The first invented steam engine is said to be by Heron the Greek in
the first century AD. It had two elbow arms jetting steam to provide
rotating thrust. The elbow arm fulcrum around a center source seems to
be in place in the step-down array of the arms
of the butterfly nebula but how this elbow jog array stays constant
to form distinct flaring wands is of conciderable concern among
scintillating brain cells which do not have an answer.
BANGLES |
|---|
Two nodes, in red, on either side of this nebula, are herein called 'bangles' in GIC wink wink.
BANGLES IN A BUTTERFLY NEBULA |
|---|
Two nodes, one within each butterfly wand of nebula M2-6 (next image below), may be the same kind of thing forming curious red bangles as shown above in the Blinking Eye nebula, except, here, in this butterfly nebula next, only a bi-polar tubular nova shell has so far formed, instead of a sphere.
If gas expanded into a sphere, the areas containing the bangles would be consistent as outline forms of bi-polar events as seen in the spherical nebula forms above, although, the above Blinking Eye nebula looks substantially dynamically different seeming the resulting cause of a single star gone nova, whereas the butterfly formula is a nova star with another star in a binary pair.
A phenomena term 'Masers' has been reported in a BBC news release which may explain how 'bangles' might be forming in polarity configurations at long distance from their nebula cores.
STEP-DROP FORMULA |
|---|
It will serve you well to know the butterfly's tubular wands are not perfectly symmetrical along a straight line axis as if blades of an airplane propeller.
The next views in overlay stereo (merge the two images together by eyesight) reveals a fold in lineal symmetry - a dynamic step-drop in the middle so that the right wand is closer to the camera, the left wand initiates farther away, initiating at center behind the step-drop.
Then it seems, the left wand flares forward, to the left, a definate kink-jog none linear array. In fact, how the kink-jog occurs, has me baffled, I see no inner imaged pictures in mind which have answers though more than one try-it-and-see inner picture has passed by my 4th dimensional tv screen. The above Greek steam engine illustration shows jets at laterally displaced positions pointing in opposite directions in elbow jogs at right angles to the axis of lateral displacement from center. The image is good, since it identifies an intrinsic mechanical construction.
The small center disk is titled on edge, and the slant angle of the disk seems to match the dynamic step-drop, that is, the right wand initiates above the center of the disk, and the rear wand initiates above center behind the disk.
Another feature not made note of in the image source text, are bubbles formed within both of the wands. Look again, you can see the round gas bubbles as plain as hey, the gas bubble areas cross sectionally equal to the width of the wands.
An Egg nuclear image in context of planetary orbital signatures is here 1. Egg nuclear images in context of major image errors and irregular patching flaws is here 2.
A most noticable dynamic step-drop of similar kind is also seen in the Egg nebula in a Hubble photo of the Egg's nucleus, a stereo view is shown next. This and other features of the Egg nebula are extensively explored in GIC here.
In the Egg, the central blast disk (if this is what it is) seems dull and opaque, and slightly formed in a square-corner shape not unlike the footpad of a snail.
Other images of the Egg nebula's step-drop are in different context here.
GIC has a main page for nebulas here.
A separate page for the Eta nebula is here.
Nebulas are also extensively explored, for symmetry properties, in this GIC page.
The bangles in the butterfly nebula are very much in shape similar to the squiggling little piggy tails seen at both ends of the Catseye nebula. Are they the same internal phenomena, or just co-incidentally similar, is yours to answer, I have none.
The Catseye seems composed of overlapping thin gas shells, the curved lines merely seeing the edges of the shells, (no different than seeing the edges of burst soap bubbles on edge).
These next views are back to the butterfly nebula, rotated to show the artwork full size. The versions, enhanced, reveal more of the ephemeral structural inner shells made by complex intermittant discharges. I would like to think the blue spikes are laser rays but most likely are telescope lensing incident artifacts.
