GIC - gravity wave properties/principles

A steady state impact image can be re-enforced by a synchronous
propigation which is not in lock-step with the steady state image.
It can even be more re-enforced by something moving. If many gravity waves are passing a marked point in many different wave frequencies and from many directions in different amplitudes and volumes, destructive standing waves do not build up because new steady-state waves build up cancelling the unharmonic and re-enforcing all wave combinations that are working harmoniously together. The steady-state startup can be temporary for instance when a tide of gravity waves is on the move and finishes passing by.

The
artist
who did this
illustration for this
solar wind Internet site, must
have been dreaming (had an interdimensional
nocturnal interlude) to have seen such
eerie similarity to a gravity
well at M101

DEFINABLE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

BANDWIDTH DEFINATIONS OF GRAVITY WAVES

For the
sake of convenience
let us call each wave a bandwith.
Thus, hundreds of bandwidths are seen in each
of the above three color tone views. Each bandwidth has
a definable 'thickness' (width). Each bandwidth has a definable
'length'. Each bandwidth has a definable 'separation' - how far apart
to next bandwidth. Also, as seen in the above three thugshots, a bandwidth
can be in an area of parallel 'lengths', or, can also be in an area of merged
'lengths', for instance two groups crisscrossing at angles to create moire
grids. The 'saturation' is 'density' though it cannot be said here if
thick bandwidths wide apart are a greater power than thin
bandwidths close together, although it can
definately be said that thin
bandwidths closer
together
represent a
'higher frequency'

Bandwidths can run
in straight parallels, as
well as curves, and undulate, crest,
and crown, and can seem to meander but actually tend to
aim toward, or cirlce around, focus points or patterns. Bandwidths
can be densly packed, and can be pristinely unique, large in scale, elegant.
Bandwidths can be merged - waffle grids created by lines crossing at opposed angles

HERE ARE THREE EXAMPLES SHOWING 'BANDWIDTH' PROPERTIES

Densely packed bandwidths surrounding M101

Isolated bandwidth field in Orion Nebula

Elegant pristinely unique and large in scale at Andromeda

BANDWIDTH FORCES

Since
each bandwidth
comprises a force in its
gravitational component compared to
the non-gravity absent in the empty troughs between
the bandwidths, can the 'force' add up to be strong enough to
comprise a 'missing mass' factor. It can be argued (but not here) that
greater 'force' may be found in strong long thick bandwidths such as
at Andromeda, compared to the higher density saturation in the
smaller thinner more closely together bandwidths at M101.
For instance can it be argued that 1000 piccolos
blasting away at full volume produce more
'force' than 10 bassoons blaring out
hard watooms (vibrations). Or,
one kettle drum banged at
maximum, can this
outpower the
other two
forces.
It goes to
cause in two ways.
In electromagnetism higher
frequency means higher energy, for instance
X-ray, vrs, ultra violet, vrs optical, vrs infra red down
to radio the weakest of all. Yet a high powered FM radio transitter
can easily 'outforce' an x-ray machine in the doctor's office under the
transmitting tower. So here (in electromagnetism) it comes back to
volume (amount) setting the quantity gradient for net force as
opposed to frequency per se. Which comes back to gravity
waves at Andromeda, are a few profoundly powerful
gravitic waves more net powerful than
heaving undulating small wave
oceons that saturate,
such as M101.
Which leads
to the
next
question.
Is the gravity
merely a peak and valley
concentration of gravity that is
already out there surrounding a galaxy, or,
is there extra 'force' in the peaks, a dominant gain
over normal gravity in the zero point vacuum so that the zero
point is not quite zero where a bandwidth is peaking at maximum strength. How
can you expect that I answer these questions. I am not Issac Newton returned
from the grave, I have not once stuck my finger up through rustling topsoil
twirling it around knocking aside flies, checking the wind, temperature,
and air pressure waiting for a great day to resurrect. Content, I
am not engineeringly minded eating mechanical equations
along with the breakfast cereal. Try picture minded,
to see images and turn them around, inspect them,
look for flaws in the ideas turned up by the
inspection within, this is the first step
but beyond that, the mental swoop,
to convert the entire inspection
into a gang of equations only
the writer can understand
is not what I do best,
or, even, what I
do at all.
If someone
else sees gravity
waves where I see them, let
that someone else report them in boolean
format or whatever it takes and everybody will be happy

