OTHER RELATED PAGES Giant bullseye made of gravity waves dominates Andromeda   Optical illusions confuse fundamental astronomy intents Vibrating wave actions - how they may conduct data Mighty spiral galaxy M101 in a 3D anaglyph Huge atom in anaglyph reveals stacks Quick Preview of main topics

VIRTUAL STEREO AS A RESEARCH TOOL - YOU CANNOT DO BETTER

Virus
at 150,000.
Notice the imperfections
on the plate upon which grow the virus.
Virtual stereo can put you right there (can spot
irregularities instantly) which otherwise - at that
small focus - require extreme industrial
complex techiques to spot at all

VIRUS x 150,000   BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPE







Here
are virus
magnified 150,000
times by electron microscope.
Notice the imperfections on the surface upon
which multiply the virus, the surface flaws
made as plain as day by the image's
stereo information

Boon
to research
expands magnificently.
Minute imperfections on the surface
upon which the virus lay, are easily seen in
virtual 3D. Surface errors not seen at all or even
suspected in the Mono original's surface physics
are seen at once in self evident view, using
3D imaging techniques that only take
a few minutes to set up, for a
picture from old archives,
or scanned from a mono
textbook. How's that
for B O O N !

Here
it is
Electrons
as Leptons, not photons,
that made the image, proving that
Leptons are carriers of interfacing 3D 'phase'
information. A photograph made by Muons might confirm
that theoretically all Leptons may have the talent (including
Neutrinos). If Muon stereoscopic mono photography
is experimentally verified, it will confirm
a stunning new fundamental property
realm in Leptons, which is
that Lepton carrier
waves convey
topological
signals of the
signal source beyond
stereoscopic binnocular physics, each
single Lepton carrier wave contains a correct stereo signal
recording its (the Lepton's) time place and space at the
exact instant the Lepton's signatures were frozen in
time by capture in photograph or image

ALL REALMS ILLUMINATED BY LEPTONS HOLD STEREO AS THEIR KEY

Here is a gold crystal, magnified 40,000 times by microscope

Gold crystal
magnified 40,000 times

ANOTHER SOURCE FOR THE MASTER SNOWFLAKE TEMPLATE

Source means
this image next
of hexagon diffraction
was used in comparing snowflake
geometry properties to construct a 6-side
12-side hexagram master image based on
slides of snowflakes projected on a
livingroom wall and drawn

Electron beam
diffracting through the atomic
lattice of a crystal of Lead Hydroxide Salt. A huge
anaglyph stereo version of this atomic crystal can be seen here



Virtual
3D shows
an entire electron
atomic lattic structure
of straight lines, with hexagonal
diamond clusters each at different planes

Notice
that although
distorted, the inner
clusters represent a six sided
floatilla of sparkly diamondoids around
a solid center, while diamonds float around the
outer circumpherence in a six sided shell rotated
15 degrees from the inner shell. This intrinsic shift
at a significant point inside the cube and sphere
(Master Snowflake Template) appears a law in
fundamental principles of energy forms
and their creations



A faint
small disk
around the center
not seen in the original
has appeared in high enhancement by
Greydon Moore, the disk perhaps electron
clouds of free (non-latticed)
electrons

ANOTHER SOURCE FOR THE MASTER SNOWFLAKE TEMPLATE

Electron diffraction pattern
by an electron microscope focusing to
planes to reveal corresponding diffraction patterns





Notice when
the two images
are focused together
there is a jump in perceptible
small details. When also accepted as a
virtual 3D view, a visibly stereo primary coherent
stacking order biased along a north-east vector
from the lower left (foreground) to the
upper left (rearward) is seen, even
as another vector planes higher
into the higher north west

'Virtual'
3D is made
by hologramic stereo
stored in the mono image,
it is not computer generated
or by alteration of the
original mono image

MORE ELECTRON BEAM SCATTERED BY THE DIFFRACTION PATTERN OF A CRYSTAL

Each different view can throw light on something not seen in others. Here are a few more views enhanced in different ways, their existence almost ho hum except by the time you have looked at these you will know something new about atoms

