenticity) of the street
scene in Ottawa east circ. the early 90's, in which the
right view above is Normal (1), then rotated 1 degree, then rotated
by 2 degrees. By 2 degrees of rotation, distortion is becoming
apparent, even though the noticeably increasing stereo
depth remains authentic in all ways


Right image rotated clockwise 1 degree



Right image rotated clockwise 2 degrees


How real can it get. That is me standing on the corn truck
selling sweet corn at the side of the road.
It is not a turnip truck.







Me on
the corn truck
confirms that slight rotation
dramatically increases stereo depth separating
parts, even in the midst of unquestioned distortion and
stress on the eyes. If knowing stereo separation is vital
in an image, rotation of one of the equal views of a
virtual stereo pair made from a mono image
will definately work

One
single mono
photo, unaltered, un-rearraged,
uncomputerized by software, untouched, is able to produce
moocho alotto stereo, the 3D was captured in the single mono frame by the
camera. The world of science hardly knows yet that their best mono
pictures by electron microscope photography hold the key to
visually unlocking the unexplored inner universe a
million and more times smaller than a grain
of sand. Any mono photo or image made
by Leptons will reproduce 3D

BI-LATERAL SYMMETRY IN DYNAMIC FORMATIONS OF GALAXIES How much can you   L E A R N   using Virtual 3D.   Vortex shapes,   v-breaches,   bi-laterals,   rooster   tails,   you learn. Small image, large image, it does not much matter they all have virtual stereo BI-LATERAL SYMMETRY AT THE CORE OF GALAXY NGC 5236     When these two images are focused together they will be in stereo. How is this possible? Read on Bi-lateral symmetry, in this case asymmetry found at the core, cannot be more self evident the instant the above image is viewed in stereo by focusing the two images together. All galaxy cores seem to have bi-lateral symmetry to one degree or another, in the case of Andromeda the bi-lateral symmetry seems slight for appearances of the large glowing ball, but when appeared exposed the bi-lateral symmetry is far more obvious The core a flattish glowing orb socked in a cavity the orb so bright so intense it is lighting up part of the rim, so hot it usually masks out to white in any photo designed to capture the far less radiant rest of Andromeda The opposite, the core reduced to a skeleton, shows a Niagra Falls formation, the center is vertical and slightly turned toward the next state of angular momentum moving outward. More images of this core are here

Notice a spike sticking out from under the rim, aligned with the core. Though short and reedy, this spike is the marker of Andromeda galaxy's north/south symmetry, in keeping with the much longer east/west symmetry which allows itself seen in major formations, moires in the case of Andromeda. A rule is thus stated, that the symmetry markers of one pole axis in 4-way axial symmetry is very short, while the other marker blows up at the ends of both poles in the other axial symmetry pole pair, which is at right angles to the short marker pole pair, in Andromeda's case, the short pole marker is unseen behind the rear rim, the blowup pole markers the 'bullseye' and 'eye in the sky' moire contentrics cammed slightly in clockwise rotation at either end along the east/west axis, the slight clockwise turn of that symmetry axis entirely in keeping in lockstep with the slant of Andromeda's short north/south pole pair markers (the spike sticking out). And that, palms rubbing together print whorls going wssst wssst wssst, takes care of that The spike stiking out is too hard-copy to be random. Let us say then it marks one of the four poles of the galaxy, this pole expected to be matched by something behind the scenes on the far rear side of the galaxy, the pole canted at an angle which matches the slant of the core, the pole axle stiking out from below the rim tells us the motor of the central core is down in the socket rather than near the top of the glowing egg. Since this pole lays along the right side of the core, suspect the rearside other pole to lay along the left side of the core FUNDAMENTAL STEREO PRINCIPLES ARE UNCONTESTABLE Andromeda is a large disk in the sky, deep dish not a sickle cell. When two images are merged together by using muscle controlled eyesight to focus them, details of each image combine in a positively re-enforced way to amplify details which now sharpened and clear would be overlooked in a normal mono view. It also happens that latent 3D content inherent in the original photograph is also active in the merge. It was always thought by physicists that stereo could only occur by binoccular two image combination each image taken with a separate lens at from 6 inches to 6 feet apart. The advent of 'anaglyph' imaging as a way to create stereo views (using red and blue stereo glasses) made from a single mono image, has established that mono pictures are stereo, the 3D in mono no worse than a poor quality binnocular stereo view but nowhere as breathtaking as full view binnocular stereo seen at its real best. Here next a 'virtual' stereo look at the very wide panorama as you look across to the far horizon of the very tilted Andromeda which in fact is seen more on edge than from above, as you instantly learn in virtual stereo view. 'Virtual' means you see a 3rd 'virtual' picture (not physically there) in between two others when you merge the two images together by eyesight

An original weakly shows little Here is an Andromeda original, reduced to caption size. As you can see the original shows nothing of the moire or wide flanges reaching out around the circumpherence in all directions, and underneath in vertical depth as well like a raisin cake. The original shows only dim weak colors and the center portion. The original film emulsions however stored a significant percentage number of weaker photons which leap to brightness when the image is highly enhanced

BI-LATERAL SYMMETRY - ONE SIDE OF THE CORE FLARES UP, THE OTHER SIDE CURLS DOWN

BI-LATERAL SYMMETRY IN THE NUCLEAR CORE ITSELF

The
hot core
kernal (yellow and
white) is standing upright like
Niagra Falls in a pronounced vertical cant
relative to the extended length of the long core
axle, and also notice that yellow tongues of
flame at the top are flashing backward
while the yellow fingers at the
bottom of the white core
are shooting forward,
this is definative
for bi-lateral
symmetry,
since the
bi-lateral aspect
of the nuclear core itself
is vertically rotated (upright) at
right angle to the horizontal long core axle,
the upright core's yellow fingers are also rotated at
right angle (forward - bottom, back - top) to the long core
axle (left side down, right side up). Concider the amount of
sheer fundamental galactic and black hole core physics
just outlined in this above brief paragraph. A real
powerful moment made in the history of home
grown astronomy, the above image was
one of the very first viewed in
Virtual 3D after obtaining
a scanner and in 1/10th
of a second after the
stunning flares vrs
down curl was evidenced
in view I knew there was a
whole new venue to the understanding
of galaxies, a flash like that just does not go away

