ROGUES GALLERY QUICK DESCRIPTIONS

FLYING DOG BONES
FLYING DIAMONDS
FLYING CHEVRONS
FLYING CHORTLES
FLYING DOMINOS
FLYING DOUBLES
FLYING COMMAS
FLYING CARPETS
FLYING ISLANDS
FLYING FLARES
FLYING DOMES
FLYING HOOKS
FLYING OVALS




THE SUBJECT IS FLYING TRIOS

Flying acrobats, because they change shape and change positions in orbits around giant stars. Some are in cross solar pairs, in common orbit on one side of a star, and the other

Click on image above to see details of two solar crossing orbit planes containing trios

By far the most common kind are flying ovals. Flying dominos (square rectangles) and stretched form (flying diamonds) are also common

Unique characteristics include a middle member (position b) which is usually brightest and most clearly formed. The end member (position c) farthest out is larger, the inner member (position a) is smallest. No exception to this has been seen where the (position a) member is larger, however exceptions occur where (position c - farthest out) seems brightest

The distance between (position a) and (position b) is noticably less than between (position b) and (position c) in tidal trios. This may seem a simple question of parallex, however, trios behind the plane of a star are also distributed in (short gap - long gap) array, which means gaps are intrincic, only the relative size of each gap is due to parallax varying proportionately according to view angle along line of sight

The above criteria lead strength to a conjecture that the middle tidal is the anchor, gravitationally pulling ahead (tidal c) when (tidal c) lags, and pulling back (tidal a) when (tidal a) moves ahead

In this middle position, (tidal b) is most in a recurrant resonance zone, getting dynamic engineering information from both (tidal a) and (tidal c) thereby constantly re-enforcing its own flavors explaining sharper details in (tidal b), and passing the flavors back out to the other two tidals - a conjecture in lack of any other

MIGRATING TRIOS

Alpha Ari
Beta Peg
Beta Per
Regulus

Not a unique class but rarely seen, different Dss plates show shift in a trio's position, revealing orbit in progress, the rareness is in strong shift in light frequency luminance between out in the clear, and partially obscured by zodiac haze as a trio glides around or behind a star, further, migrations are seen from one Dss plate to another and variants in the photo quality between plates is conciderable. Migrations seen indicate only minor rather than major motion has occurred from one position seen to the next

I have seen only seven migrations indicated enough to be pointed out as migrators, many other possibles have been seen but it is not easy to point to them and say hey! without grinning sinfully, because trios change shape as they migrate - ergo - can't tell which is a valid migrating hit, also, some I have declared migrating may be duds, and, those declared are in orbits declenting close to edge-on, any which may be polar - that is - looking down from above a solar system, are not easy to identify, so no polar view migration in orbit is shown

MIGRATING TRIOS IN SCALAR FORMATIONS


Movement in orbit (as seen between two different plates) is slight, it cannot be said with certainty that migration has occurred from one side of a star to another during a time period between two different Dss plates of the same star, where now a trio is in a position where no trio occurred in the other plate

Migrating trios are distinguished from merely different trio(s) appearing in contra orbit on the other side of a star as well, showing orbital disk. Migrators appear displaced and transfigured between two Dss plates showing possible movement in orbit, and none permanency in morphology (which seem constantly in flux in fluctuation and oscillation)

I have peered diligently but have not seen an occurrence of a trio migrating successively through three Dss plates - there are eight Dss plates possible in total (Poss1=4 and Poss2=4) but more than enough images are missing some plates

Second problem is there is no rule as to which plates, or set of plates, contains the best hits. In some cases Poss1 plates contain more tidal information, in some cases an infrared plate contains useful. The library of Poss1 plates is skimpy, many pissing or missing, which is the third intrinsic problem


Problem four is picture quality. For instance the flying hooks were spotted in an Alpha Ari infrared plate which was nearly black when downloaded. Some plates are rich with objects seen the moment the picture is dished onscreen by Dss prior to download. In one of its plates giant star Vega has a splatter gun of orbiters outstandingly visible, particularly long thin island ovals, and chortles

The sidecar Alpha Ari image above has been deliberately shown in a first simple stage of enhancement to show that work needs to go into an image before making its salient details clear enough to show without having to explain uncertainties, this image would require several further image adjustments before being self evidently satisfying, the Vega image linked in the paragraph above is easier to factor, except, in the Vega image the reverse is the problem - how to downturn the solar glare and crank up other reostats to more expose the dimmest chortles

Once downloaded things can get interesting very quickly. For instance, ruling out plate flaws is the sheer abundant physics found in objects such as the flying hooks, for instance a leading edge of each falls in a perfectly straight line to the star's center, whereas the cross section size of each has a spectrum quality, with a mathematics possible for analyzing, termed 'domino ratios' and described in the Trios.htm page