Enhancement by   high Contrast and Gamma Correction




Enhancement by   high Contrast, Gamma Correction, and Color

Image 1

Enhancement by   Gamma Correction



Enhancement by   Histogram Equalize



Notice
that the
right hand lines are
each vectored like arrows toward
an unseen focal point of center deep behind
the scenes, a phenomenon seen in 3D which has probably
never ever been seen in Fourier Analyse, or atomic mechanics
studies of such diffraction pattern images as these. It
is felt, in looking at these images in stereo, that
the independent swirling patterns may be
actual paths caused by electron
clouds moving in loose
orbits between atoms.
Careful study
of the
vectoring
straight lines
of dots may prove
these are in phase to each
other in angles related to 30 - 60 degree
fractal geometry facets of hexagrams, the vectors
form outlines of the sides of a tilted shallow six sided cylinder.
Angles of 15 degrees, even 7.5, are surely infused throughout the structures

Original.
Notice how all
lines of dots are in
straight lines, curves are
illusional due to thin to
thick to thin dots
in each line



REGARDS   Image 1   ABOVE    

Instead
of ghosts,
more formations
clearly appeared when the
original was hit with high Contrast (+12),
then high Gamma Correction (+385), where such use of high
contrast a favorable outcome in this unusual image whose original
media seems totally black but is actually filled with data in
ranges too dim to be discerned by human eyesight.
Galaxy images can be like that, black deep
space surrounding a bright center
object, but wholesale
quantities of
actual
information
can be stored in the
dark medias of the image, for
instance   Image 2   below is a bright galaxy
in black space in the original, which turns out to be a
larger galaxy when the dim medias are enhanced into bright light

IMAGE 2

See more Ngc2997 here

SONIC EXPERIMENT MONO PHOTOS - HEXAGRAM FORMS RE-ENFORCED ORIGINAL RESONANCES TO REPRODUCE STEREOPHONIC SOUND FROM MONO

A few
      photos from a
5 year sound experiment
on how to re-awaken stereophonic
sound in mono recordings and single speaker
playback, show that Virtual 3D is a reality and not
a fallacy. These photos were taken with a dirt cheap 110mm
camera and most were very dark and brooding when devloped through
ill maintained machines that shot the strips through faster than the      
speed of light (you know the type of photo finishers I mean). And yet,
despite being blasted out the door and out past the intersection
by high enhancement levels, still come through with more
than enough 3D stereo to make the point. Genuine
3D exists in mono-only pictures

GEOMETRY MASTER TEMPLATE IN PHYSICS PROPERTIES AND PRINCIPLES

Snowflakes,
coherent crystals of
ice made by sound as in 'sonics'

Bet
you did
not know that
snowflakes are not flat



   

GEOMETRY MASTER TEMPLATE IN PHYSICS PRINCIPLES AND PROPERTIES

   

From this
snowflake and
others, plus atomic
lattice electron diffraction
patterns (following) came the master
'Snowflake Geometry Matrix'

---

WHAT CAN GO WRONG

Every action has an
equal and opposite malfunction

(Cliff Livingstone 1998)

---

Hints are forever free in illusion vrs Reality What can go wrong. Plenty. Mainly, an image can break into vertical strips that overlap. For instance the next image has broken up into overlapping vertical strips. The strips will vanish if the image is rotated 90 degrees and re-displayed but this is not always desirable. A solution for vertical strips is to play with the numbers varing display size, changing one of the Widths by 1 or 2 points or have both Widths the same to find a parameter that is clean, the tradeoff being the 3D stereo may not be as pronounced

VERTICAL STRIPS - 'venetian blind' display deffect


Thin splits
close together are
like blinds r' us for your
picture window, opened slighty so
that one edge of each slit is closer to
the eye. It makes it impossible for a
picture with vertical slits to
be definative


SECOND VIEW

IMAGE 3 - Great stereo, problem, a venetian blind strip vertically down the middle where two halves of the image are stereoscopically separated

Vertical venetian blinds totally destroy this strip of 3 images. The solution is a change of just one +point in width, making all three widths the same