In sonics
(sound) long
waves are the carriers
of propigation, short waves cross
lateral to the propigations are the cross
frequency harmonics. For instance a strong input of
short cross harmonics (say) high pitched middle C, can
induce strong frequency responses in the resononaces
of very low tones of C. This little animation
an anomymous artist contributed to the
Internet, shows nicely the nature
of super high frequency cross
harmonics within long wave
propigations. In sound,
the cross harmonic
signals also
carry the
signals of
3D stereophonics. It
seems logical to assume similar
signals operate in the arenas of gravity waves

FLUTTERING FIELD IMAGES

Pick out which one is
an alternating current (AC)
and an oscillating current (OC)

Demonstrating fundamental physics principles,
rapid fluttering creates stand alone 'steady state'
images inside the field of flutters

If blue represents one kind of force, and red another,
then two different manifestations are occuring
by the same fluttering - red forms, and
blue forms - within the mutual
red/blue fluttering

IMPACT VIBRATIONS

OFF - no signal

ON - carrier waves are active in two ways - propigation,
and steady state impacts

A steady state impact image can be re-enforced by a synchronous
propigation which is not in lock-step with the steady state image

More than one source of impacts - increased harmonics and results

More than one strength of impacts - steady state increased vibrations,
propigations simulated are two kinds of synchronous, and one pulse

UNIFYING THE ENERGY PRINCIPLES

Impact vibrations in principle have a look and feel which seems
to have a hand in everything from subatomic particles to
galaxies and galaxy superclusters. All carrier
forces from the Strong, Weak, Gravity,
and Electromagnetic, seem to
co-operate in making
the propigations
and steady
states
work
using
aids such as
Relativity and lineal
sum combinations, with ratios
transforming magnitudes in between the
states and statuses comprising the foundations

ANDROMEDA VISIT

Out at Andromeda is not a deep sucking sound but the sound of a mighty roar.

Snippit of techno blab (grabbed from a Seds Andromeda page)

"The entire galaxy is rotating in space, with the lower portions approaching while the upper parts recede. The rotation is not completely smooth, showing `bumps' where the spiral arms occur, which are probably due to the spiral density wave that maintains the arms. By applying gravitational theory to this rotation, we can `weigh' M31, and when we do it seems that there may be ten times as much material as we can see in the visible portions of the galaxy, distributed in a huge dark halo."

Click on images for large size

Once again the moire

Long
wavelengths
foreground (over right end)
and short wavelengths rearground (behind
left end) in doppler mechanics interpret as a motion
with the near right end moving forward and the rear left
end moving back. Smaller moire rills seen behind in
the middle area at the rear are also compact
in fact much shorter (closer together)
also shorter in lengths (lower
amplitude). These gravity
state interpretations
of doppler mechanics
are entirely consistent
with scientific interpretations
of Andromeda's electromagnetic spectrum wherein
minutely discrete differences in radiant frequencies at different
places in Andromeda describe a galaxy in rotation, the lower
portion moving toward us, the upper portion receeding

ANDROMEDA CALLING, NEW LONG DISTANCE RATES, DIAL THESE NUMBERS

The visualization
of a flapjack doing a lazy midair
flip in front of us, as interpreted by reading the
gravity (moire) doppler shifts, is as real as it gets. The gravitic
doppler properties at Andromeda are elsewhere collaborated by careful motion
studies using small frequency shifts in Andromeda's electromagnetic spectum
via many telescopes over a long period of time to determine an identical
motion, as seen in electromagnetism. The same doppler motions are
seen in gravity waves at Andromeda except, the gravity waves
are standing right out in the open magnified at cosmic
proportions whereas the electromagnetic doppler
frequency shifts designating motions are
housed at atomic levels effected in
atoms and molecule radiations
of electromagnetic light
from Andromeda. What
is here in two
entirely
apart states
of fundamental physics are
producing entirely identical results.
At roughly 5,000 to 15 light years across (width
of a gravity rill in the thin and large size moire) vrs
10 to the power -6 cms for atomic spectrum wavelengths, it is
hardly possible to draw a direct proportionate comparison
between the two states (gravitic and electromagnetic),
but suspect the ratio could be in the range of
10 to the power 40. This is consistent
with cosmologies which explore
the power of gravity at
levels of subatomic
particles, such
as a proton,
and 'Plank's length'