POWER CORDS CONJOIN AT A 'V' BREACH

This
enhanced
and magnified
spectacular view of
NGC 5236 shows a short
thin pair of arms (like power
cords), doing a 'V' breach fold
at the rear end of the
long core axle. The
image is not
able to
tell
if the
power cords
are diving in at
the 'V' breach, or issuing
out where the two power cords diverge

BI-LATERAL SYMMETRY - ONE SIDE OF THE CORE FLARES UP, THE OTHER SIDE CURLS DOWN

THE CORE PLATES OF NGC 5236

Click here for more maple leaf cores
Click here for more Ngc 5236 data
Click here Ngc 5236 'snub'

Once
again, the
unmistakable legup
over all astronomy which does
not use 3D visualizing to L E A R N.
Imagine, trying to equationalize the curlies
on the left side in a gang set with the curlies on
the right side all in a flat plane whirlpool, then going
to the conference and 'argueing' over whose equations are
correct, whose are better, and thousands of pros do -
argue with others rather than share the gists, that
no equations can be right if bi-lateral
3 dimensional energy dynamics
are not included

For
instance,
you cannot help
but notice, in looking
at the above image in virtual
3D again, that this is a L O 0 0 N G
swoop, it is stretched out front to back, it
is not a tight compact merry go round around
center, it is stretched out a long distance
in space. It is a 'vortex', a long
cylinder winding around an
axis through space.
Take a slinky
and stretch
it out, then slowly
rotate it in your hand, the
turning coiling slinky is a 'vortex'
and many galaxies are like this, stretched out
huge long distances in space, unlike 2 dimensional views
which create a totally false illusion that all galaxies are snuffed
up around a core. But this is simply not true, as a single second
look at the above image, and a quick look at images here,
will tell you in a way you will remember forever after.
Vortex forms are invariably contracted inward
tight into a small center point where
assumed black holes reside,
the slinky ergo is
also extremely
pinched in
the middle

VIRTUAL 3D WAKEUP CALL

When zoomed
and Ngc 5236 first
viewed in Dec/1996 it was
realized in that instant that here
was an important discovery, for reason that it
demonstrated significant value in the use of Virtual 3D
in the examination of astronomy images of far distant objects,
and for the second reason that since seeing this core's
profoundly self evident bi-lateral symmetry, no
core of a galaxy since has been seen which
does not have bi-lateralness to some
degree, usually self evident even
to the naked eye, sometimes
seen only after a look
in Virtual 3D

Skip this if you get bored with conjectures

WORKABLE THEORY SUGGESTION Any image you see by eyesight is not formed at the surface of what you see, but rather in a thin layer immediately above the surface. Photons incoming and leaving (absorption/emmision) pass through this plane of incident index and refraction, the incoming photons flood in from all directions and angles, and reflect at all angles, they do not return on the same incoming path. Immediately above any surface is a zone of intermix where photons exchange imformation by contact with each other, here is where the inherent hologram information about the surface's topology is imprinted in the photon flood that eventually reaches the camera, or enters your eyes. There may also be property in the electron adding imprint to photons, for instance which side of the electron is the photon on when its wavelength disentangles from 'excitement level' and leaves 'orbit' Photons hold the key, as lepton particles, they absorb 'imprints' of what is happening around them in the enviroment they leave to reach termination either on film or in the eye's retina. When you look and see, you are not looking actually at a solid surface, but rather at a plane just above the surface, where the image you actually see is created. Here is where stereo information in imprinted like a super subtle hologram that continues to the final destination of the 'carrier wave' photons The photons do not enter a camera point source to point source. Contrary to common physics belief, photons enter a camera from all angles, and strike a camera's films over all parts of the frame, incoming from different angles. For instance photons from the upper left corner of the view can strike the lower right corner of the film, and visa versa, continuing to record super subtle hologram information via positive re-enforcement in cross-hatching patterns made as the random (non-point source) photons strike the film Actually, I am not speaking about photons per se, but Leptons   More about incident light strikes is here in optical illusions

