Gravitic seas made of energy, in long wavelengths (low frequencies) saturating space between galaxies, and in short wavelength high frequencies around and even in galaxies, and superhigh frequencies supershort wavelengths surrounding clusters and around (even within) stars, not to mention star forming dust field regions.

Solar system perfect eclipses, so perfectly embodied in equations which home in to absolutes when renomalized, may be 'out in the open' manifestions of Gravitic Sea wavelengths operating behind the scenes ultimately steering resistive masses into slots having the least resistent most harmonious happiness with the gravitic waves forcing the spaces taken place between planets and the planet's eccentricities in plus or minus 1+1+1 states within the greater crude motion motivating forces in the 1x1x1 powers of gravity. It means the 1+1+1 forces in the gravitic seas are more powerful than the 1x1x1 forces of gravity.

MASS EXISTS IN CHAOS.   ENERGY EXISTS IN ABSOLUTES

This is because 'gravitic seas' operate in manifestions of absolutes, whereas gravity operates in manifestations of chaos. The gravitic seas fundamentals operating in solutions of absolutes is because the fundamental prime in Gravitic Seas is the 1+1+1 actions of multiple units of 1 unit of electronnic charge force. Here then is where the quantum/cosmic state of 1+1+1 functions combines with the 1x1+x heaves and shoves in cosmic underground irregularities which seem to operate in layers, much as do elementary particle mass spectrums seem to operate in layers of rest state, stable, excited stable, and excited unstable. Notice that no unstable state can have a stable rest state in mass. Energies always do seek the most harmonious least chaotic states to exist, and decay to get there.

Which means that Gravitic Seas must have their own Grand Cosmic Unification set of properties and principles on par with or analgous to the Grand Unification schemes so far glimpsed for elementary particles.

Gravitic quarks, gravitic gluons, I don't know what these might be, but am not against the idea that cosmic quarks and gluons (or analogous equivalent) are out there. Cosmic strings theories I do not think hold any exciting answers. Entropy is the basic exciter of Gravitic Seas, the more the local entropy the higher the excitement, and the greater entropies come where gravity (masses) is conflicting with the same space occupied by Gravitic Seas.

It means the entropy in galaxies as matter is inexorably climbing uphill not petering out downhill over long eons of time. Gravitic Seas concentrations in heaves and valleys can effect red shift so the universe might in reality be a dramatically different picture than portrayed by the Big Bang's red shifting flying apart thought images.

What part Gravitic Seas play in the cosmic microwave background radiation is not an idea forthcoming from a moi' who is getting exhausted from brain bursts, except perhaps the background radiation is the bottom line frequency at which Gravitic Seas currently appear in existence, that is, there is no lower Gravitic Sea vibration energy than the current microwave background radiation, which can increase over time don't be too hasty in writing off positive entropy, which can happen because you have not only universal mass to discuss entropy, but Gravitic Seas energies to also add into your entropy formulas.

Gravitic Sea vibrations are everywhere. The Gravitic Sea is pure energy, in exchange compliment to mass.

This thinker (a moi) does not know if gravitic seas came first whose presence allowed condensation of mass, or visa versa, but the inner all seeing eye of intuition suggests gravitic seas came first and mass is condensate resulting from disturbances within the gravitic seas. Check writer's draft paragraphs 1 through 4 for attempts at trying to place a cause and effect rule of direction in conversion of 'gravitic seas' ultra cold pure energy to hot (relativistic) mass.

This is made an illumination in consciousness by the fact that Gravitic Sea harmonics extend all the way down into the realm of elementary particles and the wavelength interraction spaces between particles of different rest states (and excited) mass energies - these are all energies, expressed in wavelengths and vibrations. Whereas mass seems peculiar, existing in stages of condensate states, from elementary particle masses, to solar masses, to galaxy masses, to congealing masses of galaxy clusters, even though the masses from solar to congealing clusters are ultimately made up of bound strong force amalgums of elementary particle rest state masses.

The universe areas having congealing clusters are nothing more than areas where time is slowing down the greater the concentration of mass in the congealing. (Gravity slows time).

