Skip to why optical illusions occur
Skip to various optical illusion examples
Skip to optical illusion difficulties in mystical truth vrs
You guys
should have a look at this. Puzzling roundnesses in protruding bubble
like formations are actually crators being seen in optical
illusion where innies become outies.
Flipped, then rotated, converts puzzling outward bubbles into correct
indented crators.
Your images were downloaded from this
link, where both images are displayed in 'outie' form.
But this is not anyone's fault, if you see outies instead of innies.
Here is a case of optical illusion gremlins caught in the act. Two
each of the above images look identical except one each is flipped
and rotated. When viewed with ambiant light streaming in from the side,
as from a window, both image pairs are innies.
In different ambiant light, for instance window(s) dark and an overhead
light beaming overhead from behind, one of the images in each pair is
distinctly an outie, no mistaking the outie bubble forms (not crators)
in each original image.
This has got to be the all time fooled me - fooled you. As I said,
the optical illusion imps are having a field day and have been at
it all along, in astronomy.
How it is possible that ambiant light striking an image after the
fact of its original flat dimension capture in different original 3
dimensional ambiant light strikes, effects images to produce optical
illusions, is discussed .... here.
It gets worse. Sometimes during the day, in sidescan lighting, outies
appear in the main in the large caldera image at the left. At night,
with rearscanning light, sometimes both trench views (left and right)
are outies, as well, both calderas (left and right) can be innies.
As hinted, this particular illusion pair is a hum dinger.
| MYSTICAL ILLUSION |
|---|
Feb 16 2005
The above image shows what we typically see in images offered by astronomers and viewed full in face on a computer screen, or in a publication. Seemingly similar to a lava dome, such dome shapes in interplanetary and moon's images have caused many a serious astronomer amateur or otherwise to pause scratching hair that sticks out from the crown, the finger of thought causing the hair to twirl in circles.
CRATOR IN ARIZONA
The dome is actually a crator upside down, this is a crator in Arizona.
CRATOR IN STEREO
Seen in 3d (focus the two images together by eyesight) true stereo is obvious. This is a mono (single) image, displayed twice, the disply width of one vrs the other differs by the ratio 1.0034 to 1. The heights differ by 1.0059 to 1, but in this image are increased above original by 17 points - extra height increases the stereo depth, in complete contradiction to binocular stereo theories which deem only width displacement between two separate images which have no identical frame can reproduce stereo.
For instance IMAGE 1 above has height increased by 17 points. IMAGE 2 has height increased by only 12 points. The stereo depth in IMAGE 1 is obviously greater, notwithstanding an arbitrary vertical stretching in the image, look to small details to see how they stand out better, in IMAGE 1.
Stereo is visible anyway when two identical mono images are displayed in identical format (both widths and heights identical), demonstrating in a forceful way that stereo content is intrinsic in mono photos.
IMAGE 3 pair are displayed to exact size of the mono original, nothing is arbitrarily changed.
In the true to life mono image view of IMAGE 3, stereo is evident though not as striking as seen in IMAGE 1. Image formats such as adopted for IMAGE 1 improve circumstances seeking to understand a real view's 3d content. The straight across format of IMAGE 3 is more than enough to reveal a stereo, though usually not good enough to judge all image aspects in a certified way. This is where the IMAGE 1 format comes in handy.
IMAGE FORMAT MODE
The image pairs are displayed at 294 and 293 for width, a limited size width necessary to have the image pair display side by side in all different browsers and screen sizes.
The height format for IMAGE 1 was to divide height by width, and multiply by 300, then, add 8 points to the height result and display six image pairs one after the other, each adjusted with the heights increased by 1, then two points, then three more decreased by 1 point, then selecting the best stereo view. For instance starting with heights of 336 and 338, each height is also increased by 1 point through two increases, then decreased by units of 1 through three versions. Typically, out of a set of six images pairs will be one pair whose stereo is superior in subtle or noticable ways.
More optical illusion reasons
| MYSTICAL ON TRITON |
|---|
Feb 17 2005
Brought into focus is a Feb 2005 release of a crator on Triton, seen by Cassini side scanning imagers. The suspician was that the done in the center of the image has smooth uprise grains on the inside of a rim of small peaks.
Turning the image around reveals what you would expect, a sunken crator inside a rim, with a wide area of hardened splashup inside the crator.
VOILA
Turning the image around by 180 degrees revealed the crator, cancelling the dome, which turned out to be mystical, the real truth hidden by the optical illusion.