SCATTERED INCIDENT LIGHT PROPERTY VERIFIED

INCIDENT LIGHT EFFECT IN BOOSTING INHERENT 3D 'Incident Light' as a property principle in reproduction of inherent 'stereoscopics' recorded in any mono photograph or high DPI digital image, has been VERIFIED by experiments. Color reproductions of images were made by both Canon and Zerox photocopiers. The Canon principle reads what color dots are found in an image, for instance photograph or magazine picture, and reproduces same, with enhancements upon same if selected. Whereas Zerox creates new rastering in the form of artificial rectangular areas marking small 'bits' of picture for repro in different colors per resident strong color per rectangular bit. The result is that Canon reproduces what it sees (which is why Canon can reproduce money which can be passed off as genuine in dark bars at night), whereas Zerox alters the image creating a sort of 'computerized' version of what it sees. In effect, Zerox reproductions have poor quality sterero. Canon reproductions have stereo which can be as good as in the original mono image being photocopied. DEFINATIVE PROOF TESTS Tests were done mounting Canon reproductions on a support panel, two images stuck side by side to it with spray adhesive, and the panel held upright in a vice with alligator clips. The tests were very simple, yet revealing, as follows. It was found that by tilting the angle of the vice's large alligator clips forward and back, and rotating the whole support structure at its base by certain degrees, that 3D stereo could be dramatically improved, or suppressed, in the two side-by-side identical mono images being studied. Two large magnifying glasses held upright side-by-side at an unusually long distance back away from the surface, was the principle method for viewing stereo, in these tests, although going cross-eyed to focus the two images also worked albiet uncomfortably if holding the images in focus for any length of time. Three main sources of incident light striking the surface of the two images were tested, one, daylight streaming in from a large window, second, light streaming down from a ceiling lamp behind overhead, and third, light streaming from a wall fixture further back in the room. EXACT GEOMETRIC PLACEMENT When the display panel was tilted to accomodate the behind-overhead source of scattered incident light, stereo noticably improved when the tilt was in the close range of 15 degrees off-angle to the light striking from the behind-overhead light fixture which had two 100 watt light bulbs. When the display was carefully turned to angles pursuent to roughly 30 degrees from incident light streaming in from the daylight window, which was more laterally to the side to the right of the experiment, stereo again noticably improved more. And finally, repositioning the display on a table top surface to be also able to capture incident light striking at off-angles pursuent to 15 and 30 degrees from the rear wall light fixture, genuine 3D stereo was again seen to be better, the rear-wall light source test taking place at night when the daylight window light source was dark. SIGNIFICANT RESULTS It become entirely clear that placements and tilts of the stereo pair of mono images relative to scattered angle incident light sources, was a fractal geometry phenomenon, that better stereo resulted no-arguement when angles relative to Hexagon and 12 sided figure formations were paramount. The experiment was continued to include tilt angle and rotation of a computer monitor displaying two identical images side-by-side and the exact same conclusions were observed - that the angles at which incident light struck the image being viewed handsomely positively re-enforced the visible 3D effect in the images, when the angles were exactly correspondent to fractal geometry principles, by shifting, tilting, and rotating the computer monitor in and out of phase with incident light angles conducive to 15, 30, and 60 degree angles striking the computer screen. The conclusion can only be that incident light in a room also conveys carrier wave information, that can positively re-enforce, or suppress, a stereo matrix stored in a mono photograph, depending on what the prevailing angles are in incident light striking the image being viewed in stereo. These simple definative experiments confirm that an In (positive) and Out (negative) phasing due to the scattering of incident light rays striking the mono images pair, principally interact with phasing elements stored in the original picture, the phasing elements not seen in the normal view or look of any picture, but which can be intuited at once by turning a picture of the Moon upside down and seeing craters turn into buttons, the change in evident Moon topology a property of elemental light interference and phasing patterns, since the Moon photo itself does not change when it is turned upside down.

See virus and other micros in virtual 3D here

It is
Ngc 2997,
another vortex galaxy.
A thick compact arm extends far
in distance this way, then kinks back far away
from the camera - it puts new meaning to the word
'writhing'. The core at the center is drawn into a tight pinch
by powerful gravities, even though there is less mass in total
(because of the pinch) the mass is more energetically
compacted, because of the pinch





That
thing wrapped
around the part of the
arm sticking up to the right is a 'rattle',
here rather poorly formed probably a factor of old age,
a more pristine instantly seen rattle is found in M101, this
rattle, like the ones in M101, seemingly formed by impact
from an object travelling or impacting across the arm
rather than the inner galaxy, the impact leaves
its tracks in the form of circular wedding
bands around the arm, in this case
a seeming time worn event, but
notice abrupt lack of
bright stars
after the
rattle,
and jog off
into space where
the assumed colliding
object took a powder. You would
not know any of this, unless somehow able to tell
that circulars are wrapped around the arm, virtual 3D makes telling easy

There
is a huge
superstructure to
this galaxy (Ngc 2997) its dim
outlines captured by electron telescope
but not enouph illumination allowed to reveal details





This intense
closeup near an inner
portion of the core of Ngc 2997, by
the VLT electronic camera manned by ESO, is
able to tell in a second flat how thick these arms
are, thick because vertical, in some parts of the
arm(s) the vertical thickness is greater
than the width, notwithstanding
the blunt (large upright
dish off the core end)

Image 1

IN TERMS OF 'MISSING MASS'

Already you have learned, with just this brief exposure to galaxies in 3D, that these galaxies are THICK

Notice
the core
topology of
Image 1, it is very
tell-tale. First, it is writhing
at a different pace and in different directions
to the whorls of the greater range of longer arms cycling
around beyond the core, a different state of dynamics than the
core bole itself. Behind the rear far end of the core bole
an arms spins off to the left issuing forward than
winds directly under the core to the right.
At the fore end, a wide sweeping
tail comes out upward to
arc back leftward
over the core
bole. Such
different
dynamic states
between inner core
inferno, and outer arm spirals,
are par for the course in galaxies, something you
might not ever know until you take a moment to view any
galaxy in this method of genuine inherent 3D powerfull. These
different rates are different states in angular momentums,
which can vary one state to the next by sharply
declented angles, and cams that are
noticably rotated out
of phase

Also
notice in
Image 1 that the
white flares (comets)
crest the tops of the arms like
tassles on the hems of thick deep curtains.
It has been subsequently found that galaxy arms in
enhanced and 3D-presented images, are typically of similar
constructs, that is, flares cresting the lineal tops of
thick deep forms comprising sheeting arms, and
very substantial quantities of 'missing'
mass hidden from view since the
hem and curtain topology
of the arms cannot
be seen in mono

You
will be
fabbergasted at
what you will see the first
time looking at a spiral galaxy in 3D.
Theorists and fundamental physicists have it wrong.
Spiral galaxies are very different than the common or dogmatic
perception seen by looking with mono eyes. Even your most favorite
astronomy picture will open up your consciousness to whole new
splendors and appreciation of celestial factories at work
making it all but impossible to continue with any
atheistic beliefs, in particular those that
have yourself as the very center of the
universe and so perhaps one of the
TINY handful comprising the
universe's most intelligent
men. Wrong very wrong.
How come seeming
religious zingo
speaks in the
midst of
serious
science?
Concider
what kind of
expensive thought
processes a scientist must
go through to formulate an aethistic
belief. Such scientists and teachers may be
hard resistive to anything new that might knock on
the floor of their aetheistic beliefs which they have
spent a lifetime making stamped in iron