Suppose the seas are heaving, such that from time to time heaves in the seas compress together thwarting natural propigation of forces, the thwarting pressure may in effect attempt to slow velocities, which cannot happen in energy, the slow attempt resulting in local vortices of time slow popping into the open as mass which is essentially motionless because mass is basically a rest state manifestation without motion until urged and pushed, a yearn in mass general relativistic properties one of the forces causing mass to alter its rest state.

The time slow popping into the open is a transition state where general and special relativistic effects suddenly come into operation because mass also arrives with inertia (which seems to be en effect of charge in lump sum concentrates of 1 charge units which total whole mass conglomerates or just the 1 charge unit of a stable elementary particle such as a proton or electron).

In this sense, gravity is an end product, not a cause, of evolutionary processes and formations in a universe. And relativity operators exist because of inertia contents in each 1 unit of electronnic charge. For some reason each unit of charge wants to stay frozen in time and place and relativity operators are what allow charge units to move around and interract to form substances such at atoms, molecules, and galaxies. In Gravitic Seas, charge units may not be incorporated in gravitic waves such as is electricity incorported in electromagnetic frequencies.



In Gravitic Seas, charge may exist in countable units of 1+1+1, positive units concentrated at one end of a gravitic wave, negative units concentrated at the other end of the wave, neutral units concentrated where gravitic waves criss cross (the neutral charge units leaving gaps in the places of actual criss crosses). Which may explain prominent low and high frequency moire pattern hatching patterns seen in gravitic waves such as around super giant galaxy M101.

The question remains begged (in the intuitional thoughts of a moi') as to whether or not Gravitic Seas energies have any kind of gravitational force component, that is, does a gravitic sea wave have gravity power which can influence anything else by gravity. It seems possible, like a Neutrino which seems mass sensitive, that Gravitic Seas may be gravitationally sensitive, but this is such a fast fleeting venue in seeing the landscape within that thoughts go out the window almost faster than the thoughts can be recognized.

Talk about pushing the envelope to the edge of the table or worse to the cutting edge of tomorrow. A lot of words for a few thoughts is the result when so much of the needed information to actually KNOW, is missing.

For a gravitationally coherent distribution is a giant super cluster of galaxies, see what enhanced images of the Perseus galaxy cluster reveal. Radial rosette in the Perseus galaxy cluster.

=========== GRAVITY UNIFIED FIELDS, PROPERTIES, BEHAVIORS, MANIFESTATIONS, ETC. ETC. It is important to understand that wavelength energy does not have inertia, so gravitic seas are not bound by the rules of Relativity theories.

An explanation of how the energies of gravitic seas may be effecting the relativistic orbit of Mercury is here. An explanation how gravitic sea energy wave strands, may contribute to a Neutrino spontaniously changing state, is here.

SELF INDUCING STEADY STATE GRAVITY GENERAL RELATIVITY, PROPERTY AND FIELD EFFECTS

In the case of General Relativity involving gravity, a gravity mass in a steady state existence induces more properties in the mass field housing the gravity, for instance the Sun's radius decreases by a small amount, and the Sun's mass increases by a small amount which happens to be exactly the mass of Venus minus Mars - to the nth degree of accuracy in the digits used to describe these two masses plus the Sun's mass. An exact mass for the Sun (1.9909930 x 10 to 33 grms) is therefore predictable to very high accuracy. The equations (mine) for these gravity phenomenas generating General Relativity modifications upon matter substances are here.

I never did more equations but if ever back in top form I might try and show how to calculate the mass of the Sun from velocity in Special Relativity equations. See how the two relativities are unified, the text and equations here (the same is also linked above) show how the two relativity theories each independently introduced by Albert Einstein, are one and the same operators within a much larger set of Universal Relativity Princples, in which a number constant known as the golden section and having the numberic value (1.61803398875) turns up as the fundamental interfacing constant between the two fields of Relativity Theory.

ELECTRICAL CHARGE PROPERTIES

It has always been assumed that 1 unit of charge force propigates at the speed of light but I know of no perfect paper which establishes why this notion has to be correct - my intuitional instinct has always been otherwise, that there is no upper limit at the Speed of Light at which a unit of charge propigates. If there is no upper charge velocity limit, charge may be an excellent candidate for information flashing from one galaxy to another carried by the carrier field of gravitic seas (which are made of energy not mass).