Perhaps the beautiful eerie ephemeral symmetrical elegance is due to a particularly well balanced pair of stars in terms of sizes, and/or orbital distances, and that such elegence is lost to more chaotic unruly looking explosives if the two orbiting stars are not in a perfectly balanced yin-yang formula to create true bi-polar elegence. One star too far away, or the other too large, or the nova wobbling and/or uneven, and the elegence is lost in chaos. Perhaps some elegance comes from oscillations that are regularly smooth like a water balloon sloshing back and forth along one axis only.
|
|
|---|
NGC 2371
Here
is another
very noticable Hubble
image of a nebula. What is noticable,
is the fact that the two bangles north and south,
glimpsed at poor res in the Blinking Eye nebula, are very
clearly seen in this Ngc 2371 nebula image when highly enhanced.
When not enhanced the original is of poor low res quality,
but when enhanced, the polar appositives in alter
radiance spools at the end of jets (north
and south) are most very apparent
A real
goodie, a godsend.
I had been ranting about certain
nebula features end-to-end, neck craned right
back like Icabod Crane with huge adam's apple, railing
about what I thought to be a discovery about nebula and anounced
loudly in Cats.htm and here is absolute confirmation
about the shouting, that made me seem
like Icabod Crane, with a giant
adam's apple bobbing
up and down. So,
if you are
young, a
yuppie,
or too young
to remember Walt Disney's
movie about Icabod Crane and the
headless horseman, do not bother racing to
references, the Walt Disney movie is not worth it.
But. Icabod Crane existed, and had a huge adam's apple,
which was featured as a 'gulp' in the Walt Disney
movie, and that gulp said everything about
fear individuals and pros have standing
up against the angst of science, only
one or two willing to stick their
neck out these days and do
against the orthodoxy,
I happen to be
one of the
few. The
following
nebula images
the stark result of
having the courage to stand
out against the orthodoxy of physics,
which controls the thinking of astronomy and science
See blue flyers for cross reference and collabating testimony
See blinking eye nebula for more cross reference and testimony
Original slightly enhanced
NGC 2371 CATSEYE NEBULA
'MASERS'
A possible explanation for the twin nodes extended on either side of a planetary nebula is found at this site, where a new nebula in the process of just forming, needs explanation and some is given, including suggestion that super high speed jets out either side of the nebula are forming hit spots at some length from the nebula core.
In the description at the above link, under the heading "Ring Of Gas", the term 'masers' is introduced, which are the production of energetic ionnizations at long and very long distance at the ends of the lobes.
It is possible that identical 'masers' or maser action of similar kind but different material excitements, are responsible for excited small local twin hot spots at either side on a nebulas outermore hems, usually shown in red, as seen in nebula such as the 'Blinking Eye' nebula, and the 'Blue Snowball' nebula, also the 'Glass Shoe' nebula.
VEIL NEBULA - NOT A MISSING MASS, AN EXAMPLE OF THE VALUE OF EXTREME ENHANCEMENT IS NEXT |
|---|
In a
2Mass image
of the Veil nebula
Ngc 6992 which includes
the Cygnus Loop, there is a
lot of blue haze captured
but not shown in the
original
I think
this is a
large very tenuous
tympani in Cygnus Loop, not
sure, and not sure but think there
are hexagram outlines straight
lines meeting at fractally
correct angles, peppering
the tenuous nebulosity
CYGNUS LOOP |
|---|
CYGNUS LOOP
For
public
interest sake,
note the next comparison -
the bell of a marching band's tuba,
seen at the top of the Lagoon closeups,
is similar in kind to a giant tuba
bell exposed by Hubble in the
Cygnas Nebula, where
the Cygnus tuba
bell is much
more lightweight
and flimsy seeming in texture
The bell
definately has
a tympani shape in
it, the upper half of a
hexagram (in magenta) frames the
opening. A range of color tone
enhancements makes unusual
unfamiliar features
easier to see
CYGNUS NEBULA
The Cygnus Loop in the Veil nebula seems to have similiar whimsy and pale veil in its nebulosity, a remnant of a long ago super nova. It means the Moon Cloud at Antares may be a long ago remnant of a very large super nova, perhaps something on par with the current Eta Carinae which is porking out a stupendous charge of smoke and gas, although, I am inclined to think the Moon Cloud is bigger and denser than a super nova remnant because of the gas volcano at the Moon eyestalk formation, such a volcano is a very strong dynamic circumstance in celestrial entropy exchanges, and, several stars are involved in the Antares Moon cloud combination unlike more diaphanous nebula remnants which are typically unique residues of single stars gone nova.