Wheels of progress run backwards when they can
religious spins the major cause of when - GM

WORDS OF WISDOM FOR VIRTUAL 3D

3D is
free gain
in knowledge.
Enjoy. Once you see
how it is done, once seen
never forgotten - you can make
your own 3D images from any picture
or photo, this includes anything, for
instance, see here a 3D view of
virus scanned by an electron
microscope to 150,000
magnification

Actually, click here for an awakening in consciousness awareness regards seeing the ultra micro small in virtual 3D anytime

SUSPECT LATENT STEREO STORED IN MONO IMAGES MIGHT BE IN PATTERNS SOMETHING LIKE THIS Not accurately detailed as to which microscope and at what magnification, these contentric atomic lattice patterns were in joint caption: 'a field electron microscope magnifies up to a million times, an ion electron microscope magnifies up to 5 million times'. I do not see understructure hexagram shapes superformed amongst squares, circles, and conal spires in the form of angular pyramids. All in all, an extremely busy bit of physics

Click on images for large

I suppose the most interesting news learned in virtual stereo view is an asymmetry co-incidal with symmetry aspects seen in nebulas. In the case of atomics above the four dart points offset from the 4 cardinal points of a compass by 45 degrees, are diving into depth away from the camera, whereas the spirellas each curve out toward the camera. In this case, all equal similar forms behave alike. In Nebula, it happens that two similar forms will be bi-symmetrically converted, that it, two opposed forms vectored away, the other two projecting toward us, seemingly a nebula property that is invariable for all nebulas which have a definable east/west or any bi-valve shape A stark example of bi-valve shape is this nebula Ngc 6210 the streeching red by Hubble image, (not me), the red top curls forward, the red bottom back like a dog's tail, the left forward (from the rear), the right back, a clear unmistakable example of bi-valve 4-way polarity

You can see the bi-valve phenomena very well illustrated here in the Sugarloaf Conspiracy You can see more bi-valve actions in nebula here You can see bi-valve (bi-lateral) symmetry at work in very large scale by this serious inspection of the Tarantula star field in the nearby LMC galaxy. If you can get into its 3D images what you see will blow you away. Promise

Photos of livingroom stereo experiment leads to discovery of stereo in mono photographs Sonic stereo in mono sound experiments photos and the Newsonic Photo Story

Proof Of Concept

High school science teachers, physics teachers, university professors, professional astronomers, take note that you owe it to your students to make them aware of such awesome 3D potential in the world's total reservoir of mono photographs, so that each person may judge for themselves without being whipped by a dogma or threatened with dismissal if they think the unthinkable - stereo is stored in all mono photographs! All that was needed was discovery of a method to cause the latent stereo to re-occur visibly, by natural, not artificial, means. The means is simply focusing in overlay two images placed side by side, and letting the intrinsic holograph content in each image merge and combine, the overlay combination engages principles which also create optical illusions in photos, except, in producing stereo, the optical illusion princples refracted via incident light from one side (one image) engage the same in the other image to positively re-enforce, generating latent stereo content which springs to light fully visible. Proof of concept     Description of concept

VIRTUAL STEREO BASIC DISPLAY

ILLUSTRATING IDENTICAL ORIGINAL HEIGHT, INCREASED HEIGHT

Both at original size (298 x 311)

Right image height increased by +2


Best display virtual stereo, left (299 x 321), right (298 x 323), left
height increased by +8, right height increased by +10, original
width (300) original height (313), proof that increased
height increases stereo depth. For example you
can now tell the flying wings are about
half way up the shaft, not up
near the top

In best
display, the
height of both images
has been increased, the extra height
translates directly into greater stereo depth.
Further PROOF that this privately discovered simple
technique for producing latent 3D content
inherent in any mono photo is
genuine and correct to
all important
physics
laws -
the picture
has not been altered
in any way. Only the size at which
each (left and right) frame is displayed is at
stake, in which the variance variariable upon the original
picture's Width and Height adjusted in their display
is by at most about .03 percent, the tiny
percentile applied to the whole
picture not to just any
small portion(s)
of the photo.
Increased
stereo is much found
by increasing the HEIGHT
slightly above original, for instance
all of the images shown herein are displayed in
Heights increased in a gradient from about +7 to +13
points depending upon the picture and which increase works
best. The slight increase in Height translates
into a greater depth field on the 'Z'
axis (into long distance
depth into the
picture)

The
fact that
increasing the
Height above the image
original translates into increased
depth in the resulting mono 3D view (in outright
violation of well established binnocular stereo photograph
theories) is proven by the following, in which the
two Widths are identical, and the Height is
increased by H=+12 points for the
left image, and H=+15 points
for the right image,
both being the
heights for
real good
stereo

Above,
wobbling
in the views,
seen only in Virtual
3D, is caused by distortions
in the camera lens. You will not see
the distortion or even know it is there
until witnessed in Virtual stereo. In fact
most camera lens (except for extreme
expensive) have some distortion,
the warps exposed in an
instant. In this case
further distortion
(zigzagging)
has come
from the
process used
to digitalize the image



Astronomy
images are correct
in this method of genuine stereo.
Hubble engineers at   Nasa   have been able
to take a few stereoscopic photos of celestial objects and have
presented their results to the public. The views produced by
Nasa using traditional binoccular stereo techniques, and
the views of the same objects produced by me using
only a single MONO photo, are identical,
except Nasa views tend to have
more foreground and deep
distance stereo
depth
whereas
mine have far
better detail and clarity

Steam
vents in
a lazy volcano
look the way they do with
you standing there, nothwithstanding,
less actual 3D. The 3D you get 'virtually' in the mono
is more than enough to diagnose the thermos. And its
all for free. I nabbed it as a small photo from
an Internet volcano watch site



