======================================================= ########## PERFECT ECLIPSES INCLUDE JUPITER AND SATURN ############ ======================================================= ---------------- HOLES ---------------- PERFECT ECLIPSES ---------------- energy forms which have no enertia ------------------------------------------- introduced by Greydon Moore e-mail greydon@look.com See covering short story surveyor.txt at cosmicastronomy.com/surveyor.txt _______________________________ Begin August 19, 1996, 6:30 AM. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ======================================================= ############# LONG RANGE METAPHYSICAL ECLIPSES ############### ======================================================= --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- QUESTIONS AT LARGE ---------------------------------- Here is brand new news, boys and girls, and everyone else in the business of astronomy, amateur telescope makers and sellers included. Witness any page of ASTRONOMY MAGAZINE to know what I mean by makers and sellers of amateur telescopes. The question of eclipse structures and 'holes' in space at large through greater regions of the solar system is at once answered by a pair of eclipse states involving 'holes' in space that occur between Jupiter, the Earth, and the Sun. These 'holes' are fantastic artifacts. Two occur very nicely bound together thank you, between Jupiter, Earth, and the Sun, as massless eclipses. Have I got your attention ! The two are so self evident that all questions of doubt are immediately put into the quiet place, once you see the obvious. Here come the details. ------------------------------------------------ JUPITER-EARTH-SUN ECLIPSE STATES ------------------------------------------------ Two states in question need hardly any introduction. Just ask: "What size of object or 'hole' has to be at the orbit of Earth, to 'eclipse' the Sun, not in parallax but in full cross sectional diameter, when seen from the orbit of Jupiter". The answer is the following: Full cross sectional diameter means: cut the Sun in half like an orange, right through its center. Forget the orange seeds they end up cut cleanly in half. Parallax cuttings of the seeds don't count. You loose, if you only want parallax with seeds cut at odd angles. -------------------------------------- JUPITER'S POLAR DIAMETER -------------------------------------- At Earth, tilt the Moon's orbit vertically upright at a 90 degree angle, diminish the mean circumpherence of its semimajor ring to become Jupiter's POLAR diameter, and you have the size of the object of the 'hole' in space at the orbit of Earth you need for the job. No other solar object or entity of any size will fit the job. In mind's eye, see Jupiter diameter glowing like a 'halo' around Earth. It is a hard hole, resonating and oscillating in pure light in metaphysical space surrounding Earth in detail. Picture expanded around Earth a rim, wide as a transparent Jupiter, which fits perfectly over the Sun, when seen from long distance from out at Jupiter itself. This is with you (the observer) looking from Jupiter, past the Earth, to the far distant Sun, from the semimajor orbit of Jupiter. Hey! What? ------------------------------------------- JUPITER'S EQUATORIAL DIAMETER ------------------------------------------- Move you to the Perihelion of Jupiter's orbit, and move the Earth out to its Aphelion of orbit, and again with the Moon's orbit tilted perfectly upright, again diminish the ring, to Jupiter's diameter, this time to Jupiter's 'EQUATORIAL' diameter and once again you have a full and perfect eclipse over the Sun at the center of the solar system. Now, this is REALLY neat and tidy, no dust left over here at all from a random accretion disk. The only kink is that first, you reduce the Mean orbit of Earth by one link equalling the Moon's 'mean' of orbit, and likewise reduce the Aphelion of Earth's orbit by one link 'equalling' the mean orbit of the Moon, to bring both Jupiter accords into perfect focus. The second accord is with Jupiter closest to the Sun (perihelion) and Earth farthest from the Sun (aphelion) to reveal that the EQUATORIAL diameter of Jupiter is the hallmark of 'holes' for this array. Then with both Jupiter and Earth in their Mean's of orbit the POLAR diameter of Jupiter returns as the hallmark for the first array. There are no other arrays possible. Only these constants fit in a knit that is beyond the toots and jowels of negative nit pickers. We are talking about nth degree of accuracy. No 10 percent Bode's Law physics permiates this kind of news illuminating the consciousness. This stuff is accurate to the nth degree. Maximum accuracy. So what? So, what have we just done is we have just redefined the POLAR and EQUATORIAL radii of Jupiter as pure fundamental constants in the solar system. We have just found them in mirrors of REALITY, in holes in space that surround Earth, at a primordeal distance from Earth that primordeal being the Moon's mean of orbit. This is a very different kind of astronomy. Get ready, here comes more. Nay ? What ? Coming on too strong ? Mouthy ? Outrageous ? Why me ? Don't fire missles at me I am just doing what's right, showing you. --------------------------------- JUPITER SHOW OF FORCE --------------------------------- Here is the Jupiter show of force, straight ahead: There is a hole in space, a focus window twice the size of Jupiter, (located at Earth's orbit at an equivalent distance of 1 Moon's orbit less 1 Jupiter radius less than the orbit of the Earth), which eclipses the Sun when observed from Jupiter. A second focus window occurs at the minimum possible distance between Earth and Jupiter. It also eclipses the Sun perfectly. Both focus windows are tight - one is of Jupiter's POLAR size, the other is of Jupiter's EQUATORIAL size. Tight is tight, like the Creator's said: "let there be Jupiter, there!, and let it be good, let it be at Earth". Which calls the whole theory of accretion disks into account. The current day accretion disk theory is old and cold, it may have to be abandoned. -------------------------------- JUPITER'S EQUATIONS -------------------------------- Here are the simple equations which state the facts: A - (n) ----------- x C = D B (this is the first focus window) Earth mean orbit - (Moon orbit - 1 Jupiter polar radius) (------------------------------) x Sun radius Jupiter mean orbit = 1 Jupiter POLAR diameter --------------- (this is the first focal object) (this is the second focus window) Earth aphelion orbit - (Moon orbit - 2 Jupiter EQ radius) [diameter] (------------------------------) x Sun radius Jupiter perihelion orbit = 1 Jupiter EQUATORIAL diameter -------------------- (this is the second focal object) Here is not airy fairy occult theories. These are facts. Do the equations, and you will see the results yourself. Well, let's do the equations. But first, some conventions: ----------------------- CONVENTIONS ----------------------- In a look at the two states, shown with datas; scale is 1.000 = 1.0 x 10 to 13 cms. The convention, used systematically hereafter, is to show everything to scale as 10 to 13 cms. Thus for example a Moon radius is shown as: .oooo1738 9 and the Sun radius as .oo696265 . Any break in lineal digits is to make easier by eyeglance the recognition of clue data values for instance for a radius of the Moon. --------------------------- DO IT YOURSELF --------------------------- As if you were doing the equations yourself, here are how the equations can be done, using actual datas from Astronomy reference tables cited further below in (ASTRONOMICAL CONSTANTS). Jupiter's POLAR diameter, and EQUATORIAL diameter, are the two resulting focal objects: Focus WINDOW at Earth orbit = [A - (n)] 1.49597927 .oo384401 .ooo66770 4187908 Earth mean orbit - (Moon orbit - 1 Jupiter polar) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius = 1 Jupiter POLAR diameter Jupiter mean orbit .oo696265 7.783285433 2 x .ooo66770 4187908 = D Observer's location ---------------- target .ooo66770 focal OBJECT at Earth orbit Focus WINDOW at Earth orbit = [A - (n)] 1.520993504 .oo384401 2 x .ooo7138 1769173 Earth aphelion orbit - (Moon orbit - 2 Jupiter EQ radius (1 diameter) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius = 1 Jupiter EQ diameter Jupiter perihelion orbit .oo696265 7.406184963 2 x .ooo7138 1769173 = D Observer's location --------------- target .ooo71398 Focal OBJECT at Earth orbit Given that the official (target) radii for Jupiter are: Jupiter POLAR radius = .ooo66770 Jupiter EQ radius = .ooo71398 you can see why enthusiastic claims are so easily made in the opening paragraphs of this disclosure. Anyone who would have come across such obvious states of solar reality, of such a different kind, perfect, would have hooted with no less the volume of sound. In current solar arrays that can have no other results, The above equations yield: | targets Jupiter POLAR radius = .ooo66770 4187908 .ooo66770 Jupiter EQ radius = .ooo7138 1769173 .ooo71398 | The mean (semimajor) orbital distance between Earth and Jupiter yields a POLAR diameter result, with one polar radius as an input term. And the shortest distance between the two planets (Earth Aphelion orbit to Jupiter Perihelion orbit) yields an EQUATORIAL diameter result, with two equatorial radii in the input term. Notice how a minimum variance in orbital distance between the two planets perfectly matches the oblative shape of Jupiter itself. Not even any space dandruff is left over in this perfection. Initially, (before re-iterating the results) the above metaphysical eclipse states yield: Input terms End result terms ----------- ---------------- | .ooo66770 2 x Jup polar = .ooo66770418 6035 x 2 .ooo71398 2 x Jup equator = .ooo713817 844324 x 2 | ------------------------ RE-ITERATION ------------------------ Re-iterated means the end term in the equation is re-introduced as input term at the beginning, and the 'equation' thus redone, over and over again, until the beginning input, and resulting end term converge toward becoming essentially the same and so are presumed to be constants. The results of re-iteration are: Input terms Final re-iterated terms | .ooo66770 2 x Jup polar = .ooo66770418 7908 x 2 .ooo71398 2 x Jup equator = .ooo713817 69173 x 2 | --------------------------------------- OTHER METAPHYSICAL ECLIPSES --------------------------------------- The above shown 'Jupiter Show of Force' is enough to set the stage for showing a number of other metaphysical eclipse states in rapid succession. Since these others are self evident, there is no need to describe each in intimate depth of detail or insight. Just a declaration of their fundamental parameters will do the job nicely. Specifically, long range metaphysical eclipses (involving non-enertia 'holes' in space), are shown for the following arrays: SATURN and JUPITER SATURN and EARTH JUPITER and EARTH (already shown above) MARS and EARTH ---------------------------------- SATURN and JUPITER ---------------------------------- The MOON orbit (recurrant in projection at Jupiter) is featured as the focal window. Recurrant means that a feature of 'holes' in space are that solar entities are found to be echoing around, appearing here and there and other places, not just in one location only. Witness the following second example of holes recurring in the spacial melodies of our solar core. SATURN-JUPITER metaphysical eclipse system: This particular system is interesting because it has a 'duo' focus, and is the only duo array so far seen in these explorations. Here, two states involve a + (plus) and - (minus) factor comprise an intrinsic relationship. Gas bag planet radii are not seen in these states. Instead, Terran 'hard' planet radii are recurred in a structure that also appears in the Earth-Moon-Sun 'perfect' eclipse system. More about 'perfect' eclipses is introduced in detail further on (and discussed in detail in PERFECT.TXT in the ECLIPSE.HTM home page). The term 'duo' focus is immediately seen as self evident, in the following array featuring + and - input terms: PLUS | 'perfect' Jupiter orbit + (2 Earth ave - 1 Moon ave) (--------------|-------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = Moon orbit - (1 Earth AVE - 1 Moon AVE) MINUS | 'perfect' Jupiter orbit - (2 Earth ave - 1 Moon ave) (--------------|-------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = Moon orbit - (1 Earth EQ - 1 Moon EQ) 'perfect' Here, 2 focus windows happen, by turning the Moon's orbit upright into a metaphysical position around planet Jupiter. Hyperfine distinction is in this Moon's mean of orbit, reduced by tiny amounts being the radius of Earth minus the radius of the Moon. In this pair of instances, the difference between adding or subtracting a common term to the mean orbit of Jupiter, yields a tiny yet significant difference in the results, the difference being identical to the radii difference between the AVERAGE and EQUATORIAL radii of the Earth, and the Moon; when Jupiter's orbit is the location of a focus window, seen from the orbit of Saturn. The same states with datas, are shown further below in SUMMARY TABLES. 