And then, rotated by only 90 degrees allows wider image pairs to be displayed side by side, revealing more stereo details about the crator, and the spiky rim outside plus the spiky upsplash inside.
Ooops dome again. A top to bottom image flip, and rotation by 180 degrees, brought the mystically vanishing crator back into true perspective. Neither flip, nor rotation alone, eliminated the dome. This (dome) is a stubborn illusion.
The difficulty in contending with such mystical illusions is that you have to more or less know a hardfact's true concept (crators=indents) before overcoming mystical fakes. Try this on religions. You can see the difficulties there in an instant. Solving those difficulties is a world wide battle underway right now, with little relief in sight.
In assuming correctly that complexity increases exponentially with each extra step in any difficulties, witness that the Triton miracle had 3 mystical appearances, and only 1 correct view, in its difficulties.
The main trouble with Triton illusion persists, in not knowing the original universal frame in which the image was captured - what is up, what is down, what is east and west.
THe Arizona creator has fewer difficulties in that the crator can be in only one of two horizontal perspectives either up or down, due to the foreknowledge that the crator was photographed from above so has to appear below, not sideways. In lack of a blue sky or horizon, in this image the upness vrs downess (crator vrs dome) comprises the main difficulties, also that scientifically the crator is known to fullfil the descriptions of a crator and not a volcano's caldera. What about an exploded pimple on a giant god's belly button (a dome with spikes within). Another difficulty is in determining if the Arizona crator is from impact from a space object, or nuclear test.
We deem it safe assuming the creation was an object hurtling in many thousands of years ago. Conspiracy theorists can claim an underground nuclear test aftermath, but to pursue this line of reasoning also have to dismiss a scientist's best ways of determining ancestral or ancient age and to do this the conspirists are expanding their difficulties exponentially.
The above Arizona and Triton crator images are also in the Mystery.htm page.
Upsidedown astronomy photos shown were dowloaded as is, upsidedown, from astronomy and teaching sites on the Internet. Even TV shows major assumed breakthrough astronomy photos full screen upsidedown, for instance craters on Mercury are rounded upthrust pin cushions. I see this all too often and wonder what science editors eat for lunch THE USPY DOWNY SYNDROM Let's start with an obvious upsy downy - the 100,100th image by the Mars Global Surveyor satellite. The image (below left) looks pecular. As rotated 180 degrees (below right) the image makes sense. And so you have an introduction to the perplexing pecular problem of why science editors, who are supposed to know their science, present astronomy images upsidedown leaving all viewers of the image scratching their bobbing heads trying to figure out why topologies can look so wierd compared to geophysical topologies seen out the living window at home or at work where sand or snow blown barren land is nearby. I am assuming if you click on the 'this' science link above you will see the upsidedown view in it's CNN Science page, but, there is always a chance that someone will step in and correct the image's orientation all other factors on the page staying the same. If you see the upsidedown view you will know the CNN science editors are happy with their work. If you see the correct view, you will know that embarassment forced the the only thing possible to end self evident moritification. Holy potatoes yasman whats going on planetary scientists in an uproar around earth swarming busy offices with publications and papers trying to figure out what kind of geophysics has formed these strange extra terrestial shapes no one yet the winner and the debate going on for some time. Turn the picture upside down and stop circulating the rightside up picture as real planetary with its holy potatoes Left, as downloaded from the Internet. Right, as turned right side up. Whoah. Stop. Pause. Time out. What is going on. Here is the Degas Crater on Mercury, exactly as downloaded from APOD on the Internet (source no longer active). As you can see, many strange objects, rounds, glassy protrudes, a circus of mysteries, in a radial spray. So this is what astronomy is all about, trying to figure out what could have caused THIS geology 