HOW FAR CAN A PICTURE BE DEGRADED AND STILL BE SURFACE CONCEPT CORRECT IN 3D. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING PICTURE OF A TORNADO IN THE LAST STAGES OF ROPING OUT BEFORE VANISHING


Long rope tornado coils for miles above a shoreline

The above
tornado spectacular
scanned by I from a daily newspaper.
The radians obvious in the digital image are due
to the fact that the newspaper spread on the carpeted living room
floor was carelessly walked on before the volcano picture was
scanned. The newspaper reported that this was a
wire photo, it was not a glossy print
used by the daily newspaper

As
you can
see, everything
is   STILL   correct.
Furthermore, the stereo sharpens
details and perception so that many things can be
seen clearly in the stereo version which simply cannot be inferred
in a single-only mono view. For instance it seems the right edge is
cropped, cutting away the point where the dark rope in the sky
(upper right) doubles back and heads further back into the
clouds away from the camera, making this a remarkably
long and kinky tornado, an understanding you
can only have by seeing the image in
its full stereo potential, other
wise it looks only cloud
in the upper right

Rope tornados, like the above, are the aftermath as the tornado quits, the long rope form appears, then it vanishes

Thus
is proven
the existence of
stereoscopic content inherent
in any mono photograph, no matter how old, no
matter how grainy, no matter how poor quality. This tornado
image is a slight enhancement (by a moi) of the original after it was
scanned, using only standard straight forward enhancing techniques
available in any graphics editor such as Paint Shop Pro,
Corel Draw, Abode. The only enhancers I used were
image density (Gamma Correction), and colors
(all three, red, green, blue, increased
by just a few points). Brightness
is also used, sparingly. But
not Contrast, which
may improve a
picture
for
3D
clarity
on rare occasions
pursuent to original processes
that produced the picture. Contrast otherwise
usually inhibits any genuine 3D the picture already has.
At least I have found this problem with Contrast so I stay away
from it. It is possible Contrast has great use in the hands of others
experimenting with their own ideas for reproducing a picture's latent
original 3D potential. Contrast can work sharpening details in a
small size picture but almost always fails its services in
larger images, and, can irradicate important
small details, plus all stereo

GREAT WALL OF CHINA

One of
the images
studied for incident
light scattering effects striking
a pair of mounted images, is this view of the
Great Wall Of China, from an ad on the glossy back
cover of a monthly magazine. Even though very grainy, when
experimentally photocopied in different degrees of
enhancement by Zerox and Canon machines,
differences in stereo gradient could
be easily seen in the depth
quality of this
interesting
little
picture.
Then, digital
scan, enhancement, and
computer screen display, changes
the character of the little image completely - behold





Two
slightly
different views,
the second in subtle color
tone adjustements, increases stereo, a
useful technique used for most images in Galaxies in Chaos



In
fact
this picture
of the Great Wall was
able to show that marginal 3D
can be seen in just a single mono photo,
holding one large magnifying glass over another
within very careful focusing, so one glass
magnifies the image in the other,
somewhat akin to hand
rigging the focus
method of a
microscope

And
so now
here is a view of
a center slice of Andromeda,
the great stereo breadth in this image's latent
stereo potential makes it plain that Andromeda is toward a
wide disk spiral galaxy circle-related around its circumpherence rather
than a narrowed sickle cell as all mono images of Andromeda imply, even
though ribbons flowing along the back flank tend to be vertical like
ribbons of pastry wrapped around the hub of a cinnamon
bun. In fact, the face of Andromeda is a wide
sweeping expanse across its broad
cross sectional area away
from the camera,
and there
is a
strong
indented
inclination in
the center region

JUPITER'S GIANT RED SPOT

If curious,
like me, about the
Great Red Spot on Jupiter,
do what I did, view the Red Spot
in Virtual 3D. This is what I learned





Not a
whirlpool,
it is a sinkhole,
ribbons of entropy flow
around, tong into the side of
the vortex, a seething mismatch of
temperatures, pressures, densities,
gases, touching the bitter cold
of outer space, not a bit
is in a funnel or
whirlpool

INCREASING THE STEREO BY INCREASING THE HEIGHT

You can actually increase an image's latent inherent stereo content conciderably, by increasing the height of one image (say the right) greater than the other image, by +10 points or more, between the side by side image. The result can be very uncomfortable on the eyes, but, since, the original mono photo captured incident rays from for instance the top of the image to the bottom of the film, and visa versa, height hence plays a very important commodity in the recreation of the original image's stereo. Usually height gradiants of +4 between the images is comfortable to the eyes, anything more can be an unusual kind of eyestrain even though stereo can increase to surpising levels. This is entirely out of context to standard binoccular stereo image theory in which height has no bearing whatsoever in the recreation of binoccular stereo using two images each photographed at least a minimum of 6 inches apart. In 'Virtual Stereo' - in a mono photo, height is one of the components of intrinsic must. In the past, height gradiants as much as +15 points between 1 image and the other were tried. For a couple of years images were staged at mostly a +4 point gradiant. Nowadays (for most of the images in Galaxies in Chaos) most images are staged in height gradiants of just +1 or +2 points, which is completely comfortable to the eyes and produces greater clarity in details seen in depth along the 'Z' axis. The change gradual from large (+15) to slight (+1), the +1 and +2 numbers coming unexpectedly one day when trying to overcome an unruly 'venetian blind' effect in an important image. Most of the images have been tested for best stereo in stagings at +1 and +2 gradiant differences in height. Only a handful of images in Galaxies In Chaos (from over 2000 stereo pairs) have been tested for +3 staging. It is possible that a number of images will have better stereo with +3 gradiants, but, as said, the +3 height gradiant parameter was not routinely checked, when testing each image pair in groups of height staged variables, before selecting and using a particular staged pair for their best stereo.