Separating distance has not been shown in the domino ratios illustration at right, click on image to see the full array of domino ratios in the trio of hooks - (width - thickness - height - separation)

Distance from star is the fifth parameter, indicated in orange. Distance will be more differential according to eccentricic arc at any given position in orbit. A quantum gravity orbital physics is forming on the front page, way beyond me using self aquired skills which do not include quantum mechanics based on derivative variable equations

The balloon is my artwork, tossed in to lighten the stress load of this page, the artwork done in 1980 which makes it a bit prophetic

The domino ratio vision for hooks orbiting Alpha Ari is askew seen only in 2 dimensions at long distance in parallax

In real time close up at Alpha Ari (if these hooks still exist still orbiting as a tidal trio) the domino ratios spectrum will be substantially altered in appearance, even if back in the same position back with the same hooked finger look, in close up the real proportions might be scary, for instance length of each hook might be longer compared to width as if starving inch worms stretched out along uniform angled slants in orbit, the amplitude height of each worm small in comparison to the long axis wavelengths, in comparison to the frequency distances apart (commercial radio stations use amplitude, wavelength, and frequency for broadcast, which are based on photon physics in particular FM takes advantages of frequencies which includes narrow bandwidth modulations, in the hooks narrow bandwidth includes separation, and width of each hook, in information networking the tilt of each hook, and its transvectoral slant angle, are analogous to phase shift, spin, and angular momentum). How many different ways to count thee, get busy oh thus



Photons containing angular momentum (as well as spin), illustration by research physicists. The hooks certainly contain both spin (acrobats), and angular momentum gained in volume step by step by the mass size of each successive hook. In the photon illustration, polarity is the slant angle of each curl, and phase is the distance between each curl in peak and valley beats along the wavelength



Phase anomaly is apparent in the trio of hooks, the two beats between the three tidals are unalike, meaning the three are out of phase, however again the spectre of parallax illusion has to be evoked, if seen in real time in full 3d is the separating distance still anomalously out of phase, or is the separating distance identical. Identical phase distance has not been seen in tidal trios, but then, who can say if any trio examined in this page is stretching out strictly on target straight out from the star across the page, so that even in 2D the phase can be seen correctly

Both polarity and phase shift are shown in this autocad illustration of projected snowflakes by Meta Andrews. Polarity shift is not seen within tidal trios there is only one polarity in each of the three in a trio, however the polarity drifts continuously as the trios transfigure in unison proceeding along in orbit. As for phase, not enough migrations have been seen to determine if phase anomaly is mutable or a constant per trio, or even exists, phase anomaly will not exist if three tidals are equidistant apart, but, this has not yet been seen



When the exploded autocad snowflakes are sandwiched into one layer, they become the master template of any ordinary snowflake. The sandwiched snowflake is at the bottom of the stack



These hoops are not standing upright they seem (in stereo) to by laying back, which means the height of each hoop is much greater than height we can see without true full strength stereo. Knowing the height is easy if numerous photos of captures in orbit are analyzed we don't have to go out there with a tape measure used like a rodeo rider uses a lasso

CHTHONIAN - A PROCESS OF ATMOSPHERIC BLOWOFF

This artist's conception looks familiar. Of a planet in proximity to a star and having its atmosphere blown off, astronomers conjecture the blowoff will have a look and feel somewhat as illustrated, the belief enforced by accute telescope evidence that the heavier atoms (oxygen and carbon) in the upper atmosphere of the planet is an oval, not round, creating a telltale ellispoidal shape for the upper atmosphere envelope

A chthonian at giant star Vega

Zoomed stereo reveals that the center hot is a slim cylander not a sphere, and that the irregularity in the left rim is enough to suggest a dustup underway with another chthonian. The image cannot determine if this is merger or breaking apart. One thing is certain, chthonians can interact within the bounds of their circumpherences (collide), not surprising at Vega where such a large number horde in a small space around the star



A center rod suggests another disk, sharply decanted at an angle, much smaller, inside the bigger outshell. A planet, if this is correct, is very small inside the inner disk. Island ovals, if the above remark is true, have two disks an outer, and an inner shielding the planet itself

At Vega - colliding gliders











At Vega

An excellent example of a chthonian - note the blow-off disk is not perfectly ecliptic in real life, it is warped by tidal forces, and, in this instance, there are two hot inner glowing sources the second either in the ring or juxtaposed by parallax view. (Parallax view means simply how we see here in line of sight to out there to an object, what we see or think we see, may not be how the object actually looks out there - ergo, parallax for lack of any other suitable word in the dictionary)

The oval with glowing rim and small glowing center, serves as a good example of ovals in generic protoype, objects with architecture

A solid planet is nearby, small dark dot in the upper portion of the picture

If seeing is believing, the ovals and island ovals seen in the teeming multitudes around large stars are gas and supergas giant planets with wind blown hair (so to speak). A hot center is warming from a planet