GRAVITY VRS ELECTROMAGNETISM VRS SOUND

WHAT IS AMPLITUDE (VOLUME), WHAT IS FREQUENCY (DOPPLER)

There are four fundamental attributes seen
in gravitic vibration gravity waves:

1 - Thickness of line
2 - Distance apart
3 - Length of line
4 - Volume (saturation) - how many lines per cubic light year.
Andromeda seems to have a low saturation volume. M101 seems to have a high saturation volume. But, then, we are only glimpsing what might actually be found at Andromeda

Both the
science of sound,
and the science of atom
physics, seems to deal with
comparable attributes:

1 - Length of wave equals frequency (both sonic and light) (short to high, and, long to low)

2 - Volume (saturation) of waves equal amplitude (bright dim in electromagnetism) (loud soft in sonics)

3 - Thickness of wave equals pitch (flute playing middle C vrs piano playing middle C). Is there an equavalent property in quantum physics, equated to pitch?

4 - Distance apart equals tone (flute vrs piano). Is there an equavalent property in quantum physics, equated to tone?

Attributes
3 and 4 for sound
might be off, it could be
4 in 3 and visa versa. I have
never looked into the attributes of
sonic resonances in terms of tone and pitch

Other
attributes
include resonances
and harmonics - atomic spectrum
appears as an attribute of harmonics, simply said.
Recurrance of a C note in the base octaves, and top octives,
when only middle C is struck on a piano, are an atrtribute of harmonics
in the world of sonics. Resonances are said to occur in elementary particle
physics when a collision between two particles at relativisitic speed
produces a 'resonance' of given properties and paramenters deemed
a 'particle' which lasts for a long enough time for it to
be determined before it decays back to fundamental
particles. A note struck on a piano never
'decays' that is, break apart
into other notes. But
any galaxy can
break apart
into other
galaxies thereby
completely disrupting
the gravitic moire occurances
found at the original galaxy before fission or
fushion. Notes seem to fuse, two notes combining to produce
a 3rd note, this sound cannot reveal which notes prior to being
combined. Elbows and knees on the floor following a nose pushing
along, can illustrate the state of trying to list all attributes
and inter-discipliniary interfaces in their told likes and
differences. Need it only be said in closing, that
gravitic vibrations certainly have many
relatives (attributes) close to
home here in our everyday
world of physics
and best
facts

Out at Andromeda is not a deep sucking sound but the sound of a mighty roar

There
may be a prime
switch in property mechanics
between the cosmologic grand state
wave mechanics (deep space housing galaxies) and
basic atomic physics or even more so, basic mechanics of
sound. In sound, longer wavelengths are said to be of lower
frequency, for instance a tuba vrs a tin flute. Thicker sound
waves are said to be of louder sound, for instance 10 tubas
instead of one. In interpreting the gravitic doppler
waves around both galaxy M101 and Andromeda, it
has been described that the thickness of
the moire, and degrees apart for
each line, are a component
of the gravitic
state doppler
frequency, whereas
length of a gravitic doppler line
(longer vrs shorter) is a question of amplitude.
It may be that the actual properties in gravitic doppler waves
are in reverse to those described here. Thicker waves (for instance
off the upper east side of M101 and over the right end of Andromeda),
are indications of volume (amplitude) showing where larger cosmic sonic
booms are occuring. It is easier to see the compacting of waves as
an element of increasing high frequency, since in none of the
gravitic wave manifestations seen in these two galaxies
can it be instantly realized that thickness of
wave, rather than space apart, equates to
motion in deep space. Length of wave
is not a factor in motions,
the thinest most close
together waves in
Andromeda (behind left
end) are also amongst the longest,
so motion as a measure of length of moire rill does
not seem to account for Andromeda's known deep space motion, so wave
length is not its doppler effect seen in gravity. The stronger the gravitic
wave in thickness of each rill, may be synomymous with sound amplitude
but in principle it associates with brighter gravitational 'light'
(more intense radiation per given frequency) to put the
matter in terms of quantum dynamic physics

