==========================================================
Title
'HYPERWAVE ESTATES'
or
ELEMENTARY PARTICLE MASS HYPERWAVES
==========================================================
THIS VERSION RELEASED BY GREYDON MOORE
AS AN EMAIL OF 16516 LINES TOTAL AND
557,313 K IN SIZE. (C) 1995.
RELEASED JANUARY 21 1995.
APPENDED JANUARY 26 1995.
INTERNET ADDRESS greydon@look.com
 
__________________________________________
PAPER 1 BEGIN DECEMBER 16/94

PART 1 ABSTRACT
Intro
...............
Self evident
Accuracies 99.999 to 99.99999 %
Oddballs
Higgs boson ?
Top quark mass candidate ?
Redundancy
Particle charges
Particle vrs momentum
Particle spin states
PROTON wavelength
The word 'isospin'
The illusive stable ETA
Candidate for the illusive 'higgs' boson
PART 2 RANGE OF GROUPING MODEL
PART 3 CRITICAL CRITERIA
Plank's Constant Converter
Particle prediction
PART 4 SOLAR PHYSICAL CONSTANTS

Interlude PART 5 DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION
 Handshakes
 Reasons for Believing in
wide width resonances
How about those RHO's
Saturn = Pion
PART 6 HISTORY
PART 7 CONVENTIONS
PART 8 RELEVANT SIDECARS
Amplitudes by the Fine Structure Constant
The PROTON is just sitting there
Behold the bold ELECTRON
PART 9 THE EARTH/MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA
Earth and Venus XIONS
Predicting a XION mass
These RHO's have resonance
More
Pi in the sky
Yin Yang Amplitudes
The super highway of PARTICLES
A mass for the NEUTRINO
Cooking the books
The Cooked Books N^ Version
.... These particles have persuasion
Virtual Reality
Its UP to the UPSILONS
Poof! the CONNECTORS

The J/PSI interlinks
Summary statements
PART 10 SYMMETRY FACTORS
Venus Rising
Su(3) Multiplex groupings
Su(3) Octuplet set
Su(3) Decuplet set
Regards the OMEGA mass
Proton (plus.minus) Ping.Pongs
A ping.pong statement
Decay modes seen at once
The stable particles of status ****
Toot! Toot ! The ETA is missing
Kaon circle multiplex
Kaon Geometry Image
The Classical Electron Radius
KAON Bubbles revisited
CIRCLE Geometry
NEUTRON Circle Geometry
ETA Circle Geometry
PART 10A BANG BUBBLES
Power bubbles for stable SIGMAs
Power bubble 1 1/2+ SIGMA +
Power bubble 2 1/2+ SIGMA o
Power bubble 3 1/2+ SIGMA 
Spoke too S O O N !
The MUON bang bubble
The N^ bang bubble
The E bang bubble
PART 11 DESCRIPTIONS
 The KAON box of
fluctuating wavelengths
and KAON Hyperwave sets
 Fractured wavelengths
 Hyperwaves
 MARS playing tunes with the Proton
Mars and Mercury
Mars and Venus
Mars and Earth
Mars itself
Mars and Jupiter
 The JUPITER balloons for IONS
 PIONS in the sky at SATURN
 JUPITER bang patterns
JUPITER orbital HEXAGRAM

JUPITER hyperwave estates
Full picture
 The MUON and NEUTRON
Sing the same song
French horn N^ version
PART 12 FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON
PART 13 CRITICAL ACCURACY
PART 14 SYMMETRY RATIO GROUPS
Integer ratios
BALLOON mass states
Here comes the MUON
BALLOONS vrs the RYDBERG ratios
Speculations
PART 15 KEYBOARD
PART 16 CANDIDATE FOR THE ILLUSIVE 'HIGGS' BOSON
PART 17 MOVE THE OUTER PLANETS OVER TO THE ELECTRON
PART 18 GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT SPECULATION
PART 19 BOOMS FROM THE ROOMS OF JUPITER
PART 20 THE THEORY OF FLUTTERS
PART 21 INTRINSIC SYMBOLIC LOGIC
PART 22 RIFF RAFF
PART 23 ERRATA
PART 24 THE MARRIAGE
corollary 
An Electron mass energy of .51099906 5 has been used
throughout the following. The reason is intuitional.
Things seems to coordinate in a slightly better way
with one more digit added to the Electron's mass, so
. 00000005 was used (half way between 0 and 9) for the
added digit.
PART 1 
ABSTRACT and INTRO

ABSTRACT

Three mechanical operators yield dozens of elementary particle
mass energies, including all of the stable baryons, the Decuplet
baryons, and the stable Muon, Pion, and Kaons. Other mass energies
also are bound within the mechanical picture, including the mass
energy difference between the Proton and Neutron. The mechanical
operators turn a different ego to the picture of symmetry involving
the particles. In here, nucleon inner higher energy resonances
are the playing field, in which lineal summed factors of particle
wavelengths (Compton), add, and subtract, and combine, in patterns
to compose resulting mass energies of particles. The mass energies
calculated in this way are accurate to 4 to 7 digits to the known
experimental 'FITS' for each of the particles involved. In all,
dozens of particles are grouped into several major patterns, which
includes mass splittings between different CHARGE states for many
of the particle wavelengths so factored.
In this scene, the particle wavelengths (Compton) are the predictable
parameters, and mass energies the result. This is in complete converse
to atomic physics in which Rydberg prime number ratios (whole integers)
for the energy states predict electron properties for electrons in
'shell' orbits around a nucleus, and the photon wavelengths for the
energy levels result non lineally.
On the other hand, in the elementary particle scene per se, the
wavelengths (Compton) are operators which control the picture's
grouping patterns. It is a much larger scene than just the octuplet
and decuplet of Su(4) symmetries, in that the basic states of both
Su(3) groups are included, as are also certain Leptons, and certain
Mesons, plus many Baryons not included in the scope of the original
Su(3). Both Su(3) groups are housed in the larger Su(4) array, which
of itself is not cited elsewhere in the datas of this disclosure.
Unlike the original Bohr model of the atom, which modelled electron
'orbits' as similar to planetary orbits but was soon learned to be a
nonvalid representation (not the same as the actual solar system nor
the electron's behavior), the razzle dazzle of the elementary particle
scheme involves actual existing planetary orbits used as control models
for wavelength (Compton) structures that directly yield particle mass
energies in matching agreements to known charge and mass energy states
for the particles involved. In fact, in the cases of stable baryons,
the accuracy is uncanny, suggestion that a flowing real time dynamic
recurrance of subatomic interactions is sitting out in space in the
Solar System.
The Fine Structure Constant is an intrinsic ratio between many of
the parts of the grouped particles. Whole integer and whole ratio
multiples of the Fine Structure Constant seem to occur but these
are Whole integer ratios of the Electron, in which 1/3 and 1/2 the
mass energy of the Electron are basic entity constituents which are
amplified by multiples of the Fine Structure Constant.
There is strong indication that a 1/3 fractional integer unit of
electron mass in fact can carry a full unit of electronic charge.
Where 2/3 E is seen, this may be a unit of momentum (no charge),
equivalent to a 1/3 E unit of mass, and carried along with 1/3 E
unit of mass plus 1 full unit of charge. (Speculation).
Along the way, in essence, the wavelengths of certain high energy
particles can sum as the equivalent of two wavelengths of the Proton.
Or, otherwise, the wavelengths of two Protons can be found as a factor
within the wavelengths of other particles. In this case, the factors
are conceiled somewhat like positive and negative factors of a square
root, where any whole number can be a factor of both, positive, and
negative, square roots, the root of the negative square not known by
taking a square root of the positive number, the root has to be known
in advance, when negative. In a similar sense, wavelengths which sum
to equal other wavelengths are not discernable in reverse. The task
is the find such sums by looking everywhere to find them as they
gradually turn up, one by one. Many such 'summed' wavelengths have
been located, and are reported below, throughout this disclosure.

INTRO

SELF EVIDENT
Most all of the enclosed datas are in self evident symmetry
sets, or in self evident disclosures of power amplifications
relating to whole integer ratio multiples of the ELECTRON,
and powers of the Fine Structure Constant.
The symmetries arrise from a lineal sum approach to calculating
the exact masses of elementary particles. The (NeutronProton)
mass difference is intrinsic throughout the calculations, as a
self contained mass unit, and also as a partial mass unit which
without the Electron works in lineal sum array with multiples
of 1/3 units of the Electron mass.
In effect, the Compton wavelengths of particles are sub factored
into units which interlink in lineal sum ways to becomes Compton
wavelengths of other particles.
Such sub unitizing is deemed 'fracturing', or 'fractured'
wavelengths, in this disclosure
Models for seeing images as to how to control the lineal summing
of the wavelength parts is readily at hand, in the existence of
the Solar system, specifically in the orbits of the 6 innermost
planets, and importantly the orbit of the Moon of Earth.
The images, self evident in the extreme, embody symmetrical
contructions, and groups of constructions also symmetrical,
such that a vastly expanded picture of what is going on in
the realms of fundamental physics and elementary particles
is apparent without question.
Most at the core of the picture, is the calculation of MASSES
of particles to the nth degree of accuracy, matching the FITS
gained from the best of experimental and particle accelarator
observations.
ACCURACIES 99.999 to 99.99999 %

In concidering just the 'Self Evident' disclosures, what is shown
are MASSES (mass energies) and/or momentum equivalents, calculated
to 12 significant digits in the form of calculations and presented
intact in the detailed methods used for presenting those facts.
These high digit calculations correspond to known masses of
elementary particles to an unheard of accuracy of typically
99.999 % in a field in which NO particle masses can be
calculated at all by direct physical methods except for the
mass of the ELECTRON.
There are some correspondences shown in the
EARTH MOON METAPHOR section which have the
unheard of accuracy of 99.9999 % involving
mass related calculations.
A particular accuracy involving EARTH orbit as a
(wave/orbit) factor, goes right to conclusion at
99.99999 %
ODDBALLS
Here and there in the disclosures, however, are included a few
isolated statements which do not occur directly from means that
are instantly self evident, either as a symmetry inclusion or a
power amplified state. These are included just in the case that
there may be a MECHANICAL offering in the background of their
derived occurrence that is not seen by me, but may be useful to
another investigator. On the other hand these oddballs may have
no actual meaning, in which case, ignore them.
HIGGS BOSON ?
The illusive HIGGS boson is suggested throughout these disclosures,
but no attempt is made herein to pin point any single term as HIGGS
since very little has reached the public domain literatures as to
exactly WHAT a HIGGS boson is. At the moment it seems nothing more
than a physicist's holy grail.
From the point of view of an outsider in the public domain,
looking in to hard cord physics from long distance outside,
most of the embodied nuckle crunchers cited in the Particle
Data Review Tables for physicists as crunchy sandwich matter,
in details for each and every known and suspected entity, is
not digestible as a quick meal nor even snacks of a lifetime.
And so a HIGGS BOSON candidate
is not being pointed to herein.
REDUNDANCY
Oh yes!
Here and there throughout, a given derivation will be shown
more than once, in fact some several times. The reason for
such madness is not loss of control, but the fact that each
time shown, pictures the given entity in a difference model
or difference configuration even though it will be the same
entity just shown in different colors and a different light.
PARTICLE CHARGES
There is no attempt in these disclosures, to tackle anything like
determining if a given MASS or mass energy equivalent, is that of
a pure particle, or is a unit of associated momentum mass energy
only or orbital momentum factor, without particle properties.
Also, no attempt has been made to rigorously balance particle
Charges, or other particle Chromodynamic quantum properties,
other than to demonstrate with great clarity the existence of
particle CHARGED and particle NEUTRAL states directly related
to (wave/mass) derivations. As to how these seeming charges
exactitudes have turned up is not addressed. Both POSTIVE and
NEGATIVE charges plus NEUTRALS, are pointed out in accuracies
that flash like Neon signs.
PARTICLE VRS MOMENTUM
As for fundamental operators seen in the models there is an
intuitive suspicion that planet orbits used as models for
the lineal sum factor of wave (Compton) particle components
are somehow related to momentum, so also perhaps quarks and
+  local orbiting entities such as the Moon, may be Quarks
revealed in Images.
PARTICLE SPIN STATES
There are grounds for this suggestion re: QUARKS
etc.
In BANG IMAGE 2, under JUPITER BANG PATTERNS of
PART 11, is a planet wave/orbit depiction in which
Venus shown in 'winter' position on the far side
of the SUN, is associated with the particle charge
states of the family of 3/2 XIONS (1823) MeV.
In the EARTH MOON metaphor of PART 9, from which
XION counterparts to Earth and Venus orbits are
detailed, the 3/2 XION state is an unexplained
mystery.
For instance, why is it not a 5/2+ XION for the
orbital interactions of VENUS.
Well, the answer to that is that, it is NOT.
However, with VENUS on the far side of the SUN in
a ' winter' position with respect to EARTH plus
1/2 (Earth + Venus) orbits, there is self evident
a mechanical apparatus opportuning a PICTURE for
the 3/2 factor, and also for the fact that there
are Unstable and Stable particles involved in the
EARTH MOON metaphor.
The mechanical scene in BANG IMAGE 2 is offered
as a powerful CLUE in discerning + and  partical
JP states.
PROTON WAVELENGTH
No attempt has been made to use the PROTON Compton wavelength
as a factoring means in deriving mass states of particles. But
the use of the PROTON Compton wavelength should be possible in
readdressing some (or all) of the derivations in a different,
albiet more complex, way.
The simple elegance of an exact SOLAR MODEL has been maintained
in order to help systematically organize and present all of the
enclosed datas and derivations.
In this 'exact SOLAR MODEL' approach, lineal sum factors for
planet orbits can result in MeV and mass entities whose datas
drift slightly from perfect exactitudes, due to the nature of
reciprocals, in which lineal sum factors reciprocated are not
also lineal summed on their own.
Nevertheless some of the reciprocated lineal summed factors
also appear in lineal sum arrangements. For instance orbits
lineally summed, when reciprocated, in many instances link
up as mass sequences which embody lineally summed whole and
integer units of particle masses and fractured masses.
In particular, the (NeutronProton) mass difference symbolized
throughout as N^ ties together many of the main states factored.
In truth, under the topic VENUS RISING, in PART 10, the N^
factor appears locked in an embrace with the planet Venus so
self evident, this appears to be the result of a fundamental
oscillation which exists self systained without question.
What the actual oscillation might be is your guess.
TASK
It is anyone's task to put this information together into a
valid dymanic pattern suitable for Chromodynamic Physics. A
myriad of factored datas point to claims of everything from
decay modes, to antiparticle mass generations. But as you
will see, this disclosure has artfully stayed away from the
more arcane side of that fundamental physics. Instead just
the facts themselves, from derivations and strings, are put
on the table and anyone who wants to dabble time to look at
proper fittings into Chromo Dynamic rigors is welcome to be
enjoyed. Think of how long it took to hammer the levels and
spin states and orbital momentums of Quantum dynamic into a
workable scheme 6 and 7 decades ago.

The word 'ISOSPIN'

It is not known by this author if the word ISOSPIN
as used in this disclosure is formally correct.
ISOSPIN is used to specify a charge arrangement where no
formal physics dictionary term seems to actually apply.
Specifically a problem is that o charge is not
an actual charge state, but an absence of charge.
Furthermore where a mid state mass (between two charge
states) is derived, there is no single word to define
that other than the category 'MIXED CHARGES', as used
in the PARTICLE REVIEW DATAS, circ. '94.
And so, the word ISOSPIN (from original SU(3) symmetry summaries
circ. 1970 has been adopted as a buzz word (or catchall) to denote
something about a charge, or also an inbetween state with no DATAS
nor charges, to identify something of special note about a particle
partner in wave/mass harmonic oscillations.
And that explains the use of the word ISOSPIN in this disclosure.

THE ILLUSIVE STABLE ETA

In (wave/orbit/mass) harmonics, the
stable ETA mass (547.45) MeV FIT has
not been found.
A lot of work was spent looking for a canditate.
Nothing has been found. In all possible instances
a derived resulting MASS was either just too big,
or too small, landing on either side of the ETA
mass, but not right on it. These are MAJOR misses.
There seems to be nothing in Solar model harmonics
that comes close.
The closest candidate is a mass of roughly
555 MeV from two derivations. And nothing
else has been seen. All other (wave/orbit)
harmonics seem to fall outside the picture.
See below under TOOT! TOOT! The ETA is missing!
in PART 11 for what schetchy details can be shown
for the stable ETA particle.
Also find under TOOT! TOOT! an ETA that turned up
totally unexpectedly when exploring MARS + PLANET
interactions on December 31, 94. At that moment
ETAs turned up in abundance through the wide arms
of JUPITER.
So ETAs exist in the interdimensional scheme of
things too. Forget the opening sentence above,
it is wrong.
It was originally written suggesting something
obtruse about ETA's, since none had been found
over the years until suddenly BINGO ! plain as
day reflecting a claim that all wave harmonics
for particle masses are completely hidden away
unseen, unknown, until hit on directly.

CANDIDATE FOR THE ILLUSIVE 'HIGGS' BOSON

In the IMAGES, a + and  factor alluding to the mean orbit of
the Earth's MOON has been used throughout, in producing exact
changes in states of Charge, and whole integer 1/3, 2/3, and
3/3 units of the Electron mass, and single units of +  N^.
If the Moon +  feature has a (wave/orbit) equivalent mass its
wave (Compton) will be in the order of 3.84401 x 10 to 17 cm
and its equivalent mass energy will be in the range of
[513,336] MeV
more than 500 times the mass of the PROTON, or roughly about
6 times the mass energies of the W and Z Weak Vector Bosons.
At that mass there will be major +  fluctuations due to
variable drifts when
factoring particle
masses in eccentric
sets with orbit/wave
datas stamped in iron
(as fixed constants).
========================
TOP QUARK MASS CANDIDATE
========================
The alledged 'Higgs' boson might also be
a candidate for the mass of a TOP Quark.
For that matter, there are bangs that are even heavier
(about 5 times more so) that might be the super heavy
cowboys top quark theorists expect. These can best be
seen exampled under such topics as 'Jupiter Hyperwave'
Estates, in Part 11.
================
OTHER CANDIDATES
================
There are other unnamed exact entities throughout this disclosure,
however, none in the ultra small range of 3.84401 x 10 to 17 cm.
Any of these might be concidered HIGGS candidates.
The INTRO has made a lot of promises.
Lets see how well they have been fullfilled.
 END OF INTRO 
PART 2 
RANGE OF GROUPING MODEL

The following elementary particle masses, and fundamental constants,
are linked into a common understanding via predicable understructures.
STABLE  UNSTABLE
  
Electron (lepton)  Rho (meson) (charges)
Muon (lepton)  3/2+ Delta (baryon) Su3
Pion (charged) (meson)  3/2+ Sigma (baryon) Su3
Pion (neutral) (meson)  3/2+ Xion (baryon) (charges) Su3
Kaon (charged) (meson)  3/2 Xion (baryon) (charges)
Kaon (neutral) (meson)  
Eta (meson)  J/PSI (meson) (low)
1/2+ Proton (baryon) Su3 *  J/PSI (meson) (high)
1/2+ Neutron (baryon) Su3  Upsilon (meson) (low)
1/2+ Lambda (baryon) Su3  Upsilon (meson) (high)
1/2+ Sigma (baryon) Su3  B+ Bo (meson)
1/2+ Xion (charges) (baryon) Su3 
 
3/2+ Omega (baryon) Su3 

 * Su(3) are two symmetry groups,
The charge states seen are the  known as the Octuplet, and the
first level FITS, those listed  Decuplet, from the Su(4) set.
as the main particle property. 

 OTHER
Antiparticle charges and other  
more kinky variables are not 
suggested, although there is  A suggested small mass
no reason to assume they are  for the Electron Neutrino
excluded. 
The radius of the two biggest planets in the solar system, Jupiter
and Saturn, is used to create locked in constants with 2 particles.
PHYSICAL CONSTANTS

Planks Constant
Planks converter = (MeV to Wave) and (Wave to MeV)
Fine Structure Constant
Speed of Light
Neutron  Proton mass energy difference
Electron Classical Radius
Borh radius (orbit) of the Electron in an atom
ABSTRACT CONSTANT

1 x 10 to power 27 = Ratio of magnetude between length
of a solar orbit, and equivalent
particle wavelength (Compton).
The following solar space lengths are linked into a
common understanding with predicable understructures.
DIRECT inDIRECT half waves
 
Perhihelion
VENUS Mean
Aphelion
Perhihelion 1/2 (Earth + Venus)
EARTH Mean 1/2 (Earth  Venus)
Aphelion
1/2 (Mars + Earth)
MOON Mean 1/2 (Mars  Earth)
1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
Perhihelion
MARS Mean 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)
Aphelion
JUPITER Mean
Radius
Eccentricity
SATURN Mean
radius (distance to Saturn cloudtops)
PART 3 
CRITICAL CRITERIA

================
CRITICAL CRITERA General
================
PARTICLE MASS ENERGY CALCULATIONS

Particle MeV values calculated by lineal sum factors of wavelength
equivalents, are accurate typically to 4 to 7 significant digits.
PLANETARY ORBITAL CALCULATIONS

Corresponding solar orbits likewise obtained as lineal sum factors
from corresponding MeV values, are accurate typically to 4 to 6
significant digits.
===================================================================
SUMMARY SCHEMATIC Lineal summed wavelengths
TABLE 1 showing unitary expansion rates.
===================================================================
+  increments are the Moon mean obit
added and subtracted to all wave
lineal sums involving Earth and
Venus orbits.
                  
 + unit sum (moon orbit)
(1319)  original
FROM EARTH   unit sum (moon orbit)
       
 + unit sum (moon orbit)
(1531)  original
FROM 1/2   unit sum (moon orbit)
EARTH + VENUS
       
 + unit sum (moon orbit)
(1823)  original
FROM VENUS   unit sum (moon orbit)

SUMMARY SCHEMATIC Converted to MeV's, showing non
TABLE 2 lineal expansion rates due to the
nature of RECIPROCALS.

where (....) is the MeV mass of a known particle.
(1315)  + (unit sum) (moon orbit)
+ difference
> (1319)  from EARTH Mean orbit
 1/2+ Xion  different difference
 (1322) *  (unit sum) (moon orbit)
 
  ** expanded bridge
  **
 
 (1526) * + (unit sum) (moon orbit)
 
 + big difference
> (1531)  from 1/2 (EARTH + VENUS) mean orbits
> 3/2+ Xion  bigger difference
 
 
 (1535) *  (unit sum) (moon orbit)
 
  **
  ** greatly expanded bridge
  **
 
 (1817) * + (unit sum) (moon orbit)
 
 + larger difference
 
> (1823)  from VENUS mean orbit
3/2 Xion 
 largest difference


(1830)   (unit sum) (moon orbit)

ACCURACY CRITERIA All datas

All Physical Contants used are listed on Page 1233 of the Physical
Review D Particles and Fields, 1 August, 1994, Part 1, Volume 50,
Third Series, Number 3, published by The American Physical Society
through the American Institute of Physics, and Great Britain allies.
Used throughout this disclosure is the Fine Structure Constant.
Its value is the ratio: 137.0359895 .
In all of the following, the Bar H value of Plank's Constant is used.
And to simply the equations, a standardized version of the Compton
wavelength MeV conversion to wavelength, and visa versa, has been
used exclusively, called 'Converter', this is:
PLANK'S CONSTANT CONVERTER

Plank's Constant value of (6.5821220 x 10 22MeV s)
speed of light times (2.99792458 x 10 to power 10 cm s1)
equals (1.9732705332 MeV 11cm)
times 1000
equals (1973.2705332 MeV 14cm)
equals h^
= converter
h^ as constantly symbolized, is used as follows:
For routine convenience, a Planks Constant Converter factor for
Compton wavelength / MeV is the term: 1973.2705332 used for all
calculations and is symbolized as Planks Constant Coverter = h^ .
All particle mass energy data is expressed in MeV.
All particle Compton wavelength equivalents are
given in terms of (1 x 10 to the power 14 cm).
All solar orbits are given in terms of
(1 x 10 to the power 13 cm).
In which case, symbol h^ has three implicit Converter values:
1. 1973.2705332 MeV 14cm
when just converting straight back and forth between
a mass energy, and equivalent Compton wavelength.
2. 1973.2705332 x (1 x 10 to power 27)
when starting with a solar orbit,
and ending with conversion to an MeV.
3. 1973.2705332 x (1 x 10 to power 27)
when starting with an MeV and ending
with a solar orbit (wave) equivalent.
The term, (1 x 10 to power +  27), itself is thus used
generically as a universal conversion in magnetude, for
instance whenever starting with a particle wavelength
(Compton) and ending with a SOLAR orbit equivalent.

