FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS IMAGE TEMPLATE
Picture the kind of physics in 'fundamental briefs'
you can gain from the above fluttering image
RISKY CONJECTURES ARE NEXT - BUT RISK IS IN DIRECT
PROPORTION TO EVENTUAL SUCCESS - AND A FAILED INSIGHT
CAN BE THE PARENT OF AN INSIGHT THAT COMPLETELY SUCCEEDS
SEEN BY SOMEONE ELSE - risky insights don't scare me - GM
1 Flipping the image results in the alternating
Up/Down becoming Down/Up (flip in spin).
2 Flipping the string (image) end-over-end results
in a steady state (standing) wave
3 Flipping an end forward, then back, as the point of
center travels along a vector results in a carrier
wave of 'diameter' measure.
4 Rotating the string in half arcs around a point of
center, in either flutter or continuous motion results
in forms whose measure is 'radius' rather than diameter.
5 Zigzagging also has something to report.
6 Picture solar orbits in a containment speeded up to
atomic speeds, the planets and moons orbiting at
velocities significantly approaching the speed of
light, and you have just breached the dimensional
gap between cosmic (large scale and very large
scale dimensional measures) and subatomic particle
interactive wavelengths (Compton).
Stop a planet or moon in midstride by interfering
with its path and you have a particle (instant
conversion from momentum energy to kenetic energy
and heat and fragments). (Particle state in duality).
Pass the planet or moon through a slit grate wide
enough to accomodate certain orbital sizes so the
object passes through and you have wavelengths
(wavelength state in duality).
The solar system per se nicely models particle
Mass and Wave duality, and photon energy/wave
duality. There is no one, or the other, in a
duality, both are combinant in a single form
of action (planet and orbit).
7 Perfect eclipse states which have no mass objects
(no gravity weighing objects) are a different class
since momentum - tied to mass - is not present.
8 My imaging abilities are sufficent that I can even
envision galaxies being formed in 'notes'
in fluttering deep space. Risky
hypothesis yes, but bad
physics no.
|