'Perfect' means that this term is a factor for Earth at its mean of orbit where an averaged sized Moon 'perfectly' eclipses the Sun. More about perfect eclipse states are found further below, described in TERRAN REGION (inner planet) eclipses. ---------------------------------- SATURN and EARTH ---------------------------------- Jupiter's EQ and POLAR radii (Jupiter's size again) are featured in these focal windows, along with Saturn's EQ and POLAR diameters, and the Moon orbit. Saturn's polar and equatorial radii are bound within these two states being shown now. An invisible Jupiter is formed around Earth, forming a focus window which eclipses the distant Sun. The polar and equatorial radii of Jupiter are the limits to which this focus window flexes in cross sectional diameter. Earth itself is in its mean of orbit and shifted outward to the Moon's mean of orbit to be slightly closer to Saturn. The circumpherencial ring comprising Jupiter's diameter around Earth flexes in finite amounts in accord with variables in focal distance, comprising Saturn's diameter at Earth, as the Earth moves in and out in very discrete shifts that factor within to Jupiter's sizes, along the sight line to the Sun. Note: that this halo around Earth is 1/2 the size (as seen from Saturn) as is the Jupiter halo around Earth when seen from Jupiter. (Saturn EQUATORIAL diameter) Earth orbit + (Moon orbit - 2 Saturn EQ) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = 1 Jupiter EQ + 1 Moon AVE radius (Saturn POLAR diameter) Earth orbit + (Moon orbit - 2 Saturn POLAR) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = 1 Jupiter POLAR + 1 EARTH polar radius In this pair of arrays, the polar and equatorial diameters oF Saturn share direct proportions with the polar and equatorial radii of Jupiter, through the distance between Saturn and Earth, in harmonics with the distance between Saturn and the Sun. There is no fairy dust from an accretian disk, here, these are absolute. The same states with datas, are shown further below in SUMMARY TABLES. ---------------------------------- JUPITER and EARTH ---------------------------------- Jupiter's EQ and POLAR radii, along with the orbit of the MOON, are featured in the focal windows. Already shown above, these states are shown again to include them in a progession of 'hole in space' eclipses advancing from the outer to inner reaches of the solar system. Earth mean orbit - (Moon orbit - 1 Jupiter POLAR radius) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius Jupiter mean orbit = 1 Jupiter POLAR diameter -------- Earth APHELION orbit - (Moon orbit - 2 Jupiter EQ radius) [1 diameter] (-----------------------------) x Sun radius Jupiter PERIHELION orbit = 1 Jupiter EQ diameter -------- The interesting thing about this amazing artifact in space is that nothing else fits at all, except Jupiter's radii and Jupiter's diameters. The same states with datas, are shown further below in SUMMARY TABLES. ------------------------------ MARS and EARTH ------------------------------ Jupiter's EQ radii, along with the orbit of the MOON, are again featured in focal windows. Earth mean orbit - Moon orbit (------------------------) x Sun radius = Moon orbit + Jupiter EQ Mars mean orbit Earth aphelion (--------------) x Sun radius = Moon orbit + Jupiter EQ Mars mean orbit + Earth EQ + Mercury polar The relatively longer distance between Earth mean and Earth aphelion of orbit, translates into a focus window shape change of just two radii, of two small planets, flexing upon the size of the Moon orbit tilted vertically like a halo around Earth. The point is, the flexes comprise exactly the right 'holes' to perfect a harmonic inner scene view window to the Sun. The same states with datas, are shown further below in SUMMARY TABLES. ------------------------------ FIRST FINISH ------------------------------ So this finishes the first part of the cruise through the solar system, looking for 'holes' in space. In this first cruise, the major 'holes' are so big (from giant planets up to the Moon orbit in size) they are called 'focus windows' and also 'focal windows', (both terms mean the same thing). A FLOW TUBE There is also a 'flow tube' beginning from view at Saturn, past Mars, past the Earth, past Venus, to the Sun, the 'flow tube' consisting of focus appatures the size of the Moon's orbit aligned upright like a row of targets at each of the planets Jupiter, Mars, Earth, and Venus. OTHER PERFECT ECLIPSES In a second part of the cruise, the Terran region is featured, involving strictly tiny hard pellet planets and no gasbags, with focus windows so small only terran planets can fit in any hole, all involving a large collection of eclipse states which metaphysically occur to perfect mathematical order between Earth looking out to Mars; two more for Earth looking past the Moon orbit to Venus; again from Earth looking past the Moon to the Sun; and from Venus looking past a recurrent Moon orbit at Venus to see Mercury in orbit at Venus at the same distance as is the Moon from the Earth. In these Terran region holes in space, eclipses, of which there are five systems, are planets of Terran region size all featured in every aspect of the structures, and so are called focal lenses to thus distinguish their smaller sizes from the much larger focus windows of the outer region holes in space eclipses. As if I have been saying: there is a huge understructure which formed the current state of affairs in the solar system, I am saying randomness did not shape the way the solar system appears through its inner mechanics. Energy forms without enertia, appear throughout the shape of the solar system. - Finis - SECOND PART _______________________________ Begin August 13, 1996, 4:00 PM. For further reference, see: PERFECT.TXT in the ECLIPSE.HTM home page. --------------------------------------------------------------------- SHORT RANGE METAPHYSICAL ECLIPSES --------------------------------------------------------------------- HOLES IN SPACE --------------------- There are holes in space. These are not holes that you can see with your naked eye. Actually, that is not entirely true. You can see some of the holes, but only in the form of very crude simulations, ie. partial images, in the engineer's of co-incidental total solar eclipses involving the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun. Otherwise, the holes are perfect. And, there are many. Holes are found in detail for EARTH-MOON-SUN metaphysical eclipses, and also for EARTH-VENUS-SUN metaphysical eclipses, for VENUS-MERCURY-SUN metaphysical eclipses, for MARS-EARTH-SUN metaphysical eclipses, for JUPITER-EARTH-SUN metaphysical eclipses, for SATURN-EARTH-SUN metaphysical eclipses, amd also for SATURN-JUPITER-SUN metaphysical eclipses. Those for the outer realms of the solar system have already been told in the opening section LONG RANGE METAPHYSICAL ECLIPSES, above. All are summarized in details below. METAPHYSICAL ------------------- Such eclipses are called metaphysical, because you cannot physically see them, since no physically solid bodies occur where the holes are occurred to be. But you can see them in stark mathematical detail, once you know exactly where to look for them. This is not entirely true. You can look at the Total Solar Eclipse of the Sun by the Moon, and see something, but you will not see the totality of THAT system (ahem), until you make the system metaphysical. And then you can see the holes as plain as clear glass marbles. In fact, imagine a solar astronomy so complete, so exact, that you can calculate the polar radius of the MOON by using the polar radius of the EARTH in a new metaphysical equation. This is true. It is a fact. The following discertation shows you how you can calculate the polar radius of the Moon, from the polar radius of the Earth. You disbelieve? You quiver? You feel a surge of SAGE? Sorry, you loose the stinky cigar contest. And even worse, you miss the golden ring on the merry-go-round, plus the fragrance of gardenias. Otherwise, behold, for here is an astronomy unlike any you have dared to imagine! It is strikingly bare naked, illuminating through from the 5th dimension. It exists. PERSPECTIVE --------------------- Pssst! Hint hint! All you have to do is change the perspective of your eclipse perception, to see that eclipses are perfect, not just one, but many, stretching through the reaches of the solar system, well beyond Earth and the Moon. The reaches include Jupiter and Saturn. ---------------------------------------------- ABANDON THE PARALLAX POINT OF VIEW ---------------------------------------------- The change in perspective is simple. Abandon the parallax point of view. Nothing more is needed. Nothing less. Instead of parallax side arms extending past the Moon to extend past the Sun, cut the sun in half like an orange, and cut the moon cleanly in half like a grape, and run a center line straight up the middle through their centerpoints, and see what geometry allows, in order to super impose one cross sectional diameter of one body, in full, over the other. What you see is truly amazing, an entirely new point of view that will change forever in one erase, any concepts you ever had about solar astronomy. The holes have two forms: a hole that sits in space in such a way that another hole somewhere else in space is perfectly superimposed by the first (original) hole. A 'second' kind of hole, is how much the first hole has to move through space to still superimpose a target hole in eclipses when the observer's location is moved by discrete amounts through solar space. For instance, a discrete amount will be in moving the observer from a Perihelion, to Mean, or the Aphelion of an observer's orbit. Nowhere else. A human eye (cornea) can flex to accomodate focus. In short words a human eye's cornea changes its shape, smaller to larger, in ultra discrete ways, to accomodate 'focus' on near, then distant objects. Likewise so can holes in space change size, in discrete ways from one size to so become another, to accomodate focus upon distant objects. So the physics of changes in the size of a focal lens is not unheard of. In fact the holes change size from a planetary body's equatorial, to polar size in radius, to accomodate eclipses. Like I said, discrete is discrete and no arguement. The second discreteness is in how much the focal lens moves to stay in focus in light of its ultra discrete changes in size. The amount the focal lens MOVES is also ultra discrete, in fact the exact sizes of equatorial and polar radii of bodies that physically exist in the solar system. Having trouble accomodating these concepts? Let's make it real easy. HOLES --------------- As already said, some holes in space include Earth's eclipse system, cast in a new light. Imagine being able to calculate the diameter of the Earth, by knowing the diameter of the Moon, via total eclipse principles of a brand new kind, at least as far as human thinking is concerned in understanding principles that exist in space anyway whether humans care to see them or not. Its true. If you marked the position of the Moon in its orbit during a hypothetical eclipse when the Earth is at its Perihelion position in orbit, then moved the Earth out to its Aphelion position in orbit, the Moon will have to shift outward to accomodate another hypothetical eclipse. The amount the Moon shifts is in fact just a tiny hop through space, the hop no larger than the diameter of the Earth, albiet a different Earth than the one in solar orbit. This second Earth is a hole in space of exact Earth size, formulated in fabrics between the real Earth and the Sun, with the oscillating Moon sitting right in the middle of the formulation, to slide there back and forth sliding no farther than one miniscule measure identical in measure to the Earth's diameter but not at Earth, instead out there at the Moon, to form 'perfect' eclipses. The whole apparatus can be made dramatically simplified by going to basics, that is, by running a single sight line through a stationary arrow in space, running in a straight line from the center of the Earth in orbit, through the center of the Moon, to the center of the Sun, and shift the Earth back and forth between its Aphelion and Perihelion lengths in orbit, and watch how the Moon slides in and out by a tiny amount that independentently confines the diameter of the Earth. This way, you also get to see how much the Moon must change in size ever so discretely from Polar to Equatorial radii to accomodate the hypothetical eclipses, since you have in fact imposed a pure form of eclipse upon two arbitrary locations for the Earth. So, the 'Moon' has to adjust in size ever so discretely to fit the nichts you arbitrarily created. With this mecahnical view now in place in front of your open eyes for steady state scrutiny - since you have done away with orbital motions and tilts - a hyperfine view of bodies becomes readily apparant. What this means is that the exact amount of changes in the size of the Moon, though extremely small, are nonetheless easily calculated. What is revealed can be called 'Hyperfine Distinctions'. Let's make one thing perfectly clear: orbital tilts and motions are very much a part of solar gravitational dynamics. It happens however that all such fluidity can be dispensed with, put aside, in order to see inner motilities in the solar system's motors clearly. For instance no motions or tilts are needed at all to gain a grasp of planet orbits, or eccentricity distances from the Sun. A straight line point of view can get you through kindergarten on this subject a lot faster than having to learn in second year university, the same orbital distances, using fluidity, as compared to how fast you got the insights you would have learned at a glance in minutes in kindergarten. FOCUS --------------- Since the focus mechanics and hyperfine view structures are dramatically simplified, with all solar motions and orbital tilts and parallax ideas put aside, so can the mathematics used to study also be dramatically simplified. In fact, a simple set of ratio proportions is all you need. RATIO PROPORTIONS --------------------------- For instance, lets put the Earth in its Perihlion location (averaged closer position to the Sun in eccentricity of orbit) and do an eclipse calculation. The proportion then is simply a question of braying: "the position of the Moon divided by the distance of the Earth from the Sun, is proportionate to the size of the Moon, divided by the size of the Sun". That is: MOON radius MOON orbit ------------------ = ---------------- SUN radius EARTH orbit Or, more accurately: MOON radius + - (x) MOON orbit + - (n) + - (x) ------------------------ = ---------------------------------- SUN radius EARTH orbit + - (y) where (n) means variables of known sizes, the sizes of planets, in fact. And (x) means exact polar vrs equater oblate radii size. (y) means orbital differences due to eccentricity. GEOMETRY ----------------- The geometry organization of straight, centerline eclipses, is very simple, very straight forward. Here is a schematic, true for all perfect eclipses. Not to scale: focal window focal object | focal lens | | | | | | | | | 90 | 90 | observer ***------------->*------------------------------->*** target degrees | degrees | | | | | | | flexing | | EARTH MOON SUN centerpoint centerpoint centerpoint JUPITER EARTH SUN EARTH VENUS VENUS ORBIT For instance, the Earth-Moon-Sun total