UNIVERSAL CONVERSION CONSTANT

Power magnetudes subatomictosolar and visa versa
are taken for granted and not specified, upon each
occurrence or use of the 'converter' constant h^.
All uses of the symble h^ have inplicit inclusion of
magnetitude conversion, when solar orbits, or particle
wavelengths, are being converted by Plank's Constant h^,
when such magnetitude conversion is an explicit factor.
The power conversion's magnetude is not shown as a term
in the derivations of particle masses, and/or equivalent
solar orbit modelling, for the sake of simplicity and
clarity regards detailing the actual entities, terms,
and factors involved. In all, however, the universal
converter constant (1 x 10 to power +  27) is
expected to be implicitely taken for granted.
The term h^ with digit value 1973.2705332 is the
only item which needs to be programmed in the strings
or equations used in runs through a calculator to make
the datas of this disclosure. The difference between an
orbit, and an MeV factor is so easily seen that just the
digit value of h^ is enough for ALL of the equations and
strings. The digits of h^ are the handiest form of shorthand
imaginable. Powers of 10 (EXPONENTS) just get in the way. Free
floating point decimal is the way to go in the fast lanes, letting
h^ do the bookeeping all by itself in keeping track of magnetitudes.

CONVERSION CONSTANT CONVENTION

Two conventions in the use of h^ are used, and only the two.
h^/(1823.57393767) means an MeV converted to wavelength.
In this case, the mass of a 3/2 XION
state is converted to wavelength. In
this example, the wavelength can also
be in fact the actual orbit of planet
VENUS.
h^/(Venus) means an ORBIT converted to MeV.
In this case, the orbit of VENUS is
stated, being converted to a particle
equivalent MeV, in which a change in
magnetude of (10 to 27) is taken for
granted.
h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus)  moon
means 1/2 the sum of Earth and Venus orbits,
to which is then subtracted the orbit of the
Earth's moon, (the wave then converted to MeV).
h^/ 1/2 (Jup eccentricity)  moon
h^/ 1/2 (Jup eccentricity  moon)
two fundamentally different characteristics
are illustrated here in which the moon orbit
is added to an entity, before the 1/2 value
is converted. This seeming small change can
have major consequence in resulting factors
corresponding to particle MASS states.
h^ conversions from orbit to particle MeV are the
the most common direction of transformation in
the uses of h^ in this disclosure.

COSMIC RECURRANCE Simplified 'Slide Rule' System

In this rational, a Cosmic recurrance, not reciprocal or mirror,
but recurrance, is pictured. This is as if a mighty slide rule
measuring inside subatomic wave/mass events is just slid along
through the dimension of space growing larger as it slides, until
suddenly, measures marked as the subatomic scope of the scale
presto ! match up more or less PERFECTLY to solar measures in
the COSMIC scale occurring as
1 SOLAR planet orbits
2 Distances between orbits
3 Distances comprising two orbits summed,
in which such distances are most easily
pictured as two different, orbits with
the planets on either side of the SUN.
4 1/2 of a sum. (1/2 waves).
5 Any sum of two orbits, or difference between,
plus and minus the Moon orbit, and plus and
minus a planet radius.
EXAMPLE 1

An example of Compton wavelength (to) MeV conversion
letting h^ do the easy work of keeping track of magnitudes.
h^ 1973.2705332 / 3861.59323 wave = .510999065853 MeV
and h^ 1973.2705332 / (.510999065853) MeV = 3861.593274 wave
in which the Electron mass is converted to the
Electron's Compton wavelength, and visa versa.
In this case, the 'power magnetude ratio' (1 x 10 to power 27)
is not needed and therefore not assumed.
EXAMPLE 2

Another example of Compton wavelength (to) MeV conversion
letting h^ do the easy work of keeping track of magnitudes.
h^ 1973.2705332 / 1.49597927 wave = 1319.04938308 MeV
and h^ 1973.2705332 / (1319.04938308) MeV = 1.49597927 wave
in which the 1/2+ Stable Xion isospin mass is
converted to Compton wavelength, and visa versa.
In this case, a wave measure (compton) of
(1 x 10 to 14 cm) is assumed, knowing that
a Compton wave is involved.
In this case, the magnetitude power ratio has
not been assumed, since only subatomic details
are illustrated.
In this case, the 'power magnetude ratio'
(1 x 10 to power 27) is not needed and
therefore not assumed.
EXAMPLE 3

Another example of Compton wavelength (to) MeV conversion
using the simplified 'slide rule' system is as follows:
h^ 1973.2705332 / 1.49597927 orbit = 1319.04938308 MeV
and h^ 1973.2705332 / (1319.04938308) MeV = 1.49597927 orbit
in which the 1/2+ Stable Xion isospin mass is
gained from a solar orbit model, and visa versa.
The solar model is the orbit of the EARTH.
In this case, a wave measure (solar) of
(1 x 10 to 13 cm) is assumed, knowing that
a solar orbit (wave) is involved.
In this case, since the solar orbit model is the
mean orbit of the Earth, the magnetude power ratio
(1 x 10 to power 27) has also been assumed, since
Cosmic and subatomic details are both illustrated
and linked in the same statement.

ACCURACY CRITERIA All datas

ACCURACY
In each EXAMPLE (1 2 and 3) maximum accuracy is shown maintained
throughout (all available digits to 12 digits plus a decimal point
are used where applicable), using a solid state calculator device
with intrinsic 13 digit free floating decimals accuracy (Monroe
326 Scientist, Circ. 1971), an old but very reliable device. An
original mechanical motor driven Monroe Marchand calculator can
do the same calculations in slow mode (all datas one by one,
hand entered. The Monroe 326 has 12 registers to instantly
store and recall any datas displayed in its single line
view screen. 'Store' and a 'Recall', are the two keys
used to handle store and recall, by instant toggle
key stokes. No programming, or special logic is
required by this device's inherent simplicity.
Twelve memory registers are nowhere enough for the kind and size
of project constituting this disclosure, so most calculations were
hand done, by writing down digital results, then reentering the
results as needed by hand. Seven of the data registers held terms
most frequently used for instantly 'cached' RECALLs toggled as
needed.
Using digits to maximum accuracy has the inherent advantage
of instantly 'seen', instantly 'understood'. No guesswork
about internal factors seen in the memory in the mind's
eye but not seen outwardly at a glance. What you see,
is what you've got, is the fundamental truth of it.
Hence, digits that compare to 6 and 7 figures are
instantly seen, and recognized as interesting.
To many authorities, this handentry approach may seem very
tedious as a way of life, but it has the advantage that the
mind can stay sharply tuned to exact factors and statements
under exploration, involving specific properties for both of
particle physics and solar physics datas, without slugging
through extra brainwork translating back and forth through
an equipment's extra thought demands, for instance, in the
programming and reprogramming of a large computer to do
calculations in an add hoc manner, or using a modern day
sophisticated pocket calculator with any number of memory
registers, and peculiar programming logics needed to access
the 'learn' and 'replay' features for each step, or to access
routines hard wired in addon circuit modules. Or more to the
point, in translating algebras trying to determine statistically
if two different coded algebras can have the same digit results.
You know the problem, process slows to a drawl keeping track of
codes, rather than glancing at resulting digits in an instant of
awareness, in an instant of illumination. Thus all digits are
expressed to their full unless otherwise noted as short forms.
Such maximum accuracy is used throughout for data details
in this disclosure, since such displayed accuracy makes
it very simple to cross check, and double check datas,
without recourse to a photographic memory or the need
to redo tasks again and again to reaffirm in detail
prior results.
What you see, is what you've got, is the
motive for using such high digital details.
This is said to reassure thinkers who ignore
digits and rely on codes, that the answers all
finally lay in the digits anyway, so why bother
with the codes.
Datas to 3 and 4 digits are pointless. Datas to
the standard 8 significant digits of most pocket
calculators are too poor to be definative.
Datas to 10 significant digits as with
many better calculators, are ambiguous.
12 digit accurracy is a bottom line
for making decisions.
SYMBOLIC LOGIC
In preparing this disclosure, it has been found extremely
helpful to have at hand full digital details, voiding the
necessity of having to redo calculations, and by sight to
verify results in 1/10th of a second.
In some parts of the disclosure, symbolic logic terms
are used for statements rather than digital details, and
in some cases, both symbolic logics, and digital details,
are incorporated in statements to help make the statement's
intent more intuitively self evident.
In all instances, (pure symbolic logic) and (both digital
details and symbolic logic), having a high digital detail
record of certain terms for immediate eyeball reference
is mandatory for speed in pursuing and verifying steps
and calculations and further explorations for symmetries
and patterns.
The difficulty has always been, looking for an answer where
the answer is unknown until it is found, in which in many
or most instances, the question solved by the answer is
also not known until there is an answer with which to
formulate the question.
In this kind of venue, information gradually unfolds as
facts gradually accumulate. Eventually enough facts seem
to accumulate to form a seeming pattern with predictable
variants. When the variants are tried and the results are
confirmed, as already predicted in thought, then and only
then can a question be posed to which the answer already
has been found.
When the question appears it is
already solved, in the same act.
The philosphy thus has been to probe and poke
around in a venue of great mystery, until its
secrets gradually start to line up in place on
the kitchen table.
It is a 'home work' kind of project, with many
notes initially recorded in 'short hand' until
the notes can be fit into a more detailed view
once their mysterious 'acts' are understood.
The result of this 'home work' and 'short hand notes'
form of data explorations and recording of results, has
resulted in a main grunt of the datas being disclosed
in this paper compiled in a brief three day period using
the Monroe 326 Scientist solid state calculator (with an
intrinsic accuracy to 13 significant digits), and this
disclosure typed into a PCB 386 computer in another 6
weeks, with added datas being incorporated on an ongoing
basis, swelling the original data burst from 1200 lines
to over 15,000.
This time span is not a very long haul in putting together
a large picture from a number of previous sporadic insights
gained over a twenty seven year period. In the three days,
the 'symmetry ratio group' detailed in full under PART 14
was now seen for the first time, something like finding a
big carot diamond hidden in the middle of a large broach or
necklace with many diamonds, which has already been studied
many times and many times again not from a jeweller's point
of view but from an outsider looking for more understanding
regards the necklace's inherent beauty. The 'symmetry ratio
group' seen for the first time during day two of the three
day work period, was seen for the first time, and found by
coincidental searches in factoring the datas. It has been
briefly described as 'The Discovery' under PROTOTYPE in
the SU(3) discussions of PART 10.
It was an unexpected find, in other words.
 R.S.L. author

CRITICAL CRITERIA Particle Datas

All Particle Datas come from the pages of the Physical Review D
Particles and Fields, 1 August, 1994, Part 1, Volume 50, Third
Series, Number 3, published by The American Physical Society
through the American Institute of Physics, with Great Britain
allies.
MASSES
All particle mass datas are given in terms of
MeV without exception. (GeV's are not used).
All solar datas are given in terms of cms.
(Meters are not used).
In which case a Binding Energy for the electon
is given as .oooo136056981 MeV and orbit of
the Moon as .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cm .
Rather than repeating the term MASS ENERGY in all citations,
the word MASS is just used for rapid reading of text. In all
uses of the word MASS, 'mass energy' may be explicity implied,
and also just energy in cases where momentum and not particle
MeV may be involved.
No momentums, or width energies, or other energies, are cited
in this disclosure. All references to MASS, and to MASS ENERGY,
refers exclusively to the mass energy of a particle, having a
wave (Compton) equivalent, except where Binding Energies are
specifically cited.
However a given mass may not be replete with properties, it may
be momentum in view. To stay away from conundrums, a cited mass
can therefore stand for both a particle's mass energy equivalent
or an equivalent momentum amount. Conundrums are presented as is,
with other hands, other minds, expected to resolve the questions.
FIT, VRS INDIVIDUAL EXPERIMENTS 'EXPMT'
Where 'FIT' MeV's are shown to be reasonably in a picture
(in an illustration of wave/mass symmetry or understructure),
the 'FIT' MeV is shown in [brackets], the same as listed in
the Particle Data Tables. Where a mass from an individual
experiment is shown instead, then ( ) brackets are used
for the MeV value. And sometimes also the term EXPMT for
'individual experiment'.
So that 1/2+ XION [1314.9] MeV FIT is the best thought
candidate for that
particle's MeV by
physicists.
And 1/2+ XION (1315.2) MeV EXPMT is from a single
experiment.
And 1/2+ XION 1315.15769304 MeV might be shown as a
mass derived from a
(wave/orbit) factor,
in this case from a
sum of Earth orbit
plus the Moon orbit,
minus ELECTRON mass.
So, no brackets.
(......) MeV EXPMT are not cited very often in this
disclosure. Most all particle datas cited are FITS.
There are certain states however, which do not have
FITS, and so (.....) single experiment values may
be cited in lieu of AVERAGE.
For instance in the symmetry group elsewhere descibed as
'The Earth Moon Metaphor for Subatomic Phenomena' two of
three well defined wave/mass groups involving XION states
have both 'FIT' values for a Negative and Neutral charge
state for one of the particles. And just a single 'FIT'
state for the other, but there are individual experiments
showing mass differences for both Negative and Neutral
occurrences for that other.
And so, the states are described in both [ ] and ( ) brackets.
For example, here is a segment taken from TABLE 4 in this
disclosure, in which [ ] brackets clearly identify 'FIT'
masses, and ( ) brackets clearly identify 'INDIVIDUAL
EXPERIMENT' masses.

From TABLE 4 illustrating generic use of ( ) and [ ] brackets.

status
+  MOON Xion o 1315.66 869213 MeV [1315.2] ****
EARTH  1/2+ Xion 1319.04 938310 MeV
  MOON Xion  1322.44 749261 MeV
minus 1 electron = 1321.93 649355 MeV [1321.87] ****
         
1/2 +  MOON Xion o 1526.26 140694 MeV (1527)
EARTH + VENUS  3/1+ Xion 1530.81 284775 MeV [1530] ****
  MOON Xion  1535.39 151532 MeV (1535.0)

WAVES
All particle wave (Compton) datas are given in terms
of (1 x 10 to 14 cm), even though no system of units
is actually cited. Instead, wave (Compton) typically
denotes a Compton wavelength.
The 'FITS' (most likely mass) for many particle masses
have been identified or targeted in calculations. However
many particle 'states' do not have 'FITS' corresponding to
wave calculations, whereas individual experiments do. These
individual experiment masses are thus quoted.
For example, the 3/2+ XION particle of the Su(3) decuplet
symmetry group is listed as a single 'FIT state of [1530] MeV,
but experiment masses are listed for individual Negative charged,
and Neutral occurrences. Since individual experimental occurrences
actually match MeV masses calculated from wave (Compton) factors,
the individual experimental MeV masses are quoted, and the single
'FIT' value is merely identified as being intrinsic, and is shown
to be not the only data worth concidering in this disclosure.
No rigorous attachment to any particular experiment or date of
experiment has been adopted as a rule or law. The only 'RULE'
is in looking to the 'lowest' deviations amongst experiments
for closest approximation to digital correspondences otherwise
calculated by waves (Compton).
PARTICLE PREDICTION

Only one particle state, a higher mass charged XION from
the ?/? (2250) status ** occurrence is being suggested
as a target particle for experimental search.
The mass suggested is close to or at the quantity 2264.7 MeV.
The only criteria for suggesting this specific mass state
is that it can be shown linked to the well defined set of
three XION isospin states identified through wave (Compton)
lineal sum symmetry elsewhere in this disclosure as the
'Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena'.
The metaphor calls for three isospin/charge XION state
masses occurring in a fourth XION group, and two exact
mass agreements already exist for that particle's set of
three masses expected by the metaphor.
The two existing agreements are
2244.93227903 MeV assume a Neutral charge
2254.79298018 MeV assume an isospin
predicted 2264.74068833 MeV assume a Negative charge
in the ?/? XION (2250) STATUS ** particle
which already has
?/? XION (2244) experiment (no assigned charge)
?/? XION (2250) estimate (no assigned charge)
Thus the third mass occurrence [2264.7] MeV
is suggested as also existing.
See details under 'Predicting a XION Mass', in PART 9.

CRITICAL CRITERIA Solar System Datas

All planetary orbit data (including Moon orbits) has been
assumed in terms of (10 to the power 13 cm) for the sake
of universal consistency.
It is assumed that the orbit of Venus is the most well measured, in
spite of the AU (Astronomical Unit) standard based on Earth's orbit.
In view of this assumption judgement calls are preferred to the Venus
mean of orbit. In other words, discrete variations of the Earth orbit
are shown resulting from lineally summed plus or minus factors, using
the full value of Venus mean of orbit in calculations.

SOLAR SYSTEM UNIVERSE Text and Paintings by Don dixon
DATA ARE FROM: Houghton Mifflin company Boston 1981.

PLANETARY QUANTITIES pages 220235

which used refined details from the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory released to the
author (Dixon) in 1981.

AND INCLUDE:
AU = Astronomical Unit = (1.49597927 x 10 to 13 cms) = Earth's mean
of orbit.
Orbits (orbital Means, Perihelions, and Aphelions) are thus converted
from the PLANETARY QUANTITIES tables, by multiplying all AU values by
(1.49597927 x 10 to the 13 cms).
PART 4 
SOLAR PHYSICAL CONSTANTS
TABLE 3


Perhelion = .4600515121 x 10 to the 13 cms
MERCURY orbit = .579092027 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = .698169037 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 1.074745915 x 10 to the 13 cms
VENUS orbit = 1.082089677 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 1.089433439 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 1.470963504 x 10 to the 13 cms
EARTH orbit = 1.49597927 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 1.520995035 x 10 to the 13 cms
Perhelion = .00356400 x 10 to the 13 cms
MOON = .00384401 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = .00406700 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 2.066565211 x 10 to the 13 cms
MARS orbit = 2.279410149 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 2.492255088 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 7.406184963 x 10 to the 13 cms
JUPITER orbit = 7.783285433 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 8.160385904 x 10 to the 13 cms
eccentricity = .37710047 x 10 to the 13 cms
radius = .000690840 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 13.47581264 x 10 to the 13 cms
SATURN orbit = 14.269906899 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 15.064032535 x 10 to the 13 cms
radius = .00060330 x 10 to the 13 cms
radius distance to cloud tops

Perhelion = 27.340068344 x 10 to the 13 cms
URANUS orbit = 28.695724759 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 30.051381173 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 44.580032648 x 10 to the 13 cms
NEPTUNE orbit = 44.965845701 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 45.351658744 x 10 to the 13 cms

Perhelion = 44.237602993 x 10 to the 13 cms
PLUTO orbit = 58.999926429 x 10 to the 13 cms
Aphelion = 73.762249865 x 10 to the 13 cms

PART 5 
DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION

The approach used for this disclosure is to take information
out of the assumptive or theoretic range and present it in
the form of Self Evident materials.
Picture how easy new insights can be.
For instance, make the Compton wavelength for the stable Xion
particle from the Octuplet group, whose properties are 1/2+ Xion
with two charge states, Neutral and Negative. In fact, make the
wavelength for both states, the Negative 1322.3 MeV, and the
Neutral 1315.7 MeV. Average the two wavelengths by adding the
two and dividing by two, and make the wavelength for the average
also. And also, subtract the wavelength for the Negative from the
average, and subtract the Average from the Neutral. In order words,
treat them with some simple lineal sum factoring.
Bear with this, the Neutral state's FIT is 1314.9 MeV
and this will be seen further on, in PART 9.
You should have a small plus and minus wavelength increment in
the neighborhood of (3.84 x 10 to the 17 cm), as a result of
the simple lineal sum factoring upon the Compton wavelengths.
Also, verify that the MeV value for the average of the two Compton
wavelengths of the two charge states of the stable 1/2+ Xion is
roughly 1319.04 MeV.
Keep all your datas on a sheet of paper, you will need them.
PHASE TWO of the new solutions: Go to the 3/2 unstable Xion
of mass range 1823 MeV. Make its wavelength, and both add and
subtract the subunit (3.84 x 10 to the 17 cm) to this wavelength
and make Compton wavelengths for both new sums, and you will see
resulting wavelengths for two more Xion states, the Negative at
1830 MeV, and the Neutral, at 1817 MeV.
Now we are ready to actually hit our original goal.
PROOF! Here it is.
Add together the two averaged wavelengths, (for the 1319.04 MeV
value, and 1823 MeV value), and divide by two. Then add and
subtract the SAME subunit (3.84 times 10 to the 17 cm) to the
new average, and make two new Compton wavelengths. These two new
wavelengths you will find correspond accurately to two Xion states
from the Decuplet Xion group, to wit, the 3/2+ Xion Neutral state
of 1527 MeV, and the 3/1 Xion Negative state of 1535 MeV, with
a mean state in between of 1530 MeV.
And there you have it, three fundamental Xion resonances in which
both charge states for each resonances are precisely calculated
as mass energies, directly achieved by using only the Compton
Wavelengths, changed by fractured lineal sum factors, through
each of the six charge particles.
But is THIS A L L T H E R E I S ?
No way, says an intuitive whisper, subliminally. There is more,
much more. The sound amplifying to a R O A R !
Look to the Solar system, in fact look right out your patio
door into the night sky when the Moon is up and so is Venus.
Let your imagination take a journey into the core of matter.
Let your imagination take a journey into the reaching heart
of outer space. And see in the mind's eye if the two can be
merged into one.
The fact is they can, and here is how ...
Let the Earth's mean of orbit stand for a Compton wavelength. You
do not have to do anything to achieve this, just merely reduce the
size of the Earth's mean of orbit by a magnetude of (1 times 10 to
the power 27), so that instead of being 1.4957 x 10 to the 13 cm,
it is now 1.4957 x 10 to the 14 cm. Do the same for the Earth's
mean of orbit PLUS the Moon's mean of orbit (equivalent to the
Moon in FULL Moon position), and also minus the Moon's mean of
orbit (equivalent to the Moon in NEW Moon position), and reduce
both by the power ratio of (1 x 10 to the power 27), and claim
both measures are now Compton Wavelengths.
Then by the standard established conversion equation
(plank's constant = 1973.2705332 MeV 14cm) convert
both wavelengths to mass energy equivalents.
The results will be 1315.7 MeV for the original (Earth + FULL
Moon's orbit), and 1322 MeV for the (Earth  NEW Moon's orbit).
You can see at once these these two values are right on target
for the two stable Xion particle charge states of 1315.2 MeV
plus an Electron mass (for the Neutral 1/2+ Xion), and 1322.2
for the Negative 1/2+ Xion. The Earth's mean of orbit itself
converts to an MeV of 1319 MeV, just in case you wanted to know.
(1315.2) is the best physics experiment value for this Xion.
NOW we are starting into earnest regions of disclosure, here.
Because the picture continues.
To be exact, couple planets Earth and Venus into an interaction.
Here is how.
Add the Mean orbit of the Earth, to the Mean orbit of Venus,
divide by two, and to the result, add and subtract the Moon's
mean of orbit, and make equivalent Compton wavelengths exactly
in the same way as described above for the Earth. You will see
without hestitation that the results are intriguing indeed. The
results are matched right on the mark by properties of the 3/2+
unstable Xion from the Decuplet group, to wit; 1526 MeV for the
Neutral 3/2+ Xion from ((Earth + Venus orbits divided by 2) + the
Full Moon's orbit)) and 1535 MeV for the Negative 3/2+ Xion from
((Earth + Venus orbits divided by 2)  the New Moon's orbit)).
Notice that I in fact used the orbit of Venus
to get this second set of Xion states.
So what about Venus orbit itself.
You have probably already guessed the outcome of THAT question,
since we are on a roll, here. Yes, in fact, the Mean orbit of
Venus itself, to which is added and subtracted the Moon's orbit,
translates into the charge states of the third Xion family already
specified above in the opening conjectures before Solar orbits were
introduced. The Xion states obtained from the orbit of Venus itself
are; 3/2 Neutral 1817 MeV, and 3/2 Negative 1830 MeV, with an
inbetween state of (1823) MeV which is listed as that particle's
precise FIT mass in the Particle Data Table.
Notice that I did not have to fudge an inch to get these
3 sets of particles straight from solar orbit models.
Right away there are astounding recurrances afoot. Firstly, adding
and subtracting a given unit of a small piece of Compton wavelength
to larger wavelengths produces disportionate results which are not
lineal sum values when the wavelengths are converted to mass energy
states, due to mathematical properties no more mysterious than the
common numerological nature of reciprocals. In this case, however;
three Xion families all cooking together on the same hotline; the
disproportionate stretching of lineal summed Compton wavelengths,
results in exact calculation of resulting MeV mass energy values,
close to detail regarding charge/mass splits, whose differences
one state to another, and one family to another, are definative
and yet definately NOT lineal.
Two principles are established in the one disclosure:
1. Lineal sum factoring of Compton Wavelengths, can yield
exact mass energy states of resulting particle masses.
2. The solar system holds a blueprint for a mighty cosmically
visible, easily seen with the naked eye, recurrance of an
easy interparticle fabrication, based on the lineal sum
factoring of Compton Wavelengths.
1a. The ability to describe new physics can get awkward in
direct proportion to the new physics being disclosed,
in a logarythmic expanding confusion imparted by the
disposer's lack of quality physics termnology.
1b. The solution is to go with the flow, do the best with
termnology and expertise at hand. As long as another
reader can follow the discloser's logic, physics is
served.
WE ARE NOT FINISHED
Another major recurrance containing an intrinsic image involves
Earth and Venus again. In this case it is the distance itself
between the two planets (the space that separates them) which
is involved.
Here is how to see that picture.
Subtract the mean orbit of Venus from the mean orbit of Earth.
Divide this sum in half. Reduce the result by the power ratio of
(1 x 10 to the power 27), and call this a Compton wavelength.
It will be a Compton wavelength for
a mass energy of 9535.25077882 MeV.
How might we double check this occurrence
(seek to find the occurrance from other means)?
Try some play.
For instance it has also been noted that the Electron mass
times the Fine Structure Constant squared, is a mass result
of 9595.98104359 MeV.
Since this is a rare mass, in a particle mass region of rarified
atmosphere with next to nothing there, look to the datas of the
Review of Particle Properties tables, for an MeV for the mass
energy range of 9535.25 MeV.
It turns out there is none. Rarified air indeed.
But wait a minute, there is an UPSILON meson, with a published
mass state of 9460 MeV's. The difference between this, and the
9595.98104359 MeV calculated immediately above, is 135.98104
MeV, which has an approximation, in the form of the negative
Pion mass of 134.9764 MeV, also a rarified air occurrence
with nothing else around it. In fact, 135.98104 minus 2
Electron masses lands at 134.95904 MeV which is pretty
ballpark to the mass of the known negative Pion, at
134.9764 MeV FIT. This is the kind of data piece
which gets noted, to be looked over in more
detail later. (Author's comment).
Substituting the real Pion mass, then the resulting mass
approximates the Upsilon mass, to a near perfect exactness,
to wit 9461.00464359 MeV, compared to the actual experimental
mass currently published in 1994 for the S 1 U(9460) particle,
of (9460.37) MeV.
Things are starting to look better.
In fact this almost looks like sculpting numbers from the Great
Pyramid to fit a theory, until the numbers are examined in detail.
Great coincidences become apparent, great because certain numbers
are so close to one another, in fact so close, that coincidence
can be ruled out.
Remember, at this moment we are discussing rarified atmospheres.
Rarified indeed.
Here goes some sculpting:
The mass difference between the charged Pion and neutral Pion is
in a FIT range of 4.5936 MeV. And also, an invisible mass energy
equivalent to the classical Electron radius is the Electron mass
times the Fine Structure Constant, being 70.0252618 Mev; a mass
energy not known to correspond to a particle or physical entity,
but IS the energy equivalent for the Classical Electron Radius.
Nevertheless, when it is added to the Upsilon mass (derived from
the Electron plus neutral Pion masses), the result is a mass of
9531.02990545 Mev which differs from the afore shown mass of
9535.25077882 MeV (derived from the orbits of Earth and Venus)
by 4.220873408 MeV.
See how close this is to the Pion (chargedneutral)
mass difference of 4.5913 MeV.
When this scientific mass difference is instead added to the
mass of 9531.02990545 MeV, the result is 9535.62350545 MeV.
Intuition forces the hand to type and enter the calculations to
convert this derived figure (9535.62350545) MeV backwards to an
original derived term for 1/2 the orbital distance between Earth
and Venus. Adding twice the resulting orbital WAVE piece to the
orbit of Venus results in an orbit value of
1.4959 6309 x 10 to 13 cm.
The Earth mean of orbit is 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm.
Why; the difference is hardly any more
or less than the radius of the Moon.
This derived value deviates at the 6th significant digit
from the published value of the Earth's mean of orbit. It
is a calculation that is 99.99 89185 % accurate.
Just for the heck of it, with the Moon radius added,
(.oooo1738), the percentage of error vanishes, such
that
1.4959 6309 x 10 to 13 cm.
+ .oooo1738 x 10 to 13 cm.
= 1.4959 8047 x 10 to 13 cm.
compared to 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm.
EARTH ORBIT
No 10% physics here, nor even 2%, this stuff is tough,
with percentages of error of 1/100th of a percent and
less, gained at once over HUGE ranges and leap frog
giant spreads within elementary particle masses.
The above Upsilon meson  Solar orbit  Pion particle  Electron
intrinsic wave/mass interaction is summarized in an illustrative
schematic elsewhere to be found under ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS, in
PART 9.
What, exactly, has just been done, here.
That is hard to say in a few words. Mainly, terms factored from
particle mass splits, and fundamental mass energies amplified by
whole ratio powers of the Fine Structure Constant, have been
individually shown associated in great detail to the mass of
a fundamental Upsilon Meson, the (9460) FIT particle.
But further, the same fundamental mass amplitude structure has
been linked to a mechanical model based on lineal sum wave terms,
in a model taken directly from the dynamic solar system.
The WAVE terms are themselves whole sound and perfect if factored
entirely in pure form, as lineal sum units of Compton wavelengths
taken from two existing Xion particles; one (1319) MeV from the
socalled Su(3) octplet symmetry group; and the second (1530) MeV
from the socalled Su(3) decuplet symmetry group. See EXAMPLES
in PART 10.
It may be coincidence that the solar mechanical modelling of
the same pure 'Compton' wavelength lineal sum factoring is in
fact identical in terms of results. It may even be that lineal
sum factoring of particle waves (Compton) taking the waves from
Xion states, is also a coincidence. This could be true if this
was the only WAVE/MASS particle manifestation ever shown.
But that is not the case, as this disclosure is already
beginning to demonstrate in abundance.
Further to this, the region of the solar system from which the
wave mechanical model is taken is intrinsically associated with
a much larger major symmetry particle (mass * charge) grouping
system, being shown in detail elsewhere under yuppi buzz words
called 'The Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena'.