Tidal objects which are square or flat large rectangles may be planets with large astroid belts extending around them similar to moons but many, if with high tilt in their eccentricity the outreaching horders can fill a trapezoid box especially if the most tilted in orbit are also the most eccentric, which then, if island oblong in their orbital range not circumpherentially gathered round (modelling our own asteroid belt), the square corner trapezoids will appear wide flat and thin in one snapshot, and more or less square in another, as the island oblong rotates precessing around the planet's point of center. Diamonds (trapezoid square with one of its diagonals flattened) are a possible description for orbiting squares but no guarantee

Squares at Betelgeuse



Diamonds at Vega



Stretched dominos at Aldebaran



DOG BONES

The above paragraph can also explain dog bones, these would be a disk belt around a planet, thick in the middle, thin in the outer orbiting parts with high tilt above and below the ecliptic declension and eccentricity extending in the upper and lower outreaches, eccentricity extending less in the middle ecliptic, this will form a square and will form a rectangle (which can be called a domino)

Now you have just had a quick introduction to a glossary of terms for objects orbiting giant stars, without further confusing by an illustration for each term since each term can occur through a broad range of topologies while still falling within the description of the term. All popcorns in a bucket steaming hot just popped look the same but each looks different within the broad range of it's term 'popcorn'

The glossary of terms is different for the limited set of terms in our own normal star solar system, these toplogies being only few in kind and only a few terms handle them, including hard planets, gas planets, moons, asteroids (irregular shaped) and comets (like popcorn all topologically the same but come in a wide range of looks and sizes)


A few acrobats

Dogbone at Vega - highly tilted chaotic eccentricic inner disk may explain the squareness of the bone ends inside the rim, the tilt is helter skelter up and down a broader declension, not constrained in a narrower zone or plane such as our solar system's asteroid belt



Highly magnified flying flare at Alpha Peg - it defies description, perhaps, a refractive reflection of machine parts from inside the telescope but ohhhh careful that's wayyyy to far over the edge of the boiling pit where theories wail true false true false up and down in the bubbles. Couldn't look more like a giant hand. Bubble Bubble







A well formed island oval at Sirius



Here are three in a row at Sirius, (position b) the middle a well formed island oval with a hot dot at center, this could be a normal oval seen on edge. Islands abound at Sirius. Sirius is so big it almost fills the Dss dashboard, ascension shifted to the right (click on word 'abound') reveals more outer area with island ovals noticable in quantity. A dark area (no stars) surrounds a nebulosity in the lower left of the 'abound' frame

THE FLYING CIRCUS - A BUSY STELLAR ZOO OF ACROBATS AND PERFORMERS

Click on images for large where click icon appears

At Alpha Ari - flying fish hooks

A recurring trio of fish hooks, this is the only recorded instance (circ Feb 5 2004) of strands of dna found formed in a domino ratios configuration. Another name could be flying nimrods but this name would probably be hard to remember, hard to explain

Three dots are hard planets, the scale does not instantly reveal if Earth sized, moon sized, or other, but assume a systemic range (from larger than Earth but not a gas bag, to Jupiter' moon sizes) is general for hard dot planets. Hard planets are everywhere in Dss star plates, nowhere in enough numbers to accomodate missing mass gradients, the combined mass of hard planets out there is miniscule in comparision to the mass of just one giant star in the space the giant star occupies as home







A detached chunk of dung near the star, two small ovals a bit further out, background stars seen through the artificial haze of the mantle. The detached, is perhaps a proto orbiter in an amorphus shape in that it has 3d definition not unlike the outline of a seagull in flight

Gamma Uma has flung some dung. You can see it in it's light halo

At Gamma Uma - large hook in the halo



At Alpha Ari - flying ovals and flying islands



There could be four in a row (lower right) if so this is the only four seen while preparing this page

At Alpha Ari - flying chevrons and flying diamonds

Flying chevrons (left) at Alpha Ari, just beyond a light amplifying nearspace telescope ring filled with sundry hobnobs, at right a string of three flying diamonds (slanted four corner trapezoids)



Starname Alpha Ari is not to be confused with starname Alpha Eri whose images are also here and there in this page



At Alpha Ari - migrating trio



It is not unreasonable to expect these two are related. From a rearground position near the star, three squares (magenta) though small are concentrated mass units and easy to see, migrating forward? on an ecliptic path seen nearly edge-on to become hooks (silver) whose design is a lower level of mass per unit area

If correct, a migration supposition also supposes major morphs are taking place in the acrobats during the distance of arc travelled