solar eclipse array is easily pictured, in the above straight line, and full cross sectional diameters, in geometry featuring overlaying spheres, but the functions are easier deduced by pure ratio proportions in which only radii are featured, these being the upper (or lower) half of a given straight line geometry. If you know the Moon's orbit but not its radius, then the Moon's radius is found at once by: MOON orbit ---------------- x SUN radius = 'MOON radius' EARTH orbit Or, if the Moon's radius is known, its position can be found at once by: MOON radius ---------------- x EARTH orbit = 'MOON orbit' SUN radius Or, if the observer's orbital point is not known it can be found at once by: MOON orbit ---------------- x SUN radius = 'EARTH orbit' MOON radius ---------------------------------------------- INSIGHT ---------------------------------------------- And now for the big insight. If you let curiosity take hold, some interesting questions have immediate answers. For instance, are total solar eclipses involving the Earth and the Moon merely co-incidences of a merry-go-round kind, and therefore amazing? The answer to that is, No! of course not! They are Not co-incidental! And therefore they are truly amazing, in fact, they are perfect! For instance, take into account the existence of the cornea of the human eyeball, which flexes in shape (changes size) to accomodate normal short distance to long distance focusing in sightings by the human eye. Don't forget, the human cornea is a gell not a solid. So of course it can flex even if slightly. The Moon also flexes in size, whenever the Moon is put in an arbitrary position (distance from Earth) and made to super impose over the Sun in a full cross sectional diameter focusing, whenever the Earth is put in an arbitrary location, for instance at the exact Perihelion, Averaged (Mean), or Aphelion locations of the Earth's orbit along the straight arrow single sight line. The distance the Moon shifts in tiny jumps along this sight line to sustain full focus over the Sun ALSO changes in slight degree per one location of the Earth to the next. The point is that the slight degrees of change perfectly match structuring so tiny it is the polar vrs equatorial radii of both the Moon and the Earth. In fact Venus and Mercury too, also Mars. In fact Jupiter too, and Saturn also, in the larger scheme of things. In other words, these bodies were sculpted by formation principles which had blueprints. Randomness did not occur in their making since there are echoes. So, neither are their eccentricities by chance, since the echoes work in tight orchestration only and exactly with the many eccentricities involved. One (echoes) defines the other and visa versa. --------------------------------------------- HYPERFINE DISTINCTION and FLEXING --------------------------------------------- Combined as a group of variables, such discrete changes can be called 'Hyperfine Distinction', which come from two different manners of change, both of which can be called 'flex', or flexing. One 'flex' is the same manner of change as the cornea of a human eyeball, which is a focusing flex of the cornea's size (or radius). And the second is how far the cornea moves in and out as the eyeball housing structure itself changes shape, ergo a 'flexing' in the cornea's location, to accomodate a focus on a bumblebee's knees, or on the peak of distant mount Everest, both focuses by arbitrary choice by the human owning the duo flexing eyeball. A further example is a human's eyeballs flexed along the sight axis to be elongated, results in short sightedness, the eyeballs flexed to be flatter, results in far sightedness. So both flex in lens size and in lens length from the optic nerve are principles incorporate in human physiology and now we see the same kind of two different flexes in solar eclipses. It turns out that inbuilt in the Moon's eclipse structure is also this 'duo' flexing, so precise, so distinct, that actual planetary datas in the form of constants can be seen directly within the fabrics of the Moon's eclipsing existence denoting a self evident conclusion that the eclipses are everything but co-incidental. They were made by a fine tuned precision act of creation. What made the precision cannot be determined by the same self evident immediancy as is their existence. What underlying causes made the 'eclipse structures' is not in the fortune telling of today's report about them. Obviously, something is cause to make them happen. (Sorry. I have little idea at this moment as to what such cause might be although of course I have many private ideas as to what the cause represents. But that is not of significant relevance at this point. Details are). (See other 'hint' topics in the lower portion of the ECLIPSE.HTM file for helpful hints and clues which may assist to throw light on the big mystery). --------------- DETAILS --------------- Now the analysis starts in earnest. Getting back to our original position, with the Earth in the Perihelion position of its orbit, standing stationary along the straight arrow sight line, the Sun cut cleanly in half like an orange, and the Moon cut cleanly in half like a grape: simple logic dictates that since the Moon is a little closer to the Sun because of the Earth's closer position, (perihelion), the Moon must move in a little closer to the Earth to become in focus the right size to superimpose the flaming stop sign Sun. To get you started, the averaged size of the Moon will work. And the following equation (ratio proportion) will give you the Moon's location out from Earth. For simplicity sake, start with the Earth at its APHELION location, and calculate: MOON average radius ------------------- x EARTH aphelion orbit SUN radius = 'MOON orbit 1' Move the Earth to its Mean (semimajor) location and again calculate: MOON average radius ------------------- x EARTH mean orbit SUN radius = 'MOON orbit 2' Move the Earth to its Perihelion location and again calculate: MOON average radius ------------------- x EARTH perihelion orbit SUN radius = 'MOON orbit 3' Since MOON orbit 1 is axiomatically the longer distance out from the Earth, subtract MOON orbit 2 from MOON orbit 1, and subtract MOON orbit 3 from MOON orbit 2. That is: MOON orbit 1 -| | minus = Earth radius 1 (approx) MOON orbit 2 -| | minus = Earth radius 2 (approx) MOON orbit 3 -| At once, it will be seen that the Moon has shifted 'flexed' in position, by tiny amounts, no more than two 'radii' of the Earth, or one Earth diameter, in fact. In other words, the amount of Moon displacement in orbit is proportionately equivalent to the length of space occupied by Earth eccentricity in orbit. So now, we know in a self evident way, that Earth's eccentricity is also not random or arbitrary. It too has cause in the same understructures that formed the Moon's eclipses. But there are still a lot of unanswered questions here. For instance, just what size of Moon are we talking about, since we have been talking about 'flex', in a manner identical to flexes in the cornea of a human eye? A clue about flex sizes for the Moon can be gained directly by using the averaged radius of the Earth to calculate Moon sizes, when doing the proportions in a different way, moving the Earth to its three data point positions in eccentricty, and keeping track of the Moon, it shifting along the sightline by increments equal to the Earth's averaged radius, while also watching the Moon change shape. It will be seen at once that a SMALLER Moon is located closer to the Earth when the Earth is put at the Perihelion data point, and a LARGER Moon is located further out when the Earth is at the Aphelion data point of orbit, out from the flat full diameter Sun. This claim can be seen at once by the following steps: Starting with the following to get a Moon orbit, for the Earth in Aphelion, then using the averaged radius of the Earth as progressive lineal sum increments for the flex gaps in space, there is then: MOON average radius ------------------- x EARTH aphelion orbit SUN radius = 'MOON orbit X' using MOON radius 1 (average) Then proceeding logically in the following way: MOON orbit X - 1 Earth radius ---------------- x SUN radius = 'MOON radius 2' EARTH mean orbit MOON orbit X - 2 Earth radius --------------- x SUN radius = 'MOON radius 3' EARTH perihelion orbit It will be seen from this approach that MOON radius 3 will be smaller than MOON radius 2, but there is no MOON radius 1. This other term can be gained by another approach, using the Moon's mean of orbit, (Moon orbit M) as follows: MOON orbit M - 1 Earth radius ---------------- x SUN radius = 'MOON radius 1' EARTH aphelion orbit using EARTH radius (average) Then proceeding logically in the following way: MOON orbit M - 2 Earth radius ---------------- x SUN radius = 'MOON radius 2' EARTH mean orbit MOON orbit M - 3 Earth radius ---------------- x SUN radius = 'MOON radius 3' EARTH perihelion orbit It will be seen from this approach that MOON radius 3 will be smaller than MOON radius 2, and 2 smaller than 1. In other words a natural flexing in the progression of cross sectional size of the Moon is self evident. However, the results are not precise. But there is another referencing point still being missed, here. To wit: where exactly in the Moon's orbit is the Moon when it shifts along by a total 'gap' equalling one Earth diameter, during these eclipse states? Well in fact the only known reference point for the Moon in orbit is the Moon's orbital mean, and it can be seen that a larger Moon starts at a point just inside of the Moon's orbital mean, and shifts by one Earth diameter to become a slightly smaller Moon (because of the intrinsic 'flex') one Earth diameter closer to the Earth. The distance at the start point (with the Earth at Aphelion position) is just inside of the Moon' mean of orbit - a value given in classical astronomy as 3.84401 x 10 to 10 cms. And so for example: Moon EQ radius -------------- x Earth APHELION = Moon orbit M + - (x) Sun radius Since start point [Moon orbit M + - (x)] is less than the Moon's mean of orbit, it is thus known that (x) is a minus term. And so: Moon orbit M - (x) = (y) . In other words (y) is how much the Moon as a focal lens is displaced from the Moon's mean of orbit. (y) is very small, in conjunction with the Aphelion location of the Earth. The space difference (y) between the start point and the Moon's orbital mean, is not recognizable, being a measure smaller than the radius of the Earth but larger than the radius of Mars. However, since Earth radii increments are already featured in our new geometry, a simple insight in the way of a simple lineal sum calculation, shows that the difference to this start gap, is less than the radius of the Earth, by an amount equal to the radius of the MOON itself. In other words: (y) = Earth radius - Moon radius. Now here is where the eyelids shoot up and discover the eyeballs for ever after. From here on you can really see detail. For instance, how is start point (MOON orbit 1) referenced to the Moon's mean of orbit in all details? Here, following, is a way of finding out if any details lurk unseen: MOON average radius ------------------- x EARTH aphelion orbit SUN radius = 'MOON orbit 1' MOON mean orbit - MOON orbit 1 = 'x factor' EARTH average radius - x Factor = 'MOON radius' approximately. Now here is where the eyebrows REALLY shoot up and uncover the eyeballs for ever after. The Moon's radius has unerringly shown up as a flex gap in space. In fact what you are already looking at, now, is an array in space in which the following steady state mechanical principles are at work: (MOON mean orbit + 1 Moon radius) - 1 Earth radius = MOON orbit 1 (MOON mean orbit + 1 Moon radius) - 2 Earth radius = MOON orbit 2 (MOON mean orbit + 1 Moon radius) - 3 Earth radius = MOON orbit 3 corresponding to: EARTH aphelion orbit for MOON orbit 1 EARTH mean orbit for MOON orbit 2 EARTH perihelion orbit for MOON orbit 3 And, having worked out by quick means in advance further above, the insight that the Moon flexes in cross sectional size from larger to smaller, as the Moon shifts incrementally closer to the Earth, in direct proportion with the Earth shifting incrementally closer to the Sun, we can now use this insight regards the Moon's flexing sizes as 'focal' object, to find precise sizes for the Earth's flex as invisible incremental flex gaps, or, if you will, as 'holes' through space, in lock stop with the Moon itself as focus object for eclipses, which, since these are full cross sectional diameters and not parallax solid objects, are also 'holes' in space, of a different kind, but none the less, 'holes'. Bear in mind that the word fudge is evident in the above works, but there are rewards to come. Its the logic that counts. Next question: let's find out if there are finite limits as to the sizes of both kinds of holes. It turns out that there are finite limits. The 'holes' can be of only certain sizes, and nothing else. As it happens the sizes of the holes are fundamental constants, already well known, in the oblate size of the Moon, and oblate size of the Earth. These, you will see, are the rewards. ----------------------------- OBLATE (FLATTENING) ----------------------------- The word 'oblate' just introduced, is not new. It officially means the equatorial radii of the Earth vrs the polar radius for the Earth, and similarly for the Moon, and for all planets. In other words planets are not perfectly spherical; their circumpherences around the equator slightly larger than the circumpherence around the poles. This difference is really slight, hardly more than a few kilometers in the case of the Earth and the Moon, a difference so slight that in factoring any cause involving the universal gravitational constant such slight differences are meaningless. The only place where these slight departures has meaning in terms of planetary mechanics is in determining gravitational buldges due to densities directly below, and so on, and also in the orbital mechanics of nearby hand made satellites, the oblativeness of the Earth, Moon, or other planets has to be taken into account to keep accurate track of the satellite's moment by moment orbiting position. But in terms of solar astronomy using the universal gravitation constant to discuss gravitational cross talk between planets or the Sun, the oblate size of the planetary bodies per se are concidered meaningless, too small. Period. Not so. The Earth and Moon have just been sculpted (by simple ratio proportions) to exact size, polar vrs equator, by means that are fundamental in the creative scriptures of the solar system itself, scriptures which lead to the existence of eclipses, and 'holes' in space. Here is how the proclamation can be vindicated, and it is easy. ----------------- VARIABLES ----------------- At this point there are 4 variables. Two are known; we know that the Moon shrinks by flex as the Earth progresses inward toward the Sun in forming eclipses, and we know that 1, 2 and 3 Earth radii comprise the gaps the Moon increments in orbit relative to the Earth in its orbits. Two variables are still unknown; the size of the Moon as an incremental 'hole' on the plus (outward) side of the Moon's mean of orbit is not known in detail for different locations of the Earth in orbit. And the size of the Earth as 'holes' filling the gaps through which the Moon 'increments', in discrete moves in forming eclipses is also not yet known. At which point we could introduce hammer and tong physics, trying a number of 'if's' and 'or's' to check out many 'this's' and 'that's', to come to a consences which can otherwise be gained directly by an assumption, which turns out to have a major leading insight trailing along right inside the assumption. ------------------- ASSUMPTION ------------------- The assumption is to assume that Earth 'holes' in space also inexorably change in flex, as the Moon shifts in or out accordingly along the straight arrow sight line, and further, we can skip the hammer and tong physics searching the variables and assume that the changeness is also from larger to smaller, that is, that in shifting from MOON orbit 1 to MOON orbit 2, the Earth's size shrinks slightly, and similarly in the shift from MOON orbit 2 to MOON orbit 3 there is a further significant shrinkage in the size of the Earth in 'holes' along the sight line. 