GIC is using this opportunity to show off Cygnus enhancements with a dual purpose, to show cross angle polarization, as well as geometry formations, for instance concentrically projecting cyclonnic swirls in the tuba bell in the whispy drifts of Cygnus - a formation such as this is expected in the inner gyroscopes of neutron stars such as in the Crab nebula - and to show off local hot areas which have teeming thermodynamic princples at work, for instance the hexagram rosette at the end of a Cygnus shoe. You can't miss it, a pretty little six pedalled flower sticking out into endspace of the nebula.
THE ROYAL BELL
The royal 'bell' jutting out in the lower right in the Cone pillar is somewhat in accord in feel and kind, to the 'tuba bell' in the Cygnus Nebula, except the Cygnus 'bell' is very tenuous, very ephemeral in a space occupancy that has only lacy trills of residual sundry matters from centuries ago, whereas the Cone's 'bell' is very now, it is dense, it is in a very travel disturbed region of Milky Way space, and is made of dense materials extra solidly compacted by visiting compressions, yet accordingly this 'Cone' density as a significant manifestation is in the same image and likeness as the ultra light hooka smoke shapes of the Cygnus nebula's Royal Bell. Well, almost the same shape.
By the way, notice how the cyclonnic circular formations on the right in the Cygnus nebula image appear somewhat similar to forms created by powerful spinning stars such as pulsars whose stupendous magnetic fields rotating at high speeds with the star drag matter around in the star's stupendous magnetic forces creating fast changing cyclonnic swirls as for instance easily seen in the Crab nebula.
The Crab nebula's cyclonnic spindle is easily seen, mainly because the nebula itself is alone out in space, not enshrouded in drifting dense nebula fields per se the Crab nebula is alone out in space. What about similar shockwave and spinner nebulas whose location is deep inside dense surrounding matterials, in this situation only glimpses and clues are available seen in fragments of larger outer cyclonnics such as revealed in plenty in the Chandra image of the Crab as linked in the above paragraph.
We are looking at a phenomena of property in seeming ordinary humdrum nebula and energetic star creating galaxy actions, in which Royal bells (which look like the bells of tubas), are intrinsically formed by various sonic and recurrantly re-percussional forces, plus it seems, powerfully spinning magnetic fields.
What the ground floor cause, what the source, what the intrinsic information speaking to us in a loud and clear language is telling us, is yours, not us, not me, yours to determine.
CYCLONNIC SCYTHS CURL ALONG A CYGNUS LOOP EDGE
Let us take an opportunity to look at a phenomena in closer detail.
A closer look at the tip of a Cygnus Loop extension, shows several cyclonnics scything in curls at right angles over the lip. These are coherent dynamic artifacts, of a kind I have not yet seen addressed by astronomy pros.
One scyth in particular (at the left in the lineup) seems an actual arc, the others might just be wisps it is hard to say. The area containing the scyths has been enhanced in a highlighted window, it looks like a Hubble square frame patching error but it is my highlighting.
It took wildly out of the box efforts to reveal the cyclonnic curls - enhancements pushed well into the courageous zone and suddenly, there they were - in repect to the Hubble original which shows nothing whatever about the edge-curling cyclonnics.
The Cygnus cyclonnic curls are similar in kind to those pointed out in the Hubble ACS image of the Cone nebula. The Cygnus cyclonnics are either by one nucleonic driving motor, or several, I think at least two - cannot tell in not knowing enough about this revealing phenomena to be specific.
Another Royal Bell, if real, more crudely formed. I was caught by surprise by this, I did not know it was there until doing a final run through selecting 3D staging alternatives, and lo there it was, another Royal Bell in the Cygnus Loop, this one smaller and featured in reds and magentas. Next is the second Royal Bell, in a highlighted window.
The Cygnus Royal Bell is different, its cyclonnics are obvious, on a much grander scale.
Enhancements pushed in envelopes past the hissing wall, show major extensions of fluid flows south from the center of the Royal Bell, hardly a thing about this seen in the Hubble original. I do not know about you, but I find little goodies like this facinating, because I KNOW they reveal more than current theories allow, about dynamic forces operating in nebulas, plus super-explosion aftermaths.
