|
ETA CARINAE - QUARTZ CRYSTAL TYMPANI DYNAMO
In
this
case I am
not showing originals.
Originals are around, everyone has
seen them, the originals sources of yin yang jabber
and wock - are there laser rays, conversly, are there not. Why,
is not an exceptable answer. So begins the Inpectophy 101 exam.
Here, the exam is thrown out the window and case in points
go straight to the jugular, there ARE thin rays,
in abundance, and more, much more, at
Nebula Eta Carinae
The
front end
Left) is essentially
irregularly flat, not a round
bellow. The rear end can also be seen as
irregularly flat, pending correct interpretation
of certain folding flattend textures in the
rear bellows when seen with keen
interest in 3D
Extremely
ribbed texture
(ribbed as in roped and
knotted - visions of the alien in
aliens come to mind). Every detail including
the smallest has (it seems) been produced
by a chuff from the Eta hot star kernal
NEXT
The
Eiffle
Tower (tall
spike in center with
21st century celebration streamers).
An outpush vectored north-west which pro image
engineers have tended to write out as spurious,
turns out to be a tongue with cross ribs,
an obvious artifact caused within
Eta energy fields
This,
if you are
a researcher who
has looked into the
subject more than once,
is the Eta Carinae nebula,
unlike any view you have
ever seen of it.
A kind of
difficult image,
so several views are shown
Hubble using astronomers have captioned this image: "Hubble Shows Expansion Of Eta Carinae Debris"
This red by
Hubble was taken in
the very first group of shots
after Hubble's myopic lens was repaired
I am
making a
guess that the
4 domintant rays in a
cross cross are light spikes from
the telescope, meaning Hubble probably took
a cooler view to capture the surrounding red cradle
with then an intense hot kernal in the center producing bright
4-way light spikes. In which case other rays seen in dim,
may also be light spikes in creating a composite
nest image into which was inserted the
dumbbell to scale. In particular,
the bright 4-way spikes
all initiate (come
into the open)
from below
and behind the
dumbbell, suggesting strongly
a searing hot kernal producing telescope
light spikes lies under the dumbbell. This disqualification
still leaves the eiffle tower, which has the added dressing of the
millennium 21st century celebration streamers, plus the jetting
curling tongue with ribs. However, one step back toward
rays vrs spikes, is that the ray pairs are in two
different horizon plane polarity phases,
the east-west spikes vector toward
the camera, the north-south
spikes vector away.
Similarly, the
other 3
spikes
seen dimly
are also each in
their own horizon plane, the
result being that no two spikes are in
the same horizon plane. This all adds to an
ascertion that if rays not spikes, each
ray is from a different co-ordinate
in the kernal core's star
I could
be wrong but,
in not being able to go
back into the Web to find the
original and caption, (and not turning up
the original in my somewhat chaotic earlier archives)
remember that this next is a time lapse shot, a photo of the
nebula and cradle followed many months later by another photo
showing how much the nebula has changed in that time period.
What is shown is the cradle has drifted north-west leaving
a prominent ghost outline - swept clean of dusty murks
- of its previous position, the outline only seen
when the image is highly enhanced
At this
Hubble images site
is a mastered version in which
only the dumbbell is featured, the tongue just
barely glimpsed, the cradle and all else banished from view.
You will notice that a number of Hubble views and images
of Eta have vanished from the Internet, pulled from
public exposure, particularly earlier shots of
which there were many, now hardly any
TIME LAPSED SPIKES
Two
sets of
radians from a
time leap image of
two views of Eta separated
(if I remember - the original I
can no longer find on the Web it seems
to have gone for a walk) by a period of 17 months,
to show how rapidly Eta is undergoing change. What has
grabbed my attention is the phase shift in the spikes, both a
counter clockwise rotation and a great change in dominant
spikes, the shadow spikes match spikes seen in
the earlier Hubble red view
See,
Inspector
Luminous has skipped
lunch to write one remark carefully, the
images are here you can see them now, they exist, but
not on the Internet, cannot find em, they are not there where
they once were. Could it be a profound mistake has caused
the envelope with the money to slide back across the
desk wrinkling into a chest pocket. Was the
original hail of congrats about the
discovery of rays blazing
laserly from Eta
withdrawn.