Referring to a Telsa experiement, it was charge that located other charge and homed in to broadcast electrical volumns without wires. Assume then each galaxy has a net component charge greater than a gauge field of 1, in this situation a positively charged galaxy will sense a negatively charged galaxy at long distance and both galaxies will migrate to each other, the lighter galaxy migrating at a faster speed giving appearance that it is aiming toward the heavier galaxy but both, like a Sun and Earth, are actually travelling toward each other in proportion to their net charge field strength, which is locked in place by each galaxy's gravity power.

Long distance desire to join forces, electrical charge based, is, might be, the fundamental dynamic which draws galaxies together in collisions and clusters.

Please do not think I am trying to buck for a Nobel Prize I am well aware that such awards go to those who work out the actual equations, for instance how can guage field units of charge force draw migrating galaxies together in mergers, and how can merger yearns result in clusters of galaxies, for instance is each galaxy cluster of same charge or are positive and negative guage field charged galaxies mixed in a cluster. See what I mean, questions??? no prize until answered, if there are correct answers in the above conjectures.

UNIVERSAL CARRIER FIELD - NOT AN ETHER

Actually, the idea of gravity acting as a field co-operative in conjunction with elecricity and magnetism is not far fetched, since gravity already has a field carrier. These are the gravitic seas which can be assumed to be saturating space everywhere. Even inside a solar system assume gravitic seas exist as extremely high frequency local vibrations, as well as long range more powerful interspace vibration manifestations which reach out between stars and galaxies.

The propigation of a gravitic sea wave vibration may be slow in keeping with evolutionary time but since some waves are extremely long in length the links are already there in place between here and there, for instance to another galaxy such as Andromeda. And since inertia is not a factor in wavelengths (no Relativity principles grappling with inertias altering the states of information), tranmission time of information in the carrier field itself can be more or less instantaneous even over long light years of inertia travel time.

Who knows how long it took for the gravitic seas to be originally established. Once established, the gravitic seas continue to modify and reform, transmute and translate, transnitting carrier wave information link to link one wave end to another, to all far reaching places imaginable as well as star to star, planet to planet. In principle, gravitic sea vibration(s) wave-lengths are the carrier of the gravitational force, and the wavelength(s) energy is what is able to transmit the 'power' of different field forces.

(I hope I have got the distinction right between a wave-length (its length one end to the other), and a wavelength (what frequency and energy is contained - in the postive to negative and negative to position pole polarities - in each long gravitic wave-length).

The notion of a 'unified fields' incorporating gravity, makes more sense if it is discovered that deep space is filled with gravitic seas - which is a dense permeating all present backdrop of gravity waves of a whole spectrum as it were, which exist as energy rather than mass, an whose spectrum properties can be inferred and analysed, and which may be more analogous to gamma photon behaviors than to electromagnetic atom spectrum states per se.

GRAVITIC SEAS MADE OF ENERGY

It is important to understand that wavelength energy does not have inertia so gravitic seas are not bound by the rules of Relative Theory.

Seas of discovery - energy seas of gravitic vibrations made of coherent gravitational waves - deep space is awash in seas of energy made of waves.

MODIFYING THE INVERSE SQUARE LAW OF GRAVITY

There is reason to believe that the power of gravity increases in longer distances from a gravitational source. The reason is sourced in two illuminations, one provided by astronomers, the other provided by myself.

The first reason concerns the perplexing observation that space craft departing the outer fringes of the solar system are slowing down, slightly, but noticably. I have of course given thought to the perplexity and deem this perhaps due to reason that the strength of the gravity force is increasing the further away from the Sun. This 'deem' is because of the second reason in which 'Interface Relativity' equations done to excruciating accuracy can show that space is contracted by gravity, that a gravity body's rest mass is increased by gravity, the increase existing in the form of planet manifestations external to the Sun whose gravity causes its own relativistic increase in rest mass (the mass of Venus minus the mass of Mars exactly equals the increase in rest state mass on the Sun by the Sun's own gravity).