And THIS is the picture turned upsidedown. Couldn't get worse. How could an amateur (me) be so careless, then so foolish as to show the mistake to anyone. You bet I am showing the mistake. Take a look, the Degas Crater turned upside down turns rightside up. Once again, pros have posted an image that is upside down. See for yourself. Craters actually appear as if an imp had wiped away Phd's with a single snipe of a fast back button Correct me if I am wrong, but, does not this Mars vastii panarama look better when flipped upsidedown. For one thing, the crators are innies, not indented bubbles. Next is the flipped image. Everything seems true Click on image for large Next is the image as seen displayed at this site, and as downloaded into my computer. Everything is wrong. Apparently, pros in the wilds are increasing their credentials and academic degree certifications by analysing images (such as this next) and convincing peers that only they are correct. But, everything in the image is wrong, because it is upside down. Innies appear as outies. If you think I am making a big case of this, you are correct. It is as if a huge population out there simply cannot tell where there mouth vrs their bottom exhaust pipe exists, when it comes to definately analysing the latest news from astronomy images, such, as, from Mars. Click on image for large I have a hard time trying to picture pros pitching woo about their analysis of the above image (which is inherently wrong). One or two isolated cases of Wrong might not be news. But wrong cases of images analysed that are wrong, and wrong, and wrong, is a condition, not a hiccup. Continue reading. Soon, you will come to sections explaining why optical illusions occur in the first place, not by human error, but by laws of image indexes and refractions. |
|---|
The number of images in astronomy which have appeared on the Internet upsidedown, whose strange features are discussed in nauseous quantities by theorists, is legendary, too many to ignore. A single second to turn the image right side up, ends bogusary conflicts. Time to get the act together is now |
|---|
PRINCIPLES BEHIND OPTICAL ILLUSIONS
|
|
FATAL MARS 'GLOBAL' IMAGES ARE RIDDLED WITH OPTICAL ILLUSIONS
There
is a serious
fault with some Global
Survery Satellite images publically
available for download and study. Many of the
images are optical illusions presenting totally false data
impressions. The following are some images downloaded in
haste and tested, to find that the original downloaded
version is completely at fault in its portrayal
of Mars planetary sciences, in being the
'outie' view in an optical illusion
rather than the correct 'innie'
view. Not all of the several
images downloaded by
me in haste seemed
inversed, but
a few are
striking
when change
is made by rotating
the image, and in one example
also enhancing it by an image processor
(Paint Shop Pro) in a Windows 98 desktop PC. See for
yourself just how much is being MISSED, and being
false portrayed to keenly perplexed planetary
scientists, by exposing the public to
10 x thousands images riddled with
optical illusions (Oct 24/2000)
Mars global satellite
Main Page
Original - not correct - downloaded as is from 'Global Survery' site
Correct - rotated by 180 degrees
Above,
a rolling
smooth undulating
surface (1st) instantly transforms
into a sand blasted windy desert plane, (2nd)
with dune directions moulded in two clearly seen vectors
Original - not correct - downloaded as is from 'Global Survery' site
Correct - rotated by 180 degrees
Above,
another sand
blasted desert plane
instantly appears when the image
is rotated into correct alignment
for its
imbedded 'optics and refractions' per
ambiant Sun angles when imaged, to
reproduce a correct view
For
instance,
you (planetary
scientist) might spend
six months trying to formulate
what kind of theories could produce
those rolling round formations.
Answer: Flip - Windblown!
Limestone
deposits on Earth
below water from the burbling
runoffs of hot springs, can have the look
and feel of flat rounds and mounds, not unlike the
mounds seen above, however, Earth's limestone hot springs
stream deposits do not look like windblown sand dunes
when turned upside down. They do not. So assume
the mounds in official Mars Global Surveyor
images are not limestone deposits from
hot spring runoffs covering the
surface of Mars very hotly
back in time. Assume
you have not been
careful with
your image
alignments and
so have been presenting
optical illusions from your best
most brillient efforts. Wrong. A mistake
is a mistake, no matter how brillient
Original - dark image - downloaded as is from 'Global Survery' site
Correct - enhanced to reveal more details that were in the original
Above,
the original
image was enhanced
(adjusted) at home by me using
an image processor (Paint Shop Pro) in
a Windows 98 desktop PC. Impossible black
valley depths are exposed, the details were
in the original in medias too dim to
be discerned by normal levels
of professional scientist
image processing, but
are nonetheless in
the original
image. It
takes me
(and
others
similar minded)
to bypass peer urgent
career needs to tackle an image
to see what is really in there, rather than
trunkating the image's possibilities to produce a
factored image guaranteed to produce another grant
for the following year because of no criticism.
I can live with criticism, cannot live
in illusions. GM
Mystery - enhanced - rotated by 180 degrees, and staged in Virtual 3D
The
above
enhanced
image produces
another visage when turned
upsidedown. In truth it is not possible
to tell which is the correct visage, except, the
cliffs (sculpted landslides) in the above view rotated by 180
degrees, seem more like genuine tissue scars than do the
rounded mounded finger-cliffs in the original. Actually
the stereo pair immediately above is correct. Notice
the pour out of a small portal lower left the
pour starting in a thin pinched stream.
This is a coherent correct item not
possible seen coherently if the
image is upside down
Then again, which is correct. Both turned versions can flip in and
out of innie - outie illusion.