The three to the rear (magenta) are in the Poss2 R plate, the hooks are in the Poss2 infrared plate. I find it possible to swing the three hooks pivoting to the right to become vertical lines, then tilt the lines up until they become squares, and move them back, to match the three rear squares - their proportionate spacing seems the same - which means major morph has not occurred so much as re-alignment in parallax as the trio swings forward? in orbit around the right flank of the star

But, who am I to say, with a kaleidescope gift of vision, that what I kaleidescope with inner perception is correct, it is, just that, kaleidescope vision is easier to pursue than a total morphology worse than inchworms which change sex as you stare watching the floor show

Revolving? left, revolving? right around the star, these two Alpha Ari static images cannot say - their time stamp will disclose orbital direction

At Alpha Ari - another migrator

The hooks show up only in the infrared Poss2 plate which has no other flyers visible. Two other plates have flyers, two boldly seen in the Poss2 R plate (green). The Poss2 B plate (grey) has several flyers skattered around, including the only string seen of four tidals in a row. Two flyers shown in magenta seem to be in a same orbital disk plane whose path arcs over the center of the star. Watch what happens when flyers from the two plates are superimposed - a migrating trio is seen in the left above the horizon centerline







The string of diamonds to the right (in grey) are the rear position of the migrating hooks shown in composite in the hooks image further above

At Beta Peg - two migrating trios



Two flying trios seen migrating through portions of their arcs in orbits. The flyers on green backgound are from one Poss2 plate, those on dark background another Poss2 plate, the two on dark dark background have both moved in closer to the star due to parallax

These flyers are very acrobatic, changing shape from dominos high up, to lower nearer the upper horizon. On the right, three ovals have moved in closer almost overcovering when superimposed telling us the ecliptic disk plane of this orbit is almost horizontal



The second migrators are in an orbital disk that is seen more on edge, the two Poss2 orbiter positions almost overlay, and in the composite above, the trio in Poss1 (re-appeared as chevrons to the left below the centerline horizon) fall in an almost straight line through the star center to the Poss2 positions



Discrete peer by eyeball deems that both flyers have migrated roughly the same distance between the two plates, this is consistent with other migrators whose distance travelled in the time span between Dss photos is not great



Trio high up and large, in the time span between two plates, has dropped down almost to circumnavigate behind the star (dark background insert)

Amorphous ovals flexed into chevrons, and trapezoids with square corners still square cornered are clear enough in the 3rd Beta Peg (Poss1) plate. Ovals in trio consolodated into spheroids are not seen in the Poss2 plates

At Beta Per - exploding trio...z o O M

At Beta Per - a migrating tidal trio, moving from straight line of sight obscured by light halo (small trio at left), out into a spread in more open view in a tilted ecliptic orbit path (exploded trio at right)



Click for full scale view of Beta Per migrating trio

At Beta Per - many small round ovals



The (position c) flying domes seems bolder but actually the (position b) dome - middle - is brighter, obeying the rule that middle is best formed, and has a rush arcing out from the center. The term 'dome' is a misdemeaner, more apt is warped sickle cell, expecially (position c), since like many ovals the (position c) member is torqued destroying a pure disk shape



At Regulus - a migrating trio



The view above assumes the trio is orbiting away, closer to the camera in orbit (red false color) and then farther away (blue false color) the trio growing smaller, its objects closer together, and dipping down as it hurtles around the rear crescent of the orbit appearing in a snap shot in time closer to the axis of the star and closer down to the central horizontal horizon through the star

Flying dominos in one view, cum flying carpets eased back into rearspace and settling toward the horizon behind the star, probably a conciderable distance greater than seen in mere 2d parallax has occured in the time span between the two photos, amount of shrink in object'sizes, and spacing apart of the trio which is converging in parallax toward a straight line of sight probably almost a single object when the trio has decended further? behind the star. As being constantly said, only the time stamp of the photos will tell if these are orbiting forward, or to the rear

Even with quadruple hits of trios in migration, the plates of themselves do not tell us in which direction orbiters are orbiting, that is, clockwise, or anticlockwise. For this information we turn to facts and stats persuent the Dss home page and find that ....

Poss1 came first. These are called Schmidt plates and are circ 1950-58, their digital scanned size is 1"

Poss2 came second, also called Schmidt plates, circ 1987-98, their scanned digital size is 1.7"

The 1" vrs 1.7" digit scan size did not say if this is the actual real size of nearly 1000 plates per run, or, if each of the 1000+- plates was scanned down to parsed digital standarization plate sizes. Hummmph

The plate summaries I saw did not detail which came before or after, blue, red, or infrared filters, neither did stats say at any given timedate when each filter was used, so we still do not know if the orbiters are coming up and around from behind a star, or are descending behind a star. Chop chop. Grrrr

Obviously, the information can be learned by anyone with enough keen interest to go the labor route hauling aunt charlie through the morass of link options to the kernals of truth, if it can be done without taking a bus to Dss headquarters and looking through sheets of paper. Grunt