REASON NUMBER 1

It means (if correct) that gravity reaching across spans of empty deep space (between galaxies and between stars) is fundamentally a little stronger that the gravity which wraps the Sun's matter bound in the Sun's own radius, which (assuming Interface Relativity equations are correct) that the Sun's radius is dimished minutely as we see it from a Sun radius of rest state size if the Sun's gravitational contraction of space effect was stitched off. In the same proportion as the Sun's radius contraction, the Sun's gravity is proportionately diminished from a universal rest state value for the gravitional constant. In other words, the value of the Gravitational Constant is less by a tiny proportion at the Sun, then it is at (say) the distance to Neptune or Pluto or to any of the planets or distance out away from the Sun.

In converse point of view, since (assumed) space is minisculely contracted close around and at the Sun, space itself stretches back to normal when leaving the contracting grip of the Sun. It means a space craft heading outbound is travelling through an increased distance and at the same velocity would appear to be travelling a bit slower when travelling the larger distance. However, this effect can be expected to be very small indeed. The larger effect is had upon the outbound space craft experiencing a larger gravity vectored back toward the Sun, the effect of increased gravity continuing and accumulating through realtime as the space craft continues to travel outbound away from the Sun.

I gave conciderable thought as to whether the gravitation force was also modified by a source's own gravity and could not decide if the gravitational force was increased relativistically by general relativy factors studied for steady state bodies such as the Sun, or did gravity decrease.

At one stage I tried to break up Newton's Gravitational Constant into every single term linked into the constant's equation but could not come up with a distinction pointing to a modification of the power of gravity by a body's own gravitational force, one way (decrease) or the other (increase).

Now, with reason number one in hand, it seems possible that gravity is relativity weakened the closer to source, and the gravitational constant's force gradually returns to rest state norm the further from the source.

This 'weakened' effect can explain certain puzzles such as a conjectured missing 'fifth fundamental force' but at this point cannot resolve questions as to how much equality exists between 'diminished gravity effects', and the assumed 'fifth fundamental force'

Dateline: Thursday, Nov 16/2000. Some of the above content was under embargoed until Oct 4th/2001 (release date).

GRAVITATIONAL INVERSE SQUARE LAW WITH RELTATIVISTIC CORRECTION FACTOR

The gravitational component of the Sun (its mass) has a beta effect (b) which influences the space around the Sun. For instance light from a star occluding the Sun is seen to bend toward the Sun, because the Sun's (b) effect has shortened the Sun's radius and contracted immediate nearby space by an amount equal to (R x b) where (R) is the Sun's radius. When (D) is any distance from the Sun, the contraction for any distance from the Sun is (R+D x (b)), the effect falling off very rapidly even a short distance from the Sun.

On the other hand, hand made satellites of Earth vacinity to outer solar reaches have been observed to slow down taking longer to reach their outer wolar destinations than is anticipated by navigation programming using the Inverse Square Law (L) of gravity. This puzzling surprise has required frequent navigation adjustments by astronomers monitoring a satellite's progress outward bound.

In (L) - the Inverse Square Law - the power of gravity falls off as the square of the distance from the Sun. The dropoff in expected distance travelled can only happen if the power of gravity is not diminishing uniformly the further out as anticipated when the Inverse Square Law is used as a constant for all distances, in which, then, the Inverse Square Law is not correct.

The distance is shortened, but more correctly, the power
of gravity is stronger at a distant point than it is supposed
to be when stated by the Inverse Square Law.

If it is assumed that gravity relativisitically influences itself (just as the electron is relativistically influenced by its own velocity in an atom - the electron's rest state mass energy (mev) increases by exactly the electron's binding energy in special relativity's intrinsic increase in mass the greater the velocity approaching the speed of light - but in fact any velocity even highway speeds on Earth have some relativistic increase in the masses hurtling along the highways, in the case of the electron in Hydrogen orbit the increase is exactly and no other than the electron's binding energy), then, the Sun's rest state mass is slightly increased by the Sun's gravity component, a relativistic mass increase equal to the Sun's rest mass times 1/b.

Conversely, distances further and further away from the Sun are also
increased by beta (1/b), except the greatest influence from relativity is
close to the Sun, very nearby, almost at, even at the Sun's circumpherence.

Conversely, if the gravitational force is also increased, by the
factor (G x 1/b = G+), the subtle almost negligible increase in the gravitational force will not be felt except over long range, since each
unit distance over that long range feels the increase of G+ over the
original value of G.