NEXT
Original - not correct - downloaded as is from 'Global Survery' site
Correct - slightly enhanced, and rotated by 180 degrees
Above,
mounds become
small craters and pock marks,
and more small (high resolution) detail is
seen by a slight enhancement of the original image's
density and color(s) strength (GM). Increasing an
image's small detail by enhancement is akin
to finding darkmass in galaxies and
astronomy images by enhancents
done with courage not
limited by peer
pressures
Mars
Global Satellite
high resolution images. This
link is to a master cylindrical map of
Mars. In this link, you will see a full sized map
of Mars blocked out in areas. Each blocked out area clicked,
will present a local picture covered with tiny green rectangles. Clicking
on any tiny green rectangle produces a detailed high resolution 'wide
angle view' image of that small area - in each will be a small
narrow white rectangle, this clicked, will produce a long
thin strip comprising a 'narrow angle view' with
resolutions resolved to objects of about
5 feet across, the size of small
boulders such as you might
find in your backyard
by the swimming pool
Mars global satellite main page
The
'flawed' Mars
images demonstrated
above are all 'wide angle' views.
Bear witness that any image you might download
may be flawed, until to test it to see if its downloaded
'orientation' is correct. Further, you MUST be aware
of characteristics in optical illusions to be
able to judge or study any such images
Here
is an item
whose width seems to
expand and contract when the image
is slowly scrolled up and down
by the cursors
These next images are of Andromeda, and are used in context
here.
An
unusual
optical illusion
of a kind I have not paid
attention to before - where innies
become outies when an image is converted to
reverse negative. Clearly, the optical properties of
depth become reversed, but how. I don't think I am
going to sink my brain into an answer for this.
MORE 'OPTICAL ILLUSIONS' - CONTINUE |
|---|
|
| |
|
|
Coloris Basin region on Mercury - image has hexagrams when seen correctly
(craters are indented). When seen incorrectly, craters are mounds.
A view as publically released by astronomers at NASA has
incorrect (mounds) instead of craters. The stark
hexagrams are much harder to discern in the
false roundness of the optical version
that is an illusion (upsidedown)
Correct - hexagram craters are obvious
Incorrect - image is not upsidedown, it is flipped bottom to top, top to bottom
Anyone
deeming themselves
intelligent enough to properly
study this image for advances in physics
would be hard pressed to pass beyond stupid poot
in their best most brillient endevours, unless they had
the sense to turn the image right-side-up and then
study its features properly. Whoah to any one
who criticises the outcomes of the smart
ones until the smartest of the smart
ones come to their senses
Official Coloris image source for Mercury
Coloris Basin Floor 'optical illusion'
|
Watch
what happens
when this picture of
the North Pole of the Moon
is slid up and down on screen, the
craters at the top are craters and those
at the bottom buttons, then when the bottom
buttons are in center display, now sliding the
image back up begins an illusions where
the upper craters are also buttons
momentarily. Slide the image
up and down slowly, you
will see this amazing
even perplexing
optical effect
If your
browser allows,
use the Up and Down cursor
arrows for best control in sliding the image
MOON NORTH POLE
FULL SIZE
Note there
are cavities in
the upper half, domes in
the lower half. This image is a
structural composite by Satellite views
stretching like slices of apple pie around a
circumpherence with the North pole of the Moon
the point of center. Assume if the lower slices
were displayed in the orientation at which
originally imaged (so that the incident
captured light angles are correct),
the lower portion would also
have cavities for craters
It is
entirely
possible this
Moon polar image is
talking false. Note the Sun
angles striking the craters, and
image center, at oblique angles. If one photo,
all of the Sun angles would be the same, but study of the
image shows the Sun striking craters at different angles almost
but not quite in a circle around the pole. This indicates
more than one shot composited, in which the Sun was
at a different oblique angle for each parse of
the composite, which will account for the
phenomena of the innies vrs outies
in the same single photograph
Note
the hexagram
craters amidst ordinary
craters on the Moon. More Moon hexagrams
|
Without
going into
details or troubling
with illustrations (examples)
need it be said simply that many of the
Mars Voyager images being shown around as proof
of Face on Mars and Egypt at Cydonia were images that
were upsidedown where innies were outies and the shriek of
claims ergo false since a sharp jutted sun-shadowed crevice of
rock does not become a huge pyramid simply by turning
the picture upside down, simply by turning the picture
right side up the 'outies' return to 'innies' (deep
shadowed jutout crevices) and the huge
array of pyramids vanishes in a paff