A REASON FOR BELIEVING IN core harmonics wave/energies

The above line of reasoning, beginning at 'WE ARE NOT FINISHED!'
is not the only line of reasoning to which the UPSILON meson can
be shown to be openly involved in (wave/harmonic) interactions.
In fact, both planets MARS, and JUPITER, also have (wave/mass)
orbit states which tie in, as will be shown further below.
Also, a larger overview ties in the (wave/mass) orbit states
directly to both the high and low masses of the J/PSI (3097)
particle.
To show these tieins, now is the time to introduce an illustrating
method, and a method of itemizing the illustrated material in small
derivations called 'Handshakes'.
ILLUSTRATION 0

h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = UPSILON harmonic
1/2 wave

Earth  Venus Sun
.*..*. *
A P  A P

  
   3/2+ Xions
 ..............................................
................................
............... Upsilon
Let the following letters typically stand for the following:
A = Aphelion of an orbit
* = Mean of an orbit
P = Perhelion of an orbit
In Illustrations, all planets will be shown along an obital (wave)
length, or solar base line, just as depicted immediately above in
schematic fashion.
The tendency to wish to identify each part, for instance the lengths
..................................
...............
will not be indulged everywhere, for the pure and simple
reason that where such lengths appear in an Illustration,
their appearance is self evident as to what they show.
Also, easily depictable information can quickly become
cluttered beyond redemption with the inclusion of just
a few extra terms to identify that which is in fact
already 'self evident'.
So self evident information will not be identified by
extra terms or symbology.
For instance, in ILLUSTRATION 0, the lineal sum orbital
distance between EARTH and VENUS, and 1/2 that sum, are
self evident, and so are not noted with busy terms.
Illustration 0 pictograms some basic nature of an UPSILON harmonic
and allied UPSILON particle state as outlined above
beginning with 'WE ARE NOT FINISHED' which can now
be changed to
'WE ARE IN NO WAY FINISHED!'
Let's start pictogramming over again, reusing
Illustration 0, to start a sequence of displayed
information, as follows:
ILLUSTRATION 1

1/2 wave ..... for UPSILON (9460)

Earth  Venus Sun
.*..*. *
A P  A P

  
  
..................................
............... harmonic = h^/(orbit lineal sum wave/mass)
= 9535.25077882 MeV HARMONIC
HANDSHAKE 51

9535.25077882 MeV  negative Pion 134.9764 MeV FIT
= 9461.00464359 MeV
= 1 S UPSILON low mass
(9460.37) AVERAGE
+ the Electron Radius mass equivalent 70.0252618 MeV
= 9531.02990545 MeV
+ the (charged Pion  negative Pion) mass difference
(4.5936) MeV FIT
= 9535.62350545 MeV HARMONIC
Compare above orbit wave harmonic 9535.25077882 MeV
divided by particle mass harmonic 9535.62350545 MeV
= 99.99 89185 % in agreement.
1 S UPSILON is the official name for this state in
the Particle Data Review Tables of 1994. Elsewhere in
this disclosure, the same state is identified as S 1
and the reason for the change is simple, it is easier
to visually see the meaning of S 1 then it is seeing
1 S. That's all folks, no other reason.
Interesting about this; the above HANDSHAKE 51 is not the only
way the UPSILON low mass state (9460.37) is seen in lineal sum
wave harmonics. There are two other harmonics which can be shown
in a similar way, as follows:
ILLUSTRATION 2

moon orbit
1/2 moon
Jupiter  Mars  Earth Sun
.*..**, *
A P 
    3.  .............
1. ..........   
......   
2. ....... 4. ...................
Four lineal sum solar orbit waves are depicted in Illustration 2.
These denote (eccentricity wave/mass) harmonic datas as follows:
ILLUSTRATION 2A linking to the J/PSI particle

moon 1/2 moon
Jupiter  Mars  Earth Sun
.*.,**, *
A P 
     4. .............
     = 1322.44749259 MeV
    
    3. ...................
    = 1319.04938308 MeV
   .............
  2. ....... = 5037.51022864 MeV
 
1. .......... = 5179.94256805 MeV
h^/(Jupiter mean  Jupiter perihelion) + Moon orbit = 5179.94256805 MeV
h^/1/2 (Mars mean  Earth mean) = 5037.51022864 MeV
h^/(Earth mean) 1/2+ Xion switch = 1319.04938308 MeV
h^/(Earth mean  Moon orbit) = 1322.44749259 MeV
 Electron 1/2+ Xion negative = 1321.93649353 MeV
where: h^ Planks converter constant = 1.9732705332 MeV 11 cm
also transforms by
Cosmic conversion constant = (1 x 10 to  27)
where: Moon orbit is the Earth Moon's mean of orbit
= .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cm
and 'switch' is a (negative/neutral) mass midstate

Here is what can be shown with the 4 (orbital/wave)
mass harmonics shown above in ILLUSTRATIONS 1 and 1A.

The high (4416) and low (3097) MASS states of the J/PSI
particle will be calculated to maximum accuracy involving
amplitudes of the Electron mass raised by ratio integer
factors of the Fine Structure Constant. Actually Electron
ratio integer factors are at the heart, raised by powers
of the Fine Structure Constant.

HANDSHAKE 52

Electron x FSC squared = 9595.98104359 MeV AMPLITUDE
 Jupiter (orbit/wave) HARMONIC 1. ... 5179.94256805 MeV
= 4416.03847554 MeV
= J/PSI high [4415] AVERAGE
J/PSI [4415] high ... 4416.03847554 MeV
 1/2+ XION switch = 1319.04938308 MeV
= 3096.98909245 MeV
= J/PSI low [3096.88] AVERAGE
NOTE
Earth (orbit/wave) HARMONIC 4 of ILLUSTRATION 1A
is the 1/2+ XION switch which is
also in the images of PART 9 called
'The Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena'.
COMPARE particle mass state 3096.88 MeV
divided by orbit wave harmonic 3096.87822043 MeV
= 99.9999425 % in agreement.
HANDSHAKE 53 more details

Electron mass = .51099906 MeV
Electron mass x FSC squared = 9595.98104359 MeV AMPLITUDE
 Electron mass x (2 FSC) ... 140.05052364 MeV
= 9455.93051995
= UPSILON [9460) AMPLITUDE
 1/2 (Mars  Earth)
(orbit/wave) HARMONIC 2. ... 5037.51022864 MeV
= 4418.42029131
 Earth mean  Moon orbit ... 1322.44749259 MeV
(orbit/wave) HARMONIC 3.
= 3095.97279872 MeV
+ 2 Electron mass ...
= 3096.99479684 MeV
J/PSI [3096.88] low AVERAGE
COMPARE particle mass state 3096.88 MeV
divided by orbit wave harmonic 3096.99479684 MeV
= 99.9962932 % in agreement.
!
COMPARE orbit wave harmonic
from HARMONICS 1 and 4 3096.98909245 MeV
from HARMONICS 2 and 3 3096.99479684 MeV
!
= 99.9998158 % in agreement.
where ! marks where the
digits deviate.
NOTE

from HANDSHAKE 51 = 9461.00464359 MeV
from HANDSHAKE 53  9455.93051995 MeV
= 5.07412364 MeV
 1 Electron mass ... .51099906 MeV
= 4.56312458 MeV
which is the PION mass difference ... (4.5936) MeV FIT
where: 140.05052364 MeV is termed a 'charged PION's amplitude
in that 140.05052364 MeV  Electron mass
= 139.53952458
which approximates PION+ ... (139.56995) MeV FIT
HANDSHAKE 54

Interval 5179.94256805 MeV (from HARMONIC 1)
Interval 5037.51022864 MeV (from HARMONIC 2)
do not allude to the 'Bottom Mesons' of masses B+ 5278.7 MeV
Bo 5278.9 MeV
There are several entities which fall within a range of 5200
to 5500 MeV's between 4416 MeV to 9460 MeV, all being of the
bottom (beauty) and bottom (strange) genre, but there seems
none with masses that perfectly land on other masses derived
by wavelength fracturing and mass factoring.
The only other wave/orbit entity which falls anywhere within
the range of 4416 MeV to 9460 MeV is in the eccentricity of
JUPITER where (Jupiter mean  Jupiter perihelion) has a mass
energy equivalent of
5232.7448192 MeV
which may seem to connect the 'Bottom Meson'
by an ELECTRON power amplitude, factored as
5232.7448192 MeV
+ 2/3 E x FSC = 46.683508337 MeV
= 5279.42832753 MeV  E
= Bo meson = 5278.91732847 MeV 5278.9 MeV FIT
 1/3 E
= B+ meson = 5278.74699545 MeV 5278.7 MeV FIT
SPECULATION
A speculation seems possible, that a 1/3
unit of Electron mass may in fact carry a
full unit of Electronic charge.
That a fraction unit of Electron mass carrying
a full unit of charge is indicated throughout
this disclosure, but is not a headline feature.

A REASON FOR BELIEVING IN WIDE WIDTH RESONANCES (speculation)

What About Those RHO's ?
Let's look at the RHO particle, and see if there is any
reason to believe that it should have a wide width mass.
What this means is, that instead of one fitted mass,
it has a mass amplitude range that expands across at
least (say) 21 MeV from (say) 754 MeV to 775 MeV.
The thinking comes not from the published Particle
data tables of August 1994, which shows no FIT but
several AVERAGES which range from 769.9 to 770.8 MeV,
but rather from wave factors, which are modelled most
perfectly by the planet VENUS in the solar system.
The solar model is intriquing and self evident enough
that there is little room to doubt that RHO resonances
have a width, manifesting through at least three
principle wave amplitudes, at least in this model.
In fact, once again let us evoke the crescents of Venus
in the night sky, and this time wait until there are no
crescents. This will be when Venus is on the far side
of its orbit from us, on the other side of the Sun, in
a 'winter' position relative to us in 'summer'.
Behold there is a wavelength, that extends across the
terran solar expanse, between Earth and that far distant
Venus. In this view it shall be said that Earth is in
the 'Summer' position, and Venus is in the 'Winter'
position at the other end of the wave, with regard
to the total wave which mechanically is a two parter
single length, which spans through the Sun.
In fact, to complete the model, wait for a few thousand
years for the orbit of Venus to precess, until Venus
arrives across the Sun from the Earth at Venus' orbit
Periheleon position, then wait some more until Venus
is in full Venus view in Aphelion of orbit position.
There are in view therefore 3 different actual waves,
comprising amplitude phases of the two parter solar waves
(orbits).
Why is this bulge being divulged as some kind of indulgent
form of physics? Because it is the bulges, the 3 amplitudes,
that hold the model for the wide width resonances of the RHO
meson.
Here is how, and it is simple.

HOW ABOUT THOSE RHO's the picture

ILLUSTRATION 1 RHO

IMAGE 1 RHO

Earth Sun Venus
.*. * .*.
A P P A
h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = RHO MeV
. . . . . .
. . ........... 775.135809795 ......................  
. . ............ 772.906160625 ........................ 
. . ............. 770.689301670 ..........................
. .
.  .
* . ......... 767.592951402 MeV ........................  
* . .......... 765.406423399 MeV .......................... 
* . ........... 763.232316887 Mev ............................
.
 .
....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................  
........ 758.050832116 MeV .................................. 
......... 755.918253135 MeV ....................................
Experiments listing masses as low as [753.5] MeV and
as high as [778.] MeV were listed in 1984 data tables.
Masses listed were as low as [764.0] Mev to a high of
[777.4] MeV, in the 1994 data tables.
There is an implicit suggestion revealed by the RHO state facts, that
particle Compton wavelengths may have eccentricy, leading to widths
that can be used to factor other particle mass states exactly. The
intuitive image comes from the reason that the above RHO states are
factors directly related to orbit eccentricity involving the symmetry
set of 3/2 XION particles (three masses) in which orbital eccentricity
is not a factor, whereas Moon orbit incrementation (which mechanically
is a local form of width) occurs.
These RHO resonances are approx. 1/2 the MeV values of the
3/2+ XION isospin and charge states for 1/2 (Earth + Venus)
+ and  Moon orbit orbits. And the RHO 765.406423399 MeV
state is the wave (Compon) equivalent of the full orbital
sum state of (Earth + Venus).
The set of RHO's also connect to three other specific
mass amplitudes, as follows:
ILLUSTRATION 2 RHO

IMAGE 2 RHO

Earth Sun Venus
.,*,. * .*.
A P P A
. h^/(orbit amplitude waves) = RHO MeV
.
.
. .................. 770.689301670 ..........................
.
.
. 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus)  moon) = 767.6957576605
* . .......... 767.592951402 MeV .......................
.
. 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) = 765.4064023875
* . ............ 765.406423399 MeV ..........................
.
. 1/2 of (h^ of (earth + venus) + moon) = 763.1307034705
* ................ 763.232316887 Mev ............................
* 5/2 E x FSC  P+ = 763.209153735
5/2 Electron mass, power amplified by
the Fine Structure Constant, minus a
Proton's mass. P+ = the Proton's MeV.
IMAGE 3 RHO

From h^/ (Earth apheilion + Venus perihelion) = 760.195477903 MeV
* ....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................
 P+ (change sign) = 178.076832097 MeV
 (N^ E), divide by FSC = 1.293780661 MeV
when N^ is the Neutron  Proton mass difference
= 1.293318 MeV FIT
Reverse engineering
when N^ = 1.293318 MeV
(N^ x FSC) = N^ amplitude 177.231111868 MeV
 P+ (change sign) 761.041198131 MeV
 (N^  E) = .782318940 MeV = 760.258879196 MeV
where N^  E = 1.293318 MeV  .510999060 MeV = .782318940 MeV
 end of RHO's
===============
SATURN = PION
===============
What is Saturn doing in the Solar System ?
Let's go straight to dialogue.
For instance, in the case of showing a direct correlation
between the space length of the orbit of Saturn, and the
Compton wavelength of the fundamental stable Pion particle,
it need only be shown that a self evident happy correlation
exists, concidering the following details which exclude any
coincidence, or even a magnificent or stunning coincidence.
No, not here, no amazing coincidence. Stunning imagery
is what is here, involving Saturn, and the Pion particle.
The facts are that in elementary particles, there are few
whose mass energies (MeV's) are found in the mass energy
range of the Pion. There is the Muon with 105.6 MeV, the
Pion itself with 139.6 MeV, and then a large gap, to the
Kaon with a mass energy of 493.4 MeV. Nothing else occurs
in this lower meson range. In the solar system there is a
large gap between the orbit of Jupiter out to Saturn, Saturn
having rouphly twice the orbit of Jupiter. Then Uranus having
roughly 4 times the orbit of Jupiter, or twice the orbit of
Saturn. In the midst of these wide departures from one data
point to the next, in terms of solar orbits, and correspondingly
in terms of elementary particle mass energies, there is one
DIRECT HIT, this being, that the orbit of Saturn is holy smoke
a mirror of the Compton wavelength of the Pion particle.
Hey hEy HEY a mistake. It is not a mirror, it is a recurrance.
The only proviso is that the solar image of space is a pure
ratio of (10 to the power 27) times larger than the wavelengths
of elementary particles. Something in the vibratory blueprints
of Reality has occurred as a magnificent recurrance of exact
kind, between the solor realm, and internal interactive small
distances for nuclii and the elementary particles, as viewed
through the Compton wavelengths of the particles.
BOHR ORBIT MODEL ...... NO!
Picture a mighty scene in place, that solor orbits are a
blowup into the macro cosmos, of energy principles that
behold the behavior of micro cosmic particles.
Forget the old Bohr orbit model  the solar system loosely
used to model a nature of electrons in shell orbits around
a nuclii. Even though the Bohr model is known to be false,
it is still good enough to introduce new readers to the
topic of atomic, nuclear, and fundamental physics, even
though the new reader then immediately proceeds to more
correct information once the Bohr model has been intro
duced to get them started.
The Bohr solar model has nothing to do whatever with the
particle data physics now being married in recurrance
partnership between the solar system and fundamental
particle mass energy/Compton wavelength states, being
disclosed in this paper you are reading for the first
time. Hint Hint.
What exactly is being modelled, or rather, portrayed, by the
solar system is very obscure, at this point. The discloser,
(moi) does not know, but suspects some mechanical orbiting
of momentums and momentum states may be able to be seen in
detail, once some more rooted concepts emerge by thinkers
who know their fundamental physics, and can supply reason
to mystery, just as did scrutinizing physicists supply
eventual reasons to the initial mysteries of the Bohr
solar model of the atom.
Details are in PIONS IN THE SKY AT SATURN, in PART 11.
PART 6 
HISTORY

HISTORY
How did a project like this get started?
Probably one single coincidental nature in particle wavelengths
started the intrigue which engaged the curiosity to keep pushing
into arcane areas until some sense began to gell out of hundreds
and thousands of isolated pieces of data. Not one, but several
systems of particle mass logics, has currently emerged.
The single 'coincidental nature' fact which started the big 'see'
came in 1969 when randomly exploring particle Compton wavelengths
to see if any information could be combed by fracturing them into
lineal summed parts and looking at the fragments for other hidden
masses.
The logic was simple enough. Since Compton wavelengths have the
nature of mathematical reciprocals contrary to the masses, then
for instance, multiplying, say, the ELECTRON mass, by the Fine
Structure Constant, then subtracting an ELECTRON mass from the
result, and converting the two results to Compton wavelengths
it is seen at once that a SMALL wave difference in the Compton
wavelengths by itself, converts to a very LARGE equivalent mass.
Good enough. But nothing was coming of this.
SPOTTING A SOLAR ORBIT
Similar explorations of the Compton wavelengths of the PROTON and
NEUTRON, and also other entities such as the stable LAMBDA, XIONS
and others, took place.
Back in those days, an isospin state for a particle was commonly
listed in the Data Particle Review Tables. For instance for the
stable XION an isospin state was listed, along with splitting to
charge states, for instance into negative and neutral masses for
the 1/2+ XION mass energies, 2 particles concidered from one.
It was noticed that the Compton wavelength for the XION isospin
state was very close to in fact you could actually say the same
as, the digital value for the orbit of the EARTH. This was just
a coincidence, until a major assumption was made, to treat the
orbit of the EARTH as a wavelength, upon which the orbit of the
moon was incrementally added and subtracted, and LO and BEHOLD!
the two resulting waves corresponded rather well to the XION's
split charge mass states seen as their Compton wavelengths.
It was immediately found that VENUS had a similar split essence,
with the orbit of the moon added and subtracted to VENUS coming
up with Compton wavelength values for three ?/2 XION masses but
at that time that XION state was not well known, and only that
experiments had produced mass/energies which approximated those
three 1823 MeV states coming from the VENUS waves, was seen.
It was not long after that an exploratory step was taken, to
look at the sum of the orbital distance comprising EARTH and
VENUS to find that 1/2 the summed orbits of the two planets
homed right in onto the masses and charge split range of the
better known 3/2+ XIONS.
It was the deterministic finding of THREE sets of solar orbital
images that had mechanical corresponce to THREE particular XION
families which triggered the idea that this could not be just a
coincidence. And the noncoindence was given a name to keep it
in mind.
The name was:
The EARTH MOON Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena.
This name kept hanging around in consciousness for years.
Gradually, over the years, some inspiration would occur to force
time taken to explore other reaches of Compton wavelength factors
in conjunction with further exploration for workable solar models
keeping in jump step with changes to the Particle Data Tables and
additions of new particles, and new estimated masses to the genre.
Plus discrete reevaluations of the fundamental constants, always
ongoing by physicists. And always, particles dropping from tables.
The whole project was put on hold in January of 1986, when a number
of new insights came about, as a result of more precise definitions
of UPSILON mesons which began to appear in the Particle Data Tables.
There were numerous areas of confusion and ambiguity in the picture
which was already starting to emerge. Mainly, how to determine that
solar orbits were involved, seemed to be a major conjectural jumble.
The project stayed on hold until middle December of 1994 when the
brain which tends to work slowly suddenly realized that the whole
of the emerging scheme could be presented entirely in the form of
just Compton wavelengths for the particles involved, in which the
particle MASSES could then be factored directly by lineal summing
mathematics, to extremely high accuracy. The SOLAR orbits would
just be models, in this suddenly epiphanated point of view.
ERGO the RESULT.
It is what now comprises this disclosure.
However a change in the slow working brain's perception took
place in putting together the final details of this disclosure
through latter December of 1994 into the start of the new year.
The perception now, is that the solar orbital models are REAL.
The perception suggests that a Cosmic blueprint has orchestrated
the formation of the solar system into its present patterns, and
is synonymous with the patterns which are orchestrating formulas
for elementary particles in reaches without, and inside, reaches
of inner nuclear space. A mighty inter spacial RECURRANCE is in
place, plain to see, out in the open.
In this perception, the present day solar GRAVITATIONAL dynamics
are the END PRODUCT resulting from the resonances and vibrations
which caused the material to come together into its current form
in the first place.
Random disk accretion cannot be the law.
A question stares stark in the face. Which came first, the solar
system, or the eggs (particles). Perhaps the question is answered
both ways. Taking a starting point, the PROTON is perhaps always
there in the empirical realm the same kind of entity all the time.
In the entirety of this disclosure the PROTON is just there. It
is not derived from anything, nothing has been found to work back
first to close in on a PROTON mass values. It is just T H E R E
and everything else seems to spring into position around it.
The ELECTRON, since its mass is derived from other fundamental
constants is not immutable in size or density, but here in the
solar system region it has finite shape.
Since the mass density of the SUN is something of the order of
10 to the power 11 times more material per unit area of space
than fills the PROTON, the solar bodies comprise objects that
are more than a trillion times as dense as the vaporous energy
called elementary particles.
It seems that the super dense presence of a solar
system's solid marbles may infer the final images,
breached down into the particle realm's resonances.
In this kind of thinking, it is possible that elementary
particle sizes may actually differ in different solar
systems throughout the cosmos. In other words, the
sizes are not constants throughout creation.
Except perhaps for the PROTON.
PART 7 
CONVENTIONS