HISTORY - THREE DAYS AT ONCE

Three days
start to finish.
Begun with a single blue
image of Andromeda, one thing led
to another so fast it was almost not possible
to keep up. Three days later everything has been studied
and written. It began with a blank page moments after first
seeing the bullseye in Andromeda, late evening Nov 22/2000 and
ran its course to late evening Nov 25/2000. All of the .HTM
files were typed by hand without a hypertext editor.
All of the images were enhanced, cut, zoomed,
and adjusted in many ways, using the
image editor named Paint Shop Pro

Ad to the list fluctuations, alternating energy, alternating current, inductions, impedence, ions, solar wind, galactic wind, galactic magnetosphere, static, and you begin to look like electricity and magnetism

NEUTRINOS

BLINDING LITTLE MICRO MINIATURE BLACK HOLES

If Neutrinos
have some mass, even
slight, yet travel at nearly
the speed of light, the following
situation could relativistically occur: that
mass increases so high, while its occupied space contracts
so much, the Neutrino's relativistic alteration becomes the parameters
of a black hole, so that Neutrinos are super micro miniature black
holes whizzing about in all directions. The only Neutrino
property known is 1/2 unit of spin plus something
which tells physicist what kind of Neutrino;
electron, muon, tau. If micro black
holes, they will not have mass
in the sense we look for
as in Mev and rest
mass. Instead
the effect
by mass is
surplanted by
gravitational effect
of the Neutrino, the gravity
effect very high since being near point
source completely, as a black hole. It is a case
where gravity at nuclear physics has strength. This is said
in reach of a question as to whether gravitic gravity
vibrations are in any way related to Neutrinos.
If so, go figure what and how. If not,
forget I said anything foolish

GRAVITIC SOURCES

BEHIND THE HAND HELD OUT, AN EVEN BIGGER BODY

It is
easy enough
to see gravitic
waves in moire patterns
around galaxies, and point to then
proclaiming here they are. It is quite a different
level of intellect to also open a page and pointing declare:
"and here are their equations". Even then the stone remains
unturned. What is allowing the gravitic wave phenomena
to manifest. Upon what elements of the deep are
they standing forth. What profound physics
in the creation called space works to
bring about the resonances, tones,
and amplitudes of gravitic
vibrations. Is there
an ether, not
bound to
light,
but to sound,
where the velocity
of light simply doesn't matter.
Gravitational force fields intwined with
magnetism even drifts and concentrations of elementary
charge might be the less esoteric explanation on the other hand
what non-esoteric explanation accounts for the interleaving
and teardrop shapes of the Bullseye at Andromeda. As
you can see, once the simple stuff is put aside,
ideas from first year physics, what begins
to loom like a mighty universal boom
over the horizon are the links
and peaks that factor
matter in the
first place
in zero
point
vacuums where
these gravity standing waves
occur, a space so basically cold between
stars that physicists are barely been able to create raw
outer space conditions in a laboratory on Earth, and science still
does not know exactly what goes on out there due to the spin city dictionary
of such things as virtual particle fluctuations, and unresolved thought
experiments in the cosmologies of the big bang

GRAVITY WAVES IN 3D SPACE

To say
that gravity
waves occupy 3D space
is not enough. A moire pattern
looking like a clambshell may be actually
like a curved 3d clambshell held in your hand.
Visualization by suggestions is still not enough.
Here, we turn to a Tokamak in Japan under
research for continuous hydrogen
fusion. Its curved walls
seen in Virtual 3D
show what
curved
space
with gravity
wave moire can be like

It all
boils down
to a lack of one
good picture is worth a
few hundred extra bucks. One
of those christmas orniments made of
paper that folds open and has layer upon
inner layer of shapes is another suggestion,
these picto thought experiments all to
get you thinking of gravitic moire
curving through space as well
as across space