VIRTUAL 3D STEREO IS PROVEN BY SELF EVIDENT DEMONSTRATION

The
above Image 3
is a 3D vista panarama
no matter whether viewed going
crosseyed to focus the image pair together,
or letting your eyes drift out of focus. The stereo
is inherent in the photograph. Since this is a single mono
picture scanned from an old magazine, the two images are
identical down both borders. One image is displayed
in width -2 points less than the other and both
are displayed at +15 points increase
over original height, with one
of the images increased
further in height
by +2 points

The
slight
fraction of
a percent difference
in the two as displayed brings
forth substantially more stereo. The
degree of change in height is arbitrary to
each image with no fixed rule as to how much to
increase an image's height in display, the only
rule being that increased height translates
directly into increased horizontal
depth when stereo is viewed.
If you
download
both images you
will find them both the
same and your computer will not
accept the second download without prompting

The fact
of such self
evident stereo in
a mono image changed not one
twit or twaddle by any computer means
or artificiality is proof that the stereo exists
in the image, and altering the image's size
parameters by fractions of a percent in
display positively re-enforces
the image's intrinisic
stereo content

THIS EXTREMELY STRETCHED HEIGHT WORKS

This
next item
is cited (exampled)
because of an unusual amount
of image stretching. The Widths are
out of synch by +6 points, the Heights are
out of synch by +6 points. And the Heights are +29
and +35 points above original. In this example, the extra
Height does translate into a greater perception of stereo
depth. This image has filtered out foreward from a
project first done nearly 5 years ago circ.
early 1997, and is still in use today
still using original numbers
since no other numbers
have been found to
improve the
stereo


Widths= +289, +305. Heights= +373, +367. Original size - Width=300x388

HOW CAN A MONO PHOTO BE STEREO

Concider
the event of a
picture of the Moon
turned upside down and instantly
the craters turn into buttons, an eerie event
commonly called an Optical Illusion. But it is far more
than that. What information from originating photons has been stored
in media to be able to change the surface look of a Moon photo
completely just by turning it upside down? All the
thoughts you can have about that phenomena
still won't take you to a quick
answer. Stereo in mono
pictures is in
league with
the same
eerie

VIRTUAL STEREO IS PROVEN

Here
next, is
the image side by
side as two identical monos,
both have a Width of 298, and a Height of 711


EQUAL IMAGES - both are the original size

You
thought
the above 'over
looking desert beyond' stereo
image was computer generated. Quess
again. It is nothing more than two identical
images simply staged in full size side by side, no
deceptions, no manouvers, no subterfuge, the
picture is genuine, the stereo is correct.
So now oh sneerer, try and criticize
your best skepticism, you can't.
Truth is self evident

3D IN A MONO IMAGE IS GENUINE

Two identical images side by side - stereo presence is self evident

Images sizes slightly adjusted in display for best stereo

Watch
how virtual
stereo untangles
the mess caused by small
sapling rods used for railings
in this 3-story log cabin in Whitehorse
Yukon Territories in northern Canada. I lived
on the main floor of this cabin for six months in
1976. This photo is a postcard bought in the local
newstand in downtown Whitehorse. It had been
advertised once in the United States as a
museum but that never happened.
The result was two or three
times a week busloads
of tourists would
knock on my
front door
wanting to
see the museum.
There was none, just me
doing mathematical physics round the clock

Discussion about cross hatch of incident light rays striking all four corners of an image frame in hologram fashion

If
you
think
the 3D in
the above image
was computer generated,
guess again. These are two identical
images presented displaced in view side by side,
the 1st actually just two side by side images. The stereo is
a latent holography in the original mono image, the fact that
true stereo is engaged by interference with cross hatch
incident light rays striking the screen is your
new physics - binnocular vision is only
one way stereo is possible. A single
eyeball cannot focus two images
together, however two eyes
can focus two identical
images together to
gain another
form of
stereo,
this being
'virtual' since
no real physical image
exists where the stereo is seen
as a 3rd (3D) view between two monos. In
comparison, a binnocular stereo view presents one
picture where there were two, or one image by focusing together
two ghost images as found in red-green anaglyphs and
pictures seen with red-blue 3D glasses. An aspect
not appreciated by 3D purists (scientists)
is that height imparts a component to
3D views not just width and image
displacement. For instance
the latent 3D in the
above outcrop
of rock
overlooking
step plane can be
marginally increased by
increasing the height of a picture
by about 5 or more pixel points for example in
a computer graphic image. See the 'second
view' above for what a small gain in the
'height' of a picture can do for
virtual stereo. The height
has been stretched by
only .015 percent