The concept of how to make astronomy easy. Lesson 101 begins. Punch
At Gamma Uma - planetary chevrons, and a chevron in the making. Numerous ovaloids are also seen at distant farspace around the star. A horde of planets are seen around Beta Tau









At Epsilon Cma - tiny gobs of cold matter surround the center



Extremely unusual - parellel thin streaks across the light halo, as if by a silent intruder, but no sign of an intruder, otherwise, equations have to be factored explaining how a star can maintain parallel streaks, plate flaws may be incorrect - witness

In histogram, the star is sitting in a moire pattern (the silent intruder). If the star is pushing to the west in its drift in the Milky Way, the mystery of the moire is explained

These are gravity waves, their signature is seen in motions where withdrawal (moving way) stretches and broadens the wave size, and moving into compresses, in compression creation higher frequencies results. This is no different (for gravity waves) then for doppler shifts for any motions, too and fro, forward and away





Click for a midsize view in which variations in wave properties are easily seen

More gravity waves

At Beta Per - light halo interior splotchy with incandescent globs of matter



At Sigma - light halo interior splotchy with scattergun gobs of cold matter



At Beta Peg - light halo infested with mottles, some exaggerate along telescope artifacts such as light spikes, demonstating that light can attract light as a physical property bent by optics



Mottling of a different kind is at Polaris (seen having a slightly off centered inner fire), and extensively between stars in the Pleiades



At Beta Car - in infrared cold gobs seem to be concentrated in a donut ring around the star, they peter out abruptly just inside the bright inner light ring made by the telescope, and also peter out as the outermost star ring circumpherence is approached, both peterings seemingly independent of the telescope's optical contributions



At Beta Car - in blue filter, a major incandescent object near the star prime, if Beta Car is a binary with a second star, we are looking at it, otherwise, this is a particularly large orbiter, perhaps even a dwarf star experiencing chthonian separation of atoms forming a glowing ring around an inner glowing distorted amorphous gob



In comparision, the puppy dog in infrared (left) and red filter (right)



Parallax could put this object a conciderable distance behind the star, in which case blast from the star could be chthoniating correctly into an atmosphere blowing not just away but also sideways, in an oval disk tilted backwards, the lower rim lifted forward toward us. It is possible the object itself is blowing its own horn, the low resolution qualities of both images cannot tell us which is event and which is speculation

At Alpha per - (not to be mistaken with Alpha Peg)



Something happened here when the Poss2 Dss infrared plate was being managed. Looking everything like an onion on the roof of the Kremlin in Russia, spirellic swirls include light amplified by light along the light spikes. Otherwise, spirellics sweep across the star, and around it as if a circumpherencial blow of flares was being swept around in rotation by global magnetic storms, or something. Have a look at the original in true scale

There is horizontal rastering in thin bands dragging streaks sideways in image smears, I think the rastering is distorting a kremlin onion that constitutes some actual event effecting the star's visible output



I know, it is no fun sounding like a scientific clutch who uses metaphisics books to prove physics, (The Cosmic Onion), bowing and scraping I plead flabbergast - I do not know whether to accept this image as real but cannot see how not to, even given its obvious rastering faults, rastering is typically a factor of digital line scanning not fixed plate focus, and I have never seen a scanner generate a kremlin onion (digging the original negative out of storage will answer the question)

At Alpha Per - ejecta

Some solar ejecta is visible in the very noisy (cluttered, unclear) Poss1 A plate, not easily seen the glare of the sun was reostated down to allow more reostating up of the ejecta enough to show it is there

There is some stability in the star's environment - two small chthonians are close together up near the top of the frame

At Arcturus - numerous long thin island ovals, just one set of three is seen (in a dim tidal trio), some dark dots of indiscriminant kind and indeterminant nature



Next, closeup of a cluster of Arcturian island ovals (chthonian objects assuming chthonian includes large planets not merely earth size)



At Vega



Two anomalies - in Dss poss1 red filter plate, an unusually large round gob, plus several small hard dot planets (look hard you will see them), a tiny white comet transiting the star (left). Three odd shapes together in a trio (right), the middle not unlike a cell dividing, or two cells joined

At Alpha Hys

In the Alpha Hya Poss2 infrared plate, four brown dwarfs are spotted, two are faint. Brown dwarfs are a big topic in Cosmicastronomy and have their own brown dwarfs page






A star with moon clouds near Gamma ori (in Gamma Ori red filter plate)

NEXT

The Gamma Ori blown up star factory

A strew of stars stretched out in a blither of fragments is not a galaxy, only a countable number of stars are seen in highly incandescent gas and or sundry material