It does not
matter, the images
once out front on the public
platform are revealing enough, no need to
speculate why they publically are revealed no longer.
Inspector Luminous thinks its a good day to laugh again at
Goliath meets the Tooth Fairy. As for the missing images,
who knows where the check went missing
from the rocket engineers pocket
SCATTERGUN RAYS
As to
whether
scattergun rays
spiking out around the cradle
of Eta Carinae are 'laser' or 'tracers' is an
open question. There is no doubt that rays are seen. ESO
has made particular note of them (see next pink images). Hubble
Eta images show rays that are clearly tracers firing from a hot hem
of the Catseye Nebula and these are self evidently tracers caused
by ejecta exploding at some distance out like popcorn kernals.
The rays in Eta are not the same, in that hot exploding
popcorn kernals are not seen at the end
of some of the rays
ETA CARINAE BY ESO
At least
nine thin dim
rays are seen in
scattergun ejecta around
the rim of the Eta cradle, in this
ESO image there are rays identical to those
seen by Hubble (ignore hot bright spikes from the telescope
SMALL VERSION OF ESO ORIGINAL
One 'jet' is known, shown in the upper right highlighted window
Original from ESO
All in all,
Eta is a mystery
needing to be unravelled.
Bring on Inspector Luminous. 'What,
ho ah, was catching a catnap. The carinae
is too complex too hard to focus, to fast changing
you say? Astronomers are hording their best - and worst - images
of it. Say what. Let me get some gums to chew on. If every
image can be rounded up that might show light on eta
and someone who knows how to tweak the nobs
er knobs expecially into the astronomy
vaults where originals before
composites lay getting
mouldy, perhaps,
just perhaps,
yawn, call
me again
lets do lunch
Traces of a
previous cradle forming
explosion seem to be visible
in this next strange image
The kernal
hiding a super hot star
is center stage in a Hubble composite
Powerful smoke jets, polar planed at different horizon planes, reveal a stoking furnace on rampage.
The powerful smoke jet dynamics are hard to understand, even in closeup. Three different color enhanced versions of the same view next each reveal different standout characteristics in the smoke outpours.
When a formation like this takes place, it's equations can defeat even someone like Einstein until someone like Hawkings steps in and shows black holes have the blueprints of the entire atomic spectrum stored within.
In fact, this is true. Look at Moore's scope into the nether regions of cosmic macro/subatomic physics. All on the basis of magnificent recurrences in dimensions of space itself, you must understand.
One thing that is totally self evident - poking a finger in the eye, poke, poke - is that the jets are definately not a ring squirting out like a jet of particles when two fast travelling heavies smash into each other in a particle accelarator, the jets from those impacts squirt out sideways in a paper thin squeeze, called a 'mercedes' because the sideways jet is usually concentrated in three vectors like the Mercedes auto logo, or a Y factor in the center of a Star of David.
Each jet of Eta is in a distinct different country of its own. This is entirely different than atronomer attempts to depict the sidejets as squirts modelled upon the particle accelarator model. A 3d view of Eta made by scientists, and viewed with red/blue 3d glasses, shows a squirt mechanism entirely unlike the mechanisms seen in the GIC stereo views above, the scientists model as you will see looking at it with 3d glasses, looks as if made in a hollywood special effects studio.
Finally, how come these particularly good Eta closeup views after all these years, the good views factored all in a group on Feb 11/2002. It was because I had decided to see if I could come up with a better view of the quartz crystal so went to the Stsci Hubble site to download a fresh image. I cannot download Tiff, my computer has never been set up to display them, but, discovered that the giant Tiff image at Stsci was actually a jpg file and boomer boomer down came the biggie into my computer, where, for the first time since 1966, I could tackle the smoking quartz crystal with ease.