'Holes' are correct to interpret the incremental gaps, in that even though radii are most readily used to demark the flex gaps, invisible bodies or transparent spheres of Earth size, plus that extra invisibly transparent Moon as another bubble sitting hard in a + to the Moon's mean of orbit,( the bubble an outie sitting toward the Sun right at the edge of Moons mean of orbit). actually do the job better in forming exact pictures of what is really going on. Interlinking spheres of different kinds and different discrete sizes is what the picture is. The phrase 'music of the spheres' takes on a whole new meaning. Conjoined soap bubbles also works in images. The above quick assumption (which turns out to be correct if you want to come to the same conclusion the long way doing hammer and tong physics to sift and sort through the variables), leads directly to one other correctly assumpted observation, that the moon 'hole' extending out there on the other side of the Moon's mean of orbit, is also flexing incrementally, and it too turns out to follow suit with all of the other flexes, to wit, from larger size to smaller, as the Earth shifts from Aphelion, through mean, to Perihelion, in orbital distances from the Sun, all of the 'holes' progressing in lock step, from larger, to smaller. Thus is verified the major assumption, with another leading insight trailing right along behind the assumption, being also revealed. In an act of great revealing, the fact that the Moon shifts in unital size to become smaller the closer approached to the gravitational power of massive solid Earth as well as the invisible massless Earth perfectly filling the gaps between the Moon's unitial hops, in conjunction with the Earth-Moon system moving closer to the much larger gravitational force of the Sun, can all be concidered acts of space contracting in the presence of greater gravity. *--CONTRACTION 1 | | Shortest Moon orbit (closest to Earth) | Shortest distance to Sun (Earth Perihelion) | Smallest Moon radius (Polar - eclipsing body at focal lens) | Smallest Earth (Polar - in flex gap) | | | MO - 3 Earth P + 1 Moon P | ------------- x SunR = Moon P Moon POLAR radius | EP Shortest orbital | | | MO - 2 Earth AV + 1 Moon AV | -------------- x SunR = Moon AV Moon AVERAGE radius | EO | | | MO - 1 Earth EQ + 1 Moon EQ | -------------- x SunR = Moon EQ Moon EQUATORIAL radius | EA Longest orbital | | *--CONTRACTION 2 Longest Moon orbit (farthest from Earth) Longest distance to Sun (Earth Aphelion) Largest Moon radius (Equatorial - eclipsing body at focal lens) Largest Earth (Polar - in flex gap) But hark. This is only true for the Earth-Moon-Sun eclipse system which is made of physical mass bodies (Earth and Moon). Other systems which have all-massless metaphysical bodies do their hyper fine structuring in reverse to that of the Earth-Moon-Sun. This symmetry reversal may be a clue as to what is actually causing or has caused the existence of Perfect Eclipses through reaches in the Solar System spanning 7 planets, plus the Earth's moon. Physicists love some small hook, anything, that can be used to help to try and structure theories that are correct. This 'gravitational' correspondence to farther cum closer in proximety to gravity bodies (Earth and Sun) may be a good toe hold for shovelling together any theory(s). GM. With the above summary statements made, it is now possible to step straight ahead to the data evidence: the equations which show how the assumptions are correct, in self evident truth. First, however, is one last step, not an assumption but an intuitional guess, to seek to lock into place an absolute value for the Moon's mean of orbit. This is done by the following equation. But first, some facts to fill the now formed container. The following datas are taken from detailed astronomy figures compiled with the assistence of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and used in a coffee table book on astronomy titled: 'ASTRONOMY', with discussion, art, and illustrations, by Don Dixon, published in 1981 by Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, a very cmprehensive set of datas, in which is given: SUN radius = .oo696265 x 10 to 13 cms MOON mean orbit = .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cms EARTH aphelion of orbit = 1.520995035 x 10 to 13 cms EARTH mean of orbit = 1.49597927 x 10 to 13 cms EARTH perihelion of orbit = 1.470963504 x 10 to 13 cms EARTH eq = EARTH equatorial radius = .oooo6378 164 x 10 to 13 cms EARTH ave = EARTH averaged radius = .oooo6367 4715 x 10 to 13 cms EARTH polar = EARTH polar radius = .oooo6356 779 x 10 to 13 cms where EARTH ave = 1/2 (EARTH eq + EARTH polar) MOON eq = MOON equatorial radius = .oooo1738.9 x 10 to 13 cms MOON ave = MOON averaged radius = .oooo1738.35 x 10 to 13 cms MOON polar = MOON polar radius = .oooo1737.8 x 10 to 13 cms where MOON ave = 1/2 (MOON eq + MOON polar). With these facts, the following equations, using all of the assumptions, are correct: MOON eq ---------- x EARTH aphelion = 'MOON orbit + 1 MOON eq - 1 EARTH eq' SUN radius therefore MOON orbit = .oo3845 03003576 x 10 to 13 cms | compared to .oo3844 01 x 10 to 13 cms. As you can see, the derived change in the MOON orbit is very slight. And now, using this derived value for the MOON mean of orbit, the following equation is also true: MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = 'MOON polar radius' = .oooo1737 96252738 | compared to .oooo1737 8 As you can see, the derived size of the MOON'S polar radius as a focal lens focused eclipser object (a 'hole' in space) is nearly the same as the published fact. In other words, the Earth's polar radius has just been used to calculate the Moon's polar radius, when the Earth's equatorial radius and the Moon's equatorial radius were used to calculate the Moon's mean of orbit. Four solar variables were used to factor a fifth to nth degree of accuracy, using a total of seven facts of solar data to factor the mobile artifacts comprising the solar total eclipse structure of the Earth and the Moon. How neat is tidy. REAL NEAT when the tidy leaves no smoke from accretion theories lying around. On the other hand, working in reverse, starting with the terms for Earth polar radius and the Moon's polar radius, to arrive at a Moon orbit mathematically, then using this newly derived Moon orbit, to calculate a resulting Moon orbit of a slightly different measure, leads to the following: MOON polar ---------- x EARTH perihelion = 'MOON orbit + 1 MOON polar - 3 EARTH polar' SUN radius therefore MOON orbit = .oo3844 68667245 x 10 to 13 cms | compared to .oo3844 01 x 10 to 13 cms. with both the Moon polar radius term, and Earth polar radius term, taken from the official data tables cited above. As you can see, the derived change in the MOON orbit is very slight. This can be called term 2, and the original Moon orbit derivation called term 1. A derived Moon orbit value (term 3) using the average datas for both Earth and Moon radii, results in: MOON ave ---------- x EARTH mean = 'MOON orbit + 1 MOON ave - 2 EARTH ave' SUN radius therefore MOON orbit = .oo3844 94551967 x 10 to 13 cms | compared to .oo3844 01 x 10 to 13 cms. --------------------------------- DOUBLE DIGIT PRECISION --------------------------------- The reason why we did this front to back, and back to front, double derivation, is to give a common term for the orbit of the Moon: (1/3 term 1 + term 2 + term 3 = common term), since the radii of the Earth are known to 7 significant digits whereas those for the Moon are physically known only to 5. With the above three-way derivation, working through the orbit of the Moon, it is possible that the Moon's oblative radii can be learned to 2 or 3 more significant digits. But this is only a guess. Physicists use such means to try to come up with better guesses as to the value of the electron charge, using better known constants such as the Fine Structure Constant to infer more significant digits regards the unit of charge. So here is where an amateur astronomy twit flicker tries the same. A common term for the Moon's orbit can be found as 1/3 the sum of the three derivations, as: .oo384 503003576 .oo3844 68667245 common term 1/3 (term 1 + term 2 + term 3) = .oo3844 88740 929 .oo3844 94551967 | | compared to .oo3844 01 Using the common term, we can quickly come to calculate the Moon's oblative radii to two more significant digits as follows: .oooo1738 9 .oo3844 88740 929 1 x .oooo6378 164 MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion 1.520995035 = 'Moon EQUATORIAL radius' = .oooo1738 83 470996 | compared to .oooo1738 9 .oooo1738 35 .oo3844 88740 929 2 x .oooo6367 4715 MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean 1.49597927 = 'Moon AVERAGE radius' = .oooo1738 32 295402 | compared to .oooo1738 35 .oooo1737 8 .oo3844 88740 929 3 x .oooo6356 779 MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion 1.470963504 = 'Moon POLAR radius' = .oooo1737 89 501665 | compared to .oooo1737 8 ------------------------------------------------------- HOMING IN - STRANGE ATTRACTORS - RENORMALIZING ------------------------------------------------------- However, originals were used as input terms for the Moon's radii, so substituting the new terms as inputs, and re-cycling, ie, re-substituting the end result as a modified input term several times, in doing the same equations over and over again, new stable values for the Moon's radii quickly home in (strange attractors) to become a complete set of derived values, starting with initially derived radii as: The initial derived set is: | moon eq = .oooo1738 834 ..... moon ave = .oooo1738 322 ..... moon polar = .oooo1737 895 ..... | to be used to make a complete set of 'perfect' eclipse states, as follows, with hard copy datas shown: .oooo1738 834409713 .oo3844 88740929 1 x .oooo6378 164 MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq .oo696265 ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion = .oooo1738 834409713 1.520995035 'Moon EQUATORIAL radius' .oooo1738 32282755 .oo3844 88740929 2 x .oooo6367 4715 MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave .oo696265 ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean (semimajor) = .oooo1738 32282755 1.49597927 'Moon AVERAGE radius' .oooo1737 89546854 .oo3844 88740929 3 x .oooo6356 779 MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar .oo696265 ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = .oooo1737 89546854 1.470963504 'Moon POLAR radius' The complete set is: | moon eq = .oooo1738 834 40971 moon ave = .oooo1738 322 82755 moon polar = .oooo1737 895 46854 | accuracy to 3 more significant digits? Here are the same set of perfect eclipse states, shown as naked facts: MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion = 'moon EQUATORIAL radius' MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean (semimajor) = 'moon AVERAGE radius' MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = 'moon POLAR radius' In which 5 kinds of VARIABLES are specified in fundamental details: VARIABLE 1 VARIABLES 2, 3 VARIABLE 4 (MOON mean orbit + 1 Moon EQ) - 1 Earth EQ = MOON orbit 1 (MOON mean orbit + 1 Moon AVE) - 2 Earth AVE = MOON orbit 2 (MOON mean orbit + 1 Moon POLAR) - 3 Earth POLAR = MOON orbit 3 corresponding to: VARIABLE 5 EARTH aphelion orbit for MOON orbit 1 EARTH mean orbit for MOON orbit 2 EARTH perihelion orbit for MOON orbit 3 --------------------------- ON THE OTHER HAND --------------------------- On the other hand, it can also be presumed just as swiftly that the current mean orbit of the Moon is as good as it gets, in which case oblative radii for the Moon, as factored by the above three pictures, come out just slightly below the current official estimates for the polar and equatorial sizes of the Moon. However, there is no need to strike the gong and sweep the stage clean of contestants, the lessness is about 1/2 a kilometer only. In fact, here is a quickly done comprise of the Moon's radii, done using the same three equations as were used above, except this time .oo384401 is used as the Moon's mean of orbit, in which case the following radii occur: MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion = 'moon EQUATORIAL radius' .oooo1738 43091148 | low MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean (semimajor) = 'moon AVERAGE radius' .oooo1737 91255047 | low MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = 'moon POLAR radius' .oooo1737 47818096 | low The complete set is: | moon eq = .oooo1738 43091148 moon ave = .oooo1737 91255047 moon polar = .oooo1737 47818096 where each radii is about 1/2 km less than official, as you can see here: Official MOON equatorial radius = .oooo1738.9 x 10 to 13 cms Official MOON averaged radius = .oooo1738.35 x 10 to 13 cms Official MOON polar radius = .oooo1737.8 x 10 to 13 cms -------------------------- PERFECT STATES -------------------------- These eclipse structures are so precise they are being called 'PERFECT' to distinguish them from the more mundane ordinary casual co-incidences otherwise known as total eclipses when the moon just happens to glide by in slow motion to ping pong just in the right move to career over the sun in 'parallax' when astronomers have just happened to get their peers ready somewhere on the curving of the Earth to look bard at this amazing event. Begin with the dawn of astronomical time in the history of those Babylonians 3500 years ago. The problem this whole time, is that astronomers and scientists have ALWAYS looked at eclipse structures and mechanisms in the point of view of parallax overlays for solid objects, never once concidering the possibility that eclipses can also be transparent, and not ever concidering 'ideal' conditions, for instance with the Earth in Perhihelion, Mean, and Aphelion of orbit. (At least it does not look like 'ideal' has ever been concidered since nothing in the common knowledge seems to exist regarding 'ideal', which leads directly to 'Perfect Eclipses' due to flexing needed to accomodate the Moon in 'ideal' positions). The plain fact is that 'perfect' eclipses simply cannot be seen with the naked eye when solid bodies are in the picture. The only way to see 'Perfect' eclipses is to go to the center points of the involved objects, and view the overlays in full cross sectional diameters, just like, (as in fact they are), looking through 'holes' in space. Something made the holes. But what. The holes themselves do not instantly reveal their secret. This secret is for scientists who like to grunt and gurgle while thinking to figure ideas. Not me. I don't have the any strong idea what caused 'holes', except to know it was one of the high points of creation, rather than, ho hum, random. Thoughts further above regarding notice of CONTRACTION 1 and CONTRACTION 2 are to me an insight which has coherency and might have clout and shout in the touts about HOW. Accretion disks don't worry me. I can see vortexes and whirls within the solar system's accretion disk that had mighty magnificent significence. But cannot say how those energies, sufficient to engineer holes in space, occurred, nor know what underlying cause blue printed the holes. Hope I'm off the hook, and no nobel prize for me. 'Nough said. ------------------------------ SPEAKING ABOUT HOLES ------------------------------ Speaking about 'holes', where do you think an image, a mirror, a recurrance, whatever, of the Sun will have to locate to be seen to be eclipsed by an Earth-sized body put in the orbit of the Moon? For that matter, what if a Venus sized object was put in the orbit of the Moon, where would the Sun be then? In both cases, a Sun image beaming abound with light from the orbit of Venus fits the bill. Right on. Nowhere else can you put a Sun to be so eclipsed. In fact, if you put a body the size of Mars in the Moon's orbit, where will a Sun be waiting to be eclipsed by superstructures? Well, why wait in suspense, the answer to that question is, in the orbit of MARS; no where else can harmonics lead to first cause to have real eclipses happen involving a 'hole' in space the size of Mars echoing in the orbit of the Moon. There is far more to the above paragraph than a bit of flippancy. Quantum numbers rear their impressive heads, for instance. More about these matters follows below, after a brief pause for station breaks. -------------------------------------- JUPITER AND EARTH ECLIPSES -------------------------------------- The holes continue, at least all the way out to Saturn. Saturn is said, because holes in space that 'eclipse' from Saturn do occur, looking from Saturn past the Earth orbit to the Sun, asking what sized object occurs in the orbit of Earth to perfectly eclipse the Sun. It turns out that objects occur, friendly objects, objects of familiar size. The same is true for Jupiter, looking from Jupiter past Earth to the Sun. In fact it was in recently finding 'holes' for Jupiter eclipses, that prompted the writing of this whole document named HOLES.TXT. The Jupiter holes were found right away, without grunts or gurgles. The holes in fact use the physical size of the planet Jupiter, in a previously unheard of sitting. Here is how Jupiter's diameter eclipses the Sun at the center of the solar system. In the formation, a viewer at Jupiter looks past Earth to see what size of hole or object at the Earth's orbit will perfectly eclipse the Sun. The radius of the object is the diameter of Jupiter. Nothing else whatever from nowhere else in the solar system fits the parameters called for in these vibrations in space. This piece of news (regards Jupiter) which relates to the opening topic at the start of this disclosure, was tossed in just as a quick reminder that we are looking at a whole solar view overall, and not just at a few local historical eclipses. -------------------------------------- MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS -------------------------------------- There are major assumptions which can be made, upon which a whole string of jewels can be brought into one picture, in more or less a self evident way. One assumption is to assume that planet radii, are actually slightly larger than those currently on the records in astronomy tables, or else, that the bodies started larger, then reduced via attrition or contraction. In either case the differences in sizes are extremely small nevertheless. Another assumption is that the radius of the Sun at one time oscillated in a very slight yet significantly powerful way. In this assumption, some planet forms embraced within eclipse structures came together as a consequence of active oscillating forces or massaging, formed as if in a forge between two or more distinct signals. This second assumption has a physical image in an eclipse arrangement involving the shapes of planet Earth and Venus in a co-joint array of eclipse states. More about this Earth-Venus-Sun structure is detailed further on. But first ..... -------------------------------------- A REASON -------------------------------------- A reason for any major assumption in the first place, is that certain quantum numbers respecting solar understructures come clearly into the picture when certain planetary bodies are allowed to have slightly larger sizes. (The difference in sizes are extremely small but nevertheless are factorable). Without this assumption, the quantum numbers are there, but not in a way in which the planetary sizes constitute fundamental constant of complete and unambiguous kind, which therefore would not change for a very long time span in solar history. In other words, a steady state picture is easily merged into one gigantic interactive image, of holes lined up in sequences in many linkups within the Terran region, with the assumption of slightly larger Terran planet sizes. The sizes in question are so very slight. For instance the equatorial radius of the Earth, currently certified as .oooo6378 164 x 10 to 13 cms, becomes, let's say, .oooo6378 722 x 10 to 13 cms, a difference of .oooooooo558 x 10 to 13 cms, ie, just 1/2 km. See SET 7 further below for terms and datas in detail. --------------------- RELOCATION --------------------- There is the possibility that not all objects formed in the solar system at the same time. The meaning to this remark is that the Moon orbit might not need to be precisely the same measure (an immutable physical constant) for all possible eclipse occurrances. There could be minor variances of extremely small kind in the Moon orbit, as a constant nonetheless, during formation or arrival of different bodies, one, then another. For that matter, it may be possible that some if not all of the bodies did not form in their current locations. They landed there after the fact. In fact moons, particularly around Jupiter and Saturn, come to mind as possibly being formed in the inner regions nearby the Sun in early days. In light of recent discoveries by keen telescope observers studying a star producing area in Orion, perhaps some of our solar system bodies drifted in from out space (remark made circ. year 2000), then took up obital positions conducive to strong signals delineating paths of least resistence, most harmonious, most user friendly with pre-existing solar signals of patterns, since the amount of body mass in any given solar orbit does not seem to be a factor in the current organizations in the solar system unless swollen midrift (Jupiter and Saturn) (and the four major moons of Jupiter) is needed in this solar system for reasons scientists and we the 'publica el curiosito' do not yet know. -------------------------------------- ANOTHER WAY -------------------------------------- Another way, is to assume that current planetary sizes as recorded in astronomy data books are factually correct, in which case a more distant assumption assumes that the Sun size has been changing, to be of discretely different radii, when different Terran planets were forming. Except this assumption is hard to pin down as to exactly what radii sizes the Sun should have in correspondence to each planetary size. Or else that Terran planets have tags of precise amounts added or subtracted to their means of orbits and eccentricities giving cause to result in the formation of planetal sizes that are the current day resulting sizes. For instance, one eclipse structure can be shown (mathematically) that has a tag reduced from the mean orbit of the Earth, of Earth equatorial radius size, then of the Earth EQ - Mercury EQ size, then of the Earth EQ size - Mars EQ size, in order to squeeze together Earth and Venus planetary sizes into a single 'perfect' eclipse structure using the current mean orbit of the Moon as a constant. The only interesting thing about this arrangement is that it is precise, no other values work, when concidering 'tags' upon the orbit of the Earth. This same array, with a slightly different term for the Moon orbit, is shown below as SET 4-B. This particular one-of-a kind array is: Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ) - Venus aphelion = 'Earth EQ radius' Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ - 1 Mercury EQ) - Venus mean = 'Earth AVE radius' Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ - 1 Mars EQ) - Venus perihelion = 'Earth POLAR radius' The same states with datas, are shown further below in SUMMARY TABLES. In particular, this array with a slightly different term for the Moon orbit, is shown in the SUMMARY TABLES as SET 4-B, in which variables for Venus alone are factored first as SET 1 (not SET 1-1). Re: this array shown immediately above, the unhappy feature is, that if this above array is arbitrary, a co-incidence of math, it throws dark spotlights on other interplantetary features, making them seem, perhaps, merely arbitrary, too, by acts of mathematical co-incidence. However, fortunately, the dark spotlight is turned away down because most of what actually does knit together in mathematical ways, are uniquelly invariant, of kinds which make mere co-incidences v e r r r y unlikely. Not to mention the fabulous set of 'QUANTUM NUMBERS' which highlight 4 of the 'Terran region' perfect eclipses into one mainframe of connected structures. The quantum numbers come under discussion further on. The other fact of orbital sizes and eccentricities, is that an extremely small seeming modification on the size of a planet's radii, can result in much larger (amplified) changes in the size of a planet's orbit or eccentricity, expansions which seem almost willy nilly and random (within the range of an orbit of the Moon in scale, for instance), but, can also at times be mathematically shown on rare mathematical occasion to be more precise and smaller, for instance a 'tag' the size of Terran planet radii. But these 'tags' do not seem to appear locked into a systematic formula denoting the work of constants sweeping through a whole range of circumstances. Just one, in fact, seems possibly at hand, and that, involving the Earth EQ radius, plus the EQ radius of Mercury, and the EQ radius of Mars, is cited above. But, there might be others. -------------------------------------- BACK TO 'THE' MAJOR ASSUMPTION -------------------------------------- Which brings us back to 'the' major assumption: that if the sizes of Terran planet radii were mathematically allowed to expand uphill ever so slightly, then an amazing self evident quantum property structuring unfolds in a self evident way already existing, set up as holes in space throughout the Terran region of the solar system. In this all-encampasing interlinking artifact, the Moon's size ends up in a slightly diminished form, the reduction very slight, indeed, nevertheless, factorable, in a quantally constant way. Mars and Venus come out noticably a little larger when factors are allowed to drift to a balance that is internally consistent for their eclipse states. In this hint, a major display of quantum numbers is embodied in a range of fundamental eclipse capabilities which include a look from Earth to a recurrant hole the size of the Sun echoing in the orbit of Mars, two looks from Earth to a recurrant hole of Sun size echoed loud in the orbit of Venus, and a hole the size of Mercury projected in the orbit of Venus. The three inner systems, allied to the Earth-Moon total eclipse system, form a set of 4 continuous quantum variables that are self evident without quest. It gets wordy, trying to describe something not yet seen. Lets look at the Terran region's set of eclipsing holes in space to see their makeup first hand. Here goes, with the following. End of the station breaks. ======================================================= ############### TERRAN REGION (inner planet) eclipses ############## ======================================================= SET 1-1------------------------------------------------------------ Moon orbit - 5 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = 'Venus EQ' Moon orbit - 4 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = 'Venus AVE' Moon orbit - 3 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = 'Venus POLAR' SET 2-2----------------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 4 Mercury EQ ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus perihelion orbit = 'Mercury EQ' Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 3 Mercury AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus mean orbit = 'Mercury AVE' Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 2 Mercury POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus aphelion orbit = 'Mercury POLAR' This set (2-2) featuring a recurrant Moon orbit projected around Venus, also features a (+ 1) Moon radius incremental as a 'tag' across the outer edge of the Moon's mean of orbit. In terms of images, it is hard to say if the correct image is of a massless Moon sitting at the Moon's mean of orbit, or is the Moon's point of center sitting one radius over on the outer side of the Moon's mean of orbit? Hard to tell, given just the images to work with. Nevertheless, + 1 Moon radius is there in the fabrics of space at Venus. SET 3-3------------already shown elsewhere------------------------ this is otherwise the Earth-Moon total eclipse which also has a 'tag' the size of the moon sticking out. Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 1 Earth EQ -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth aphelion orbit = 'Moon EQ radius' Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 2 Earth AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth mean orbit = 'Moon AVE radius' Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 3 Earth POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth perihelion orbit = 'Moon POLAR radius' Once again notice there is a little 'tag' the size of the radius of the Moon, precipitated on the other side of the Moon's mean of orbit. It is such 'tags' that gives these mechanicals so much meat, so much mystical must, so much veracity. That single extra message, that one little extra moon sized balloon echoing in space, that 'tag' makes it seem more than ever that these intergrid interlocked systems have been created by conciderable intelligence somewhere beyond the torques of ordinary Newtonian gravity. Only these two Terran region systems, with Moon sized extra tags, eclipse Suns at the 'center' of the solar system. Interesting. Gotta be some fundamental causes in nature to make this double coupling happen. When you find the causes, let me know. I am s o o o curious about this but simply do not have reasonable answers. But oh how the curiousity tickles the lobes of thought. SET 4-4----------------------------------------------------------- In this set, SET 4-4, Venus sized increments mark the flex locations for the focal lenses which are Earth sized. Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = 'Earth EQ radius' Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = 'Earth AVE radius' Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = 'Earth POLAR radius' -------------------------- QUANTUM NUMBERS -------------------------- A clear cut progression of quantum numbers representing the number of holes incrementally defining each flex gap is seen for all of the states, grouped into a system which has progressive quantum numbers as follows: flex gaps quantum numbers target focal objects Venus x - 5 - 4 - 3 for Earth to Venus, with VENUS in the Moon orbit Mercury x - 4 - 3 - 2 for Venus to Sun , with MERCURY in the Moon orbit Earth x - 3 - 2 - 1 for Earth to Sun , with the MOON in the Moon orbit Venus x - 2 - 1 - 0 for Earth to Venus, with EARTH in the Moon orbit Mars x - 5 - 1 + 3 for Earth to Mars , with MARS in the Moon orbit SET 5-5----------------------------------------------------------- Mars has a slightly different look to its eclipse array. Its quantum count 'progresses' by 4 units of a constant, rather than by one, to form its own flex gaps (flexable holes in space), as follows: Moon orbit - 5 Mars POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Nars orbit - Earth apehlion = 'Mars POLAR radius' Moon orbit - 1 Mars AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Nars orbit - Earth mean = 'Mars AVE radius' Moon orbit + 3 Mars EQ -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Nars orbit - Earth perihelion = 'Mars EQ radius' ------------------------------------ MORE PERFECT ECLIPSE SYSTEMS ------------------------------------ 4 more SETS for the outer planets Jupiter and Saturn, are listed further below after 'Astronomical Constants'. ---------------------------- SERIOUS DISCUSSION ---------------------------- Which brings matters to a serious discussion. The above 5 sets of eclipse structures seem best defined by using the derived 'common term' for the Moon's mean of orbit, earlier assumed to be: | .oo3844 88740929 x 10 to 13 cm. See DOUBLE DIGIT PRECISION further above for deriving the 'common' Moon orbit term. This value produces marginally more accurate agreements to most of the known planet oblate radii for the Terran planets and the Moon. On the other hand, the current official Moon orbit which is .00384401 x 10 to 13 cm, produces definate, more accurate calculations for all of the outer planet more far ranging holes in space eclipses, seen for the outer planets Jupiter and Saturn, and also for the eclipses seen from Mars looking past the Earth to the Sun. See: SET 6, SET 7, SET 8, SET 9 further below for MARS-EARTH-SUN, JUPITER-EARTH-SUN, SATURN-EARTH-SUN, and SATURN-JUPITER-SUN eclipse states. Does this mean two marginally different Moon orbits were involved, one as a constant when the outer planets and their metaphysical eclipse states were formed, and the other an original for an earlier stage, involving formation of Terran region structures? Well, it is hard to say, isn't it. Instincts have it that the greatest elegance is in having one single simple constant known as the Moon orbit, but even greater elegance is found in math that balances to the nth degree, in which case two marginally different Moon orbital means, may be the case. In either case, we come smack up against the situation for SET 4-4, in which the EARTH is seen in the Moon orbit to eclipse a hole in space the size of the Sun found in the orbit of Venus. This set is different in that Venus forms the incremental flex gaps by which the Earth shifts along the sight line to accomodate perfect focus over the invisible Sun at Venus. A slightly larger Moon orbit accomodates this system to nth degree of accuracy in mathematics. But on the other hand a slightly larger Sun at Venus also produces a form of nth degree of mathematics except with an enlarged Sun (less than 1/10 the size of the Moon larger) all of the other variables comprising Terran formations remain unchanged. The Sun's radius is currently given officially as .oo696 265 x 10 to 13 cms. The 'enlarged' Sun needs to have a radius of: .oo696 4324449684 and one other slightly different value to accomodate 'Earth in the Moon's orbit' total eclipses perfectly. This is an enlargement of only .ooooo1674 x 10 to 13 cms, which is less than 1/10th the size of the Moon. And yet, a change this small, can be counted or factored in perfect eclipses. But, thought images of an incredibly powerful beating Sun sculpting holes out of raw space in the mighty beats, does quicken the juices that comprise thinking, a little. Perhaps the problem is in assuming that the flex gaps have to have increments that perfectly match the sizes and shapes of currently existing physical bodied planets, for instance Venus, Earth, the Moon, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, etc. It is possible to let a thought leak, that the flex gaps need not have to be precise matches to physical endowments to reveal perfect eclipses. How can this be argued within the scope of this disclosure? It can't be argued. The best advice is seen when the flex gaps do match their physical planet counterparts to the nth degree of mathematical accuracy. Except for the case of the Earth in the Moon's orbit, in which Venus forms the flex gaps. The simplest mind game to dance around this conundrum is to assume a Moon orbit that is slightly enlarged. But that does not have to be the right answer. Holy smoke, most of physics has been historically advanced by many answers, in which, occasionally, one of them is found eventually to be correct. --------------------------- ------------------ SUMMARY TABLES ------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ DEMONSTRATIONS and RESULTING DATA TABLES ------------------------------------------------------ In the following demonstrations and resulting data tables, it is not declared that certain methods of derivation for certain terms are absolutely correct. Absolutely convenient is about what it is. In the following, a 'common term' for the Moon's mean of orbit was factored from a set of 3 Moon radii, that was factored for eclipse SET 3, as was detailed further back near the beginning of this disclosure. The common term is .oo3844 88740929 . The 'common term' was then used in the following data summaries to factor all Terran region eclipse states, and factored Moon radii also used, in the assumption that these factored Moon radii terms may (or may not) be more accurate physically to 2 or 3 more significant digits over the official sizes as published elsewhere in astronomy data tables. For convenience sake, the words 'solar term' are used to identify the existing mean orbit of the Moon, since this value is used for all of the outer eclipse states. The 'solar term' for the Moon orbit is .oo3844 01 . The word 'target' where stated means an original underived value. It does not mean the same as a an eclipse state's target. English, eh. --------------------------------------- ASTRONOMICAL CONSTANTS * --------------------------------------- Scale : 1.00 x 10 to 13 cms ............ ............. Sun radius .oo696265 Common term Moon orbit .oo3844 88740929 (terran region) Solar term Moon orbit .003844 01 (outer region) ............ ............. Planet radii |------------------------------------------------ | polar averaged equatorial |------------------------------------------------ Moon | .oooo1737 8 | .oooo1738 35 | .oooo1738 9 Mercury | unknown | unknown | .oooo2439 Venus | unknown | unknown | .oooo6050 Earth | .oooo6356 779 | .oooo6367 4715 | .oooo6378 164 Mars | .oooo3376 7 | .oooo3386 65 | .oooo3396 6 Jupiter | .ooo66770 | .ooo69084 | .ooo71398 Saturn | .ooo55021 | .ooo57675 5 | .ooo60330 | averaged = 1/2 (EQ + POLAR) Planet orbit Mean = 1/2 (Perihelion + Aphelion) Perihelion = 1.074745915 VENUS Mean = 1.082089677 Aphelion = 1.089433439 = Perihelion = 1.470963504 EARTH Mean = 1.49597927 Aphelion = 1.520995035 = Perihelion = 2.06656521 MARS Mean = 2.279410149 Aphelion = 2.492255088 = Perihelion = 7.406184963 JUPITER Mean = 7.783285433 Aphelion = 8.160385904 = Perihelion = 13.475781264 SATURN Mean = 14.269906899 Aphelion = 15.064032535 * From: UNIVERSE, text and paintings by Don Dixon, Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, 1981. With assistance from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. DETAILED BELOW ARE: Terran region SET 1 for Earth to Venus, with VENUS in the Moon orbit and Venus as flex gaps. SET 2 for Venus to Sun , with MERCURY in the Moon orbit at Venus, and Mercury as flex gaps. SET 3 for Earth to Sun , with the MOON in the Moon orbit and Earth as flex gaps. SET 4 for Earth to Venus, with EARTH in the Moon orbit and Venus as flex gaps. SET 5 for Earth to Mars , with MARS in the Moon orbit and Mars as flex gaps. Outer region SET 6 for Mars past Earth , JUPITER radius + Moon orbit focal windows SET 7 for Jupiter past Earth , JUPITER diameter focal windows SET 8 for Saturn past Earth , JUPITER radius focal windows SET 9 for Saturn past Jupiter, Moon orbit focal windows Suppliments SET 4-A for Earth to Venus, with EARTH in the Moon orbit, and Venus as flex gaps, with an 'adjusted' MOON orbit. SET 4-B for Earth to Venus, with EARTH in the Moon orbit, and Venus as flex gaps, and showing three different Terran planet sized 'tags' in the Earth's orbit. ---------------------- TERRAN REGION ---------------------- _____________________________________________________________ SET 1____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-VENUS-SUN common term .oo3844 88740929 .oooo6065 49326223 Moon orbit - 5 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.0898433439 = 'Venus EQ radius' .oooo6065 49326223 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo6060 26024901 Moon orbit - 4 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = 'Venus AVE radius' .oooo6060 26024901 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo6055 03625759 Moon orbit - 3 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = 'Venus POLAR radius' .oooo6055 03625759 3 Venus radii as input variable, are re-iterated with 1 Venus radii as end term, to home in (strange attractor) to a constant value. _____________________________________________________________ SET 2_____________________factored datas__________________________ VENUS-MERCURY-SUN Moon radii are from SET 3. common term .oooo1738 83440971 .oo3844 88740929 .oooo2438 94061957 Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 4 Mercury EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus perihelion orbit 1.074745915 = 'Mercury EQ radius' .oooo2438 94061957 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1738 32282755 .oo3844 88740929 .oooo2438 09466269 Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 3 Mercury AVE .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus mean orbit 1.082089677 = 'Mercury AVE radius' .oooo2438 09466269 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1737 89546854 .oo3844 88740929 .oooo2437 24982171 Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 2 Mercury POLAR .