CYDONIA ILLUSIONS
In
Cydonia
on Mars, a mysterious
circle looks like a 'water catch basin'
in one view, and like a toilet seat in another view (rotated)
the stunning differences due to the light principles of
optical illusions when a 3d view is imbedded
in a two dimension print
A 'water catch basin' becomes a toilet seat when image is inverted
Pyramids become light shadowed sharp outcrops when image is re-oriented
UNKNOWN AREA ON MARS
The
black dot
speckling in the
above photos is due to poor
resolution (low bytes) in the original
Voyager scans of Mars, which were originally intended
only to find a suitable place to land a mars probe
on the surface. Nevertheless these originals
(blemished with speckled) have proven
a surprising source of info for
Mars planetary scientists
NEXT
This
next is
unusual, appearing
in a book on Mars published in
1986, the book heavy on pyramids and magic
numbers between rocks and such, but one photo was
shown as a demonstration of what Mars natural terrain
was like, captioned as a 'flood plane' the photo in
the book with image co-ordinates and so on has
not appeared since and the image numbers
for it seem to have taken a walk
right out of JPL records. The
next two images show the
image as originally
released, then
turned
upsidedown
by a moi GM to
abruptly show anything
but flood plains (the geometry is
self evident). In fact it turns out the original
assigned to example a Mars flood plane is patentally false,
as you look at it carefully (the next image) you will
see that it cannot example anything, none of
the innes and outies make sense
Not a flood plane, features do not make sense - as published in book
Coherent geometry stands forth in dominant features - as inverted by GM
Massive
geometry structure
on Mars. Forget Cydonia and
Face-on-Mars' enthusiasts, at the moment
I seem to be the only one aware of this massive
geometric construction and seem to be the only one showing
around pictures of it (October 21, 2000). The abnormalities in the
above picture include a tube of rock at the base of a tall tower
(which has an orb on top). To the left a six sided figure
is outlined in stone with other spikes of star
nature seen surrounding. The image seems
to be of a situation well eroded
in other words not an up
and running site
filled with
vitality
|
Chaos
at one end
of the core (left),
calm uniform outswirl at
the other end (right), a standard
core manifestation, example
of core chaos
Tongs
(talons)
snaking off one
end of the core and
curling down in one orientation,
curling up when the image is rotated. At the
other end, a delta spill plane curling down, then curling
up after rotation. It barks so loud that images have to be presented
in their true orientation in space relative to Earth in order to
truly understand the dynamics being revealed by the image
Golden harmonic spiral inside dwarf galaxy IC3328
Even
at the
distances of
galaxies, left side
light sources vrs right side
light sources are vital in the interplay
of incident lights after the fact striking the image
WHEN INNIES TURN INTO OUTIES
MOON'S JUTTING PLATE
FLIPPED TOP TO BOTTOM, JUTTING PLATE SEEMS TO HARDLY JUT
Flipped, standout features are more easily seen in the
right image
Rotated, most features seem the same
The
inversion
in the purple colored
'plate' photo is subtle, and is
included to show that subtle forms of
inversion can occur, for instance tiny
craters can invert from pits to pock
marks but major features can
seem unchanged or just
marginally different,
unlike the opening
photo where
obvious
craters
change to
an appearance
of lava flows after
a massive volcano, effects
like this can be totally misleading
and I have often had to turn a picture upside
down, particularly images of Mars or solar system moons
close up, in order to understand what the picture is revealing,
whereas the originals which has to be turned upside down by
me, are the ones pro astronomer's are using and making
declarations about, regards what the picture
shows, vrs what the picture actually
shows, revealed when I the
amateur turn it up
side down
This
black and
white side view
above is tossed in to
give perspective on the sheer
magnitude and size of this abberational
plate which juts high out into space above the
surface, on the near side of the Moon
Here next,
topology inversion
occurs in this full sized
picture of the Moon when the image is
flipped, but not when the image is rotated by 180 degrees
In
this
next inversal
the jutting plate, so
instantly seen in the left image
is hard to spot in the right (inverted) image
PARTIAL INVERSIONS
Have
fun with this
next magnification, some
features invert, for instance a
prominent triangle up-jut seen at the
top of the second and third view, is hard
to find in the first view, and a tiny
pockmark in the giant bowl next
to the jutting plate becomes
a button in one of the
re-aligned views
- you find it
COMPLETE INVERSION
Next
a complete
change in persective
as innies become obvious outies
when the image is both flipped,
and rotated by 180 degrees
Here
next no
perspective
change when the
image is both flipped,
and rotated by 180 degrees.