LET h^ = Planks constant converter (Mev to Wave) (Wave to Mev)
= equal (1.9732705332 MeV 11cm)
= equals 1973.2705332 (convenient pure digit value)
LET E = Electron's rest state mass and/or energy equivalent
= .510999065 MeV
LET FSC = Fine Structure Constant
= 137.0359895
LET P+ = Proton MeV
= 938.27231 MeV
LET N^ = Neutron  Proton (mass energy difference)
= 1.293318
LET Ko = Kaon neutral (497.672) FIT
LET K+ = Kaon charged (493.677) FIT
Proton masses when subtracted from lesser amounts
of mass force a change of sign which is not always
included in a string, for simplicity sake.
Values reduced by the FSC (Fine Structure Constant)
are shown as the reciprocal
x 1/FSC
since a divide sign is not available in the normal
character keys of a typewriter keyboard. Since the
whole of this disclosure has been typed for EMAIL
only the lower 128 ascii characters can be used to
keep the text compatable with UNIX softwares.
SHORT HAND CONVENTIONS
Certain short hand conventions have been adopted
to eliminate the need for tedious repititious data
detailing, in which serious formats used by mathematic
scholars are not known by this author, and so, formats
have been invented to illustrate factors in a logically
availing manner.
SYMBOLIC LOGIC
A form of invented 'symbolic logic' has been evoked
to handle symbology for different physical terms, and
a 'philosophy of science' of a unique kind has been
invented to handle description of data derivations,
mathematical techniques, and pictograms in the form
of IMAGES and SCHEMATICS to illustrate results. None
of these forms has little, if any, correspondence, to
tradition physical or mathematical disclosure modes.
See more about the 'logic' under
INTRINSIC SYMBOLIC LOGIC in PART 21.
FLOATING POINT DECIMALS
In the floating decimal point system, used as the only decimal
mode for the conventions, all decimal points are exactly as needed,
at once showing whether for instance an MEV is, say, .510999065,
or 938.27231, and whether a wave is 14.269906899 (Saturn's mean
of orbit) or 1.49597927 (Earth's mean of orbit) or .oo384401
(Moon mean of orbit).
RESULT OF CONVENTIONS AND SYMBOLIC LOGIC
Doing calculations is entirely by the digits entered and resulting.
All recourse to exponents (EXP) or systems of units, are completely
dispensed with, and only resulting figures in exact digital matchups
to Planetary Solar datas, or Particle Data Tables, is required in
any calculations. The conventions do the job of keeping track of
quantities effortlessly, automatically, without fail.
DERIVATION CONVENTIONS
Derivations typically assume the following
conventions. For example:
h^/(orbit) = (x) and (x)  P+ x 3/4  P+ = particle MeV
is incorrectly stated mathematically but follows a direct
lineal logic, as follows:
For h^, an automatic conversion ratio of (1 x 10 to 27)
is assumed, which thus converts magnetudes from Cosmic to
Subatomic space, ie. orbit (wave) to wavelength (Compton).
Thus h^ can assume (1973.2705332 x (1 x 10 to 27)).
ILLUSTRATIVE LOGIC
AND SO
h^/(orbit) = (x) and (x)  P+ x 3/4  P+ = particle
logically interprets as follows:
Planks conversion divided by an orbit (wave) = (x1) a number
(x1) x (1 x to 10 27) = (x2) an MeV
(x2) MeV, minus the Proton mass = (x3)
(x3) divided by 4, then multiplied by 3 = (x4)
(x4) minus the Proton mass = (x5)
(change sign is assumed)
(x5) a resulting particle's known mass energy MeV,
calculated to high accuracy typically.
To clarify the use of the illustrative logic, here is
the same mathematical derivation, expressed in a more
standard mathematical manner, using an actual example:
(1/2 Earth + Venus) orbits, converted to subatomic
wave (Compton) value, then converted to Mev, to which
is subtracted the Proton mass, the result reduced by
3/4, then subtracted from the Proton mass, to yield
a stable charged (KAON +) mass energy, using the
illustrative logical sequence, as follows, :
h^/(orbit)  P+ x 3/4  P+ = particle MeV EQ. 1
NOTE Specifically the above statement EQ. 1 is exactly as
entered into a solid state calculator, step by step,
to produce a result.
CALCULATOR CONVENTIONS
THUS
WHEN
1.289034473
h^/(1/2 earth + venus) minus Proton divide by 3 times 4
minus Proton (change sign)  1/3 electron
= Kaon + MeV
DIGITALLY
(1973.2705332 / 1.289034473)  938.27231 x 3/4  938.27231 (sign)
= 493.866906703
 1/3 E
= 493.6965573682
CHARGED KAON + = 493.677 FIT
WHERE
divide
(1973.2705332 / 1.289034473) = 3/2+ Xion 1530.81284772 MeV
1530.81284772  938.27231 = 592.540537729 MeV
592.540537729 x 3/4 = 440.405403296 MeV
440.405403296  938.27231 =  493.866906703 MeV
change sign = 493.866906703 MeV (Kaon +)
 .170333021 = 493.696573681 MeV (Kaon +)
IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC
Therefore the implicit CALCULATOR logic in the statement:
h^/(orbit)  P+ x 3/4  P+  1/3 E = particle EQ. 2
is self evident, when any such statement is illustrated
in the facts, as executed by a simple calculator device
which does not require extra programming to add, subtract,
multiply, and divide.
The straight in, data entry steps, of EQ. 2
are the mathematical equation per se, also
called 'strings'.
This convention, IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC, supercedes the
need for any evoked 'formal' approach to the mathematics
needed to unfold the inclosed calculations and disclosures.
In many ways, IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC is similar
to the programming syntax used as protocals by the
now abandoned programming regime known as APL in
wide spread use in the early 80's for doing math on
mainframe computers. In that regime, at least in some
uses of it, terms were entered in a strict lineal fashion
one step to the next to proceed from beginning to end in
factoring a mathematical statement. Changing the sign,
and reciprocating a result along the way, were the norm.
I watched some work done by an APL programmer in which
statements within statements were lineally entered
first, as if unravelling an equation from the inside
out. Sad to say, however, that one or two hours could
be spend programming one step in APL, with, say, 35
steps more to go, while the whole string of 36 steps
could be done in less than a minute on a calculator
of non programable kind.
 R.S.L. author
That (APL), and the current IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC
used to tackle equations for this disclosure, are a far
cry from programmable computer logics, or computerized
mathematics, in which algorythms are first written out
by hand to figure out how to program in the statements
for handling each individual kind of equation and each
equation variant.
The difficultly is that hundreds of different variants
of an equation might be needed to hunt down an insight
in a single spurt of intuition, and preprogramming is
just simply impossible for insight floods coming in at
a rate of 1/10th of a second per glimpse. The only way
is to go the route of rote, handling each insight one
at a time by hand in spurts of fast data entries using
nothing but digits, since all proofs in physics are by
balanced digits. Within the scales of balanced systems
of units, the balanced digits are always the proof for
the bottom line of empirical descriptions.
IMPLICIT CALCULATOR LOGIC equations are as straight
line lineal input/output as they can possibly be made
to be, in this disclosure. It can also be called
'Calculator convention logic'.
'Calculator convention logic' will be frequently used in most of
the following data disclosures, beginning next below in PART 8.
Thus is explained away the whole of the missing maths; the boolean
logics, the tensor whoola boolas, the gauge messages, the algebraic
derivatives, the calculus, the logrythms, the statistical analysis,
all vanished and replaced by D I G I T S linked together by coded
strings of pure and simple logic.
TEXT CONVENTIONS
One difficulty (no matter what convention is used for data
represention), is the lack of physical space on a page sized
ordinary text screen in an IBM compatable computer, to depict
much data on a single line. For this reason, some statements
are in two (or more) lines, and sometimes more than one display
has to be used to illustrate all insights for a particular
derivation or factoring of data(s).
Note that all of the datas and forms are typed in the normal
characters of a standard typewriter keyboard so that the file
itself can be routinely transmitted as EMAIL in the 128
character set of Unix, via InterNet or netware equivalent
systems in the information SuperHighway.
ILLUSTRATIVE CONVENTIONS
In fact, most of the datas being disclosed will be illustrated
in several different ways to get at all of the insights intended.
A standard illustrative form is typically shown in TABLE 5
where a number of data terms in a symmetrical group are tabled.
Another typical form is IMAGE 1 UPSILON, in which waves are
depicted along a base line symbolically representing the length
of the waves. Attempts to illustrate to scale are meaningless
due to large lineal wave distances between modelled entities.
In IMAGE 1 UPSILON solar orbits are depicted along a
base line extending in one direction from the Sun, and
so mechanically these are radii of orbits.
In ILLUSTRATION 1 RHO, solar orbits are depicted extending
in orbital diameters crossing the width of orbits, with the
Sun in the middle, a different mechanical nature in that in
this image, orbits are implied as being somehow relevant to
some point of center, rather than some point at one end of
a wave, with an orbital radius originating from the Sun.
This difference may or may not be an intrinsic property in
the nature of particle waves (Compton), but it certainly does
help for the moment the picturing in the mind's eye, of wave
linkups which occur extending from one entity position on one
side of the Sun all the way across space to another entity
position on the other side of the Sun, in which not one but
two distinctly different entities, and also specified entity
eccentricity positions, in the solar system are noted.
Thus orbits are termed 'Summer' and 'Winter' positions when
reference is made relative to the adding of two orbits, and
this is mechanically empirically correct by looking at the
distances between two planets, one on one side of the Sun,
and the other planet on the other side of the Sun in model
imaging. Ergo, 'Summer', and 'Winter', planet positions.
Similar modelling can be used perfectly correctly to model
lineal summed factors of particle waves (Compton) with an
invisible data point as a point of center that substitutes
for the Sun. In which case a particle's wave Compton) thus
modelled should seem to be intrinsically twice the size of
a normal Compton wavelength from the (bar h) value of Planks
contant, (yielding a diameter equivalent value for that
particle's Compton wavelength), since a diameter seems to
be illustrated. But this is not necessarily the case in
particle wave structures, since many of the modelled waves
(Compton) appear to be single total lengths, comprising the
lineal sums of two (or more) separate other radius waves.
The possibility, of course, in an idle moment of speculation,
is that a particle's wave (Compton) is in fact a construct of
two waves momentarily joined to comprise one temporary length.
However, a conjoined nature of waves is not instantly seen in
any of the models portrayed in this disclosure.
This disclosure treats all particle waves (Compton) as single
devices unique to each particle, even though the single device
may in fact be a collage of two (or more) waves.
FOR EXAMPLE
The particle wave (Compton) for 3/2 XION (2244) state
is a collage of four single orbit radius waves, when
modelled as solar orbital equivalents.
Specifically, the following solar collage has
four waves (orbits) lineally summed to yield:
1 2 3 4
h^/ ((Venus  (1/2 earth + Venus)) + Moon)
= 2244.93222 MeV
= 3/2 XION [2244] which is
an experiment's value in the 3/2 XION (2250) state of
Status **.
'SLIDE RULE' RECURRANT RESONANCE CONVENTION
In all orbital references, it is taken for granted that
the same symmetries, or data results, can be obtained by
the direct factoring of particle wave equivalents (Compton),
without tagging a solar orbit as causal.
Casual tagging of solar orbits as direct manifestations
of equivalent particle waves (Compton) is an assumed
recurrant symmetry principle in the fundamental scheme
of Cosmic Reality, in this disclosure.
In such a recurrent scheme, one realm (subatomic for instance)
is not a mirror of the other (reciprocal) but rather a resonance
recurrance (slide rule), in which only the magnetude of the scale
factor differs, as if the two arms of a slide rule have been slid
along the edges of two long rulers extending the length (diameter)
of the solar system, and at the start, marked in details clearly
seen to Compton wavelength exactitudes in the order of (10 to the
minus 14 cm). In actual fact, the smaller realm (subatomic)
uniformly expands (as if in red shift) by a magnetude of
1 x 10 to 27, to become solar and 'Cosmic'. Slide Rule
Symmetry then comes into the picture comparing sizes
of the two realms to note the numerous similarities.
 end of CONVENTIONS 
PART 8 
RELEVANT SIDECARS

============================================================
POWER AMPLITUDES of the ELECTRON mass energy equivalent
by the Fine Structure Constant
============================================================
This covers many key parts, whose entity terms and data values
are detailed in full under FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON in PART 12.
Here is a list of 'whole integer ratios' factors
of the ELECTRON actully used in this disclosure
in amplifications by the Fine Structure Constant.
1 E raised by x FSC
3/2 E raised by x FSC
2 E raised by x FSC
5/2 E raised by x FSC
and E x FSC squared
when the Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895
and E = .510999065
1/3 E These factors of the
2/3 E Electron are commonplace.
and
4/3 E These are assumed to be
5/3 E E + 1/3 E, and E + 2/3 E.
1/2 E By itself, also turns up.
The ELECTRON is covered in more detail under
FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON
in PART 12.

THE PROTON IS JUST SITTING THERE

The PROTON seems to have no direct derivable state.
The PROTON occurs in numerous +  (plus minus) situations,
with something derived ADDED to the PROTON, or SUBTRACTED from
the PROTON, or two Protons summed on either side of an entity,
but no naked PROTON by itself.
Some PROTON situations are combined +  factors.
For instance several KAON states shown in PART 11
under 'The KAON box of Fluctuating Wavelengths'
feature the proton locked in +  situations,
which can be schematically illustrated as thus:
* 1/2+ SIGMA MeV

 difference is a non particle state mass unit

 + Proton

  Proton

 difference is a non particle state mass unit

*change sign KAONS +  o MeV
in which the 'non particle state' masses,
of the order of 439 MeV to 444 MeV, are
themselves whole integer multiple constructs
of SU(3) symmetry mass energy units, as also
shown within the SYMMETRY FACTORS of PART 10.

BEHOLD THE BOLD ELECTRON

On the other hand, the ELECTRON turns up in derivations
all over the place. Notwithstanding that the ELECTRON
mass energy itself can be calculated by fundamental
constants by just knowing the Bohr Orbit of the Hydrogen
Atom, or even, for that matter, just knowing the energy
equivalent of the 1st spectrum line in the Hydrogen Atom,
from either of these empirically measurable values, the
ELECTRON mass itself is calculated directly as amplitude
expansions of the above two mentioned physical constants
as whole Integer multiples, and whole Integer powers, of
the Fine Structure Constant.
In reverse engineering, using 'Amplified Electron
Resonances' gained by derivations involving interactive
particle wave (Compton) components, the Elecron mass can
be repeated, generated by incorporating the particle wave
Compton) components into an 'Amplified electron resonances'
structure, to hence gain many different estimates of an
Electron rest mass energy.
The 'Amplified Electron Resonances' are detailed
under FACTORS OF THE ELECRON found scattered
throughout PART 12.
In this view, the Electron, and electron mass ratios
of (plus\minus) +  1/3 E and 2/3 E and a few
1/2 E variables are common.
4/3 E variables are also commonplace, and these are
concidered simply as 1 Electron + 1/3 Electron mass.
1/2 Electron mass variables are not concidered a
disturbing violation, since it may not be Electron
mass per se involved, but momentums, having exact
Electron mass equivalents, in which case a 1/2 mass
electron equivalent can be gained in Physical Constants
by direct amplitude enhancements stemming from the
Bohr Orbit cross sectional DIAMETER, diminished by
the Fine Structure Constant, and converted from
wave to energy equivalent.
1/2 units of the Electron mass can also come directly
from the Electron's rest state binding energy in the
Hydrogen atom, which is less than the Electron's rest
state mass energy by (2 x (FSC squared)), where, then,
the Electron binding energy x FSC squared is 1/2 the
Electron's rest state mass energy and may in fact be
in similar, a precise unit of momentum.
PART 9 
THE EARTH/MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA

This intense grouping, involving just the Earth and Venus Planet
Orbits, ultimately gives all of the particles of the Su(3) Octuplet
and Su(3) Decuplet groupings, including both stable and unstable
particles, with three sets of XION particles, including both
charge states ( and o isospins) for each of the 3 Xion sets.
SYMMETRY FACTORS in PART 10, covers the territory further.
Other particle mass energies are also mechanically deducible
from: The Earth/Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena.

TABLE 1METAPHOR Lineal summed wavelengths
showing unitary expansion rates.

PLANET ORBITS XION PARTICLE KNOWN STATUS
(Compton Wavelengths) Charge Sets masses
   
minus 1 electron = 1315.15 MeV (1315.2) ****
+  MOON Xion o 1315.66 MeV

EARTH  1/2+ Xion 1319.04 MeV

  MOON Xion  1322.44 MeV
minus 1 electron = 1321.93 MeV (1321.87) ****
         
1/2 +  MOON Xion o 1526.26 MeV

EARTH + VENUS  3/2 + Xion 1530.81 MeV (1530) ****

  MOON Xion  1535.39 MeV
         
+  MOON Xion o 1817.11 MeV

VENUS  3/2 Xion 1823.57 MeV (1823) ***

  MOON Xion  1830.07 MeV

TABLE 5METAPHOR In more detail, with an extra
extension to another Xion.

PLANET ORBITS XION PARTICLE KNOWN STATUS
Compton Wavelengths) Charge Sets masses
   
Su(3) octuplet
minus 1 electron = 1315.14 900093 MeV [1315.2] ****
+  MOON Xion o 1315.66 869213 MeV

EARTH  1/2+ Xion 1319.04 938310 MeV

  MOON Xion  1322.44 749261 MeV
minus 1 electron = 1321.93 649355 MeV [1321.87] ****
          
Su(3) decuplet
1/2 +  MOON Xion o 1526.26 140694 MeV (1527)

EARTH + VENUS  3/1+ Xion 1530.81 284775 MeV [1530] ****

  MOON Xion  1535.39 151532 MeV (1535.0)
         
+  MOON Xion o 1817.11 881384 MeV (1817)

VENUS  3/2 Xion 1823.57 393770 MeV [1823] ***

  MOON Xion  1830.07 508736 MeV (1830)
                  Predicting a XION mass.
This 4th set of numbers does not contain symmetry factors.
                    Suggested extension.
PREDICTING A XION MASS
======================
VENUS +  MOON Xion o 2244.93 227809 (2244)
MINUS 
(EARTH, MINUS  Jp ?? Xion 2254.79 298023 [2250] **
1/2 
EARTH + VENUS)   MOON Xion  2264.74 068837

> a predicted particle ?
DERIVATION IS AS FOLLOWS

where

venus venus earth venus
((((1.082089677  (((1.082089677  ((1/2 (1.49597927 + 1.082089677))))
moon
 .oo384401))) = G
LET

VENUS  (1/2 EARTH + VENUS) = F = .206944796 x 10 to 13 cm
(VENUS  F)  moon = G
(1.082089677  .206944796)  .oo384401 = .871300870 x 10 to 13 cm
AND .871300870 IS THE h^ COMPTON WAVE EQUIVALENT FOR
2264.74 068837 MeV
                                   
predicted Negative particle for
?/? XION [2250] **
There is another major collidiscope involving (particle/planet)
interaction via (wave/orbit) harmonics to calculate particle
masses.
This major 'collidiscope' involves EARTH  VENUS resonances
to leap straight up into the heavy mass UPSILON including its
highest ranges.
It is a very large window, with incredible mechanical and
predictable properties and is handled below under its own
section, titled
'It's UP to the UPSILON'.
The main gist of the EARTH MOON METAPHOR is; dancing between
planets Earth and Venus to produce a set of 3 different XION
family charged particle states, plus, for instance, a direct
connection to Upsilon mesons.
The situation can be easily summarized by
an image of the solar system, as follow:

EARTH/MOON IMAGE 1

SUMMER POSITION WINTER POSITION
1/2
Earth  Venus SUN Venus
.*..*.*.*.
+   +    +
moon moon  moon moon  moon moon
 

 ............  charge
3/2 XIONS  ................ isospin state
wave/orbits  .................... o splits

 ................................
3/2+ XIONS isospin ....................................
wave/orbits o ........................................
 ............................................
i ................................................ 1/2+ XIONS
o .................................................... wave/orbits
NOTICE that in terms of a LABORATORY point of view the + 
character of the moon orbit (wave/orbit) increments
changes to  + characters at the WINTER position
for Venus, in the characteristic (wave/orbit) lineal
sums for the 3/2+ XION particle.

EARTH/MOON IMAGE 2 Hook Link MAIN FRAME

SUMMER POSITION WINTER POSITION
1/2
Earth  Venus SUN Venus
.*..*.*.*.
+   +   +
moon moon  moon moon moon moon


 ...........  charge
3/2 XIONS  ..... HOOKS ... isospin state
wave/orbits  ................... o splits
 ..............................
3/2+ XIONS isospin ........... LINKS ................
wave/orbits o ......................................
 ...........................................
i .............. MAIN FRAME .................... 1/2+ XIONS
o ................................................... wave/orbits
EARTH SUN
 end of basic EARTH/MOON METAPHOR intro 
Details of XION particles in the EARTH MOON METAPHOR
start further below at IMAGE 1 EARTHMOON
under MORE.
Still to follow are
These RHO's have resonance
MORE
Pi in the sky
Yin Yang Amplitudes
The super highway of PARTICLES
A mass for the NEUTRINO
Virtual Reality
Its UP to the UPSILONS
Poof! the CONNECTORS

The J/PSI interlinks
Summary statements

CONTINUED The EARTH/MOON Metaphor for Subatomic Phenomena

ILLUSTRATION 1 XION's

In which are depicted orbits and equivalents (charge/masses)
(Earth) + moon = 1/2+ XION  charge
(Earth) (1319) = 1/2+ XION * (isospin)
(Earth)  moon = 1/2+ XION o neutral
[1/2 (Earth + Venus) + moon = 3/2+ XION  charge
[1/2 (Earth + Venus) [1530] FIT = 3/2+ XION * (isospin)
[1/2 (Earth + Venus)  moon = 3/2+ XION o neutral
(Venus) + moon = 3/2 XION  charge
(Venus) [1830] FIT = 3/2 XION * (isospin)
(Venus)  moon = 3/2 XION o neutral
where 'isospins' are a connector, and not
the average of the two charge masses, since
the massed differences between each state
in a set are non lineal, but are lineal in
their equivalent (Compton) wavelengths, and
can thus be modelled by exact solar orbits.
IMAGE 1 XION's

Earth 1/2 Venus
.*..*..*. ..... to sun
+ moon  moon + moon  moon + moon  moon
...................
...................
...................

The 1981 datas showed conciderable real touching in solar orbit wave/mass
harmonics, but the revised 1994 solar astronomy datas show very little,
compared to before. And so a bit of reverse engineering has been done
upon the 1981 solar datas, to home in on planet orbit values, that
stick together nice and tight in correspondence with elementary
particle stuff. The figited solar datas can be concidered as
pure wavelength (Compton) states for the particles, with
suprising correspondence to solar datas, but from the
point of figiting it, let's concider the particle
wave lineal summing to be entirely within the
realms of Compton wavelengths, with the
solor correspondences used as models
to show the way pointing to what
to look for.

These figures are in the ballpark. All that is needed is for
fielders to run around a bit to catch the balloons of energy.