The
following is
not the Grand Canyon
on Earth. It is a much larger canyon
on Mars, an original image turns into 3D scenery
by a bit of science and aquired techniques in image staging

VIRTUAL 3D's TREATMENT OF A MARS CANYON

The
3D in this
magnification is
actually quite elegant
concidering it is from a single
mono picture, in this case a second
version of the same is slightly enhanced
in color density giving slightly more depth
to the stereo field when the two images are
superimposed. What 3D is present is 100%
authentic to original on Mars the only
difference being the stereo on
Mars is much greater, this
is an awesome canyon





From Nasa original - texture is dull, dark, and brooding

Snowflake master geometry images have been moved here

Stunning cliff face virtual 3D images have been moved here

STREETCAR



The
pritzling
(razzle dazzle)
in the image is because
of a larger image reduced to small
display, the usual result is scintillations,
3D fundamentalists ignore, 3D purists
go nuclear when they see it.

The
sprintling
is not a fault of
virtual 3D. Try the two,
in large images of the street
car shown side by side as a pair.
The only way you can see it, unless you
have genetically engineered eye muscles,
is to focus by going gently cross eyed.
Only portions can be seen, the image
is so large, but, note the 3D,
and notice, no sprintling

Definition -
those who go nuclear
become intent to destroy or
irradicate those who made them
go ballistic, particularly the person at
the source. Watch out for nuclears, you
may not even know they have already
passed through ballistic and are
even now nuclear intent, calm,
planning, getting ready
for the moment to
strike. The
Earth
does not need
nuclear emotions

Two identical images side by side - stereo presence is self evident

Images sizes slightly adjusted in display for best stereo

here for the exciting hoary of this 3-story log cabin

NOT QUITE STONED

In the
following, the
word 'astounding' means
the brain buzzing in very pleasant
surroundings, not a blown mind, not an euphoric
exhaultation, a very pleasant buzz stemming from complete
unexpected surprise with hardly any mental bucket yet to put it in

HISTORY OF VIRTUAL 3D

How
it all
started. Circa
November 1966 there was
no such thing as 3D in mono images,
3D anaglyphs were being used by the medical
and research professions to pass around stereo images
made from two separate binoccular photos merged together into
one anaglyph viewed with red and blue 3D glasses. Otherwise, all
stereo vision was produced by binoccular eyesight needing 2
photos, to satisfy each eyeball. I had just within days
learned how to hypertext code a file using
instincts from once before having
produced a 1400 page editor
manual using a KISS
giant laser
printer
on loan
its codes
it turns out
the underneath level
of what is now hypertext so the
first day I saw this I had my own home page
up on the Internet and two days later was including
images. I wanted to show three images from the sonic sound
experiments, I put in the codes for length and width for all three
and called the page to screen in my Netscape browser and instantly
saw something was wrong, one of the three photos had been a
scanned vertical photo the other two horizontal the
vertical photo now totally distorted a TV
set in the corner looking like a
pumpkin. Something went
dingdongbing in
a front
lobe, it
was, hey, isn't
that how stereo is made
from drawning disporportionate lines
to make 3D comic books and cartoons. I restaged
the image, this time vertically, this time two identical
copies side by side one a little wider the other a little higher
and took a look. Amazed was I. The coffee table legs were in
the fireplace, no. The chair was behind the wall, no.
The TV set was floating in space looking turned
inside out, no. I was astounded because
I was looking back into a living
room I had last seen two
years earlier, in
3D. Instead
of complete ruin
and distortion, the two
mono photos leaped to life revealing
the single mono photo, scanned to digital, had
inherent 3D galore. Other images proved likewise. I turned
to astronomy, posted a scanned picture of galaxy Ngc 2997 and
saw a writhing galaxy vortexing through space its long arms
yanging forward then yinging back and taking an abrupt
kinked jog through space behind the galaxy. Believe
me I was hooked you can never retreat
from a sight like that

In
those
days circa
1996 I thought you
had to use a lot of horizontal
and vertical stretch in an image to get
good 3D its true you do but the focusing effect is
murderous on the eyes. Today I use minimum possible stretches
to display an image and need only to show details seen easily in
3D which can't be recognized in mono. It is possible to get
more, even substantially more, stereo in the images I
show but to do so forces siege of great eye
strain and a lot of work finding the
ultimate perfect window for
best 3D. No way, good
enough is good
enough. If
I can
show
details
unseen in mono,
this is good enough for me

LIVINGROOM PAIR

Original pair of living room images revealing on the instant stereo in a mono photo, are below as Newsonics 7. Apolgies for the eyestrain these images are very stretched The history of 'virtual 3-d' is very short. I accidentally came across the principle when attempting to color enhance and sharpen a very poor quality photo of a sound experiment underway 2 years before first passing the photo through a brand new first time scanner just acquired, being tried at home. The photo was of a demonstration in which full stereophonic 3-d sound was being reproduced from original mono Glen Miller wire recordings, using just a single 10 inch woofer with an 8 inch oval woofer wired in line and lying propped at a distance on the floor, both speakers driven by a single 22 guage lead from a single channel of a cheap getto blaster. The demo worked. The result is summarized as 'the jaw dropping demo' under "newsonics' on my science anamalies page at jawdrop.htm - link updated Jan 2001 - G.M. Proof of 3d image concept       Description of 3d image concept Details of 3d sonic discoveries       Photos of 3d sonic experiments

NEWSONICS 1


AND

NEWSONICS 2


ORIGINAL PHOTO

THE ORIGINAL LIVINGROOM WAS LIGHT BUFF WITH LIGHT BROWN CARPETS. YOU CAN SEE THE PROBLEM IN THE FOLLOWING ORIGINAL PHOTO. THIS IS THE WAY THE PRINT CAME BACK FROM THE HOLE-IN-THE-WALL HIGH SPEED DEVELOPER SERVICE

NEWSONICS 3


I ACCIDENTALLY RE-SIZED ANOTHER (A VERTICAL SHOT) BY MISTAKE AS HORIZONTAL UNDER TWO OTHERS THAT WERE HORIZONTAL AND SEEING MAJOR DISTORTION REALIZED IT SHOULD BE POSSIBLE TO GET SOME STEREO FROM SUCH RE-SIZING OF TWO DIFFERENT COPIES OF A SINGLE ORIGINAL. I WAS SURPRISED AT HOW MUCH STEREO WAS INHERENT. THIS WAS ON NOVEMBER 5, 1996.