The look and feel is a small vocal star cluster has been rent assunder by something of the magnetude of a fireworks factory explosion, the invisible something has distributed strew in short and long streaks across orders of magnetudes of light years in a distant starry backdrop across space, the stars in the exploded factory are of the magnetudes of the deep space background surrounding Gamma Ori, so have to be distant by at least the rear distance of that focal range



Click for exploded star factory large
Click for exploded star factory extra large

At Atlas

One of the seven sisters called the Pleiades, (also M45), mottling in the realm is very apparent in the blue filter Dss plate, not at all seen in either infrared or the red filter plate

Smaller star Pleione is above

As seen next below, mottle is extensive inside the light halos of both stars and concentrates to the edge of the light ring. It is obvious the light rings did not gather the mottles to them, instead the light rings may be revealing a natural tendency for light to amplify light, that is, the mottles are dim but illuminated by an intrinsic ability of strong artificial light sources to amplify naturally occurring radiations, such as that from the objects called mottling

Mottling at Alas in the blue filter plate



Also seen abundantly clear in the blue plate, is cross polarization in the moon clouds where bands of strands align at right angles to stars where facing each other, which means the star's winds are effecting distant material close to other stars forming right angle results to the strike angle of the winds

Click for Alcyone full size



Gendler view of M45



In this Gendler view showing polarizations in the moon clouds, a red flush at the image bottom shows where a different mixture of syndry matter adrift in the Pleiades field of vision, the red drift is not of the same material components as the polarized moon clouds



Histogram of the Dss red filter plate shows the same polarization in bands of moon clouds facing mutual stars, no mottling is seen

THE FLYING CIRCUS - A STELLAR ZOO OF GYRATING ACROBATS AND FLUCTUATING PERFORMERS

At Alpha Ari - flying hooks



At Regulus - flying fronds



At Alpha Peg - flying squid



At Alpha Peg - flying flares


At Beta Per - flying domes



Island ovals may be gobs seen on edge, on partial edge they are ovals, nerly edge on they become island to our cameras, this could be unquestionably true except island ovals are typically large, much larger than typical ovals, which are usually larger than typical gobs which can be more or less fully circular. In view of their size it is possible island ovals are a distinct class which will be island shaped regardless of the parallax of their sighting

At Capella - flying chortles



At Vega - flying chortles



At aldebaran - two sets (doubles) of trios merged along the same radial spoke



Positions 2, 4, and 6 each have a tiny hot dot at center



Modicum of stereo reveals the trios are each in a separate plane (two tilts in orbit) the 1st, 3rd, and 5th members are behind the plane of members 2, 4, 6, which explains that there are not six tidals in a spoke, rather 3 each are in 2 spokes the spokes narrowly separated by a slight horizontal displacement in altitude in disk, with both spokes falling along the same parallax in radian degrees around the hub, it happened at the moment this Dss picture was taken, question is did the six merged in parallax sustain, or dissolve to two trios far separated shortly after (topology can get wordy, try publishing this as a theory, try publishing it anyway)

At Sirus - flying miscellaneous doubles



At Vega - two sets of three, doubles sideslanted



Modicum stereo reveals how each trio occupies a coherent plane. A euclidean line can be drawn across each trio, with each trio's tidal in the same ecliptic alignment along the line, which slightly downdips it is not straight across the screen, however modicum stereo cannot tell if the trios occupy the same declension in orbit because we are looking into a converging stereo depth backward along a tangent into the star hub off screen in the upper left, we can see that the (bigger) lower trio is closer to the camera



Two sets of flying diamonds, three each set, side slanted, that is, aligned in phase shift processional rather than along a single radial spoke to the star which is further off screen upper left

At Alioth - three amorphous ovals at a slant angle



At Betelgeuse - flying diamonds



At Sirus - flying commas



At Regulus - flying carpets



At Regulus - flying dominos





The dominos and carpets are both at Regulus, and both have edges aligned against a euclidean straight edge vectored to the center of the star

It moves them into a new physics class, whose formulations may include a new branch of mathematics termed domino ratios

At Alpha Eri - flying chevrons



At Alpha Eri - flying ovals



A quick look at the zoo in an Alpha Eri master plate is worth the effort
A chevron in the making is seen at Gamma Uma

At Vega - flying dogbones





Both dogbones are in middle position in concert with two dim chortles in each trio. Look more to Vega in the Trios.htm page showing chortles in tandem which are a cluster of double sets two chortles each



The dogbones occupy mid positions within split chortle tandems, demonstrating that chortles though low in radiance (hardly any visible heat), are substantial in mass

The word spoke is used, it means straight line out from a Hub. Spokes in the rings of Saturn are an excellent example of lineal straight out, gently undulating in Saturn's rings because these at Saturn are gravity waves revealed by energy excited condensates. Earth's magnetic field lines can reveal themselves overhead by energy excited condensates in clouds, for example

If this image is correctly revealing (gravity waves), it reveals that gravity waves operate outside the thermodynamic system of planetary period/orbital coupling laws (which embody differential velocities according to child radius out from parent body). Gravity waves behave as spokes on a bcycle wheel, the farther out on a radius, the faster the transvector velocity. Arguments for transvector velocities for gravity waves outside the rules of gravitational coupling velocities can be made for gravity wave influences on velocities in outer parts of galaxies

At Saturn - spokes in the ring disk





Stereo reveals gentle up and down undulations in the spokes


It can be seen that some of the thinner spokes do not point to the center of the planet. Spokes directed to a star, plus drifting near a star, are explored in the Flyers.htm page.