In power amplifications, 1/2 factors of the Electron mass are used.
Append this to say; On the other hand, it seems more to the point to
assume that 'whole integer ratios' of the FSC
(Fine Structure Constant) are not intrinsic and
fundamental, rather, 1/2 units of Electron mass
equivalent, are intrinsical factors.
Here is a list of 'whole integer ratios' factors
of the ELECTRON actully used in this disclosure
in amplifications of the Fine Structure Constant
as prior noted further above.
1 E raised by x FSC
3/2 E raised by x FSC
2 E raised by x FSC
5/2 E raised by x FSC
and E x FSC squared
when the Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895
and E = .510999065
===================================
THESE RHO'S HAVE RESONANCE
===================================
These RHO (mass/wave) resonances are interesting. In particular
two particular amplitude waves have revealing modelling images
with other reasons attached.
The amplitude waves are shown here in ILLUSTRATION 3
and are taken from ILLUSTRATION 1 of PART 5.
ILLUSTRATION 3

SUMMER WINTER
Earth SUN Venus
.*. * .*.
A P P A
h^/(orbit amplitude wave) = RHO MeV
 
 ........... 763.232316887 Mev ............................
 
....... 760.195477903 MeV ................................
Earth aphelion to Venus Perihelion,
and Earth mean to Venus aphelion,
are imaged.
Here is what is so interesting about these: Both of these
RHO (wave/mass) quantities interact with the PROTON. And each
(wave/mass) individually reacts with other fundamental quantities,
as follows:
HANDSHAKE 1

RHO (mass/wave) resonance 763.232316887 Mev  the PROTON
change sign = 175.039993113 Mev
which is a good approximation of 5/2 the Electron mass
x FSC where FSC is the Fine Structure Constant.
This is not an idle inclusion since integer ratios of the
Electron power amplified by the FSC are included in other
derivations that will be shown later.
HANDSHAKE 2

RHO (mass/wave) resonance = 760.195477903 MeV + 2 ELECTRON
= 761.217476023 Mev
 the PROTON change sign = 177.054833977 Mev
+ the PROTON = 1115.32714397 Mev
+ 2/3 E
= 1115.6678100 Mev = 1/2+ LAMBDA
IN THE SAME VIBRATION

RHO (mass/wave) resonance = 760.195477903 MeV + 2 ELECTRON
= 761.217476023 Mev
 the PROTON change sign = 177.054833977 Mev
+ 1/3 ELECTRON = 177.225166998 Mev
x 1/FSC
= 1.2932746181 Mev = N^
= Neutron MeV  Proton MeV.


 PROTON MeV

diff  N^ power amplitude

 RHO MeV


 PROTON MeV

diff  RHO MeV

 N^ power amplitude
x 1/FSC = N^ (Neutron  Proton) mass difference
all of which has come from one single (wave/orbit)
h^/(Earth apehlion + Venus perihelion)
= RHO MeV = 760.195477903 MeV
= a cosmic orbit particle vibration
and, an amplitude wave.
OH HO TURF SURFING ASTROLOGY TYPES HAVE JUST SPOTTED VENUS !
==========================================================
Venus is turning out to be a nice lovely planet. It mentions a lot
of things to say about understructures. Here is another, v e r r y
interesting handshake.
HANDSHAKE 3

From here on the PROTON will be identified
by the symbol P+ representing the PROTON
= 938.27231 MeV.
h^/(Venus mean)  P+ divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV

+ 1/3 E = 177.230658551 MeV

x 1/FSC =  1.293314692 MeV

= N^ =  1.293318 MeV FIT
when N^ = Neutron  Proton
AND ALSO
h^/(Venus mean)  P+ divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV

diff =  1.291024771 MeV

h^/(Venus mean + Moon)  P+ divide by 5 = 175.769300762 MeV
where N^ is the (Neutron  Proton) mass difference
such that (PROTON + 1.291024771 MeV) = 939.563334771 MeV
approx = the NEUTRON
= 939.56563 MeV FIT
AND WHERE
h^/(Venus mean)  P+ divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV
+ 1/3 E
divide by FSC = 1.293314692 MeV
PROTON + P+
= 939.565624692 MeV

NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV FIT
derived accuracy = 99.999999 4 %
LAMBDA mass claim

Deriving the stable LAMBDA once again another way:
177.060325534 Mev
PROTON is + 938.27231 MeV
= 1115.33263553 MeV
+ 2/3 E
= 1115.67330157 Mev
 99.999 5788 %
1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.678 MeV EXPMT
 1/2+ LAMBDA MeV

 PROTON MeV

 Venus (wave/mass)
where (h^/(Venus mean)  P+) / 5 = 177.060325534 MeV
NOTE 1/2+ LAMBDA (1115.33263553 Mev) / (1115.32714397 Mev)
= 99.999 5076 %
where 1115.32714397 Mev is from HANDSHAKE 2.
If precision is needed, then either LAMBDA
mass claim increased by 2/3 E results in
1115.32714397 MeV + 2/3 E = 1115.66781001 MeV
1115.33263553 Mev + 2/3 E = 1115.67330157 MeV
percent of accuracy  99.999 0410 %
1/2+ LAMBDA FIT 1115.684 MeV
It means a 1/2+ LAMBDA stable particle's mass has
just been calculated to high accuracy by two methods
entirely different, to close in on a similar result.
1. From an (EARTH aphelion + VENUS perihelion)
Cosmic virbration, in HANDSHAKE 2.
= 1115.67330157 MeV
2. From a (VENUS mean) Cosmic vibration,
in HANDSHAKE 3
= 1115.66781001 MeV
HANDSHAKE 4

WINTER 1/2 wave SUMMER

Mars  SUN Earth
.*. * .*.
A P  P A

..........................................................
....................... = 1045.33350825 Mev
WHERE 1045.33350825 Mev  PROTON = 107.061198257 MeV
AND 107.061198257 MeV divided by FSC = .781263364 MeV
+ ELECTRON = 1.292262429 MeV = N^
WHERE N^ is the (Neutron  Proton) mass difference
SUCH THAT (PROTON + 1.292262429 MeV) = 939.564572429 MeV
NEUTRON = (939.56563) MeV FIT
Here is introduced the first exploratory probe of small and ultra
small terms which seem to fill niches and chinks in these esteems
of creation.
N^ from HANDSHAKE 3 = 1.291024771 MeV
diff = 1/3 E x 1/FSC approx.
N^ from HANDSHAKE 4 = 1.292262429 MeV
where small diff = .oo1237658 MeV
x 1/FSC = .169603688 MeV
approx. 1/3 E = .170333021 MeV
REMARK
All of the above factors in the four 'HANDSHAKES' were factored in
terms of wave harmonics and wave amplitudes, modelled entirely upon
solar mechanical orbital images as data sources. It does not mean
that all four are correct, but guess that one at least is correct.
Here is the same set of resonance interactions, this time,
the factors use just the fundamental Physical Constants and
elementary particle datas, as the source inputs.
HANDSHAKE 5

The LAMBDA mass is PRECISELY calculated to complete agreement
with the FIT mass, and the best registered experiments, as
follows:
Deriving the stable LAMBDA once again another way:
where P+ is the PROTON = 938.27231 MeV FIT
where E is the ELECTRON = .510999065 MeV FIT
where N^ is the NEUTRONPROTON mass difference
= 1.293318 MeV FIT
===================
Then N^ x FSC = 177.231111868 Mev
+ P+ = 1115.50342186 Mev
+ 1/3 E = 1115.67375488 MeV

1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.678 MeV EXPMT
1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.684 MeV FIT
In terms of Cosmic tiein the LAMBDA value = 1115.67375488
calculated immediately above from Fundamental Constants is the
same as the LAMBDA claim = 1115.67330157 calculated above in
HANDSHAKE 3 as Cosmic Resonances toned in the ECCENTRICITY of
EARTH and VENUS orbits.
Here is the accuracy between
the two realms of creation.
1115.67375488 MeV
 99.9999 593 %
1115.67330157 MeV
1/10,000th of a percent error.
=================================================================
MORE EARTH/MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA
=================================================================

IMAGE 1 EARTHMOON

where P+ = 938.27231 MeV Proton
where N^ = 1.293318 MeV NeutronProton mass difference
where E = .510999060 MeV Electron
and harmonic mass ratios between states are introduced
THEN WITNESS

set 1
===============================================
1/2+ XION  = (1321. 32) MeV FIT
  moon + 1/3 E  N^ = 1321. 32450761
h^/(Earth)
 + moon  4/3 E = 1314. 98736002
1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT
===============================================
set 2
===============================================
1/2+ XION  = (1321. 32) MeV FIT
= 1321. 35233732
VE x 6/4 x 3/7 + P+ + E  N^
  moon 1535.39151529  P+ = VE
h^/1/2 (Earth + Venus)
 + moon 1526.26140691  P+ = VE+
VE+ x 6/4 x 3/7 + P+  N^
= 1314. 9798287
1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT
===============================================
set 3
===============================================
1/2+ XION  = (1321. 32) MeV FIT
= 1321. 32516539
V x 3/7 + P+ + 5/3 E
  moon 1830.07508733  P+ = V
h^/(Venus)
 + moon 1817.11881381  P+ = V+
V+ x 3/7 + P+
= 1314. 92081163
1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT
===============================================
1/2+ XION  Set 1 1321. 32450761
2 1321. 35233732
3 1321. 32516539
1/2+ XION o Set 1 1314. 98736002
2 1314. 9798287
3 1314. 92081163
NOTE a slight declination in derived masses, can
be clearly seen walking the town from SET 1
through SET 3. This is either the way it is,
or the masses should be perfect.
In not being perfect it may mean one or
another of the input datas is slightly
out of whack.
Attempts to arrive at perfect results has
not been successful. All attempts resulted
in DRIFTS and FLUCTUATIIONS in other datas
derived by working backwards in reverse
engineering to discretely modify
the planetary orbit
input terms.
No luck.
Alas.
A suggestion is that XIONS cascading from one
particle decay may in fact discretely vary from
XIONS popping out of another collision forming
a different original high energy particle.
This can have image if waves (compton) are
components of different kinds in different
collisions, with the seeming same resulting
XION popping out like an Imp on stage, bearing
in mind that the Imp started out in different
waving wire locations before teleporting into
the particle detector's start 'branch' point,
when different originating particles hook the
decays which produce XIONS.

Pi IN THE SKY

The following has been noticed.

IMAGE 2 EARTHMOON

circumpherence
where E2Pi = 3.210701785 MeV Electron x 2Pi NOTE
where Pi = 3.141592653 Ratio of a circle
* if E is a radius vector
then the circumpherence
= 2 Pi R
NOTE IF E MeV is represented as the vector of a radius,
THEN E x 2Pi is represented as the circumpherence
of a circle of radius E MeV,
AND E x 1Pi can be concidered a semi circle circumpherence
respecting that in terms of wavelengths the Electron
Compton wavelength is the circumpherence of a circle,
and it, reduced by 2Pi, is the circle's radius. Thus
physical lineal measures are the components.
That is, expanding the ELECTRON mass energy equivalent
by 2Pi, is equivalent to reducing the ELECTRON Compton
wavelength from a circumpherence to a circle's radius.
This is kinky, in that the h^ constant already in
use is an assumed radius quantity. Dogs, you gotta
love them: lick their balls, lick your face, lick
their balls, lick your face. Let sleeping dogs lie
in meditating on the 'kink'.
Maybe GOD has the answer.
set 4
===============================================
+ 4/3 E + E x 1Pi = 1321.33606607 MeV

h^/(Earth) .................... = 1319.04938308 MeV

 5/3 E  E x 2Pi = 1314.98701616 MeV
===============================================
set 5
===============================================

h^/1/2 (Earth + Venus) ........ seemingly no E 2Pi operators

===============================================
set 6
===============================================
1/2+ XION  = (1321. 32) MeV FIT
V* + E + E x 2Pi = 1321. 40899416

h^/(Venus) ..... 1823.57393767  P+ = V* = 1317. 68729328 MeV

V* + E  E x 2Pi = 1314. 98759053
1/2+ XION o = (1314. 9) MeV FIT
===============================================
I can't remember how V* was actually derived  RSL.
Set 4 1314. 98701616 MeV
ratio of perfection  99.9999 563 %
Set 6 1314. 98759053 MeV

COMMENT

Two different derivations are the same MeV.
Set 1 is wave/orbit evolved. Set 4 is circle
geometry evolved.
set 1

h^/(Earth)
 + moon  4/3 E = 1314. 98736002 MeV
1 / 99.9999 738 % 
 5/3 E  E x 2Pi = 1314.98701616 MeV
 circle
h^/(Earth)

set 4
Another pair of derivations are the same in
terms of proportionate accuracy. Set 1 is
Earth wave/orbit evolved. Set 6 has circle
geometry Venus evolved.
set 1

h^/(Earth)
 + moon  4/3 E = 1314. 98736002 MeV
99.9999 824 % 
circle = 1314. 98759053 MeV
V* + E  E x 2Pi

h^/(Venus) ............  P+ = V*

set 6
====================================
THE YIN YANG AMPLITUDES
====================================

IMAGE 3 EARTHMOON

set 7
===============================================
The TRAFFIC LIGHTS which switch lanes of logic.
The N^ vrs 5/2 E order is reversed when working
through the Proton.  P+ x 2  P+
change sign
===============================================
where E+^ = E + (N^ divide by FSC squared)
where E+^ = .511067935 MeV
where E = .510999065 MeV
where N^ = 1.2933318 MeV
= (NeutronProton) mass difference
YIN

h^/(Earth) 1.495980753
 = 175.098675075 MeV
 P+ x 2  P+ change sign  2/3 E+^  N^ = 5/2 E+^ x FSC
 P+ x 2  P+ change sign + E = N^ x FSC
 = 177.231111868 MeV
h^/(Earth) 1.495980375

YANG
NOTE the E and E+^ are different.
E = .510999065 MeV
E+^ = .511067935 MeV
WHERE E+^ = E + (N^ x 1/FSC squared).
YANG power resonance is perfect.
In reverse engineering, (running the Set 7 Yang equation
backwards starting with N^ x FSC), the resulting value
for the EARTH mean of orbit is
1.495980375 x 10 to 13 cm
Uncanny accuracy 
1.495980753 = 99.9999 747 %
!
YIN power resonance is perfect.
WHEN E+^ = E + (N^ divided by FSC squared)
THEN
Earth orbit
1.49597927 x 10 to 13 cm.
Astounding accuracy 
1.495980375 = 99.9999 261 %
!
set 8
===============================================
Here is the digit way of looking at
the behavior of the TRAFFIC LIGHTS
in the form of a YIN YANG algorythm.
=====
AGAIN let's see your cards
===== ====================
YIN

h^/(Earth) 1.495980753 = 1319.04897464

380.775764644
761.551529282 175.086750759 MeV
176.720780717 176.380068759
 P+ x 2  P+ change sign  2/3 E+^  N^ = 5/2 E+^ x FSC
NOTE this factors as an E of + N^ divided
by FSC squared === the Neutrino!
 P+ x 2  P+ change sign + E = N^ x FSC
176.720112803 177.231111868
761.552197196 1.293318 MeV
380.776098598

h^/(Earth) 1.495980375 = 1319.04840859

YANG
set 9 reverse engineering
===============================================
Here is the other way of looking at
the behavior of the TRAFFIC LIGHTS
in the form of a YIN YANG algorythm.
YIN

h^/(Earth)

5/2 E+^ x FSC + 2/3 E+^ + N^  P+ change sign, divide by 2
175.086750759 2/3 x .511067935 176.720780717 380.775764641
+ P+ = EARTH MeV
1319.04807464
EARTH ORBIT = h^/ 1319.04807464
1.495980 753 x 10 to 13 cm
el matcherino 1.49597927 ==========
1.495980 375 x 10 to 13 cm
EARTH ORBIT = h^/ 1319.04840859
1319.04840859
+ P+ = EARTH MeV
177.2311111868 .510999065 = 176.720112803 380.776098598
N^ x FSC  E  P+ change sign, divide by 2

h^/(Earth)

YANG
====================================================
The accuracy of these two amplitudes is self evident
====================================================
As you can see.
 end of YIN YANG amplitudes 

THE super highway OF PARTICLES

Are you ready to hit the high lanes, the super heavy ball
bearings that arise when Venus and Earth get hit with comets
and oscillate?
Even though SET 5 had no (E x 2pi) split levels, there are
higher levels to be had in abundance through the Electron itself
in power amplifications by the Fine Structure Constant, which
takes the picture up in to the high meson mass and wavelength
ranges of the UPSILON, where precise imaged mechanics featuring
E x 2Pi units of mass, and +  lineal sum increments of the
Moon orbit upon the distance between Earth and Venus, spell
out a near perfect picture of a great Cosmic song singing
about S O M E T H I N G going on.
The song is recorded below under ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS.
==================================================
A mass for the NEUTRINO ?
==================================================
A reason for thinking of a NEUTRINO mass
is that TWO targets become precise direct
hits when the 'NEUTRINO' mass is added to
to the mass of the ELECTRON.
The 'NEUTRINO' mass in question, is N^ the
NeutronProton mass difference, divided by
the Fine Structure Constant squared to give
+^ = .oooo68870 MeV.
This produces a mass energy unit, which is
roughly 5 times that of the binding energy
of the ELECTRON, which itself is the Fine
Structure Squared as a reduction onto 1/2
the ELECTRON. In other words, the ELECTRON
can be concidered a power amplification of
the ELECTRON's own unit of binding energy.
Binding energy means the energy equivalent needed
to hold an ELECTRON in its rest state position in
the Hydrogen atom, and called the Rydberg Energy
as a Physical Constant by physicists.
When the 'NEUTRINO' energy (in MeV's) is added to
the mass of the ELECTRON, the following occurs:
LET +^ = the 'NEUTRINO' mass.
AND +^ = N^ divided by FSC squared
WHEN N^ is the (NeutronProton) mass difference.
THEN E + +^ = E+^
And so
PERFECT 'NEUTRINO' EXAMPLE 1

neutrino
is
here
P+ + [1/2 ((( P+  (((E+^ x 5/2) x FSC)) + 2/3 E + N^ ))))]
P+ + [1/2 ((( P+  (((5/2 x E+^) x FSC)) + 2/3 E + N^ ))))]
is the h^ wavelength for orbit 1.4959 80753 x 10 to 13 cm

Earth orbit 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm
accuracy ratio = 99.9999 008 %
shown otherwise in: The YIN YANG Amplitudes.
PERFECT 'NEUTRINO' EXAMPLE 2

neutrino
is
here
A. h^/(Earth)  P+ x 2  P+ sign + 2/3 E+^
= E^ = 177.058875789 MeV
B. h^/(Venus)  P+ divide by 5 = E^ = 177.060325534 MeV
C. N^ x FSC  1/3 E = E^ = 177.060778846 MeV
D. FSC x 5/2 E+^ + E + 1/3 E + N^
neutrino = E^ = 177.061354932 MeV
is
here
FOR EXAMPLE string D run without the Electron
augmented by the Neutrino, yeilds
= E^ = 177.0 37806351
which is on its own, it does not match
anything, so that the use of E+^ in
this string is DEFINATIVE.
WHEREAS string A (derived from Earth orbit)
run without the Electron augmented by
the Neutrino, yields
= E^ = 177.0588 29875
which is hardly changed from the
original string, so thus the use
of E+^ is AMBIGUOUS.
ANOTHER LOOK AT A NEUTRINO

It is possible that N^  E rather than N^
itself is the holder of Neutrino substance.
In which case
N^  E N^
 will be less than 
FSC squared FSC squared
by a factor of E understanding that this term

FSC squared
for E is an MeV equivalent associated with the
electron binding energy of the Atom = E

2 FSC squared
==================================================
Cooking the books
==================================================
It does seem like adding a tiny integer unit to the
mass of the ELECTRON to make things copisetic with
an already existing digital number such as numbers
that express the distance of the EARTH to the SUN
in centimeter units, is 'hacking' a little bit too
lustily.
However, there is the fact that the YANG derivation
is perfect anyway, without hack. Secondly the hacked
YIN term gains some extra dimensions in perspective
with the hack included, the hack being the additive
factor of N^ divided by the Fine Structure Constant
squared to produce an energy quotient suggested as a
candidate for a 'NEUTRINO' mass +^ if there is one.
The 'hack' creates a perfect equality between the
entity known as N^ times the FSC, and ELECTRON
times 5/2 times the FSC, in that it manufactures
the N^ entirely from the ELECTRON binding energy
if equations are to be believed.
Here is the manufacture:
LET Eb = the Electron Binding Energy.
= .oooo136056981 MeV
THEN 2 Eb x FSC squared = ELECTRON rest mass E
= .510999065 MeV
AND 5/2 E x FSC + 5/3 E
= 175.914821372 MeV
OOPS
there is no way to tie 175.914821372 MeV to N^ x FSC
since the difference between the two MeV's happens not to
be N^ but 1.316290495 MeV, instead of 1.293318 MeV.
Let us produce a 'NEUTRINO' mass, a form
of NeutronProton binding energy spin glue
within, and raise it in power by the FSC
squared.
The 'NEUTRINO' mass energy will have to be
+^ in the order of
= .oooo68870 MeV = +^
to be of an any use, since it happens to be
N^, when raised in power by the FSC squared.
When this 'NEUTRINO' is added to E to yield
E+^ and the 'manufacture' is run again, then
Here is the manufacture again:
LET Eb = the Electron Binding Energy.
= .oooo136056981 MeV
THEN 2 Eb x FSC squared = ELECTRON rest mass E
= .510999065 MeV
AND E + +^ = .511067935 MeV = E+^
THEN 5/2 E+^ x FSC + 5/3 E+^
= 175.938530653 MeV
+ 1.293318 MeV for N^
= 177.231848653 MeV
divide by x FSC = 1.2933 23376 MeV
and redo the proceedure several times,
until N^ converges to a constant value
= 1.2933 23416 MeV
compared to the empirical (physically measured) N^
= 1.2933 18 MeV
This 'Neutrino' caused change is good
enough agreement for having cooked the
books.
It is an agreement that is 4 significant
digits better than the 'oops' value above
= 1.316290495 MeV.
The Cooked Books N^ Version

REMORMALIZING
When the 'manufacture again' is run anew, substituting
the new value 1.2933 23376 as N^ , by repeating the
run, N^ very quickly settles into a values
= 1.293323416 MeV.
IMPLICATION

What is implied is that an exact 'NEUTRINO' operator
of the Binding Energy of the Neutron (N^) is also in
the Binding Energy of the LAMBDA (N^ x FSC + 1/3 E)
and in direct consequence via lineal summing of wave *
(Compton) factors also in the mass energy constructs
of other very massive particles. A rather complete
self contained package of particle parts is at hand.
* Spelled out in UPSILON QUESTION 1
under VIRTUAL REALITY
next topic below.
Here is how the 'NEUTRINO' ... Neutron Binding Energy
corelates to the LAMBDA Binding Energy, and amplified
power bubble of the ELECTRON energy. The operators are
switched in mid stride by a 1/3 unit of ELECTRON mass.
When N+^ = 1.2933 234161 MeV
N^* x FSC = 177.231854969 MeV
N^* + 1/3 E+^ = L^ = 177.402210047 MeV
L^ + P+ = LAMBDA = 1115.67452004 MeV
when N+^ = 1.293323416 MeV
as determined under 'manufacture again' above.
trace switch N+^ x FSC = N*^ = 177.231854069 MeV
with Neutrino
N*^  5/3 E+^  N+^ = 175.086750760 MeV
divided by FSC = 1.277669839 MeV
divided by 5/2 = .511067935 MeV
= E+^ = .511067935 MeV