In realtime, in real astronomy physics, therefore, when a Voyager Satellite reached Neptune, it was experiencing a gravity there of G+, not G, and was travelling noticably slower than it was supposed to be travelling.

Because of the relativistic factor of (G x 1/b = G+), the
gravitational force at Neptune is greater than expected
from the Inverse Square Law, by a factor of (+).

It means (D) the Distance Law, (because of relativity upon G), is actually a gradually increasing slope which departs from the Inverse Square Law (L) straight line, by greater amount the further from the Sun.

The result is a gradual slowing (or halting) of forward velocity,
beyond what the Inverse Square Law predicts for 'Velocity-at-Distance', for instance to Neptune.

The modified Inverse Square Law (Lm) - where (L) is the Inverse Square Law) - and (m) is the modification, which equals (L x 1/b = Lm), is the calculation of a satellite's velocity. Close to the Sun, close to the Earth, the modified (Lm) falloff of (G) over distance is very slight, but the farther out you go, (for instance to Neptune at 30 times further out than Earth) the more inexorably noticable the falloff in velocity will be as (G+) not (G) holds the travelling satellite with more force to the Sun the farther from the Sun.

It is possible the subtle intricacies of gravitational relativity theory can drop away completely when a proper chart is composed showing a lineal Inverse Square Law for gravity over distance, with a modified Inverse Square Law plotting showing an increasing upcurve the further away from source (the Sun), the modified curve departing further and further from the straight line plot of the Inverse Square Law.

At any point in distance (or time) along the chart the gap between the two graphs grows greater, and yet both graphs seemingly reach the end of the chart at the same length, except length cannot be at issue, unless, the created gap itself is a measure of distance when subracted from, or divided into, the distance alledgedly achieved by the Inverse Square Law.

The proposal is that the chart can show how much less an object has travelled away from the Sun in a period of time at a certain original velocity, by using the gap between the two graphs, at any point along the graphs, as a measure of how much the distance actually travelled has been shortened by the modified Inverse Square Law.

The same arguements should suppose for light travelling through the Universe. Since light bends toward a gravitational body such as the Sun the closer the light passes the body, the same can be assumed for light leaving the body, the light does not bend, rather, the travel distance is shortened yet since light can be said to travel at a constant velocity regardless of any tension effecting it, what is happening is that the light is travelling a longer distance than the tensions expect it to, the stalement results in the wavelength in the light to stretch, thereby shifting to lower apparent frequency (blue toward red).

Conversely, when you are near a strong gravitational body, for instance the Sun or standing nearby a black hole's event horizon, incoming light will appear to blueshift for the same reasons light redshifted when seen departing a strong gravity body.

In terms of the Universal frame, light travelling long cosmic distances will continue to redshift on a rising graph, the farther from source when travelling our way.

Interpreted (such as Earth as the center of the Universe since everything (except planet moons) is seen to physically travel around the Earth as the Earth revolves daily, an inexorably increasing redshift in light as a function of gravitationally tensed distance will reverse in an optical illusion of the mind (a brain fart) and appear to be redshifting light from objects travelling away from us at faster and faster velocity the farther away from our busy eyeballs across vast cosmic distances.

There is another tension which adds to the redshift. Go all the way back to the rear wall of the Universe to give lots of time to watch the light travel coming toward us. As it passed the first galaxy it bends toward the galaxy (relativity - what the heck). The next galaxy is on the other side of the light vector so it bends toward that other galaxy, then bends toward a third upward, toward a fourth downward, toward a fifth again on the same side of the light vector as was found the first galaxy. You can already see what is happening, the light is travelling a meandering path, a miscellaneous fluctuating wave path made only by the galaxies and interspace media mass densities through which the ray of light passes. Yet really notice what is happening.

The light blue shifts as it yings and 'accelarates' toward the first galaxy, red shifts as it yangs away from the first galaxy, only to blue shift again as it yins toward the second galaxy. The net effect of all of the yins and yangs equalize, and yet the light has definately travelled a longer path, yet the pathlength is not showing up in the frequency because of the yin/yang equalization, therefor has to show up in more redshift equaling the extra distance traveled banging along left to right, up to down, when passing galaxies and dense masses on its path 'straight' toward us.