Obviously
the stereo is
only partial, in
particular the distant
desert hills are not rolling
out into a vanishing horizon deep
in the distance, but you must admit
that for a mono photo this scene has one
handsome load of stereo, and, it is all
genuine, no weird topoloy, if a dog
was in the picture the dog's
3D tail would still be
wagging behind the
dog where it is
supposed to be

One
other
aspect of
virtual stereo
you may need to know -
if viewing the 3D scene by gently
going cross eyed, the resulting virtual image
will be about 1/3 smaller. When viewing in 'drift' focus,
letting the eyes drift out of focus until a new focus arrives
(as if focusing to the next street over), the image will
be full size and more details will be clearly seen

PROBLEMS - THE VENETIAN BLIND EFFECT

VERTICAL STRIPS - 'venetian blind' display deffect


BOTH WIDTHS IDENTICAL - no venetian blinds

A venetian blind effect can occur when the two widths are not identical, it puts vertical image mismatch errors down the height, for instance in the above the first view has venetian blinds right down the image making some details hard to interpret and exaggerating the stereo separation between some rocks. In the second view both widths are the same and no venetian blind error is seen. By the way the effect is very much like patching errors in astronomy images where two small segments patched together in compositing a telescope image are not of the same image density resulting in a straight line discontinuity

Subtle venetian blinds confuse Andromeda details

Venetian
blinds rent
their way in a
stacatto of vertical
splits across the image, this
image has widths separated by 2 points

100% PURE TEST DRIVE FOR VIRTUAL STEREO

HOW IS VIRTUAL STEREO POSSIBLE? Click here for related principles in optical illusions When a camera takes a mono image not only do point source light rays strike the film in all straight line point source vectors, cross indicent ambiant rays from all quarters also strike the film, for instance rays from the upper left of the view-frame striking the lower right view-frame of the camera, and visa versa, a sea of cross-hatched incident rays, the results totally in accord with hologram principles, the cross hatching imbedding a matrix of 3D imprinted into the film itself. The picture is viewed after the fact in side-by-side pair, the small differential gained by the two image separation, is more than enough to re-engage the 'cross hatch' in a possitively re-enforcing way, the result being some of the original view's stereo recreated in a 'virtual' format by the two image side by side focusing of the two images into a 3rd 'virtual' image in between. The cross hatch is extremely high frequency, that is, not major point to point source long distance wavelengths are involved, rather, extremely accute small measure wavelengths are focused, the kind of waves seen in moire patterns when an oil slick imparts a moire pattern on the surface of a dish of water. The 'moire' is intrinsically defined enough that even far distant views such as a deep space galaxy can be seen in 3D form. The 3D form is captured in any radiant manner whose carrier waves are Leptons, these include radio to x-rays and include images by electrons as with an electron microscope. Now you know how 3D in a mono picture is possible. The existence of a cross-hatch 'moire' in any mono picture is proven without question by the advent of optical illusions: a picture of a crater on the Moon turned upsidedown presents a button on the Moon, the crater has vanished in an optical illusion. The explanation for this is simple, a camera sailing over the Moon in a satellite captures a crater illuminated by ambiant light rays from the Sun striking the crater at oblique angles which then reflect on into the camera at other oblique angles. When the satellite sails over the crater from one direction, then another, the crater looks the same from all angles. However, the instant the satellite's camera captures a crater's picture, all of the unique oblique angles of the light rays in effect at that instant in time are captured in the camera and the only way to re-see the crater correctly after the fact is to view the resulting crater image later in setting which approximates the oblique angles of light which were stiking the crater at that time. Home alone months later ambiant light rays are so totally different, when striking the now 2 dimensional flat image on printed page at angles totally not the same as when the Sunlight struck the crater. The result is an optical illusion, if the image on page is not approximated in an allignment sufficiently coherent enough to re-engage the original Sunlight's ambiant cross-hatch moire pattern of incident striking light rays. When 'out of alignment', the crater photo on page will be a round mound, when in alignment with rays from your room, the crater will be a crater. A whole lot of physics is embodied in this simple phenomena of an optical illusion, the principles themselves going back straight to first cause in the optics of visibility and perception in the universe. 2 dimensional views are a total illusion, totally misleading, 3 dimensional views are the only way to view the universe. The sheer number of photos you see with mounds instead of craters attests to the reluctance of astronomers and publishers to uphold to the first laws of pure and correct physics - orient the picture correctly, do not show an optical illusion to the public at large - Greydon Moore