HARMONIC RESONANCES

THE PREVIEW STAMP ALBUM COLLECTION

These are screen captured 'previews' from an image editor. Not always but it sometimes happens that the 'preview' image in my Paint Shop Pro program has a sing not seen in the image being 'previewed'. An aquaintance noticed 'sing' in an image I happened to have up onscreen and remarking on it forced me to realize that after four years I could have the 'sing' image by screen capture. I was off an running, several hours later these were the images that had sing and were screen captured. As I said not every image works but these did particularly those of giant spiral galaxy M101

If a
gravity
wave can have
gravity power, there
may be enough strength in the
gravity waves saturating the deep space
fields around galaxies to account for the mysterious
missing mass. I do not have to say anything more about the
subject except to toss the idea into the ring. Toss.
Toss again. The smirk on the face of Inspector
Luminous is worth a photograph, except,
(you all know this), the camera
is out of film. The smile,
and the toss, are
separate
ideas.
If you
can think in
metaphysical and
metaphorical terms, you
can figure out that last statement

SUPER HIGH FREQUENCY MOIRE AT M51

Moire
at M51 are
very illusive. Much
richer in smaller saturations
of wave length and diffraction, a few
rogueshots from above the satellite galaxy at
M51 reveal what might be genuine moire,
too indistinct to tell without doubt, if
real moire the gravitic sea
around M51 is super
high frequency

No moire
were seen
in red color
tone enhancements

Large image reduced to caption size

CORKSCREW SMOKE TRAIL

THE INFAMOUS BORIS THE TORUS

PHYSICS DIALOGUE BY WORLD LEADING PHYSICISTS

Here
is dialogue
worth reading. It
shows that physicists
can be very chatty, very feet
on the ground when they want to be.
It concerns the Higgs Boson and the
contest now underway to be the
first, now that CERN has
shown the way. Of
interest is
the mention
of bilions of dollars
steered toward the search. I
on the other hand think in terms of
a few dollars a week, some from welfare for
a two year period, to finance the kind of research
you are reading now. Never mind the money, the Higgs dialogue
in this link is facinating and verrry interesting for many reasons
most good. The link seems to be a computer generated variety,
meaning it might not work when you try. Anyway, the file
itself has been downloaded as an .HTM so at minimum
the dialogue is here to read. Enjoy. And, (truth
in information lobbying), reading dialogue
like this makes me feel less of an
asshole for some of my own
chatty dialogues

EYEBALLS IN CENA

Eyeballs
in Cena, and
oblongs in M110,
have been moved to here

SLIP STREAMS

Here
you have
five motions -
forward, standing
still, moving backward,
counter clockwise rotation, and,
if you look, definate clockwise rotation.
The only thing missing is cross band motions, and,
if you look at the color image (3rd) you will see it clearly

You
must see
this page, which
discusses slip streams in
greater depth, and explores the
possibility of slip streams
in galaxies

The
slip stream
effect. Watch how
narrow bands move in opposite
direction in this movie by pros showing
Cassini Satellite views of bands and a white oval
at Jupiter. In galaxies, where slip stream is crossing
laterally to our view, you cannot see the slip stream
since the only way we can detect motions at such
far distances at the moment is by doppler
shifts (toward and away at various
angles large enough to show
doppler, but no full
lateral). In
time, slip
stream
motions
will be seen
by displacements, but
what time are we talking about,
millennium, eons, dispensations, to see slip
streams in a galaxy. So, assume galactic slip streams occur.
In globular (planet sphere) circumstances, slip streams are caused by
angular momentums in belts desparately trying to equalize in different
velocity rest states allowable, working from pole to the equator. In
galaxies the fundamentals are different, in diskels, no globe, all
desparate angular momentum's conflicts will be different
nonetheless just as desparate. Ergo, bands of
angular momentum exist in galaxies.
The reason why I am porking
galaxy angular momentums
in your face is that
nowhere have
I seen
premier or
even any discussions
about angular momentums in galaxies.
Anything seems to deal with how to assign physics
quantum numbers to different kinds of galaxy arms then use these
quantum numbers to try and comprise theories about how these arms have
formed. The problem being that after nearly two decades of theories
the best super computer modelling results have achieved a 2%
success, a whopping increase over the last previous
attempt of 1.8%. So, the conclusion is
obvious, theoritists do not know
how to model creation of
galaxy arms, yet.
Two ingredients
missing are that A:
arms obey fundamental instincts
of angular momentum, and B:, arms occupy
3D space. Both of these (A and B) make theoretical
conjectures about arm formations using parameters
taken straight from the flat doily on aunty's
armchair meaningless. Save the money,
use intelligence instead of
mental brain powers,
to model galaxy
arms. Give
some of the
saved money, to me