Measure the total length of the wave, vrs the straight line assumed distance between a point at the rear of the Universe where the light started, and us at Earth where our telescope captured its photons. Not only has the meandering path lengthened the actual distance travelled, the accumulating content of all of the galaxies and masses intervening have also increased the red shift by gravitational relativity. By the time the light reaches us, it is not 'tired' photons, but 'modified' photons, stretched, and stretched, and stretched toward a red universal kindom at the rear wall, which is not due to a big bang.

The following illustrations are art simulations by Greydon Moore and not done by calculations in a computer.

Expanding universe - 

raisins in the cake theory - 

as a cake swells the raisins move farther 

apart while staying the same size as the cake bakes. 

A 'modified' photon concept will present serious difficulties 

to cosmologists who use big bang expansionism to plot the 

possitions of galaxies, clusters, and superclumps. In 

big bang calculations, a red shift is used to plot 

the location of a distant object according to 

how much red shift the object has. In 

reality, areas in the universe are 

dense, and thin. Light passing 

through a dense region will 

be red shifted more than 

light passing through 

regions that are 

thin. It means 

that two far distant 

galaxies which seem to have 

the same red shifts but in different 

cosmic locations do not by default have the same 

distance to them. Illustration 3 shows what can happen 



ILLUSTRATION 3 (as pictured in the mind) 



Here is what a clump of galaxies might look like if plotted 

according the big bang red shifts, the right edge us the 

observer, looking out left onto a clump of galaxies 

plotted at different distances further away in 

deep space. Suppose light from some of the 

galaxies are actually passing through 

gravitationally dense space, and 

the light of other galaxies 

is in free passage through 

near empty space as it arrives 

at Earth. Instead of a scattergun, 

the clump might actually look confined if 

all of the galaxies happen to be in a cluster close 

together rather than strewn through a spray separated by billions of light years. 



          










This 

simulation 

of galaxy cluster 

(compact in local region of space) 

vrs galaxy clump (sprayed through cosmic long distances), 

used a piece of an  M74 spiral galaxy image from Noao. Thank you 

you guys and girls who produced the image with a lot of hard 

work and profound skill with a telescope 





 
  TESTING FOR YIN/YANG EQUALIZATION IN A BRIGHT STAR PASSING
THE SUN'S EDGE, BUT NOT DISAPPEARING BEHIND THE SUN
 


Look back to the known image of the light of a bright 

star displacing in space toward the Sun as it approaches 

the edge of the Sun, just before occluding behind the Sun. 

In modification of photons by gravitational relativistic 

tensions, the light should also blue shift as it 

approaches the edge of the Sun but because of 

'yin yang equalization' the light will also 

red shift, as it pulls away from the Sun. 

And therefore no shift in frequency is 

observed. However, in the occluding 

example the bright star disappears 

just as it is blue shifting, yet 

this still does not tell us 

anything new except to 

concur that doppler 

shifts occur in 

the presence 

of enough 

gravity. 

We will have 

to look for a star 

that is glancing by, passing 

very close to the Sun disk but not actually 

touching the Sun or disappearing behind it. In this 

transaction, it should be possible to see, first, a miniscule 

increasing blue shift change in the bright star's frequency when 

approaching the Sun (yin), and a proportionate increase back to 

red as the bright star departs the Sun's influencing tensions 

(yang). But this is still not what we are looking for. 

According to modification of the photons, there 

should be an actual residual extremely 

minute red shift momentarily, due 

to the longer path the bright 

star's light travels 

in its yin/yang 

journey bending 

this way then back 

that way, when skirting 

the edge of the Sun. The residual 

minute net red shift, which will be only momentary 

until the star passes on out of the range of any 

significant 'tension' from the Sun, 

might be measurable 



Greydon Moore




Check out 

this  list of giant 

gravity wave formations in deep space 



Check out 

this  discussion 

on electron/elementary 

particle factors perhaps modelled 

by sonic properties as heard in experimental 

home stereo and stereo 











 




         Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore 

         World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004     


    

form  

A

&

O

3

3

             







 
 
 

                  Click google logo for site search

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home

Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA

ODDESSY

CLIFFR

CONTACT