Small knobs are seen in the rings, these do not seem to be playing games with the spokes. Several low mass small chunks can be seen in standout afforded by stereo view, orbiting in the rings

The above 2 spokes views are of identical image, each with slightly more 3d one view to the next, using the two views a technique to help gain some measure as to how much the spoke waves are not flat, also how much can be learned by modicums of stereo, for example small lumps in the rings stand out sharply in the second stereo view compared to the first view



At Vega - a crowd of island ovals all dutifully pointing along their long axis to the center hub of the star

CRITERIA

Do not decieve yourself for even a fraction of a second. These objects have been captured in Dss photographs of nearby giant stars which top the list for brightness in the nightsky. None of these objects are a creation by a scammer's skills these are recorded in camera's records in moments of time recently passed.

Objects in the flying zoo around stars are transitory, illusive sometimes striking in standout, and they transfigure in tandems and trios as they orbit. Picture the rings of Saturn 100 times as big, around a body 10 times larger than Jupiter, the rings the edges of ovals yinning in one part of their orbit, yanging in another, three Jupiter-ring ensembles together all uniformly morphing as orbit force revolves the planets with rings all in a straight line yinning and yanging in an etheric choreography as they serenely glide around their star, tilted one way all three together, then another, constantly changing their paradigm, while intrinsically maintaining their three body trio

This is not how busy planets scam, it is how they behave. Crochet hoops like this, in a row, are so bizarre, they have to be believed. And not a single disco turntable in the world at the present time (circ Feb 2004) has an equation to explain them. Ovals, yes, perhaps quickly explained, but HooPS! This is worse than discovering the ketchup on your best tie is changing

You see, the problem is, hoops have no gravitational points of center



At Alpha Phoenicis - three small ovals



PROVISO

I am aware that motion picture and video cameras will spray a trio of light refection created objects from a bright source in their lens, the trio recognizable smallest nearest the source largest furthest away, usually in these lens constructs the largest is the brightest and the constructs can take up a sizeable portion of the area viewed

In the early 90's I saw witness to an image being taken live by copter over a certain area of Ottawa a beautiful full colored six sided construct in the screen over an area just to the north of Ottawa across the Ottawa river in fact directly over a 4,200 sq ft former international architectural award winning home in Aylmer in whose basement was temporarily stored all of my good and unfinished physics research projects the superimposure of cube and sphere in the lens radiating precisely from my location so clear cut I thought of making attempt to get a copy of footage from the TV station but could not - no money - which is the reason why the temporary storage over there across the river in the first place

With such events in mind I have always looked upon trios in Dss plates as perhaps merely lens constructions, expecially big bold trios, but have not been forced to accept fakes in that none are alone in a plate and some plates are fully saturated with Chthonians for instance in a Dss Poss1 plate, the whole screen, when the image is enhanced, is filled with chthonians and I do not know how these could be faked by glass. Dew mist or rain perhaps on the lens, except, how can rain drops falling on my head have domino ratio physics

Email note to astronomers in GB. Hello. Is your telescope able to photograph nearby giant stars, in particular, does it still use photographic plates. Put a Soho filter over the star to eliminate the star's overbrillience to see if your telescope can capture objects in orbit A hard planet has been spotted floating in the center of the Omega nebula, concidering the amount of drizzling rastering the Hubble Acs camera has to do just to get a simple picture, there is not little but no chance the hard dot is an error popping up consistently in (...insert high number) of individual drizzle free Hubble Acs frame areas used to composite the final Hubble image of the Omega nebula

Drizzle looks like this (next). Hubble engineers have to pick and nick their way through such a cabbage patch to factor a nice image. The drizzle is caused by an intrinsic error in the Acs lensing which inputs a line of poor resolution across the middle of every snapshot. The line moves like an astigmetism in an eyeball whereever the eyeball focuses so Hubble image engineers have learned to live with it by patching in richly coded clumps of extra software in the download data stream from Hubble, as one way of accomodating