HERE IS THE ENHANCED ORIGINAL, AND AGAIN, AS ACCIDENTALLY RESIZED. YOU CAN SEE AT ONCE WHAT DIFFERENCE A LITTLE ENHANCMENT MAKES, PLUS WHAT YOU CAN SEE IN 'VIRTUAL 3-D'.

NEWSONICS 4


DISPLAYED IN SIMPLE ERROR AS

NEWSONICS 5


HMM - ISN'T THIS HOW STEREO IS CREATED, ALBEIT WITH TWO SEPARATE PHOTOS BY TWO SEPARATE CAMERAS OR LENS?

NEWSONICS 6


ERGO - A DISCOVERY - THESE IMAGES SUPERIMPOSED ARE STEREOSCOPIC

NEWSONICS 7


THIS WAS THE DISCOVERY, THAT STEREO EXISTED EMPIRICALLY COHERENT IN A MONO PHOTOGRAPH. IT WAS A VERY PLEASANT BUZZ INVOLVING MORE THAN JUST TWO FRONTAL LOBES. VERRRY PLEASANT. ALMOST NUMBING. BUT NOT QUITE, I WAS ALREADY REFUNCTIONING SECONDS LATER, STAGING THE NEXT 'LARGER' VIEW.

NEWSONICS 8

SO, THERE IS THE DISCOVERY,   3-D EXISTS IN A SINGLE NONE-3D PHOTO

The photo taken looking down
upon the layout from a 3-step ladder,
with a 110mm camera held vertically, the scene
you see is correct, looking again into that living room
from 2 years before. Pretty successful from a single mono photo.


SEARCHING AROUND

AND SO, I STARTED LOOKING AT EVERY KIND OF PHOTO I COULD GET MY HANDS ON. ASTRONOMY IMAGES WERE JUST INCIDENTAL, BY THE BY, HOWEVER IT BECAME FACINATING TO SEE DETAILS AND DEPTH EMERGING, COMPLETELY CHANGING THE ASSUMED CHARACTER OF MANY OBJECTS ESPECIALLY WHEN THE BEST ASTRONOMER CONJECTURES WERE WHOLELY MISSING SALIENT FEATURES SEEN IN AN INSTANT IN 3-D.

I had general population passing interest in astronomy at the time, no big deal, occasionally bought a copy of Discover Magazine or Astronomy Magazine, had never been involved in astronomy, except for the third eyeball turned to astronomy circumstances due to solutions of 'Perfect Eclipses' solved 6 years earlier as a mathematical excercise not as an end consequence of emersion in total eclipses, which itself came by the by as simple curiousity - two total eclipses were upcoming back to back in the early 80's and TV even the daily newspapers were screaming about this, showing images and scientifically hand drawn schematics of giant Moons beside Earth parallaxally superimposing even more-giant Suns sitting right beside the Moon, even idiotically grinning cartoon characters battling each other in screetching adult's kids voices for supremacy in the universe. All this racket over two back to back total eclipses, with a lot of money involved in promotions, products, and trips to the best view sites.

A curiosity element got ahold of me, just how far apart is the Sun and Moon during a total eclipse, and most important of all, how far does the Moon move in accomodating total eclipses with the Earth closest to the Sun, and farthest away. To my complete bewilderment, the amount in space the Moon moved in connectivity in the maximum range of the Earth's displacement in eccentricity in orbit, was no more, no less, than the diameter of the Earth.

It took another 8 years of hard work cracking for long sieges on the 13 digit calculator's digit keys to balance the equations into a 'perfect set' where Earth's equatorial diameter, and polar diameter, drop out as fundamental constants in inner gravitic space in the solar system. Sorry for the mouthful but accuracy is accurate, that above is the simplest quick take I can make for you on what took place during the 1980's as a total annonamous member of society who had not yet even eased over the edge into becoming a self declared amateur astronomer research finder.

Next is the first astronomy image ever scanned by me. The writhing vortexing arms blew me away. You can never turn back from a vision like this, seen for the first time. Don't forget, the magazine article accompanying the photo described a flat plane galaxy with arms winding around a disk decribed as theoretically flat as the rings of Saturn. A 2D dimensionally flat galaxy, (which everyone believed before Hubble came on line).

One look at the writhing worm armed vortex cutting swaths through depths of 3D space, and I cut out the photo for storage and threw the magazine with its 'article' on pure cutting edge modern science and astronomy research in the garbage. No need to keep such 'science' any longer. The flat universe of the ego centric Earth had vanished in one fact that effects the whole of astronomy. So, a pent up core dump has just been dumped - GM.

NGC 2997 PAIR

The above Ngc 2997 image is an extreme hardship pair, don't forget, as already mentioned, at the start back then I thought extreme differences in height and width were needed to evoke the mono picture's inherent 3D.

PRECURSOR TO THE PRESENT EVOLVEMENT

Earlier tests circ dec 1996 describing placing of view planes and incident lights from overhead, from rear of room, and from windows, at critical 15, 30, and 60 degree angles, noticably increasing stereo effects when viewing mono images side by side in Virtual 3D pairs, using two identical color photocopy images mounted side by side on a panel, stuck in place by graphic artist layout spray adhesive, two magnifying glasses held side by side the principle viewing device.