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus aphelion orbit 1.089433439 = 'Mercury POLAR radius' .oooo2437 24982171 _____________________________________________________________ SET 3_____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-MOON-SUN .oooo1738 83440971 common term .oo3844 88740929 1 x .oooo6378 164 MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq .oo696265 ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion = 'Moon EQUATORIAL radius' 1.520995035 .oooo1738 83440971 target .oooo1738 9 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1738 32282755 .oo3844 88740929 2 x .oooo6367 4715 MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave .oo696265 ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean (semimajor) = 'Moon AVERAGE radius' 1.49597927 .oooo1738 32282755 target .oooo1738 35 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1737 89546854 .oo3844 88740929 3 x .oooo6356 779 MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar .oo696265 ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = 'Moon POLAR radius' 1.470963504 .oooo1737 89546854 target .oooo1737 8 In case you fell asleep at the last bang, this is the same structure otherwise known as the famed total solar eclipses of the Sun, except those solid eclipses (one only, and parallax), are taught to be co-incidental, whereas these three straight liners are all perfect, because they are not solid, they are holes in space, including the Sun which is cut in half like an orange, with multiple Moons all cut in half like grapes, and multiple Earths filling the flex gaps like conjoined light bubbles, the overlaying cores quite a sight, in particular the Sun, because everything is transparant. Looking up the center line would be like looking up a telepathic telescopic. Like looking into one of the hallowed halls of Reality. In mind's eye see a cube and sphere (six sided outline) with a star of david inside as a housing which holds the artifacts stable. See, what you have here, are energy forms which have no enertia. _____________________________________________________________ SET 4____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN In this attempt, radii for Venus are too low, when re-iteration is for Venus radii as flex gaps, using known Earth radii for the focal lenses. common term .oo3844 88740929 .oooo6035 3851188 low Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = 'Earth EQ radius' .oooo6378 164 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo5979 0948066 too low Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = 'Earth AVE radius' .oooo6367 4715 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = 'Earth POLAR radius' .oooo6355 2909575 low Note : Venus EQ and AVE, and Earth POLAR, are derivatives. It is clear that something is amiss, ie these terms do not balance favorably at all. Nevertheless there are no other variables to come together to make a perfecting view with Earth replacing the Moon in the orbit of the Earth to eclipse a hole in space the size of the Sun, which turns up as a hole in space at Venus. A question is, then, what is the source size of any of the variables which first engineered this artifact in the Terran region of solar space. SET 4-A, and SETS D and D-A, (exploratory models), have better accords. _____________________________________________________________ SET 4-A__________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN using an adjusted Moon orbit Note : This set was determined using the Earth's POLAR radius to arrive at an 'adjusted' value for the Moon's mean of orbit. Terms for Venus AVERAGE and EQ came from SET 1. The accord is better, but no exactitudes matching other derived solar datas are seen, agreements are good just to the 5th significant digits. adjusted (derived) term .oo3845 78766010 .oooo6065 49326223 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = 'Earth EQ radius' .oooo6378 674516133 | target .oooo6378 164 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3845 78766010 .oooo6060 26024901 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = 'Earth AVE radius' .oooo6367 620541116 | target .oooo6367 4715 *----------------------------------------------------- adjusted (derived) term .oo3845 78766010 .oooo ooooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = 'Earth POLAR radius' .oooo6356 779 | target .oooo6356 779 This state, using an original Earth POLAR value, was used to arrive at the 'adjusted' Moon orbit. _____________________________________________________________ SET 4-B__________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN showing 'tags' on the Earth orbit resulting in near perfect accord to 'target' sizes common term .oo3844 88740929 .OOOO6065 49326223 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ) - Venus aphelion)) 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 1.089433439 = 'Earth EQ radius' .oooo6378 13335862 | target .oooo6378 164 Earth EQ from SET 4-A .oooo6378 674516133 Earth EQ from SET D-A .oooo6378 72192720 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo6060 26024901 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mercury EQ)) - Venus mean 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 .oooo2438 94061957 1.082089677 = 'Earth AVE radius' .oooo6367 46255864 | target .oooo6367 4715 Earth AV from SET 4-A .oooo6367 620541116 Earth AV from SET D-A .oooo6367 64380594 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mars EQ)) - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 .oooo3399 188592577 1.074745915 = 'Earth POLAR radius' .oooo6356 76644242 | target .oooo6356 779 Earth PO from SET 4-A .oooo6356 779 Earth PO from SET D-A .oooo6356 779 no change This oddball set has close agreements throughout, using the 'common term' for the Moon's orbit. Values for Mercury EQ and Mars EQ come from SET 2 and SET 5. _____________________________________________________________ SET 5_____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-MARS-SUN common term .oo3844 88740929 .oooo3374 89259527 Moon orbit - 5 Mars POLAR .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth apehlion 2.279410149 1.520995035 = 'Mars POLAR radius' .oooo3374 89259527 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo3386 99702592 Moon orbit - 1 Mars AVE .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth mean 2.279410149 1.49597927 = 'Mars AVE radius' .oooo3386 99702592 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 88740929 .oooo3399 188592577 Moon orbit + 3 Mars EQ .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth perihelion 2.279410149 1.470963504 = 'Mars EQ radius' .oooo3399 188592577 Mars radii are slightly higher for EQ and slightly lower for POLAR, by about 3 kms, compared to official datas published by science. _____________________ OUTER REGION _____________________ _____________________________________________________________ SET 6_____________________factored datas__________________________ MARS-EARTH-SUN 1.49597927 .oo384401 Earth orbit - Moon orbit .oo696265 .oo384401 (------------------------) x Sun radius = 'Moon orbit + JUPITER EQUATOR' Mars orbit .ooo7138 42641218 2.279410149 *----------------------------------------------------- 1.520995035 Earth aphelion .oo696265 .oo384401 .ooo7138 42641218 (--------------) x Sun radius = 'Moon orbit + JUPITER EQUATOR Mars orbit + Earth EQ radius 2.279410149 + Mercury polar radius' focus window = .oo4646 0025108 - Moon orbit .oo3844 01 - Jupiter EQ .ooo7138 42641218 quick - Earth EQ .oooo6378 164 little table = Mercury POLAR .oooo2437 2969863 ------------- ---------------- target is .oooo2437 24982171 from SET 2 _____________________________________________________________ SET 7_____________________factored datas__________________________ JUPITER-EARTH-SUN A quick schematic of the JUPITER focus window at Earth. FOCUS WINDOW + + A SCHEMATIC | | | | | | | | not to scale | | | | ....|....... * *----- --*-- -----* * ......|..... MOON ORBIT | | EARTH | | MOON ORBIT | | DIAMETER | | | | | | * <.........Jupiter POLAR diameter x 2 Jupiter EQUATORIAL diameter x 2.......> Cross Sectional Areas Terms and datas in detail. 1.49597927 .oo384401 .ooo66770 4187908 Earth mean orbit - (Moon orbit - 1 Jupiter polar) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius = 1 JUPITER POLAR diameter Jupiter mean orbit .oo696265 7.783285433 2 x .ooo66770 4187908 *----------------------------------------------------- 1.520993504 .oo384401 2 x .ooo7138 1769173 Earth aphelion orbit - (Moon orbit - 2 Jupiter EQ radius (1 diameter) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius = 1 JUPITER EQ diameter Jupiter perihelion orbit .oo696265 7.406184963 2 x .ooo7138 1769173 _____________________________________________________________ SET 8_____________________factored datas__________________________ SATURN-EARTH-SUN .ooo60330 1.49597927 (Saturn EQUATORIAL diameter) Earth orbit + (Moon orbit - 2 Saturn EQ) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius .oo696265 Saturn orbit 14.269906899 = 1 JUPITER EQUATOR + 1 Moon EQ .ooo7138 17691736 .oooo1739 5447975 target .oooo1738 9 *----------------------------------------------------- .ooo55021 1.49597927 (Saturn POLAR diameter) Earth orbit + (Moon orbit - 2 Saturn POLAR) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius .oo696265 Saturn orbit 14.269906899 = '1 JUPITER POLAR + 1 EARTH polar' .ooo6677 04187908 .oooo6356 07597219 target .oooo6356 779 _____________________________________________________________ SET 9_____________________factored datas__________________________ SATURN-JUPITER-SUN with + - tag factor PLUS | 'perfect' 7.783285433 | 2 x .oooo6367 4715 .oooo1738 35 Jupiter orbit + (2 Earth ave - 1 Moon ave) (----------------------------) x Sun radius .00696265 Saturn orbit = 'MOON ORBIT .oo384401 14.269906899 - (1 Earth AVE - 1 Moon AVE)' .oooo6367 4715 .oooo1738 1011114 target .oooo1738 35 *----------------------------------------------------- MINUS | 'perfect' 7.783285433 | 2 x .oooo6367 4715 .oooo1738 35 Jupiter orbit - (2 Earth ave - 1 Moon ave) (----------------------------) x Sun radius .oo696265 Saturn orbit = 'MOON ORBIT .oo3844 01 14.269906899 - (1 Earth EQ - 1 Moon POLAR)' .oooo6378 164 .oooo1738 0625774 target .oooo1737 8 ------------------------------ TERRAN REGION AGAIN -------------------------------------------------- using 'SOLAR TERM' .oo384401 for the Moon's orbit -------------------------------------------------- SET A____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-VENUS-SUN solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 5 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = 'Venus EQ radius' .oooo6064 10910724 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 4 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = 'Venus AVE radius' .oooo6058 8772882 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo6053 65448899 Moon orbit - 3 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = 'Venus POLAR radius' .oooo6053 65448899 SET B___________________factored datas__________________________ VENUS-MERCURY-SUN solar term .oooo1738 9 .oo3844 01 .oooo2438 38696944 Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 4 Mercury EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus perihelion orbit 1.074745915 = 'Mercury EQ radius' .oooo2438 38696944 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1738 35 .oo3844 01 .oooo2437 540961368 Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 3 Mercury AVE .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus mean orbit 1.0820995035 = 'Mercury AVE radius' .oooo2437 540961368 *----------------------------------------------------- .oooo1737 8 .oo3844 01 .oooo2436 695537715 Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 2 Mercury POLAR .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus aphelion orbit 1.089433439 = 'Mercury POLAR radius' .oooo2436 695537715 SET C____________________factored datas____________________________ EARTH-MOON-SUN targets Moon EQ .oooo1738 9 Moon AVE .oooo1738 35 Moon POLAR .oooo1737 8 solar term .oo384401 .oooo1738 43091148 .oooo6378 164 MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius .oo696265 EARTH aphelion = 'moon EQUATORIAL radius' 1.520995035 .oooo1738 43091148 | low .oo384401 .oooo1737 91255047 .oooo6367 4715 MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius .oo696265 EARTH mean (semimajor) = 'moon AVERAGE radius' 1.49597927 .oooo1737 91255047 | low .oo384401 .oooo1737 47818096 .oooo6356 779 MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius .oo696265 EARTH perihelion = 'moon POLAR radius' 1.470963504 .oooo1737 47818096 | low SET D____________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN Venus terms are from SET A. solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = 'Earth EQ radius' .oooo6375 67744262 | low target .oooo6378 164 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = 'Earth AVE radius' .oooo6364 65334053 | low target .oooo6367 4715 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = 'Earth POLAR radius' .oooo6353 8406702 | low target .oooo6356 779 SET D-A__________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN using an adjusted Moon radius Adjusted (derived) term is from SET 4-A. These Earth radii results are just slightly higher than the results of SET 4-A. adjusted (derived) term .oo3845 78766010 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion 1.49597927 1.089433439 = 'Earth EQ radius' .oooo6378 72192720 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3845 78766010 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean 1.49597927 1.082089677 = 'Earth AVE radius' .oooo6367 64380594 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3845 78766010 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 1.074745915 = 'Earth POLAR radius' .oooo6356 779 no change SET D-B__________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN showing 'tags' on Earth's orbit Venus terms from SET A. solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo6064 10910724 Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ) - Venus aphelion)) 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 1.089433439 = 'Earth EQ radius' .oooo6376 67785866 | low *----------------------------------------------------- Mercury term from SET B. .oo3844 01 .oooo6058 8772882 Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mercury EQ)) - Venus mean 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 .oooo2438 38696944 = 'Earth AVE radius' .oooo6366 00940859 | low *----------------------------------------------------- Mars term from SET E. .oo3844 01 .oooo oooo Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR .oo696265 ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mars EQ)) - Venus perihelion 1.49597927 .oooo6378 164 .oooo3398 412892451 1.074745915 = 'Earth POLAR radius' .oooo6355 51370136 | low SET E____________________factored datas___________________________ EARTH-MARS-SUN solar term .oo3844 01 .oooo3374 12243952 Moon orbit - 5 Mars POLAR .