At Aldebaran - oval between two indistincts

I have gone the distance of trying to catalogue a zoo of object kinds and shapes in tandems and trios orbiting giant stars and think their tidal trio orbits (in seeming defiance of standard Keplerian/Newton orbit/period laws) are because the outer pulls on the middle, and the inner of the three also pulls on the middle, sharpening the appearance of the middle object in a trio, further, when accelarates ahead or lags it is pulled back into position by the others, the inner when pulling ahead is pulled back by the middle, while the outer when it starts to lag behind is accelarated ahead by the middle

The result over time is a self sustaining self checked trio orbiting in a self locked straight line radial out from a star

I have also gone the effort of displaying flying zoo acrobats in stereo, even though the stereo in these grainy original Dss back and whites can be modicum at best (in some cases striking) textures in the flyers is noticed enough to tell a bit about each via the modicum of stereo seen, adding colors helps enormously, selecting colors more or less at random for best effect

Author interjects - the project has become very unweildy. At my age encroaching the great horizon into geriatric short term memories, it becomes noticable not holding quick instant info for more than the immediate moment it takes to act on it, plus, the overwhelming download onslaught of hundreds of plate images with many more in the hundreds comprising zooms and enhancements, how to name them all, how to keep track of them all expecially similar greek starnames, how to rigorously index plate versions and filters, no way. In view of this, I cannot guarantee all stars are identified as correct, more, that all Dss plates identified are correct. Some plates are unmistakable and there is no problem there. There is no problem anyway in that I have come to the conclusion that existence in Dss plates is intriguing enough without at this point knowing exactly what plate has exactly what intriguing object. Hope this leaps me out of the frying pan and over the fire

Plus getting cocky. I twice set forth on a long saga each lasting several hours compositing views showing trios migrating in orbit, the second an expecially elaborate large and unweildy image showing migration of two trios each in three different positions seen through three different Dss plates, only to discover that I had merged trios from two entirely different stars. Cocky is good, until discovering the mistake. There was a time in recent past when I would simply not have made such error. The time has come to declare information overload - the max has peaked. Time to call it quits, take a holiday from brain strains


At Alpha Eri

One thing I have learned over the past decade is to trust my instincts, I never waste time, unless there is some profit in it. So why the peculiar interest in Alpha Eri. I went back to Dss, downloading every image, which itself was an illumination in that confusion is inherent due to the fact that the Poss2 B and Poss1 A plates are identical, both (2119x2119) both with the same lost eyelash in the photo near the star, for that matter all of the Poss2 plates are flawed with an image fadeout at the top, two of the images were hustled by someone's strip of roughly cut white paper across the top. Poss1 A and Poss2 B plates identically have a cropping at the top where the image simply fades away to nothing before the top of the frame

First thing I found investigating the image (Poss2 A - splattered with trios) is a cross solar radial, linking trios in a way suggesting a disk with trios orbiting on either side of the star. A second set of trios (square), vectored to an area near the top of the plate which was faded out but here a huge boost in image density by gamma correction revealed a tandem pair of long strings two out of a possible three the third simply absent in the absence of film media, nicely however the tandem strings cross vectored straight to the squares on the other side of the star, demarking another orbital disk zone

The trans solar disks are detailed in the black and white, click on image for large. The tandem strings are profiled in the magenta view, click on it for a full scale large image

An Alpha Eri, oval with a dark disk inside, plus two tandem wavy strings



At Alpha Eri - flying acrobats everywhere



Poss1 plate is busy with flyers and acrobats, which surround the star in a furry fullball of orbits including polar and equatorial, a wide range of wranglers - too bad other plates are not available to show more

OTHER STRETCHED OUT UNUSUAL FLYERS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING

At Regulus - disturbed trio

Trio in the making - or at an end - or in a momentary quick appear/disappear existence, in either case three fronds are present in a trio the 3rd (farthest out) is faint

More Regulus



At Alpha Peg - a recurring pair of giant squid

Two looping strings of strew, which are also in fact image recurrences - one smaller - the other larger further out on tandem radial. The two are very dim and do not enhance well in normal image, which is why the looping bottle shapes are shown in the more chattered form of histogram, next





In the two views above, hints of a trail of disturbance link the large squid and dark hole, if true, the two have been (or are) locally interactive

GM - February 19/2004 Ottawa Canada

Reference pages

Pages   Hark.htm,   Regulus.htm,   Ringling.htm,   and   Trios.htm

Pages   Planets.htm,   Planets1.htm,   and   Planets2.htm, these three pages prepared in 2001 and 2002, deal with stars and their orbital families. Planets.htm is the main page, Planets1.htm has more detail on certain stars, Planets2.htm contains redundancy (as does Planets1.htm) but usually the same material is in a different context or theme.

Brightest stars list 1. This includes greek names, which are the main name choice in Dss archives. Star names given in their original arabic are often not found in Dss.

Brightest stars list 2 - no greek, arabic and common are the names, many of the starnames used for this list are not found in Dss archives.

Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004         form   A & O 3 3