INITIAL (ORIGINAL) INVESTIGATIONS - OF PHYSICALLY MOUNTED IMAGE PAIRS,   BY 'A MOI' THE AMATEUR SCIENTIST

Note:
your eyesight
can be used to create
a composite image on the spot.
By focusing two image together in which
the best details of one merge with the best details
of the other resulting in an image spectacular in
the amount of extra information which can be
seen in the one combined view. Forget
the bonus stereo, the overlay
itself intensifies hard
to see details in
copious lush

POSITIVE RE-ENFORCEMENT OF PEAKS, NEGATIVE SQUELCHING OF VALLEYS

In the next pair, a green enhanced M101 view at the left has some inner detail, just. A more strongly enhanced green image of M10 beside it, has all inner features obliterated but more traces in the far outskirts are seen. Then the two are merged, inner features are seen, and the outskirts features are amplified beyond what is seen in either image, because of positive re-enforcement intensifying peaks and squelching valleys in the image's trapped photon matrixes.



It means valleys can be false inputs from camera and print, etc. Positive peaks, when intensified, overwhelm any false positives inputted into the image from outside sources such as camera and print. Nice Virtual stereo bonuses free for the taking, we do not have to do any work to get the bonuses.

HOW TO MAKE THE STEREO VANISH

By
the way
notice how much
stereo improves by the
change of just one point in width,
the first of each of the next two images is
stages with Width=299 and Width=298, the second
image of each view is staged at Width=298,
Width=298, both widths are the same.
Stereo in the second views has
collapsed to almost
unseen, this
blows any
concepts
right out
of the water
that chance displacement
of objects and vanishing point perspectives
causes the stereo, to see such dramatic stereo change in
vanishing point perspective - hand drawn - is the cause of stereo
in these astronomy images is false, the stereo is in the images
and has nothing to do with hand drawn 3d cartoon binoccular
mechanics, the 1 point difference in width is
wayyyyyyyyyy too small to be effecting
a hand drawn cartoon version
of stereo





Three hardship pictures scanned from a glossy paper monthly magazine,
the first two as large pictures reduced to small size, the third (tree)
printed on paper so thin you can read letters from the page behind. All
three have useful useable stereo





   

BIG IMAGE SUMMARY

Two identical canon photocopies of this image (netfishing in shallow tropical river), mounted side by side by double back masking tape on an upright support panel, the panel itself (carboard) mounted on a sturdy small vice with alligator clip which swivelled in any direction, was used to study incident light striking an image at different angle(s), producing better, producing less, stereo, depending on the incident angle(s), finding that angles set as close as possible to 15, 30 and 60 degrees by moving around the support panel and/or vice and swivelling the alligator clip, using a large plastic protractor to measure, produced best stereo effects when the angles were at hexagon related (15, 30, and 60 degrees) often the change in improvement more than noticable.



The run of tests was done prior to having any scanning means to make digital images for display in a computer. As soon as a scanner was available (shortly after) all externally mounted tests were abandoned (no need) instead tests turned to the monitor itself where turning it in relation to any incident light(s) striking the screen from different directions produced subtely different noticable degrees of improved stereo expecially when the monitor itself was tested in various 15, 30, and 60 degree facings to incident light(s), and also the tilt of the monitor itself responded with best stereo when tilt angle of the color screen was in 15 or 30 degree angles to incident light.

The fishing stream image above was from the back of a glossy monthly science magazine (top quality high gloss print and paper). The original picture was in an ad for another monthly science magazine.



For instance did you know there is a bend in the river, seen in the panel mounted external print 3d tests. A boy sits on the shoulders of someone wearing a yellow shirt, and a women with her arms forward dipped in the water is stooped with her knees apart. These details were not seen in the canon photocopy tests, these 3d details came to light later in browser digital display.

A much smaller image which has come to be called the 'chinawall' was a small piece collaged amongst many travel ad images on the back of another issue of the glossy monthly magazine got from the supermarket newstand, the chinawall image photostated well and in particular scanned well yeilding what was seen at the time as rather amazing stereo from a mono image increasing proportionately the zeal at which stereo in mono images tests were pursued at this time (fall 1996).

View 1

In particular, notice how far back the chinawall snakes into the distant hills disappearing into the upper left. In simple display, View 2, (two identical images side by side at identical display parameters), the long distance vista has less opened up stereo, stereo presence is definately in View 2 but lacking is the gain in sonic space (3d openess) comprising the sense of the stretched out long distance Z axis depth seen in View 1. The opened up vrs compressed stereo illustration is firmly mentioned to cast light on intrinsics as to how more 3d can be coaxed out of mono images.

View 2



In fact the chinawall image (original 190x282) could be enlarged to nearly twice itself (View 1 displayed above at 299x453 and 298x455) and instead of loosing, gained substantially in stereo depth and details which could only be seen and understood in stereo.

Original is small



Other images were in the early tests circ fall of 1996.

A tibet cliff face with dwellings was interesting because of its degree of mono stereo in which a large image was reduced to small side by side, producing sizzling in the image (small data points scintillating because no counterpart one image to the other is available to focus together).





A scan of a Whitehorse Yukon postcard of a three story log cabin (where I lived and did math/physics/geometry research for six months on the 1st floor (straight up the first flight and in my yellow front door) circ spring summer 1997) was also extensively tested for fine detail for instance seeing a skelter of telephone lines in stereo which could not be distinquished at all in mono.



What at first was most intriguing was the degree to which the thin stick railings differentiated into details in mono stereo.



The record for best stereo goes to this desert escarpment, its a fluke why this mono image can have such pronounced 3D, virtual stereo is usually less pronounced in the extreme limitings of simple innocent browser display, best 3d requires accute discrete small variants in image width and height per side by side pair whereas browser display affords only about 10 percent and less of that accuracy.

Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004         form   A & O 3 3

                  Click google logo for site search

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home

Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA

ODDESSY

CLIFFR

CONTACT