1 .511067935 MeV
compare  100 %
2 .511067935 MeV
when 2 = E+^ = .511067935 MeV = E + N^ divided by
FSC squared.
===================
The PERFECT Neutron
===================
Wait a minute !
Hold the phone !
Something just went whizzing by in the calculator.
It looks like tautalogicals to me, says the slow
drawling spokesperson. Looks worsn' that, says
the one who speaks a bit faster.
Looks like none of those, says the person who wrote
it (moi), due to the fact that both the IMPLICATION
and that under 'manufacture again', come from two
entirely independent fundamental Physical Constant
sources.
At the very least, number 1.293323416 is a
direct derivation of the numbers for the E
mass and the FSC and may have nothing to do
with the (NeutronProton) mass difference
= N^, since either terms E or E+^ can be
used to derive a N^ value, by the steps in
RENORMALIZING, immediately above.
It seems that something is amiss in
physics in the realm of the NEUTRON.
Until memory is jogged, to remember what happened under
the original 'Here is the manufacture'. Then to finish
it off:
LET Eb = the Electron Binding Energy.
= .oooo136056981 MeV
THEN 2 Eb x FSC squared = ELECTRON rest mass E
= .510999065 MeV
AND 5/2 E x FSC + 5/3 E
= 175.914821372 MeV
AND SINCE
N^ x FSC = 177.231111868 = 1.293318 MeV x FSC
DIFFERENCE ..... 177.231111868  175.914821372
= 1.316290495 MeV clearly this is
NOT the real N^.
WHEREAS
neutrino
is
here
when E+^ is substituted for E in the above equations,
DIFFERENCE ....... 177.231854069  175.938530653
N^ = 1.293323416 MeV clearly this may be
a real N^ in that
P+ + N^
= 939.565633416 MeV
 99.999999 6 %
NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV FIT
more or less
100 % exact.
Hmmm, says the slow speaking drawler, don't
be too hasty, could be a tautalogy, yu know.
 end of A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO 
==================================================
THESE PARTICLES HAVE PERSUATION
==================================================
Subtopics include:
IONNIC GRAPPLES
IONNIC ALGEBRA
IONNIC WAVELENGTHS
Enough info has been gathered together under
A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO  to hook together
several things into one lockedin constancy.
In this, a minutely adjusted PROTON mass and same
for NEUTRON results. These results are shown here
just for the sake of show, the minutely adjusted
masses are not used elsewhere, so if deemed to be
significant or even fundamental by speaker at any
speed, let that speaker do the final homework to
integrate the show into other parts and pieces of
a larger big picture.
Much of the 'Persuasion' picture is tautological, in other
words results can be expected to be due to simple math and
not to fundamental understructure, or to many distinct and
intricate fundamental parameters coming together.
SPECULATION
It gets interesting when hidden terms are revealed by
opening up certain equations. It may be timely to the
suggestion that these 'hidden' terms are in some ways
like 'guage' fields, which some researchers now think
may be hidden undetected behind the scenes in certain
particle interactions. Certainly fractured wavelength
bits and pieces knitted together comprise a large big
picture hidden in the background of a single mass, if
the wavelength field is not included in the overview.
HERE IS A 'MINI' PICTURE
This MINI picture includes something else not used
elsewhere; simple algebra to derive certain terms;
and a description that is copisetically given with
all parts together; both energies, and wavelengths
(Compton).
Lets start with 'IONNIC GRAPPLES'.
===============
IONNIC GRAPPLES
===============
The Picture is simple.
Let 'SOURCE' terms be:
LET N^ = 1.293323416 MeV
from 'The Cooked Books' above in
A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO.
LET E = .510999065 MeV
LET E+^ = .511067936 MeV
from 'The Cooked Books' above in
A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO.
except the N^ term used to create E+^
is 1.293323416 so that
E + 1.293323416 x 1/FSC squared
= .511067936 MeV
The 'IONNIC GRAPPLES' are:
GRAPPLES 1
*> = 177.2318541569 MeV
 + N^ + 5/3 E+^
 E+^ x 5/2 x FSC = 175.0865085870


*> N^ x FSC = 177.2318541569 MeV
 diff is obvious = E+^ x FSC = 70.034700343 MeV
*> N^  E+^ x FSC = 107.1971538257 MeV


 E+^ x 3/2 x FSC = 105.0520505152
 + N^ + 5/3 E+^
*> = 107.1971538257 MeV
These 7 pieces of data are locked together in constancy
when the source terms have values stated as E+^ and N^
in the 'SOURCE' terms as shown immediately above.
The strings are loose if N^ is NOT exactly 1.293323416 MeV.
WHEN THE STRINGS ARE LOOSE:
a renormalizing attempt to close in on a constant value for
N^ is UNsuccessful because there are two different intrinsic
terms, both of which change in the renormalizing, the rate
of change of one term being much smaller than for the other's
rate of change, which causes things to gradually unwind when
attempting to renormalize, for instance as follows:
LET N^ = 1.29332341 3 MeV (slightly altered DOWN)
^
* = 177.23185 4165 <* not
  the
 5/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^  same
 
 THEN N^ x FSC = 177.23185 3644 <*

 THEN N^  E+^, x FSC = 107.19715 3300 <*
 
 3/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^  not
  the
* = 107.19715 3821 <* same
LET N^ = 1.29332341 9 MeV (slightly altered UP)
* = 177.23185 4171
 change
 5/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^ is fast
 
 THEN N^ x FSC = 177.23185 4466 <*

 THEN N^  E+^, x FSC = 107.19715 4122
 change
 3/2 E+^ x FSC + N^ + 5/3 E+^ is slow
 
* = 107.19715 3827 <*
WHEN N^ = 1.29332341 6 MeV (original GRAPPLES 1)
there is no drift nor flutter the GRAPPLE
is locked tight.
==============
IONNIC ALGEBRA
==============
The IONNIC GRAPPLES picture broadens to include the
PROTON and NEUTRON masses as follows; when it is
learned that:
N^ x FSC + 2/3 E+^ ( x 2Pi) approximates a LAMBDA mass
N^ x FSC + 2/3 E+^ ( x (2Pi  1))
approximates a PROTON mass
WHERE P+ x 1/( x (2Pi  1))
approximates (N^ x FSC) + 2/3 E+^
SUCH THAT
N^n = (P+ x 1/( x (2Pi  1)))  2/3 E+^
= 1.293494055 MeV
WHICH APPROXIMATES
N^ + (E+^ x 2Pi) x 1/FSC squared.
However, the string is loose. A renormalizing attempt
to close in on a constant value for N^n is also not
successful. The PROTON mass is an X factor, it is an
arbitrary input, which effects any attempt to do a
renormalization to close in on a constant value for
N^n, for instance as follows:
BEGIN N^n = 1.2934940 55 MeV
EQ. 3 x FSC + 2/3 E+^ x 2Pi  P+  2/3 E+^
= 1.2934940 53 Mev = N^n
AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.2934940 47 MeV
AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.2934940 07 MeV.
As you can see, N^n will keep drifting further out of focus.
The solution is to do a reverse engineering, starting
with N^ and deriving a value for P+ (the PROTON).
AND SO
LET Pi = 3.141592653
LET N^ = 1.293323416 MeV
N^ + (E x 2Pi x 1/FSC squared)
= N^n
= 1.293494390 MeV
SO THEN
N^n x FSC + 2/3 E x 2Pi
+ 1115.868261914 MeV approximates LAMBDA
 N^n x FSC + 2/3 E x 2Pi
= 938.27231 2191 MeV fits the PROTON
SO THUS, substituting in EQ.3,
BEGIN N^n = 1.293494390 MeV
EQ.3 x FSC + 2/3 E x 2Pi  P+  2/3 E
= 1.293494390 Mev = N^n
AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.293494390 MeV = N^n
AGAIN EQ.3 = 1.293494390 MeV. = N^n
IT IS OBVIOUS that the N^n ain't gonna budge.
I see two items worth peering at
says the slow speaking drawler :
1 The E value of the ELECTRON
has been used for increments,
and NOT the E+^ value.
2 The resulting PROTON mass is entirely
within the experimental FIT of [938.27231] MeV FIT.
I see something else, says the one who speaks a little faster:
P+ + N^n = 939.56580658 MeV
= No^ = mass for the NEUTRON but it is too high,
by an amount equal to, hmmm, looks good
for it being E x 2Pi divided by the
Fine Structure Constant squared.
You gotta tautology, there, fella, says the slow speaking
drawler. If you subtract E x 2Pi x 1/FSC squared you'll
get
No = 939.56535606 MeV
exactly the same as adding N^ to P+
when N^ = 1.293323416 MeV
and P+ = 938.27231219 MeV
except,
an I gotta givyah points,
they're all locked together as constants.
I see what you mean, says the one who
speaks a little faster. Question is, how
much is tautology, and how much is fundamental
physics?
Gotta nother question, says the slow speaking drawler,
just cooked it up in the mainframe:
if N^ x FSC + 1/3 E + P+ = 1115.67452222
it differs from our FIT value by [1115.684] MeV FIT
 1115.67452222
= .009477775
which looks galldarn like N^ x 1/FSC
so
if
I append N^ x 1/FSC to the end of 1115.67452222
I get 1115.68 396009
which is gooda' nuf for LAMBDA [1115.684] MeV FIT
and so
using this LAMBDA
everything FITS tightern' a drum,
the drawl
getting noticably slower
keeping in lock step with
GRAPPLES getting faster
in the antics of the mathematic's algebra.
===================
MORE IONNIC ALGEBRA
===================
WHICH BRINGS US BACK TO FIRST CAUSE  THE ALGEBRA
LET Pi = 3.141592653
LET P+ = 938.27231219 MeV as derived in
IONNIC GRAPPLES
THEN P+ divide by 2Pi  1 = 177.595949723
 2/3 E
= 177.255283679
= L^+
divide by FSC = 1.293494390
and 177.595949723
divide by FSC = 1.295980350
= N^+
where 1.295980350  1.293494390
= 2/3 E divide by FSC
So FAR so GOOD.
1.295980350 x 2Pi = 1115.86826191
LAMBDA^ (high)
 P+
= 177.595949723
In ALGEBRA, it happens that
1.295980350 x (((2Pi  1) x FSC)) + 1)
= 939.568292541
NEUTRON (high)
and NEUTRON (high)  P+
= 1.295980350
which is back where we started.
The point is, that in wavelengths the
stuff factored under IONNIC ALGEBRA
becomes the factors of simple circles.
==================
IONNIC WAVELENGTHS
==================
Let's first convert some mass to wave energy:
LET any wavelength be 10 to 14 cm.
h^/ 1115.86826191 = 1.768372307 LAMBDA^ wavelength
h^/ 938.27231219 = 2.103089377 PROTON wavelength
h^/ 939.568292541 = 2.100188510 NEUTRON wavelength
h^/ 177.595949723 = 11.111010900 L^+ wavelength
h^/ 1.295980350 = 1522.60837305 N^+ wavelength
Since wavelengths are reciprocals to energy, they work in
converse order to ALGEBRA which factors mass. And so there
is:
LAMBDA^ wavelength x 2Pi = L^+ wavelength
1.768372307 x 2Pi = 11.111010900
and
11.111010900 x 1/2Pi  1 = 2.103089377
PROTON wavelength
etc.
The point is that in the geometry of a circle, when
LAMBDA^ wavelength is a radius
L^+ wavelength is the circle's circumpherence.
where LAMBDA^ radius is inside the bounds of a PROTON
or within the measure of a PROTON's wavelength, while
the L^+ circumpherence comprises a circle within a
shell that comprises a PROTON property (not the
Proton radius).
Wish I could d r a w geometry on a typewriter, says
the speaker with a drawl, should make it a lot easier
to see at once.
Don't know, says the one who speaks a little faster,
looks like a tautology to me.
You speak with too much haste,
says the one who speaks fastest of all.
 end of THESE PARTICLES HAVE PERSUASION 
==================================================
VIRTUAL REALITY
==================================================
The E^ value derived immediately above as 177.061354932 MeV *
is interesting in its own right, because it has causality that
branches out into the Cosmos as well as infiltrating sub atomic
resonance and decay structures.
* As D in PERFECT 'NEUTRINO' EXAMPLE 2
when N^ was 1.293318 MeV
Here is a summary of four COSMIC/SUBATOMIC recurrences:
When N^ = 1.293323416 MeV
When E^ = N^ x FSC  1/3 E+^
= E^
= 177.061498090 MeV
1. h^/(Earth)  P+  1/3 E+^ x 2  P+ change sign
= E^ = 177.058806918 MeV

diff  approximate
 1/2 E x 1/FSC

2. h^/(Venus)  P+ divide by 5 

= E^ = 177.060325534 MeV

diff  approximate
 1/3 E x 1/FSC

3. N^ x FSC  1/3 E+^ 
= E^ = 177.061498090 MeV
4. FSC x 5/2 E+^ + E + 1/3 E + N^
= E^ = 177.061498189 MeV

the rugga bugga is 177.061498090 MeV
well, the percentage of
error doesn't show up in the
calculator the error is so small 99.9999999 %
For instance, if the E^ value of string 4 is worked
backwards to an E^ value for string 1, by subtracting
from E^ of string 4, first, 1/3 E+^ x 1/FSC, then
1/2 E+^ x 1/FSC; the result reverse engineers back to
a value of the Earth's orbit:
1.49597 8994 x 10 to 13 cm.
If E instead of E+^ is used, the reverse engineering
yeilds and Earth orbit value of:
1.495979 033 x 10 to 13 cm.

1.495979 27 x 10 to 13 cm.
The rugga bugga = 99.99999 841 %
Either way, this is close tracking between Cosmic realms.
Bearing in mind that if the Big Bang portion of
the cosmology seen by telescope is taken out of
the picture, the remaining picture is still the
complete self contained view possible by seeing
everything in terms of Compton wavelengths, all
lineal sums and fractured into pieces linked.
 end of VIRTUAL REALITY 
======================
ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS
======================
UPSILON orbital angular momentum states are pin pointed.

IMAGE 1 UPSILON Jupiter's Eccentricity

aphelion JUPITER perihelion to SUN
**.*. // 
 moon moon +
*...............................................
*..........................................
*.....................................

3 Fundamental UPSILON (orbit/waves) occur.
These three (orbit/waves) involve the eccentricy factor of JUPITER,
which is the orbital distance between JUPITER, and its aphelion or
perihelion of orbit. The eccentricity factor is MODIFIED by plus
or minus increments equal to the orbit of the EARTH's moon.
In terms of fundamental waves (Compton) they associate directly
with higher mass UPSILON mesons, in a self evident pattern. The
whole picture ties together the exact MASSES of UPSILSON states
1S 2S 3S 4S.
THE BIG PICTURE BEGINS AS FOLLOWS

Let J^ = JUPITER eccentricity factor
= .37710047 x 10 to 13 cm
= JUPITER mean  JUPITER aphelion
Converted to particle wave (Compton)
mass energy equivalents there is found:
h^/ (1/2 J^)  MOON = 10573.2692632 MeV
let h^/ 1/2 J^ eccentricity = 10465.4896238 MeV
h^/ (1/2 J^) + MOON = 10359.8813611 MeV
which are
UPSILON DATA 1

h^/ (1/2 J^)  MOON = 10573.2692632 MeV = UPSILON 4 S
(10580.0) MeV
h^/ 1/2 J^ = 10465.4896238 MeV
(10355.3) MeV
h^/ (1/2 J^) + MOON = 10359.8813611 MeV = UPSILON 3 S
In particle physics experiments NO particle masses
of any other kind have shown up within the range of
these two UPSILON S states derived from JUPITER.
UPSILON DATA 2

The other two UPSILON S states are:
4 S = (10580.0) MeV = 10573.2692632 MeV (from J^  moon)
3 S = (10355.3) MeV = 10359.8813611 MeV (from J^ + moon)
2 S = (10023.30) MeV derived below
1 S = (9460.37) MeV derived below
UPSILON DATA 3

In the spread of mass potential between the four S
states tabled in UPSILON DATA 2 are several other
mass states that tie directly in to the BIG picture.
FROM J^  MOON
4 S ====== 10573.269 MeV
  
  
  + diff = 107.779 MeV (approx N^  E x FSC) = 107.205 MeV
  
  
  
   *  10465.48962 MeV (from h^/ J^ = (orbit/wave)
   
   
   + diff = 105.604 MeV (approx 3/2 E x FSC) = 105.037 MeV
   
3 S  =========== 3 S = 10359.881 MeV
    FROM J^ + MOON
   
   + diff = 763.904 MeV = RHO range  P+  P+ = LAMBDA
    range
 +  diff = 549.969 MeV = ETA range
   
  +  diff = 442.189 MeV = KAON range
   
2 S ================= 2 S = (10023.30) MeV
  
  + diff = 562.930 Mev  P+  P+ = 1313.616
   1/2+ XION range
  
  *  9595.981 MeV = (E x FSC squared)
  
  
  + diff = 135.611 MeV PION range
  
+ diff = 1115.684 MeV = 1/2+ LAMBDA FIT (1115.684) MeV
  
  
1 S ================== 1 S = (9460.37) MeV

 = 9457.585 MeV
It is clear that many fundamental particle mass approximations are
induced within the wide arms of the UPSILON S states when two of
the states are derived from the eccentricity factor of JUPITER.
These approximations (ranges) include PION XION
KAON N^  E x FSC
ETA 3/2 E x FSC
RHO LAMBDA
"If you think this looks good
wait'l yuh getta loada the
next page" !
UPSILON DATA 4 Next Page

In UPSILON DATA 3 a clear anomaly is the citing of a full
1/2+ LAMBDA FIT mass, rather than an approximation only to
UPSILON 1 S state 9460.37 MeV.
The reason for this extact mass
citing for the LAMBDA is mighty.
It involves a PRECISE calculating of specific KEY mass integer
units, plus a slightly revised (lowered) term used for the EARTH
moon's orbit in the JUPITER eccentricity interactions.
The result of just TWO minor adjustements is an ARENA that
becomes tightly locked together, all parts are exact fits.
The main adjustment, was to use the assumed 'NEUTRINO' mass as
a + increment to the rest state mass of the ELECTRON, and then
use the 'adjusted' ELECTRON mass for all following derivations.
The other minor adjustement was in deducing a slightly lowered
term for the orbit of the EARTH'S moon.
For an assumed 'NEUTRINO' mass, see elsewhere wherever
the word NEUTRINO is cited in this disclosure.
To save you the trouble, here it is anyway:
N^ x 1/FSC squared = .oooo68870 MeV
which is the assumed 'NEUTRINO' mass
when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT.
Several routes were followed, in which an ajustment was assumed
and strings (with the adjustment) were run foward then backwards
through the calculator to result in other adjustments which were
also 'renormalized' so to speak by running the strings backward
and forward again, redoing the calculations in different ways.
Very quickly in fact almost at once, in less than a half an
hour a whole NEW PICTURE stablized into a self evident view,
involving UPSILON S state masses.
In other words it is not feasible to point to a starting
place and saying, 'here is a single insight that started
the road to discovery'.
What you SEE is what you've GOT, is what counts.
How you got there doesn't matter.
The NEW PICTURE takes up a great deal of line space
in text. Therefore the energy/frequency/waves of the
plateau's demonstrated, have to be parsed (broken up)
into several smaller pictures.
In the NEW PICTURE the exact MASS entities calculated fall
into place merely by the adjustments, in the main using an
adjusted ELECTRON increased by the 'NEUTRINO' mass energy
increment, which is N^ divided by the FSC squared. This
means the resulting datas fell out onto the table top, in
the open, one after the other as a direct consequence. The
use of tweezers and a bag of marbles to shape concepts did
not occur. What a satisfying half hour!
This is why it took less than an hour to produce the stuff,
finished.
Let's begin over again.
UPSILON QUESTION 1

The first step to the NEW PICTURE rundown began as follows:
Question: An intuitive assumption.
What EARTH moon orbit would be needed to have
calculated S 3 and S 4 UPSILON mass states,
using J^ orbital eccentricity for JUPITER, if
the two calculated states were separated in an
exact split by energy entities N^  E x FSC
and 3/2 E x FSC
so that
 MOON = S 4 UPSILON 10572.6954732 MeV
+ 107.205849362 MeV = N^  E x FSC
h^/ 1/2 J^ = 10465.489238 eccentricity MeV
 105.050313380 MeV approx 3/2 E x FSC
+ MOON = S 3 UPSILON 10360.4393104 MeV
By working backward: using 107.205849362 MeV = N^  E x FSC
for 1.293318 MeV
Determining the  MOON factor for S 4 UPSILON was
calculated first, resulting in a MOON orbit term of
.oo3823633 x 10 to 13 cm
which was substituted in h^/ (1/2 J^) + moon
to yield the S 3 UPSILON state.
The ELECTRON mass increment difference of
105.050313380 MeV approximating 3/2 E x FSC
via 10465.4896238 eccentricity MeV
 S 3 UPSILON 10360.4393104 MeV
becomes .... hey what gives !
turns out to be an ELECTRON value of .511059485 MeV
which was increased over the rest state ELECTRON mass
of .510999065 MeV by just .oooo60419 MeV, which was
an approximation of the ELECTRON mass plus (2E divided
by the FSC).
When an ((ELECTRON plus 2E divided by FSC)) adjustment was
tried, things did not hold together, there was some subtle
flutter and drift when running calculations back and forth.
Bits and pieces of tiny spurious digital
matter kept poking out.
On a hunch, the 'NEUTRINO' mass was instead tried as
an ELECTRON adjustment.
It was the bonanza, the mother load. The first time
tried all of the equations (strings) locked up tight
into CONSTANTS !
The adjusted ELECTRON mass using a NEUTRINO increment,
worked. The result was an almost negligable change to
a derived Earth MOON orbit for use with JUPITER, to
calculate UPSILON masses.
The new EARTH moon orbit found itself to be
.oo3823697 x 10 to 13 cm.
compared to .oo384401 the official original.
Thus, the stage is set. Everything is ready.
Let the show begin.
Let EARTH moon orbit = .oo3823697 x 10 to 13 cm.
Let adjusted ELECTRON mass = .511067935 MeV
= E+^
= E + (N^ x (1/FSC sguared))
and (N^ x (1/FSC sguared)) = NEUTRINO
= .oooo68870 MeV
And so,
here is the LOCKED in higharchy for UPSILONS.
starting with:
UPSILON STATEMENT 1

Homing in on characters results in a nice bright NEUTRINO !
.oo3823697
 MOON = S 4 UPSILON 10572.6938963 MeV
+ 107.204272480 MeV = N^  E+^ x FSC
h^/ 1/2 J^ = 10465.489238 MeV
 105.052050450 MeV = 3/2 E+^ x FSC
+ MOON = S 3 UPSILON 10360.4375734 MeV
.oo3823697
where E+^ holds a NEUTRINO.
Let's not get ridiculous here. This is
not being waved as a proof of NEUTRINO
mass. The plus N^ x 1/FSC squared unit
is termed 'NEUTRINO' for bookkeeping
purposes, giving the entity a name. It
just seems this particular entity kind
of fits the bill for a candidate for a
possible mass for an ELECTRON neutrino.
Particularly since it is lurking right
in the middle of N^, in the factor of
N^  E = n^ .782318935 MeV.
It is roughly 5 times the ELECTRON's
binding energy = .oooo136056981 MeV.
UPSILON STATEMENT 2

5/2 E+^ x FSC = 175.086750759 MeV
and
P+  175.086750759 MeV = RHO range
= 763.185559240 MeV
so that
S 3 UPSILON state 10360.4375734 MeV
 763.185559240 MeV
= 9597.25201416 MeV
x 1/FSC squared = .511066740 MeV
 99.9997661 %
E+^ .511067935 MeV
bearing in mind that the percentage of accuracy
is by factors held together by large magnitudes
of intrinsic inherent differences, due to power
amplitude ratios involving the FSC squared thus
some digital trunkation is allowed ...
... a gift from Mr. Fudge
who got the gift from Mrs. Brownie.
UPSILON STATEMENT 3 Two NEUTRINOS

Peering more closely to the definition
of UPSILON STATEMENT 2 it is seen that
S 3 UPSILON state 10360.4375734 MeV
 E+^ x FSC squared 9597.27445548 MeV
= 763.163117920 MeV RHO range
 P+ change sign = 175.109192080 MeV
and 175.109192080 MeV is 5/2 x FSC the
value of an ELECTRON mass equivalent of
.511133440 MeV
which looks like an ELECTRON rest mass .510999065 MeV
plus TWO units of N^ x (1/FSC squared).
In other words, working from E+^ x FSC squared
to yield a RHO range mass, the factor which hooks
to the PROTON, is a power amplification of a rest
state ELECTON, plus 2 NEUTRINO's.
Well, that took some trouble to explain,
but fortunately it is done.
UPSILON STATEMENT 4 The ELECTRON's binding energy

The terms spelled out in UPSILON STATEMENT 3 can
be called CONSTANTS, since they behave as such.
The CONSTANTS remain consistent when the field of
view is broadened to take a sharper more detailed
look into some of the understructures implicit in
the JUPITER / UPSILON Cosmic oscillation.
Using the E+^ value of the ELECTRON
as a constant term, several other new
derivatives can be easily shown.
Three different views are examined as follows:
UPSILON CONSTANT 1 Deriving the ELECTRON

BEGIN:
Let state 3 4 UPSILON = 10572.6938963 MeV
from h^/ Jupiter eccentricity
 MOON adjusted
.oo3823697 x 10 to 13 cm
then
S 4 UPSILON 10572.6938963 MeV
 1115.50342186 = P+ + N^ x FSC
N^ = 1.293318 MeV
= 9457.19047444 MeV
+ PION (139.56995) MeV FIT
= 9596.76042444 MeV
divide by FSC squared
= .511040563 MeV
minus
which approximates E+^  2 Eb electron
binding energy
.oooo27211
when E = .510999065 MeV
= .511067741 MeV
.511067741
Percent of accuracy  99.9999 684 %
.511067935
UPSILON CONSTANT 2 Deriving the S 4 UPSILON STATE

IN REVERSE ENGINEERING:
LET E+^ = .511067935 MeV
= E + (N^ x 1/FSC squared)
the NEUTRINO
LET E^ = .oooo27215 MeV = E+^ divide be
FSC squared
= 2 x E+^ binding
energy factor
LET Eo = .511040720 MeV
= E+^  E^
THEN
Eo x FSC squared = 9596.76338755 MeV
 PION +  (139.56995) MeV FIT
= 9457.19343755 MeV
+ 1115.50342186 = P+ + (N^ x FSC)
when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
= 10572.6968594 MeV
 1 / 99.9999 719 %
10572.6938963 MeV
S 4 UPSILON
UPSILON CONSTANT 3 Derive the LAMBDA cohort