Its difference is its a side-scan
image, whereas the optical illusion image
above (craters at a Moon pole) is straight overhead
A collapsed plateau in mono, a lava dome in stereo
With
a picture
like the above
(despite poor quality
resolution) astronomer's simply
cannot know what they've got since the image's
most salient feature is not constant or entirely predictable,
in that it seems a collapsed (crashed) center plateau in
the crater, but also a buldging lava dome, and this
might be due to the side-scanned image itself.
It needs to be tested - if side-scan
images can produce false starts.
The long rod sticking out
into space (like an
old timer's
longtube
telescope,)
I suspect could
be an explosed lave tube
from watching geophysics on TV but
not necessarily, it could be somthing else, a mystery
These
clues
are all I
need to show,
to fabricate together
an intriguing puzzle which can
be straightened out by physics the hard
core way (by fundamental equations), the puzzle
being just what constitutes the parameters for an optical
illusion to occur in a 3D object tranferred into a
two dimensional plane via photograph, and how
do the parameters interract to produce,
or not produce, optical illusion.
Do not expect the equations
from me, not my forte
Due to
the fact that
astronomy images are
rarely noted as to true alignment
in deep space, images I have used have been
oriented to most suite local conventions, for instance
images of bar galaxy Ngc 1365 have all been
shown in
the same orientation for an instant familiar sight.
It is recommended most urgently, however, that
when true orientation use it and only it
to bypass theory and interpretation
faults caused by optical
illusions in the
image
Here is an
example of an obvious
Upsy Downy. Everything looks
correct, the roads etc., except there is
a large done, where there should
be a crater
It is the
Barringer crater
in Arizona. I turned it
upside down to show how much an
optical illusion can effect an image
The optical illusion
(dome) is caused by the angle
of incidents of light rays from a source
glancing off the crater from all directions and striking
the camera, the light is a single source whose incoming rays have
a dominant common vector as they strike the crater and glance off.
More about the cause of optical illusions sourced in glance
angles of incident light rays is
here 1 and here 2
3D-IMAGE.HTM under topic: 'HOW CAN A
MONO PHOTO BE STEREO'
3D PRINCIPLE - how is 3D possible
in ordinary mono only images
PLAYING WITH THE ROSETTE NEBULA
A curiosity
is created - decreasing
the width of just one Rosette pane
by 10 points has resulted in extreme folding
in perspective plane between stereo views. Below
is a second view with correct widths
A partial
hexagram (six-sided)
in featured in the above yellow
Rosette Nebula image. A partial hexagram
oif similar shape is glimpsed through overhaze
in Orion, next, from images featured
here
A galaxy
image in which
the grey arm cyclonnics
separates into an entirely free
horizon plane floating free over a
dull homogenous backdrop mat. I have
never seen this before. The drifting
steam effect does not mean the
galaxy is made of vapor.
A purple patch
inserted
in the
original
serves instead
to intensly highten details
A PERFECTLY LOGICAL SEEMING CHANGE OF EVENT, WHICH IS FALSE
In an
astonishing
change of event
the image completely
reverses its 3D when viewed
by letting the eyes drift out of focus,
then viewed by gently going crosseyed. The
eye-drift 3D view correct. The reason such
dramatic 3D intent reversal is because
the image has been arbitrarily
modified so is not
authentic to
original
scan
1a
The
extra 3D
is handmade by
sliding a piece of the
right arc to the left plus a
small piece of the lower arc upward,
resulting in a dramatic change
in 3D horizon planes
In this
next example,
the integrety of the
Virtual 3D state stays intact
but 3D noticably collapses, and the single
red slash moves into the background, when the
image is viewed by gently going crosseyed.
This is because the red slash was
arbitrarily added, the red
slash was not in the
original scan
|
|---|
|
Original M101 image used in this presentation is found
here
Original Andromeda images used in this presentation are found here and here |
|---|
| Click for a serious look at a possible cosmic bias in the way gravity aligns objects in deep space. A (left to right/down to up) bias is sensed, as the prevalent almost universal 'matter' views. Anti-matter views, rarely (hardly ever) seen, are the converse, with (right to left/up to down) co-ordinates closest to the camera. |
|---|
Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004 form A & O 3 3
|
Click google logo for site search
For the world's most comprehensive searches use
|
|---|
Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home
| DRUMBALLIA | ODDESSY | CLIFFR | CONTACT |