Click for Nasa Eta 3d image large
Click for Eta billows original large
A more
recent Eta image
shows where the cradle itself
up pops from a ledge in the Keyhole nebula
This
next view
is the first image of
Eta seen by me in 3D. As you can see
the image staging is noticeably disproportionate,
in those days (Dec 6\1996) I thought great disimilarity
in mono image size was needed for stereo. As you can
guess, in spite of eye discomfort, I was hooked
on the Eta nebula the first time I saw it
in 3D. The particular image does
not seem to be around any
more, this colored
view backdates
to the fall
of '96 and I
do not remember if
this is the way it was found or
did I make hesitant early color adjustments to it
|
|---|
Catseye Nebula page
Cats Eye Ngc 6543 Eta Carinae
With
this interesting
fello we get everything from
rays to the shell outline of a quartz rod
crystal, loud harks of quantum atomic physics recurrencing
in Cosmic Macro Realms is the quality revealed
by t h i s p i c t u r e
COMING TO A THEATRE NEAR YOU
Behold
Goliath. Are
you illumined? Has
your consciousness begun
to spin faster? Mine hasn't.
Goliath doesn't do a thing for me
except to make me twist and turn a bit in
angst as to wondering how it is possible that
pro astronomers can be so far off the mark
Ps
I've
known over
the years physics
department chairmans on
a first name basis and more than
one Nobel Prize Winner so feel qualified
in making the following remarks:
Here
it is, titled
eta-art2.jpg, because
that's what it is, art. I had a
friend back in the mid 60's in Vancouver
named 'Rice-Jones' one of the first names I ever
knew using contractions to identify important seeming father
family name and important mother family name the point of this above
remark being that he was a good enough artist that he did not need
famed family name added, to add luster to his existence. Now,
here is where it becomes astro-psychic. Try and picture
the number of brains at Nasa who had synaptic
input into the creation of this next
picture of Eta Carinae, the
fabululous Nebula thought
to have lazer rays
in it. Picture
an artist
who
doesn't
know diddly
about astronomy,
so nit-pick brain number
1 shoves input across the desk to
artist, nit-pick brain number 2 does similar,
nit-pick brain number 3 does the same, all shove paper
across the desk to the artist to achieve input and all earn
their salaries, including the artist who produced 'Goliath'
because otherwise the 'artist' hasn't the slightest
idea of what 'Eta' is all about' and all of
the nit-snickers earn their salaries
proving their PhD's and the
public gets stuck with
a picture like
'Goliath'
and the
powers
that be,
the authority
structure that finances
all of this to happen, does not seem
in the slightest concerned that consiousness is being
compromised in the most grevious ways, the only agency on Earth
capable of letting loose a howl against these at Nasa so you can see
the problem, the more the problem of 'Goliath' is explored, the
more it becomes a question of political science,
not astronomy
Here
is the image
I like to call 'Goliath'
neets the Tooth Fairy' an image concocted
by Nasa renouned professional artists to show to the
world what Nasa thinks is the bottom line as to what is happening
at nebula Eta Carina. A cynic's interpretation can go another way, that
'GOLIATH' has been deliberately distributed as an international
fraud by Nasa as that which Nasa wants the world's public
at large to think about nebula Carinae for reasons
which can only be conjectured by lesser
intelligent pychiatry stuff
GOLIATH
Oh,
I've always
wanted to mention, and
this seems a good place to do so, that
Marshal McLuhen once asked me if I would give some of
his seminars for him at his Coach House institute at the University
of Toronto in October of 1969. I turned him down. I didn't officially
turn him down it was just that at that time I had some poetry notes
stored in a wooden crate box in the basement of a house in
Vancouver and like Pascel, couldn't let it lie, had
to get back to that box, had to get back to
Vancouver, left Mr. Mcluhen behind,
hitchhiked west, got to that
box, and the rest is,
never mind, the
universe
never
turned
at twice
the speed because
of what I dredged out of that box
So
you are
wondering who
I am, or who I think I
am. I like to think of myself as a
communicator, irregardless of the media, or the message
|
|---|
Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004 form A & O 3 3
|
Click google logo for site search
For the world's most comprehensive searches use
|
|---|
Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home
| DRUMBALLIA | ODDESSY | CLIFFR | CONTACT |