Another
convention is to
avoid using long filenames
at all cost - I cannot stand tilds ~ I cannot
handle their presence I do not like them and only when all
graphic image filenames and url HTM filenames are 8 characters
most can I avoid tilds because believe me whenever a tild
shows up I do what it takes to get rid of it even if it
means recoding several pages and click links to
banish the tild while keeping each filename
separate and intact so no two separate
files can overright each other due
to having the same name, a
rigorous writing means
but well worth the
effort, might
seem pointless
until you find yourself
in the task of keeping track of over
60,000 astronomy images, zooms and enhancements
spread through several large directories in two 50 gig hardrive,
if you are familiar with Windows unlikeables you will instantly
understand how confusing tilds are in filenames and how
risky they are, for instance tilds 1 to 15 in
one directory, copied in quantity only
7 files selected from the 15 into
another, results in a whole
new order of filenames
in the tilds, thank
you Microsoft,
and I have
only once lost
control of images (about
100 of 150) when Microsoft renamed them
all for me after a copy into another directory which
had careful tild names for similar images, you do not want to
hear the story of how hard it was to straighten out that mess. So
why do astronomers want to use up to 37 characters for a
filename (the record I have seen so far) when eight
simple characters works just fine, without
frying the brain or frustrating your
work due to file losses thanks
to tilds, an astronomer at
task in their own
machine might
be well at
home with 37
characters in a
filename but they are
delivering tilds to the next
taker and there is where caution has
to be taken by the giftee reciever every time,
slowing down the world, not by a deep sucking sound,
but an eerie squeeking shriek. Actually, since we are on
the topic, two or three characters for a filename is
also a kneecapper since many astronomers do use
only the minimum and these miminums can
clash with catastrophic results if
the sleepy enthusiast is not
paying attention to every
last step occuring on
a computer screen.
For instance,
P3.jpg, how
many times have
you downloaded a P3.jpg.
M51.jpg is another name that gets
in the way of smooth flow all too often

LETTING IT FLOG ON THE TABLE

Like those who have become advocates of an aspirin a day keeping the strokes away, I have become a recent advocate of so much liquore keeping the medicine away, only so much, never having been a heavy imbiber I do a can a day of a certain Danish beer with a certain mml size and %content which fits the bill as ideal for daily consumption, and have found that the daily consumption ruins daily, the capacity to focus eyeballs (as in viewing newspaper cartoon stereograms) exactly at a certain moment after consuming the daily quotient.

Yes, the eyes will simply not focus. It is simply impossible to pull two images together in stereo focus and, trying going crosseyed to get the focus, little helps because the cross-eyed yangs in and out, yinging, despite my best efforts at muscle control.

So, you, if having had a shot or two before looking at any one of my pages in Galaxies in Chaos, and slurrily mutter 'wad the fuck is this yup up to', wait till you sober, I tell you sincerely from the front end of my heart that you cannot focus my pictures in stereo if you have had more than a critical percent of alkahol in your lunch a certain time before trying to focus any of my pictures.

Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004         form   A & O 3 3

                  Click google logo for site search

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home

Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA

ODDESSY

CLIFFR

CONTACT