WIND DIRECTIONS
May as well insert it here since I seem to have no other place to put it. Long drawn out strands of diaphonous matter in nebula involve winds which are blowing along in the general direction of the strands, in parallel.
A concequence of this curiousity is an impression that long lineal drifts such was seen in trailing wisps at Cygnus involve winds which basically travel parallel to the stretching reaches of the wispies, whereas a honeycombed pattern such as seen in the Crab nebula (next) involve extra 'winds' which flow cross angles to the flow of motion of the slowly drifting wisps of cigarette smoke.
CIGARETTE SMOKE IS A GOOD MODEL
Watch cigarette smoke curling up from the glowing end of a lit cigarette and see the the wisps slowly taken in drifts by ambiant soft background air-flow currents in the room. You will see, watching, drift formations temporarily take on the look and feel of wisps in the Cygnus loop and other nebula, actually almost perfect reproductions in model forms, whereas subtle ambiant cross current background winds in the room temporarily reproduce honeycomb patterns more like those of the Crab.
For diaphonous, think of cigarette smoke from the glowing end of the cigarette drifting out into the air in extremely subtle wind currents and gradually stringing apart, still coherent until the last fade when the smoke drift suddenly dissovlves into nothing.
When more of the many different winds are blowing at right angles to the diaphonous drifts, honycomb/cavity patterns among long strings can develope, such as in the Crab nebula, next.
The above sequence of images with descriptions are also featured in the GIC Hubble ACS images page.
COLDEST SPOT POSSIBLE IS NOT ALL COLD |
|---|
By Berneare Eeneo 3
An
image by ESO
called Bernard 68 has
a huge black area comprised of a
dark molecular cloud which does not radiate
resulting in a dark stinkhole claimed by ESO as
one of the coldest places in the universe, but, it
is warm, not in the middle, around the fringe,
where warm stars are casting heat. A
trail of disturbance descends
from the top upper left
of the frame down
the outside
left of
the stinkhole
but it is not possible
to tell, in these stereogram overlays,
if the trail is being caused by the stinkhole
ESO at their VLT site have radiation studies which include the dark area seen filled with red stars. See next image at left, this is the original, titled Pre-collapsed cloud 68B. Enhancement reveals even more. See image at right. (Question - does pre-collapse mean prior used, as for instance a used car, or does it imply not yet collapsed. The term pre-collapsed doesn't seem to state its intent exactly. Words, eh).
Click for original 1
Click for original 2
Click for enhanced
3D does not reveal any indepth, that it, the darkness is not due to brooding dark depths. Merge the two images together by eyesight to see 3D. You will see the dark cavity is essentially flat, unlike a cavity at Bhr71 shown next below, which is very much a dark deepsink.
AREA 51 IN BHR71 IS NOT ENTIRELY EMPTY
The ESO VLT original shows an Area 51 which seems to be abandoned.
The flaming matchhead is highly irregular and 3D hints that it has toridal roundness (depth) on it's eastern side. A white arch below the head of the match arcs at contra angle outward this way toward the camera.
Click for original
Click for enhanced 1
Click for enhanced 2
Click for enhanced 3
Reflection nebula M78, in a Malin AAO image, is very brooding in original, shows drawing sweeps of sundry and diaphanous matter when highly enhanced for use in GIC.
Click for enhanced full size
Click for original full size
FLAME NEBULA
Another nebula of similar shape (flaring wings) is the Flame Nebula, image shown next. This, named Ngc 2024, is featured in the GIC rays page.
A very large nebula is revealed in a nebula imaged small by Subaru.
The image does not enlarge beyond this point because its finer details simply dissolve into pixel nonesense, already you can see pixel squares around the bright stars, though finer mesh details are still visible within the balloons of the nebula.
The above Subaru zoom enhancement is included in GIC because it is so beautiful. Typically, GIC images are teaching images, or images that reveal. In this case there is nothing to teach through exposure to the above Subaru image, except its beauty.
I am struck by similarities between the moth wings of the above nebula and the Trapezium of Orion, it is as if a mothwing nebula has two wings and the Orion version has only one wing, the other wing not yet formed, or not yet joined, assuming that Orion can evolve into a two wing moth.