IN CONVERSE ENGINEERING
BEGIN
Let 10572.6938963 MeV = S 4 UPSILON state
And let E^ x FSC squared
= 9596.76338755 MeV
 (139.56995) MeV FIT charged PION + 
= 9457.19343755 MeV
+ 1115.49969242 MeV LAMBDA cohort
= 10572.6931299
where 1115.49969242 MeV
= P+ + (N^ x FSC)
when N^ = N^  E^
= 1.293290784 MeV
when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
and P+ = 938.27231 MeV FIT PROTON
10572.6931299 MeV
 99.99999 27 %
10572.6938963 MeV
S 4 UPSILON
where the LAMBDA cohort was assumed, resulting
in the near perfect percent of accuracy.
UPSILON CONSTANT 4 Deriving the charged PION

Let 10572.6938963 MeV = S 4 UPSILON state
 1115.49969292 MeV LAMBDA cohort
= 9457.19420338 MeV = S 1 UPSILON state cohort
 9596.76345642 MeV = E^ x FSC squared
change sign
= 139.569184170 MeV = derived charged PION + 

139.56995 MeV FIT
percent of accuracy = 99.999 4512 %
In this kind of mathematical derivations the
end value for the PION can fluctuate through
rather large drifts depending on minisculely
small changes in the control term E^ . For
instance if the actual PION mass 139.56995
is added to 9457.19420338 and it is reduced
by the FSC squared, the result deviates from
E^ by a very tiny amount:
.511040761
 1 / 99.99999 27 %
.511040724
It means a tiny fluctuation at the 8th
significant digit of E^ drifts into
a noticable change to the PION mass. A
perfect derivation to the PION mass is
illusive.
Although the goal of a perfect derivation seems
real; due to the massive masses of the UPSILONS,
and mighty power amplifications of the ELECTRON,
leaving pretty well NO room for error; the mass
either LANDS right on target, or not at all.
The only arbitrary INPUT into the whole scheme is
the charged PION mass. It is not derived from other
fundamental physical constants in the UPSILON frame
described above as UPSILON CONSTANT 4.
UPSILON COMMENT 1

It is fun, playing with numbers. It is even more fun to see
the numbers crunch into nearly perfect exactitudes. This is
the same exacting techniques that are used to derived exact
binding energy MeV's for different isotopes of atoms. Each
possible data digit after the decimal point, is captured to
the nth degree of accuracy by heavy breathing physicists.
Here in the UPSILON constants nothing is wasted. Every data
has an exactitude, expressible in balanced digits and units
of MeV.
UPSILON COMMENT 2

There is an excellent opportunity to see how hidden
terms of a certain value can seemingly reappear as
another value of different means but in fact really
are the original terms in another coat of colors.
The opportunity exists due to the fact that the datas
of UPSILON STATEMENTS 1 to 3 are CONSTANTS which have
no change in the form of 'flutter' or 'drift'.
Here is the opportunity.
It is simply this; curiosity arouses to wonder
what difference might be seen between the value
of 9597.27445548 MeV and 9595.98113748 MeV,
when
UPSILON cohort 9597.27445548 MeV = E+^ x FSC squared
diff = 1.293318 MeV = N^
UPSILON cohort 9595.98113748 MeV = E x FSC squared
the diff 1.293318 MeV to be expected, since E+^
differs from E by + (N^ x 1/FSC squared) and
both COHORTS are reverse in power amplification
ie., TIMES the FSC squared, rather than divided.
The point is, the difference here is not significant
in terms of any new clue. It is just here because of
the CONSTANT math.
HIGHLY RELEVENT
It is highly relevent, however, to see such a tiny
ball bearing drop out of the works due to the fact
that the 'works' are constructed entirely from the
wave/orbit mechanics of JUPITER's eccentricity of
orbit. In the non lineal nature of reciprocals the
fact that mass inter bits can be summed in a whole
and perfect accord with wave/orbit inter bits, is
a powerful scheme concidering the slightest change
to the orbit of JUPITER will throw the whole tight
collection of reciprocal nature CONSTANTS out the
window, stopping the marriage to the BIG picture
of UPSILONS by an act of bad faith.
UPSILON DATA 5 Second Next Page

Now it is time to say goodby to JUPITER and hurtle
across space back to the EARTH MOON METAPHOR FOR
SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA.
Here in the boondocks of particle lore is another
motion picture involving particle waves (Compton),
and exact masses, plus other tieins to particle
states for several different kinds of particles,
in yet another mega drama featuring waving wires,
directed by the incredible strings of super chords
with GODS playing the harmonicas.

IMAGE 2 UPSILON 1/2 waves at EARTH and VENUS

Earth 1/2 Venus SUN
.*.!**
+ moon moon 
*....................*.....................................*
**
XION WAVE
Earth 1/2 Venus SUN
.*.!**
+ moon moon 
.....................*..................*...................
**
UPSILON wave
UPSILON DATA 6

The UPSILON wave, another 1/2 wave operator, has a converted
mass value of 9535.25978462 MeV which at first seems to be
sitting in the middle of nowhere until a bit of sleuthing, a
mere bit of child's play based on expectations, produces the
following picture; UPSILON INTERFACE DATA 1.
This is take from an interaction between EARTH and VENUS and
is smack in the middle of the EARTH MOON METAPHOR panarama.
Converted to particle wave (Compton)
mass energy equivalents there is found:

UPSILON INTERFACE DATA 1

h^/ 1/2 (Earth  Venus)  MOON = 9715.72078673 MeV
diff 180.470002112 MeV
Let h^/ 1/2 (Earth  Venus) = 9535.25078462 MeV
diff 173.887788338 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Earth  Venus) + MOON = 9361.36299628 MeV
Still nothing to look at.
But wait.
This EARTH/MOON METAPHOR data has not
been hooked to the UPSILON.
Here is what happens when a HOOK in engaged.

Let S 1 UPSILON state = 9461.00464359 MeV
from
HANDSHAKE 1 in DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION, PART 5


Let UPSILON cohort = 9457.19341388 MeV
from above topic
UPSILON CONSTANT 4 Deriving the charged PION


UPSILON PICTOGRAM 1 EARTH/MOON METAPHOR interface

In the following
let the ELECTRON be E+^ (NEUTRINO ENHANCED) = .511067935 MeV
.oo384401
h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS)  MOON
1/2 wave  9715.72078673 MeV
    
    
     70.025262505
1/2+ SIGMA +     + diff = 180.470002112 + E x FSC
========      + P+ + N^
      4/3 E
     = 1189.37947411 MeV
     = 1/2+ SIGMA + [1189.37] MeV FIT
    
    
    
hook =====*====== 9595.98104359 MeV UPSILON plateau
      = E x FSC squared
      power amplitude
      when E = .510999065 MeV
     
     
PION o   *  diff = (134.97640) MeV = PION o FIT
     
     
     
1/2 wave *  9535.25078462 MeV h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS)
    
    
    
1/2+ SIGMA o     + diff = 254.716143144 + P+  N^
========      + 5/3 E
     = 1192.54690961 MeV
     = 1/2+ SIGMA 0 [1192.55] MeV FIT
    
    
    
S 1 =======*======== 9461.00464359 MeV UPSILON particle state
  
  
  
1/2+ SIGMA    +  diff = 258.527349180 + P+ + N^
========     4/3 E
   = 1197.41155868 MeV
   = 1/2+ SIGMA  [1197.436] MeV FIT
  
  
cohort ============= 9457.19343755 MeV UPSILON cohort
 
 
 
N^  + diff = 354.357790450 approximates
  2 x N^ x FSC
  = 354.463798138 MeV
 
 
1/2 wave  9361.36299628 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS) + MOON
.oo384401
in which the singular characteristic of the
EARTH MOON METAPHOR interface, is collusion
with all three stable SIGMA particles.
======================
POOF! THE CONNECTORS
 Orbital 'hooks' and other ionnic 'grapples'
THE J/PSI INTERLINKS
======================
There are two major particle families that tie together
nicely with a few orbital 'hooks' and ionnic 'grapples'.
What else can these intermediate connectors be called.
Two of the states exist. One is of the famed bottom mesons.
The second is a super high mass stable LAMBDA. Both have
balls when it comes to linking together thinking particles.
A third bridge resonance comes from MARS
in tune with EARTH vibrations.
The bridges tie together the UPSILON family, with the
famous family known as J/PSI mesons whose serindipitous
discovery by two different teams of researchers was BIG
NEWS announced on the very same day from opposite sides
of the North American continent, since the BIG news was
proof of existence of a new quark called CHARM.
So much for history.
CHARM, it seems, can come from the ARMS of the solar system.
Here is how.

BRIDGE IMAGE 1 Cosmic oscillations
==============
JUPITER eccentricity MARS EARTH VENUS
*..*.*.*
+ moon moon  + moon moon 
perihelion
1/2
.........!.........
J/PSI UPSILON bridge
..!.. waves
....!... 1/2
.....!..... ......!......
upper UPSILONS S 3 and S 4 ........!.......
waves ..........!.........
S 1 lower UPSILON
waves
All are 1/2 waves.
BRIDGE DATA 1

The solar (wave/orbits) depicted in
BRIDGE IMAGE 1 Cosmic Oscillations
are are all 1/2 waves.
====================================================
HERE IS A SUMMARY OF THE wave SETS
depicted by BRIDGE IMAGE 1
====================================================
WAVE SET 1 JUPITER mean  perihelion
========================================
WHEN J^ is Jupiter's eccentricity (Jupiter orbit mean  perihelion)
THEN upper UPSILONS S 3 and S 4 occur as
..!.. S 4 UPSILON 10572.6938963 MeV h^/ 1/2 (j^  moon)
...!... cohort 10465.4896238 MeV h^/ 1/2 (j^)
....!.... S 3 UPSILON 10360.4375734 MeV h^/ 1/2 (j^ + moon)
ALSO
..... full wave 5286.34694815 MeV h^/ (j^  moon)
....... full wave 5232.74481190 MeV h^/ (j^)
......... full wave 5180.21878670 MeV h^/ (j^ + moon)
WAVE SET 2 EARTH  VENUS
============================
1/2 h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS)  MOON
......!...... 9715.72078673 MeV
........!....... 9535.25078462 MeV h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS)
..........!......... 9361.36299628 MeV
S 1 lower UPSILON h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS) + MOON
waves
Detailed further above, and summarized as UPSILON PICTOGRAM 1
EARTH MOON METAPHOR
interface
WAVE SET 3 EARTH  MARS
==========================
1/2
.........!......... 5037.51022864 MeV obtained by
J/PSI Upsilon bridge h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Mars)
wave

BRIDGE PICTOGRAM 1 J/PSI UPSILON interface
======================
THE UPSLION CASCADES

UPSILON ================ 10864.0 MeV UPSILON
1/2 wave   h^/ 1/2 (EARTH  VENUS)  MOON
 
 
 
hook  * 10465.489238 MeV h^/ 1/2 J^
1/2 wave   
  
  
  
  
S 3 UPSILON ============= 10360.4375734 MeV
1/2 wave    
   
   
hook 1  9597.27445548 MeV = E+^ x FSC squared
   
hook 2 * 9596.25231961 MeV = hook 1  2 E+^
    
    
    
S 1 UPSILON ** 9457.19343755 MeV S 1 UPSILON cohort
1/2 wave        in UPSILON CONSTANTS 1
      
      
      
(J/PSI high)  + ========= diff = 4416.03353291 MeV
      
      
      
      
      
full wave *  * 5432.0 MeV approximates upper lambda
      = 1/2 UPSILON 10864.0 MeV
     
  +  * 5428.0 MeV approximates B*s meson
      5427.97901514 MeV
      B*s (5422) MeV
     
meson       5425.0 MeV approximates B*s meson
     
     
     
full wave * ** 5180.21878670 MeV BRIDGE
    1/2 UPSILON 10360.4375734 MeV
   
   
1/2 wave  *<** 5037.51022864 MeV (wave/orbit)
EARTH  MARS   = h^/ 1/2 (Earth  Mars)
 
 
RHO +  diff = 764.185253790 MeV
power   approx 764.207695110 MeV
amplitude   =  P+ change sign
  = 174.064614888 MeV
  = 5/2 E+^ x FSC
   2 E+^
 
 
 
cohort  *==*=== 4419.68320891 MeV
 
J/PSI high *=====*========= 4416.03353291 MeV
   J/PSI [4415] MeV AVERAGE
  
  
  
1/2+ XION  +  diff = 1319.04938308 MeV
isospin    = h^/ Earth (wave/orbit)
  
  
1/2+ XION    * diff = 1322.44749259 MeV
negative    = h^/ Earth  moon (wave/orbit)
  
  
  
cohort   *=== 3097.23571631
   99.99999 23 % ***
  * 3097.23595435
  
   diff = 1/2 (E+^  2E+^ x 1/FSC) **
  
J/PSI low *============== 3096.98414983
J/PSI [3096.88] MeV AVERAGE
** The 2E+^ x 1/FSC underplus
may be just space dust not an
official mass increment.
*** 3097.23571631
 99.99999 23 %
3097.23595435
This tiny percent of error serves
to represent what is left over as
a discrepency after interlinks in
an huge MeV range of
9596.25231961 to 3096.98414983
= 6499.26904627 MeV spread.
Note that the accuracy is what is
left over after a cascade of math
datas beginning at 9597.27445548
= E+^ x FSC squared, and ending
at the J/PSI low particle. This
is a very wide range and includes
two (wave/orbit) MeV values for
both Earth orbit itself, and the
Earth  moon (wave/orbit) MeV. In
all 6 different planetary orbital
MeV waves are in this model.
All in all an extremely T I G H T
cascade through a major skyscraping
tower of power.

BRIDGE PICTOGRAM 2 J/PSI UPSILON interface
'ionnic grapples'


UPSILONS  S 4 10572 MeV




power amplitude  E+^ x FSC squared


bridge diff  1115 MeV 1/2+ LAMBDA




ULSILON interface ===== S 1 9460 MeV





bridge diff  5037 MeV h^/ 1/2 (Earth  Mars)



J/PSI interface ===== high 4416 MeV


bridge diff  1/2 + XION 
 1/2 + XION isospin


hook to J/PSI's  low 3097 MeV

BRIDGE COMMENT 1

Hello again;
here is an excellent opportunity, to see how HIDDEN
terms of a certain value can seemingly reappear as
another value of different means but in fact really
are the original terms in another coat of colors.
Taking DATAS from BRIDGE PICTOGRAM 1 immediately above;
AND DERIVING 4416.03353298 MeV
+ 5180.21878670 MeV
= 9596.25231961 MeV
WHICH IS .511013505 x FSC squared.
CLEARLY .511013505 is NOT E+^ = .511067935 MeV.
HOWEVER .511067935  .511013505 = .oooo54430 MeV
= 2 E+^ divided by FSC squared.
EXACTLY ! It is HIDDEN !
Bingo!
==================
SUMMARY STATEMENTS
==================
SUMMARY STATEMENT 1

The single term 9457.585 (the bottom term in UPSILON DATA 3),
is the single term which lock steps three different groups of
grappling particles into one main Cosmic OSCILLLATION. It is
a generic value for 9457.19343755 MeV (a Cohort), which has
been derived via UPSILON CONSTANTS and used immediately above
in UPSILON PICTOGRAM 1.
SUMMARY STATEMENT 2 The included NEUTRINO

It became more and more apparent, as the UPSILON
factors were explored and determined, that masses
fit together in lock step with (wave/orbits) in
CONSTANT form, when the ELECTRON augmented by the
alledged NEUTRINO mass yielding character E+^ is
used for all derivations.
Things that kept pushing and poking calculations
out of shape vanished, when E+^ is used in lieu
of an ELECTRON rest state mass by itself. The
details become lock stepped as CONSTANTS when an
E+^ NEUTRINO augmented ELECTRON mass is used as
the ELECTRON's fundamental unit in the UPSILON
skyscraping tower of power.
SUMMARY STATEMENT 3 PURE and THERMODYNAMIC forces

It is quite possible that the data CONSTANTS of
UPSILON DATA 4 'Next Page' are a pure form of
understructure, something akin to pure Rydberg
numbers which define atomic spectum states, and
the actual look of the resonating matter is the
kind of data which is summarized in the UPSILON
DATAS 1 through 3, which are the thermodynamic.
The resonating matter point of view is substantiated by
material presented in DISCUSSION and MAIN INTRODUCTION
in PART 5 under HANDSHAKE 2 in which eccentricity terms
for JUPITER are presented in full waves, rather than in
1/2 wavelength links presented in the UPSILON DATAS.
For instance 5179.94256805 MeV is cited in HANDSHAKE 2
as a direct link between the S 1 UPSILON 9460 MeV state
and the 4416 MeV J/PI state for its higher mass.
5179.942 MeV is 1/2 amount 10359.881 MeV, shown
above near the beginning of this topic, as the S 3
UPSILON state under UPSILON DATA 1.
5428.0 a higher bottom B* state
is 1/2 the UPSILON upper state of
10860.0 MeV.
Actually, the real UPSILON upper state
of (10865.0 MeV) is twice 5432.5 MeV.
There are several other links. Rather than spell
them out in dialogue, let us SEE how they work
in practice in particle mass derivations.
You can see them derived a second time, this time
as lock step CONSTANTS, under THE J/PSI INTERLINKS
immediately above.
 end of ITS UP TO THE UPSILONS 
 end of The EARTH/MOON METAPHOR For Subatomic Phenomena 
PART 10 
SYMMETRY FACTORS

============
VENUS RISING
============
A look into the HEART of simple SU(3) symmetry
can be started by a look into the HEART of VENUS.
The following picture contains a (wave/orbit) bracket
around the well known (NeutronProton) mass difference.

Home of the PROTONNEUTRON mass difference

Venus SUN
.*.*
+ moon moon 
*...............................................*
*......................................................*
*.............................................................*
The above picture contains nothing astounding except
the Moon of Earth has been put in orbit around Venus
and the mechanical picture used to portray a pattern
that claims itself a reiterative existence for the
NeutronProton mass difference through lineal sum of
wavelength (Compton) bits and pieces, and lineal sum
factoring of single and amplified mass units as well.
Here is the scene in schematics and symmetry patterns
in digital data details, using Venus as a SOLAR model
for a subatomic (wave/mass) occurrence.
*....... h^/ (Venus)  moon = 1830.07508736 MeV

mean 
 h^/ (Venus) = 1823.57393767 MeV
of orbit 

*....... h^/ (Venus)  moon = 1817.11881384 MeV
charge
3/2 XION  *....... 1830.07508736 MeV


Venus 3/2 XION  1823.57393767 MeV


3/2 XION o *....... 1817.11881384 MeV
charge

AMPLITUDES

 charge
*....... 1830.07508736 MeV  P+ x 1/5  N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC


 venus
 1823.57393767 MeV  P+ x 1/5 + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC



*....... 1817.11881384 MeV  P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC
o charge
 charge
*.......  P+ x 1/5  N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC = 177.237570493 MeV


 venus
  P+ x 1/5 + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC = 177.230658555 MeV



*.......  P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC = 177.232951789 MeV
o charge
Notice the self evident (+ ) bracketing of N^ and 1/3 E .
 charge
*.......  P+ x 1/5  N^ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.2933365130 MeV


 venus
  P+ x 1/5 + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293314692 MeV



*.......  P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293331426 MeV
o charge
where N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
where FSC = 137.0359895
See what I mean!
NOTE another + unit of 1/3 E MeV
 charge
*.......  P+ x 1/5  N^ + 2/3 E + P+ = 1115.68021351 MeV


 venus
  P+ x 1/5 + 2/3 E + P+ = 1115.67330157 MeV



*.......  P+ x 1/5 + N^ + 2/3 E + P+ = 1115.67559481 MeV
0 charge
1/2+ stable LAMBDA 1115.685 MeV FIT
1115.678 MeV BEST EXPERIMENT
This experiment's value is by far the most occurrances.
And so you SEE !
The opening statement under

Home of the PROTONNEUTRON mass difference

has been vindicated.
=====================================
Here is another look at VENUS RISING
=====================================
h^/ (Venus mean)  Moon = 1830.07508736 MeV
 P+ divide by 5  N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC
divide by FSC = 1.2933365130 MeV
h^/ (Venus mean) = 1823.57393767 MeV
 P+, divide by 5, + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC
divide by FSC = 1.293314692 MeV
h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon = 1817.11881384 MeV
 P+ divide by 5 + N^ + 1/3 E = N^ x FSC
divide by FSC = 1.293331426 MeV
WHERE N^ is the (Neutron  Proton) mass difference (1.293318) MeV FIT
Unmistakable features include symmetrical
+  N^ factors
+  MOON factors
+ units of 1/3 the Electron.
NOTE the accuracy 1.293314692 MeV (from Venus mean orbit)
 ratio = 99.999 7442 %
(1.293318) MeV

REVERSE ENGINEERING for VENUS RISING

Starting with the FIT value of N^, and working in
reverse direction, to derive planet orbit for Venus.
Let N^ = (1.293318) MeV FIT
FOR VENUS MEAN
N^ x FSC  1/3 E + N^ x 5 + P+ = N,1
h^/(N,1)  MOON = Venus MEAN
derived = 1.082108703 x 10 to 13 cm
actual = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm
FOR VENUS MEAN
N^ x FSC  1/3 E x 5 + P+ = N,1
h^/(N,1) = Venus MEAN
derived = 1.082088332 x 10 to 13 cm
actual = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm
FOR VENUS MEAN
N^ x FSC  1/3 E  N^ x 5 + P+ = N,1
h^/(N,1) + MOON = Venus MEAN
derived = 1.082095174 x 10 to 13 cm
actual = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm
NOTE Two unmistakable characteristics in pattern:
All three clusters have a  1/3 E mass increment,
N^ switches from positive to negative for Moon
orbit increments negative to positive, and N^
is absent from Venus planet orbit itself.
 end of VENUS RISING 
=========================
SU(3) MULTIPLEX GROUPINGS
=========================

SU(3) SYMMETRIES the stable LAMBDA

The following schematic contains several
selections of PROTON related information.
* h^/ (Venus mean)
=  3/2 XION neutral 1823.57393767

diff  + 885.301627671 MeV

 PROTON MeV (938.27231) MeV FIT
h^/ (Venus mean) = 1823.57393767 MeV
 P+ = 885.301627671 MeV
let V0 = 885.301627671 MeV
divide by 5 = 177.060325534 MeV AMPLIFIED mass difference
6 = 147.550271278 MeV SU(3) decuplet
7 = 126.471661095 MeV SU(3) octuplet
where N^ x FSC  1/3 Electron = 177.060778846 MeV
and N^ = (1.23318) MeV FIT
where 177.060778846 MeV is a (LAMBDA  PROTON) mass difference
such that 177.060778846 MeV + 2/3 E = 177.401444889 MeV
+ P+ = 1115.67375488 MeV
where 1/2+ LAMBDA stable = (1115.684) MeV FIT
NOTE
The mass accuracy 1115.67330157 MeV
derived from  ratio = 99.999 0410 %
h^/ (Venus mean) (1115.684) MeV
 P+ x 1/5
+ 2/3 E
+ P+ = LAMBDA
NOTE
The mass accuracy 1115.67375488 MeV
derived from  ratio = 99.999 0817 %
N^ x FSC (1115.684) MeV
+ 1/3 E
+ P+ = LAMBDA
NOTE
Mass accuracy 1115.67330157 MeV
derived from Venus,  ratio = 99.9999 593 %
and from 1115.67375488 MeV
Neutron  Proton
mass difference
IN THE FOLLOWING SCHEMATIC: using V+ x 1/5 from Venus orbit
* 1/2+ LAMBDA 1115.67330157 MeV
 + 2/3 Electron MeV
diff  + 177.060325534 MeV = V+ +
  PROTON MeV
diff   177.060325534 MeV = V+ 
  2 Electron MeV
* RHO MeV 760.189986336 MeV
= RHO (mass/wave) resonance
which is ... h^/ (Earth aphelion + Venus perhelion)
= 760.195477903 MeV
See more about RHO wide width resonances
under HOW ABOUT THOSE RHO's in PART 5.
In schematic form, using just (Neutron  Proton) = N^
* 1/2+ LAMBDA = 1115.67375488 MeV

 + 1/3 Electron MeV
diff  + N^ x FSC
 +
  PROTON MeV
 
diff  + N^ x FSC
  1 Electron MeV
  2/3 Electron MeV

* RHO MeV 760.189533023 MeV
RHO MeV (mass/wave) resonance
from h^/ (Venus)  P+ = V+
= 760.189986336 MeV
From V+ (Venus) 760.189986336
 99.9999 403 %
From N^ x FSC 760.189533023

SU(3) SYMMETRIES the OCTUPLET

Starting again with another (wave/orbit)
string from the 3/2 XION group:
h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon = 1817.11881381 MeV
 P+ = 878.846503812 MeV V+
let V+ = 878.846503812 MeV
divide by 5 = 175.769300762 MeV
6 = 146.474417302 MeV SU(3) decuplet
7 = 125.549500544 MeV SU(3) octuplet

AN OMEGA ?