SMOKE AND ATOMIC EXPLOSION AND RILLS ON MARS

Have
you seen
smoke.htm. It
has other material which
supports material here in blare.htm

Moire
crash thatch
from more than one
source moving in more than
one direction at more than one velocty.
Motions include simultaneously on a (x1-x2) axis
(width), a (y1-y2) axis (height), and a (z1-z2) axis
(depth). For example going from New York City to
Peking by going around the Earth, over the
South Pole, and through the Earth
simultaneously, the result
will be a smooth curve
on a gentle down
slant if all
3 motions
are at the
same velocity, a
hill and valley curve
if the three volocities each differ

Cross
thatch gravity
wave patterns such as these
found at M101 are nothing more in property
faxes than the simply interference patterns of waves
from two (or more) sources travelling at the same (or different)
velocities. It happened this afternoon on TV was a guick on-screen
illustration of how oceanic wave troughs from one major North
Atlantic storm were joined and intermixed by giant wave
troughs from another storm to form the largest
storm of the century to strike the Alps,
the intermix of the two storm
wave troughs shown as a
moire grid almost
like the above
illustration.
Perfect, thought
I, what else to do but
find an illustrating image on
the Internet and use this to easily show
how gravity waves can form moire grids so elegantly.
One and a half hours later I lay on the floor, defeated, eyeballs
out on two long stalks snaked along the floor, long tongue stuck in a
wall socket in the next room. What a saga, what defeat. It seems that
twicky thin one-line twitchers is how physicists like to demonstrate
their best stuff these days. One site by a Phd featured movies
made by 'mathematica' good enough that I have included
3 below. Believe me I searched everything from
electron holography to x-ray interference
patterns to commercial hologram sites
(some are now new age what used to
be called 'holistics' now called
'hologram'), ocean waves (were
mostly surf's up and here is
where to buy the best surf
boards), national science
bodies and wave analysis
for global regions per day
and conditions 'error' not found,
and so on, I felt like a cartoon when I called it
quits, and still had not found a simple image showing two
interference patterns caused by two dobblers each moving over a
petrie dish, nor, a holograph photograph showing fractal moire
saturations that form the holo picture when two lazer
beams are fired through, the simplest emodiments
of principles seems to have vanished from
the human intellect. Now I shall pull
my tongue from the wall socket
and carry on with grinding
my teeth. But first, two
movie simulations, then
a select of 'wave' pics
from the internet, and, a
movie of two drops of water
Waves analysis and ilustrations 1
Waves analysis and ilustrations 2
Wave
interference
patterns simulated as
movies made by a Phd
using 'mathematica'

Laser
interference
patterns from a ringing
bell, crashing cymbol, struck
edge of plate, and small
chinese dinner bell

Tidal
wave bunching
up crashing against
shore. I see this in reverse,
gravity waves stretching out (lower
frequency) and getting stronger (higher
amplitude) as a body pulls away from
a point of intensified gravitic
activity

Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore
World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004
form A & O 3 3

Click google logo for site search

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home

Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA ODDESSY CLIFFR CONTACT

form A & O 3 3

Click google logo for site search For the world's most comprehensive searches use Fast crash course in astronomy More advanced at top of home Available Downloads DRUMBALLIA ODDESSY CLIFFR CONTACT

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Click google logo for site search

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home

Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA ODDESSY CLIFFR CONTACT