Other images of the Orion view used above, are here.
BLUE RAY UNEXPECTEDLY TURNS UP IN HUBBLE NGC 4151 IMAGE |
|---|
Ngc 4151
laser image.
It is the blue ray
that is interesting, it
is not a typical telescope light
strut spike as seem the four red rays
Green enhancement of Ngc 4154. Original.
GALACTIC AND UNIVERSAL CORIOLIS EFFECT
It
is an
odd bias and
the cause is not known.
I have an assymetric vision, short
sighted, the left eye very somewhat weaker than
the right, both eyes in the - 500 range compared to 20 20
for perfect vision. It may be the asymetric vision, or some other
cause, but what is in question is that most galaxies in deep space
seem to have a face that faces to the left. If you look carefully
at the many Hubble views you will see typically that all
deep space views of galaxies show galaxies
canted to the left, at least,
that is what I see.
I also see
that most
inner cores also
canted to the left, like
a fish's eyeball left turned. Not
all, but most, innermost galaxy cores seem to be
facing left, at least, as I see it. Now, I mentioned the
vision situation in anticipation this might be effecting what I
see onscreen in 3D images. If not, if you see the same, what
it means is something incredible - that the Universe
Cosmic is 'handed' that is, that a Universal
dynamic has a distinct left-handed
turn to it, where most galaxies,
and most galaxy cores, are
turned to the left, as
if some great cosmic
pull is causing
them to turn
that way.
What
do you
think. If you
see left-turned visages,
then a fundamental constant in entropy
cosmic energy exchanges is effecting outer space and
deep space, somewhat in the same way that something very fundamental
causes electron neutrinos to have a distinct one-of-a-kind-only "handedness"
What do you think. Is it possible that there is a property similar to
north hemisphere - south hemisphere coriolis forces effecting
the spin of hurricans, tornados, and water down the
drain spout. Suppose the Universe also has an
equivalent 'coriolis', such then that we
here in our place called Earth are
in a 'hemisphere' of the Universe
where such a 'coriolis' effect can
be noticed due to our position in a
Universal hemisphere where a 'coriolis
condition is required to obey a fundamental
physics requirement in Universal constituentations
THEORY OF 3D PHOTOS
Traditional
long standing occular
vision 3D theory upholds that binary
occurs by two images side by side photographed by
two lenses about 6" to 6' (6 inches to 6 feet) apart, creating
spacial displacement which when refocused by bringing the two images
together superimposed over each other to creat one image, results
in recreation of the original stereo binoccular displacement
seen in stereo by two correctly focusing eyeballs. The
traditional theory cannot uphold for galaxies, too
far distant. Nearby nebula, and comets right
in the Solar System, can be captured in
binoccular by fortuitous chances in
alignments and positions, the
'binoccularness' coming
from the existence
of two separate
images spaced
apart in 3
dimensional
space. So goes
traditional theory,
which also upholds that
stereo is impossible in a mono
photo because no spacial displacement
between two lenses (eyes) took place when the
photograph was captured by camera, telescope, or video
Let's
throw
all of that
above paragraph
against the wall and
slap a bandaid against it
taken fresh from the first aid box
The plain
fact is that
the above bandaid
covered traditional theory
upholds that all information coming
into the lens of the camera comes in in straight
lines, point source to point source, a photon from the tip of
a pimple on a nose comes straight in to EXACTLY the same position
in the framing of the film, proportionately reduced to 35 or 110 or 70 mm
film sized, but, straight in from tip of pimple on nose to tip of pimple
in same proportionate place on film. The real fact is no. There is
more. Photons from the upper right corner of the scene
land in the lower left corner of the film as well,
and visa versa from the lower left corner of
the scene to the upper right corner
of the film. In fact photons
from the pimple on
the nose may
have
glistened
off the upper left
side of the shiny tiny red mound
with white crown on top, and entered the camera to
land on the right lower side in the frame of the film intermingling
with pizza on the lower lip of the astronomer being photographed. The
point is that a scathing cross-hatch of photons incoming from
all possible vectors lands on the film, creating a very
subtle high frequency mat of extremely tiny angles
of phase on the film, laid, (as well as main
and dominate photograph scene), as
a subtle matrix mainly like the
scene saved by a hologram.