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth apehlion 2.279410149 1.520995035 = 'Mars POLAR radius' .oooo3374 12243953 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo3386 22410792 Moon orbit - 1 Mars AVE .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth mean 2.279410149 1.49597927 = 'Mars AVE radius' .oooo3386 22410792 *----------------------------------------------------- .oo3844 01 .oooo3398 412892449 Moon orbit + 3 Mars EQ .oo696265 -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth perihelion 2.279410149 1.470963504 = 'Mars EQ radius' .oooo3398 412892451 ____________________________________________________________________ AND FINALLY HERE ARE THE SAME DATA SETS IN PURE ASKME FORM (NO DIGITS, FUNCTIONS ONLY) ____________________________________________________________________ Anyone can use their own datas and data tables to see what they can come up with either better or worse using the naked shells tabled below in this final set. -------------------------------------- TERRAN REGION ONE FINAL TIME naked artifacts -------------------------------------- _____________________________________________________________ SET X-1____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-VENUS-SUN common term Moon orbit - 5 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = 'Venus EQ radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 4 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = 'Venus AVE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 3 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = 'Venus POLAR radius' 3 Venus radii as input variable, are re-iterated with 1 Venus radii as end term, to home in (strange attractor) to a constant value. _____________________________________________________________ SET X-2_____________________factored datas__________________________ VENUS-MERCURY-SUN common term Moon orbit + 1 Moon EQ - 4 Mercury EQ ------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus perihelion orbit = 'Mercury EQ radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 1 Moon AVE - 3 Mercury AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus mean orbit = 'Mercury AVE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 1 Moon POLAR - 2 Mercury POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Venus aphelion orbit = 'Mercury POLAR radius' _____________________________________________________________ SET X-3_____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-MOON-SUN common term MOON orbit + 1 Moon eq - 1 Earth eq ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH aphelion = 'Moon EQUATORIAL radius' *----------------------------------------------------- MOON orbit + 1 Moon ave - 2 Earth ave ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH mean (semimajor) = 'Moon AVERAGE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- MOON orbit + 1 Moon polar - 3 Earth polar ----------------------------------------- x SUN radius EARTH perihelion = 'Moon POLAR radius' In case you fell asleep at the last bang, this is the same structure otherwise known as the famed total solar eclipses of the Sun, except those solid eclipses (only one, and parallax), are thought to be co-incidental, whereas these three straight liners are all perfect, because they are not solid, they are holes in space, including the Sun which is cut in half like an orange, with multiple Moons all cut in half like grapes, and multiple Earths filling the flex gaps like conjoined light bubbles, the overlaying cores quite a sight, in particular the Sun, because everything is transparant. Looking up the center line would be like looking up a telepathic telescopic. Like looking into one of the hallowed halls of Reality. In mind's eye see a cube and sphere (six sided outline) with a star of david inside as a housing which holds the artifacts stable. SEE, WHAT YOU HAVE HERE, ARE ENERGY FORMS WHICH HAVE NO ENERTIA. _____________________________________________________________ SET X-4____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN In this attempt, radii for Venus are too low, when re-iteration is for Venus radii as flex gaps, using known Earth radii for the focal lenses. common term Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ (low) ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = 'Earth EQ radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE (too low) ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = 'Earth AVE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = 'Earth POLAR radius' ____________________________________________________________ SET X-4-A__________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN using an adjusted Moon orbit adjusted (derived) term Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus aphelion = 'Earth EQ radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus mean = 'Earth AVE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- adjusted (derived) term Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius Earth orbit - Venus perihelion = 'Earth POLAR radius' This state, using an original Earth POLAR value, is used to arrive at an 'adjusted' Moon orbit. ___________________________________________________________ SET X-4-B__________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-EARTH-SUN showing 'tags' on the Earth orbit common term Moon orbit - 2 Venus EQ ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - 1 Earth EQ) - Venus aphelion)) = 'Earth EQ radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Venus AVE ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mercury EQ)) - Venus mean = 'Earth AVE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 0 Venus POLAR ------------------------------------------ x Sun radius (Earth orbit - (1 Earth EQ + 1 Mars EQ)) - Venus perihelion = 'Earth POLAR radius' _____________________________________________________________ SET X-5_____________________factored datas__________________________ EARTH-MARS-SUN common term Moon orbit - 5 Mars POLAR -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth apehlion = 'Mars POLAR radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit - 1 Mars AVE -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth mean = 'Mars AVE radius' *----------------------------------------------------- Moon orbit + 3 Mars EQ -------------------------------------------) x Sun radius Mars orbit - Earth perihelion = 'Mars EQ radius' _____________________ OUTER REGION _____________________ _____________________________________________________________ SET X-6_____________________factored datas__________________________ MARS-EARTH-SUN Earth orbit - Moon orbit (------------------------) x Sun radius = 'Moon orbit + JUPITER EQ' Mars orbit *----------------------------------------------------- Earth aphelion (--------------) x Sun radius = 'Moon orbit + JUPITER EQ Mars orbit + Earth EQ radius + Mercury polar radius' focus window - Moon orbit - Jupiter EQ quick - Earth EQ little table = Mercury POLAR ------------- _____________________________________________________________ SET X-7_____________________factored datas__________________________ JUPITER-EARTH-SUN A quick schematic of the JUPITER focus window at Earth. FOCUS WINDOW + + A SCHEMATIC | | | | not to scale | | | | .......... * *----- --*-- -----* * ............ MOON ORBIT | | EARTH | | | | | | + + Jupiter POLAR diameter Jupiter EQUATORIAL diameter cross sectional area Earth mean orbit - (Moon orbit - 1 Jupiter polar) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius = '1 JUPITER POLAR diameter' Jupiter mean orbit *----------------------------------------------------- Earth aphelion orbit - (Moon orbit - 2 Jupiter EQ radius (1 diameter) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius = '1 JUPITER EQ diameter' Jupiter perihelion orbit _____________________________________________________________ SET X-8_____________________factored datas__________________________ SATURN-EARTH-SUN (Saturn EQUATORIAL diameter) Earth orbit + (Moon orbit - 2 Saturn EQ) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = '1 JUPITER EQUATOR + 1 Moon EQ' *----------------------------------------------------- (Saturn POLAR diameter) Earth orbit + (Moon orbit - 2 Saturn POLAR) (-----------------------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = '1 JUPITER POLAR + 1 EARTH polar' _____________________________________________________________ SET X-9_____________________factored datas__________________________ SATURN-JUPITER-SUN with + - tag factor PLUS | 'perfect' Jupiter orbit + (2 Earth ave - 1 Moon ave) (----------------------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = 'MOON ORBIT - (1 Earth AVE - 1 Moon AVE)' *----------------------------------------------------- MINUS | 'perfect' Jupiter orbit - (2 Earth ave - 1 Moon ave) (----------------------------) x Sun radius Saturn orbit = 'MOON ORBIT - (1 Earth EQ - 1 Moon POLAR)' ___________________________ _______________________________ ___________________________________ _______________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ ONE FINAL OBSERVATION __________________________ HYPER FINE SWITCHEROO - a tiny element of chaos changes everything. It has been repeatedly mentioned that the 'Hyper Fine' quantities for each given eclipse system involving a set of states associated with given planets and given solar obits, comprise datas which are locked in tight for each term, the terms for planet radii gained by strange attractor mathematics whose wonderous forms are such that the 'attractors' seem not to be able to produce any other datas except those we want. Fundamental physics cannot get better than this thanks to such 'strange attractors'. These formed the radii in the first place before we (many humans) had a chance to mess around with planet radii and eclipses studied in Newtonian mechanics. Just how delicately fragile the radii are is easily demonstrated by forcibly changing a radii to an unreal value how (introducing a tiny element of chaos) made unreal by a very tiny amount only a few miles and watch two things transpire. First, the 'strange attractiveness' begins to unravel instead of homing in on a fixed value ('attractor'). In 'unravelling, the same proportionate equations used for the 'strange attractors' actually causes the mathematical certainty of a perfect eclipse state to begin to fall apart in rapidly expanding departures from the solar constants used to fuel the 'attractor' equations. This is the first rule - that only the constants (planet radii) themselves are in a complete system-wide co-ordinated affair. The second tone in the lobes of the human brainbox studying perfect eclipses is major stunning reversal in the flexing progressions of Hyper Fine quantities as the false math data begins to unravel from strange attractor status. By this is meant the following: flex works in the physical body system (Earth-Moon-Sun) to smaller space measures the closer a body is to gravity from mass (Moon approaching closer to Earth, Earth in orbit closer approaching the Sun). Whereas, in, for instance, the Venus-Mercury-Sun system (where a massless 'hole in space' (Mercury) eclipses the sun when the massless Mercury is in a non-mass Moon orbit around Venus (the Moon's orbit is teleported to Venus and there a massless Mercury eclipses the Sun at the center of the solar system)), in these Venus perfect eclipses also of 'strange attractors' the Hyper Fine Distinction is in reverse, that is, the closer a body is to a mass body, the larger the measure of space comprising body radii and orbital position. However, when 'unravelling', the 'reverse' form of hyper fine distinction almost instantly transforms into the other form as seen in the Earth-Moon-Sun system, and quickly thereafter, the whole system mathematically goes on to disolve with no constants through only a few more re-iterations in doing the 'strange attractor' equations using non-discrete datas for even just one of the state's radii terms. In other words a tiny amount of chaos destroys such systems completely. ------------------------------------------------------------- See: TABLE 4-3 and TABLE 4-4, found in DISCUSSION F-C under 'HYPER FINE NARROW RANGE and SWITCHING', - in SWITCHEROO.TXT file in the ECLIPSE.HTM home page, for an example with terms and datas showing how easily a Mercury 'strange attractor' perfect state transforms its hyper fine distinction (switches) when a tiny element of chaos (falsification) is entered into its 'strange attractor' ratio proportion equations, the falsification causing the equation to unravel and disolve into totally meaningless chaos. ------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________ _______________________________ ___________________________________ _______________________________________ _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT ______________________ In a footnote from leaking thoughts it can be suggested that perfect eclipse structures such as occur as holes in space throughout the solar system, at least out to Saturn, can be used to skillfully factor a more accurate value for the universal Gravitational constant. To do this, astronomers would really have to polish the lenses of the Hubble telescope and other measuring devices to get as hard a handle as possible on Terran body radii, particularly for Venus and Mercury. And then use the hardened datas to advantage in coming to a consensus as to just what the mean of the Moon's orbit should actually be in greater detail, for instance. Also, then, a more accurate reading on the orbit and eccentricity of Saturn, for example, should be possible. Etc. Oops, thoughts leak. ---- Finished ---- August 31, 1996. Second editing October, 2000. email: greydon@look.com