All it takes to redo
the original 3D
scene in a
mono
image is
to display the
image in two, identical,
side by side, separated by about 4 inches,
so the two can be re-focused into one, and ergo there is
your 3D once again. This is perfectly true for galaxies. The cross
hatch of polarized light rays hitting cross angled left side source to
right side film is of course extremely small, almost too small to
be calculated by Cray Supercomputers in trigonometry, but
real they are, containing vitally valid 3D information
about galaxies and any other phenomena including
your chairperson, photographed in mono
Witness
this galaxy in 3D
CLAIM TO FAME
My
one and
only claim to
fame as a telescope
observer took place in a backyard
in a suburb at a house party noisy with university
students and staff, one of the students living there having a
4 foot white tube on tripod set up in the backyard kept coming in
trying to find anyone interested in going out for a look at
Jupiter which apparently was coming in loud and clear,
the fello knew how to thumb the ephemeris. I
was the only one who could be bothered
to step outside in the brisk
cool night of autumn
and was glad I
did, there
were
the
four
moons
first seen
by Galileo no wonder
he stood up against the entire
Vatican and declared them wrong, all four
moons as bright and brillient as you could want them,
two on either side against pitch black deep space, Jupiter
itself very bright and big enough to see features. It
was a sudden abrupt view of it that stayed the
distance changed my idea forever of
what Jupiter might look like
through a telescope
An
oportunity
lost took place the
previous year in Toronto where
students of astronomy were staying at Rochdale
College on Bloor street and every weekend made a midnight
jaunt up Yonge to Richmond Hill where the university of Toronto
had a small observatory, that was the key word 'small' methought
because small it would not be worth the effort as the students
of astronomy went around rounding up anyone interested
in trecking to Richmond Hill for a look. Turns
out 'small' is not the right word to
use, that Richmond Hill
observatory has
turned up
more
than once
in the press as being
a source of relevent achievements
That's it - the romp is over
You
have to
understand that
this image has very high
stereoscopic value when viewed in 3D
yet was scanned as a single mono image published
in a magazine (the kind with high circulation you buy once
a month from the Super Market magazine rack). The fact of the stereo,
authentic and in all ways correct, being inherent in the image even
after the original photograph was printed by printer's ink
on a magazine page, then scanned with a Hewlett
Packard Scanjet 4P, even after all of these
translations through different media's
the image is still remarkably
stereoscopic. Why, I do
not actually know.
I do know that
original
content
entering
the film was finely
polarized with cross-hatching rays
in interference patterns due to rays entering the
film not point source but from upper left of image to lower right
of film, and upper right of image to lower left of film, and
so on. What ingredient(s) in the image character can
then further (after the fact) transfer and
carry on through printed page to
scanned digital image is
not so apparent or
abundantly
clear.
A clue
is in the
existence of optical
illusions. Have you ever wondered
why craters on the Moon when shown in a photograph
are correct when the photo is showed one way, and turn into outies
when the picture is turned upside down, for instance a picture of a
pock marked section of the Moon completely changes in outlook
and information when the magazine is turned upside down.
I have wondered about this and have no answer
easily stated. The picture contains
refractive index information
which makes the craters
innies when incident
light strikes them
one way, and
outies
when
incident
light strikes
the refractive parts a
different way (when the image is
turned upside down in front of you). This seems
to me actually a very deep element in physics and not one
I have ever seen addressed, for instance in a Scientific American
artical. However I do sense that stereo inherent in mono images such
as the cliff face in Afganistan (or wherever it is) can exist at
least in part due to index of refraction gradients similar
to those that will turn a Moon's craters from innies
to outies when the crater's image is turned
upside down. Something about the way
light reflects off the page
accounts for the
switcheroo.
By what
actual
physics
incoming photons
are engaged with outgoing
photons reflecting off the page is outside
of my keen ken-scope. Hopefully these musings can trigger
creative juices in the neural nets of keen minded thinkers who might
also now want to ponder why stereoscopic veracity exists in mono photos
Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004 form A & O 3 3
|
Click google logo for site search
For the world's most comprehensive searches use
|
|---|
Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home
| DRUMBALLIA | ODDESSY | CLIFFR | CONTACT |