V+ x 5/6 = 732.372086510 MeV SU(3) stable Omega
+ P+ + E + N^ = 1672. 44871357 MeV
3/2+ OMEGA = (1672. 44) MeV FIT

A NEUTRAL KAON example

V+ x 3/6 from P+  7/3 E = 497.656726942 MeV
KAON o (497.672) MeV FIT
showing some drift.
===========================
SU(3) GROUPS
===========================
An SU(3) OCTUPLET group arrives as follows:
When V+ = h^/ (VENUS) + moon  P+ = 878.846503812
* SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V+ + x/7)

 + 125.549500544 MeV = 1314. 92081163 MeV
 + 125.549500544 MeV = 1189. 37131108 MeV
 + 125.549500544 MeV = 1063. 82181054 MeV

*P+ = PROTON MeV
where the following stable particle mass
states have just been calculated as follows:
* SU(3) OCTUPLET

 V+ x 3/7 + P+ = 1/2+ XION o
 V+ x 2/7 + P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA +
 V+ x 1/7 + P+ = unknown

*P+ = PROTON MeV
which match known stable particle masses as follows:
* SU(3) OCTUPLET

 1/2+ XION o = (1314.9) MeV FIT
 1/2+ SIGMA + = (1189.37) MeV FIT
 = unknown

*P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT
where V+ = P+  h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon
in agreements that include such mass calculated accuracy as
(1189.37) MeV FIT
 = 99.999 8897 %
1189. 37131108 MeV

SU(3) SYMMETRIES the rest of the OCTUPLET

Using the converse obital harmonic of Venus, that is:
h^/ (Venus mean)  Moon = 1830.07508733 MeV
AND 1830.07508733 MeV  P+ = 891.802777332 MeV
LET V = 891.802777332 MeV
then the following occurs.
1/7 of V = 127.400396761 MeV
1/6 of V = 148.633796222 MeV
1/5 of V = 178.360555466 MeV
WHERE
V x 1/7 x 2 + P+  1 E = 1192. 56210445 MeV
x 3 + P+ + 8/3 E = 1321. 32516539 MeV
V x 1/5 + P+  N^ = 1115. 33954746 MeV
V x 3/6 from P+ + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV KAON
Putting these into a schematic, the picture is:
When V = h^/ (VENUS)  moon  P+ = 891.802777332
* SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V + x/7)

 + 127.400283904 MeV = 1320. 47350028 MeV
 + 127.400283904 MeV = 1193. 07310352 MeV
 + 127.400283904 MeV = 1065. 67270676 MeV

*P+ = PROTON MeV
where the following two stable particle
mass states are calculated as follows:
* SU(3) OCTUPLET

 V x 3/7 + P+  5/3 E = 1321. 32516539 MeV
 V x 2/7 + P+  1 E = 1192. 56210445 MeV
 V x 1/7 + P+ = unknown

*P+ = PROTON MeV
which match known stable baryon particle masses as follows:
* SU(3) OCTUPLET

 1/2+ XION  = (1321.32) MeV FIT
 1/2+ SIGMA o = (1192.55) MeV FIT

*P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT

SU(3) SYMMETRIES the DECUPLET


First ROUTING

The DECUPLET SU(3) group can be approximated from several
routes. This that follows seems to be a main thoroughfare.
where V+ = P+  h^/(Earth) + Moon = 377.396382114 MeV
V+ x 7/3 = 880.591558266 MeV
divide by 6 = 146.765259711 MeV SU(3) decuplet units
* SU(3) DECUPLET using P+ + (V+ x 7/3 x ?/6)

 + 146.765259711 MeV = 1672. 09860855 MeV OMEGA
 + 146.765259711 MeV = 1525. 33334884 MeV too low
*... + 146.765259711 MeV = 1378. 56808913 MeV SIGMA
  + 146.765259711 MeV = 1231. 80282942 MeV DELTA
  + 146.765259711 MeV = 1085. 03756971 MeV unknown

* P+ = PROTON MeV

  146.765259711 MeV
  146.765259711 MeV
....  146.765259711 MeV = 497. 976530867 MeV
 2/3 E = 497. 635864823 MeV
KAON o ... (497.672) MeV FIT
showing some drift
where particle masses are
determined as follows:
* SU(3) DECUPLET using P+ + (V+ x 7/3 x ?/6)

 + 146.765259711 MeV + 2/3 E = 1672. 43927459 MeV OMEGA
 + 146.765259711 MeV = 1525. 33290995 MeV too low
*... + 146.765259711 MeV  1 E = 1378. 05709006 MeV SIGMA
  + 146.765259711 MeV  1 E = 1231. 29183035 MeV DELTA
  + 146.765259711 MeV = .............. ... unknown

* P+ = PROTON MeV
* SU(3) DECUPLET MASSES alternatives

 V+ x 7/3 x 5/6 + P+ + 2/3 E = 1672. 43927459 MeV
 V+ x 7/3 x 4/6 + P+ = too low
*... V+ x 7/3 x 3/6 + P+  N^ = 1378. 05695840 MeV
  V+ x 7/3 x 2/6 + P+  4/3 E = 1231. 12149733 MeV
  V+ x 7/3 x 1/6 + P+ = unknown

 P+ = PROTON MeV
which match known particle masses as follows:
* SU(3) DECUPLET

 (1672.43) MeV AVERAGE = 3/2+ OMEGA 
 none = 3/2+ XION
*... (1378.0) MeV EXPERIMENT = 3/2+ SIGMA +
  (1231.1) MeV EXPERIMENT = 3/2+ DELTA + +
  .......... = unknown

P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT

 
 
*... (497.672) MeV FIT = KAON o
However, a neutral KAON is not experimentally
known to associate with a positive 3/2+ SIGMA
decay, so this Ping.Pong resonance seems not
to be a depicted decay mode, unless this KAON
has other properties from the stranger side
of KAONS.

Regards the OMEGA mass


NOTE Regards 3/2+ OMEGA [1672.45] MeV FIT

This 1672. 43927459 MeV is the only mass possible
in the EARTH MOON METAPHOR group of particle masses
that corresponds to the FIT mass of the 3/2+ OMEGA.
This is from the (Earth) + Moon (wave/orbit)
mass resonance from the above DECUPLET set by
the string
P+  h^/(Earth) + Moon x 7/3 x 5/6 + P+
+ 2/3 E = 1672. 43927459 MeV .
The Earth (wave/orbit) resonance itself produces a
mass of 1678.67217433 MeV which is far too high to
be the OMEGA.
From h^/ (Earth)  P+ x 7/3 x 5/6 + P+
The Venus (wave/orbit) resonance itself produces a
mass of 1676.02366639 MeV, which is still too high
to be the OMEGA. The resonance is by the equation
1. P+  h^/(Venus) x 5/6 + P+
= 1676.02366639 MeV .
2. The h^/(Venus) + Moon (wave/orbit) resonance
P+  h^/(Venus) x 5/6 + P+
= 1670.64439651 MeV .
is a tad too low for an OMEGA
however 1670.64439651 + N^ + E
= 1672.44871357 MeV .
3. The h^/(Earth + Venus) (wave/orbit) resonance
P+  h^/(Earth + Venus) x 5/4 + P+
= 1678.94798216 MeV .
is far too high to be an OMEGA, although
note that it differs from string 1 by:
1678.94798216 MeV  2 N^  2/3 E
= 1676.02068011 MeV .
4. The h^/(Earth + Venus) + Moon (wave/orbit) resonance
hits upon the OMEGA mass range, not the FIT value but
within the range of more than one experiment:
P+  h^/(Earth + Venus) + Moon x 5/4 + P+
= 1673.25868114 MeV
 (N^  E) = .782318935
= 1672.4763622 MeV.
============

SEVERAL DECUPLET ROUTES

The DECUPLET SU(3) group can be approximated
from several routes, such as the following:

Second ROUTING

where V = P+  h^/(Venus)  Moon = 891.802777332 MeV
divide by 5 = 178.360555466 MeV
6 = 148.633796222 MeV SU(3) decuplet
7 = 127.400396764 MeV SU(3) octuplet
* SU(3) DECUPLET using P+ + (V x ?/6)

 + 148.633796222 MeV = 1681. 44129111 MeV not OMEGA
 + 148.633796222 MeV ...... = 1532. 80749488 MeV
*... + 148.633796222 MeV ...... = 1384. 17369866 MeV
  + 148.633796222 MeV ...... = 1235. 53990244 MeV
  + 148.633796222 MeV = 1086. 90610622 MeV

* P+ = PROTON MeV

  148.633796222 MeV
  148.633796222 MeV
....  148.633796222 MeV = 492.370921334 MeV
+ N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV
KAON +  ... (493.677) MeV FIT
NOTE In this routing the CHARGED KAON is produced.
In the previously shown 'First ROUTING' the
NEUTRAL KAON particle occurred by the string
P+  (P+  h^/(Earth) + Moon x 7/3 x 3/6)
= 497. 976530867 MeV
 2/3 E = 497. 635864823 MeV
KAON o ... (497.672) MeV FIT
where particle masses are
determined as follows:
* SU(3) DECUPLET MASSES

 V x 5/6 + P+ = unknown, too high for 3/2+ OMEGA
 V x 4/6 + P+  2 E = 1531. 78549675 MeV 3/2+ XION
 V x 3/6 + P+  N^ = 1382. 88038066 MeV 3/2+ SIGMA
 V x 2/6 + P+  1 E = 1235. 02890337 MeV 3/2+ DELTA
 V x 1/6 + P+ = unknown

*P+ = PROTON MeV
which match known particle masses as follows:
* SU(3) DECUPLET

 .......... = unknown
 (1538.78) MeV AVERAGE = 3/2+ XION 
 (1382.8) MeV AVERAGE = 3/2+ SIGMA +
 (1234.9 MeV ESTIMATE = 3/2+ DELTA +
 .......... = unknown

*P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT
===================================
SU(3) SUMMARY REMARK
===================================
Only a few SU(3) data banks have been
illustrated in factors inherent in the
Earth Moon Metaphor For Subatomic Phenomena.
There are SU(3) symmetry data banks inherent in each of
 moon
h^/ (Earth) by n/3 factors
+ moon
 moon
h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus) by 3/2 x n/7 factors
+ moon
 moon
h^/ (Venus) by n/7 factors
+ moon
each of which has PROTON plus ratios such
as 3/7 or 4/5 times the (wave/orbit) MeV,
minus the PROTON in the algorythm.
* SU(3) data bank OCTUPLET

*... P+ + Ballon ratio y ...... = 1/2+ particle
  P+ + Ballon ratio y ...... = 1/2+ particle
  P+ + Ballon ratio y = unknown

* P+ = PROTON MeV

* SU(3) data bank DECUPLET

 P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle
 P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle
*... P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle
  P+ + Ballon ratio z ...... = 3/2+ particle
  P+ + Ballon ratio z = unknown

* P+ = PROTON MeV

 P+  Ballon ratio z
 P+  Ballon ratio z
.... P+  Ballon ratio z for ratios = 148 MeV range
= KAON MeV
BALLOONS are discussed in more detail under
BALLOON MASS STATES, in PART 14.
=================================
The PROTON (plus.minus) Ping.Pong
=================================
The 'PING.PONG' of the PROTON is introduced as a two way summing
technique that manifests the mesh of several corresponding masses.
Here is a quick schematic of the nature of 'PING.PONGS' in the PROTON.
*

* baryon = P+ + ?+n x BALLOON mass state
+ * baryon = P+ + ? x BALLOON mass state
 
 
 PROTON MeV
 
 
 * meson = P+  ? x BALLOON mass state
* meson = P+  ?+n x BALLOON mass state

*
Here mesons and baryons constructed of identical lineal
sum terms occur in different mass pairs, linked to the
Proton mass as multiple LINEAL SUM terms added to the
Proton, and subtracted from the Proton in equal amounts.
For instance, ?+n can mean a mass unit (+)
expanded by adding integer units of (?) to
itself (n) number of times, and these sums
are then added or subtracted upon the PROTON.
The nature of this (plus.minus) above and below the
Proton mass, is given the buzz word Ping.Pong for
the sake of creating an instant concrete picture
for such a unique fact amongst particle wave/orbit
resonances.
BALLOONS are discussed in more detail under
BALLOON MASS STATES, in PART 14.

A PING.PONG STATEMENT

Here in schematic form, a PING.PONG correspondence with the
CHARGED KAON and 3/2+ SIGMA + particles, featuring units of
N^ producing the exact derivations, where (Neutron  Proton)
mass difference is N^ .
Featuring V = the h^/ (venus)  moon (wave/orbit)
* 3/2+ SIGMA + (mass/wave) resonance


+ * 3/2+ SIGMA + = (1382.8) MeV FIT
 
   N^ = 1382. 88038065 MeV
  + 3/6 V = 1384.173698661 MeV
 
 
 PROTON MeV
 
   3/6 V = 492. 370921334 MeV
  + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV
 *
 KAON +  ... (493.677) MeV FIT

* KAON MeV (mass/wave) resonance
from
h^/ (Venus)  Moon
NOTE characteristic + N^ and  N^ terms in this
PROTON Ping.Pong.

DECAY MODES SEEN AT ONCE

NOTE This PROTON Ping.Pong
seems to tell of a 'decay' mode.
KAON  is the main decay mode of 3/2+ SIGMA +
So if N^ the (Neutron  Proton) mass difference
therefore housing an Electron then it should carry
a unit of  (minus) charge, so that the charge
switch from Postive SIGMA to Negative KAON is seen
at once in the above (plus.minus) PROTON Ping.Pong .

Pro tem OCTUPLET array

In an OCTUPLET array, the Second ROUTING
source codes produce the following stable
particles.
An SU(3) OCTUPLET group arrives as follows:
using V = P+  h^/ (Venus mean)  Moon
and V x 1/7 = 127.400396761 MeV
* SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V x ?/?)

* 3/7 x V + P+ + 5/3 E = 1321. 32516539 MeV
  2/7 x V + P+  1 E = 1192. 56210445 MeV
  1/5 x V + P+ + 2/3 E  N^ = 1115. 68021350 MeV
 
*P+ = PROTON MeV
 
 
 
* P+  3/6 x V + N^ = 493. 664239334 MeV KAON

*KAON + 
which clearly match known stable particle masses as follows:
* SU(3) OCTUPLET

* 1/2+ XION  = (1321.32) MeV FIT
  1/2+ SIGMA o = (1192.55) MeV FIT
  1/2+ LAMBDA o = (1115.684) MeV FIT
 
*P+ = (938.27231) MeV FIT
 
 
  KAON +  = (493.677) MeV FIT
*

*
NOTE This PROTON (plus.minus) Ping.Pong
seems to be a depict a 'decay' mode.
KAON  is the main decay mode of 1/2+ XION 

Complete OCTUPLET array

A more complete symmetry grouping is now right at hand.
Picking up on datas originally introduced further above
under

SU(3) SYMMETRIES the OCTUPLET

a more complete picture can be evolved, using two planetary
(waveorbit) resonances, to capture two different sets for
Charge states of the Stable baryon particles.
The two planetary (waveorbit) resonances are:
V = P+  h^/ (Venus mean)  Moon
V+ = P+  h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon
where the V set has already been itemized in
the PRO TEM OCTUPLET ARRAY immediately above.
Using V+ = P+  h^/ (Venus mean) + Moon
the other stable baryon set is:
* SU(3) OCTUPLET using P+ + (V+ x ?/?)

* 3/7 x V+ + P+ + 5/3 E = 1314. 92081163 MeV
  1/2+ XION = [1314.9] MeV FIT
 
  2/7 x V+ + P+ = 1189. 37131108 MeV
  1/2+ SIGMA = [1189.37] MeV FIT
 
  1/5 x V+ + P+ + 2/3 E + N^ = 1115. 67559480 MeV
  1/2+ LAMBDA = [1115.684] MeV FIT
 
*P+ = PROTON MeV
 
 
 
* P+  3/6 x V + 7/3 E = 497. 656726942 MeV

*KAON +  [497.672] MeV FIT
 end of SU(3) MULTIPLEX GROUPINGS 
=================================================================
THE STABLE PARTICLES OF STATUS ****
=================================================================
Here is a MASTER schematic, of all of the STABLE
fundamental BARYON particles, all determined as
wave (Compton) coupled in mass harmonic multiple
units, the entire group modelled COMPLETELY upon
the orbit of the planet named VENUS in the solar
system.
minus
Oops, sorry, the 1/2+ SIGMA  particle
does not show up anywhere, its mass seems
too far out of range for any of the orbit
wave derivations to land close, let alone
strike right on.
Its mass range of 1197 MeV seems to have
no solar (wave/orbit) image, at least not
that has been seen, so far.
FUTURE STRIKE That negative charged stable SIGMA
has shown up locked in the jaws of
a prefect mass symmetry, described
later, in PART 10A as
BANG BUBBLES.

MASTER SCHEMATIC data

PHYSICISTS AND MATHEMATICIANS N O T E
WHAT ARE THE O D D S OF HITTING T H E S E threee BARYON
M A S S E S RIGHT ON TARGET BY C O I N C I D E N C E S ?
stable baryons
* h^/ (Venus)  Moon = V = 891.801 MeV

 V x 3/7 + P+ + 5/2 E = 1321.325 [1321.32] MeV FIT
 x 2/7 + P+  1 E = 1192.562 [1192.55] MeV FIT

 x 1/5 + P+ + 2/3 E  N^ = 1115.680 [1115.684] MeV FIT

+ 
 PROTON MeV
 

 V x 3/6 from P+ + N^ = 493. 664 MeV
 KAON +  ... [493. 677] MeV FIT

*
stable kaon meson
PHYSICISTS AND MATHEMATICIANS N O T E
WHAT ARE THE O D D S OF HITTING T H E S E two BARYON
M A S S E S RIGHT ON TARGET BY C O I N C I D E N C E S ?
stable baryons
* h^/ Venus + Moon = V+ = 878.845 MeV

 V+ x 3/7 + P+ = 1314.921 [1314.9] MeV FIT
 x 2/7 + P+ = 1189.371 [1189.37] MeV FIT

+ 
 PROTON P+
 

 V+ x 2/7 from P+  PION + 
 1/3 E = 547.433 MeV
 ETA o = [547.45] MeV FIT

 V+ x 3/6 from P+  7/3 E = 497. 657 MeV
 KAON o = [497. 672] MeV FIT

* KAON MeV (mass/wave) resonance
stable mesons
where PION +  = [139.56995] MeV FIT

MASTER SCHEMATIC fits

stable baryons
* h^/ Venus  Moon = V

 1/2+ XION  = [1321.32] MeV FIT
 1/2+ SIGMA o = [1192.55] MeV FIT

 1/2+ LAMBDA o = [1115.684] MeV FIT
+ 
 PROTON P+
 
 KAON +  ... [493. 677] MeV FIT

*
stable kaon meson
stable baryons
* h^/ Venus + Moon = V+

 1/2+ XION o = [1314.9] MeV FIT
 1/2+ SIGMA + = [1189.37] MeV FIT

 1/2+ LAMBDA o = [1115.684] MeV FIT
+ 
 PROTON P+
 
 ETA o ... [547.45] MeV FIT

 KAON o ... [493. 677] MeV FIT

 PION +  ... [139.56995] MeV FIT

*
stable kaon meson

AND FINALLY simple single pictures

* h^/ VENUS  MOON = V

 
 h^/ VENUS mean of Orbit = V0
+ 

* h^/ VENUS + MOON = V+
stable baryons
* h^/ Venus + Moon = V+

 P+ + 3/7 V+ + = 1/2+ XION o
 P+ + 2/7 V+ = 1/2+ SIGMA +

 P+ + 1/5 V+ + 2/3 E + N^ = 1/2+ LAMBDA o

+ 
 PROTON +
 

 P+  2/7 V+ + PION +   1/3 E = ETA o

 P+  3/6 V+  7/3 E = KAON + 

*
stable kaon meson
stable baryons
* h^/ Venus + Moon = V

 P+ + 3/7 V + = 1/2+ XION o
 P+ + 2/7 V = 1/2+ SIGMA +

 P+ + 1/5 V  2/3 E + N^ = 1/2+ LAMBDA o

+ 
 PROTON +
 

 ETA o ... [547.45] MeV FIT

 KAON o ... [493. 677] MeV FIT

 PION +  ... [139.56995] MeV FIT


*
stable kaon meson

SU(3) SYMMETRIES the ORIGINAL datas

Here is a typewritten version, approximating the original
calculations that 'discovered' the SU(3) symmetry sets
on Christmas Day, 1994.

PROTOTYPE

h^/(venus mean) 1823.5739767  P+ = 885.301627671
MASTER UNITS
divide by 5 = 177.060325534 to N^
885.30083767 divide by 6 = 147.550271278
/ divide by 7 = 126.471661095
/
/
/
The set of 3 intrinsic ratios
in ONE mass element were the
discovery !
THESE SUBFACTORED AS
885.301627671 divide by 5 = 177.060325534 to N^
divide by 6 = 147.550271278
x 4 + 4E = 1530.51739137
x 3 from P+  N^
+ 2/3 E
= 497.668844207
divide by 7 = 126.471661095
x 2 = 252.943322191
+ P+
 3 E  2/3 E
= 1189.34196895
WHICH POINTED TO divide by 5 + P+ + 2/3 E = LAMBDA
whereas + 1/3 E
divided by FSC = N^ = 1.293314692
divide by 6 = Decuplet mass increment units
x 4 = approx 3/2+ XION isospin
x 3 = KAON FIT (497.677) MeV
divide by 7 = Octuplet mass increment units
x 2  E
= approximate JUPITER (wave/orbit)
= 253.526682297
and 252.943322191 = 2/7 885.301627671
 147.550271278 (1/6 885.301627671)
= 105.393050913
+ 1/3 E
approximating
MUON [105.658389] MeV FIT
and 105.393050913
 2/3 E
approximating
5/2 E x FSC
when E is
.511069562
where it was later learned that the
'NEUTRINO' augmented ELECTRON used
for many of the more exact factors
in this disclosure, is
.511067935 MeV.
These datas have been used as a guide,
but are not the right stuff. The real
derivations occur throughout the SU(3)
information, using the above PROTOYPE
as a clear cut, self evident image, a
road map straight into inner concepts
about how to handle and stablize that
which is abundantly obvious used in
calculating the exact MASS states of
many fundamental particles and values
of allied fundamental constants.
The discovery that the 'Earth Moon Metaphor' system of hooks
was linked through common
1/7
1/6
1/5 whole integer ratios
was made as a surprise from Santa on Christmas day, 1994.
 end of The stable particles of status ****

TOOT! TOOT! The ETA is missing!
Not so.
It can be shown in the following harmonics.

ETA = [547.45] MeV FIT
and where E 1Pi = 1.605350908 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon = 392.495086857 MeV
 P+ + 10/3 E ...= 547.480553359 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 392.195215908 MeV
 P+ + 8/3 E ...= 547.439758265 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 391.895802818 MeV
 P+ + 6/3 E ...= 547.398505311 MeV
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon = 392.495086857 MeV
 P+ + E 1Pi ...= 547.382574051 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 392.195215908 MeV
 P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E ...= 547.341778957 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 391.895802818 MeV
 P+ + E 1Pi  E ...= 547.470859024 MeV
See associated factors and datas at the end of
MARS PLAYING TUNES WITH THE PROTON in PART 11.

COMMENT

The reason for the title TOOT! TOOT! is the ETA
was missing, for many years, until a sudden chance
calculation on the spur of the moment turned it up
as an optical illusion hidden in an unlikely digit
combination involving Mars and Jupiter, the facets
revealed in an instant at 3 A.M. December 31/94.
The only candidates for ETA occurrences prior,
were three, in the 555 MeV range. Neither of
them in correspondence to current ETA FITS, but
all were in a prior range concidered for ETA's
by particle physicists.
change sign
1/2+ XION 1321.5  P+  P+ = 555.0 MeV
5/2 E x FSC  P+ x 1/2
change sign  P+ change sign = 556.6 MeV
and also
* + Earth perihelion) = 557.810463794 MeV

h^/(Mars perihelion + Earth mean) = 553.893584690 MeV

* + Earth aphelion) = 550.031329899 MeV
 end of TOOT! TOOT!
=====================
KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX
=====================
The basic gist is simple.
KAONS masses appear to occur in fluctuations involving
3/2+ SIGMA states ping.ponged through the PROTON
by two KAON cohort states that translate through
the PROTON's mass energy, into exact KAON masses.
The cohort states have no known physical particle
counterparts. They are also called 'corollary'.
Here is a schematic of the 'fluctuating' interface.
KAON SCHEMATIC 1 simplified

* 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.867

+ ============== diff 444.595 MeV
 corollary


 * 3/2+ SIGMA 1378.874 MeV
 
 + ================ diff 440.601 MeV
  corollary
   PROTON 938.27231 MeV
  corollary
  ================ diff 440.601 MeV
 
 * KAON +  497.672 MeV


 corollary
 ============== diff 444.595 MeV

* KAON o 493.677 MeV
All of the mass datas shown in the SCHEMATIC
turn up elsewhere throughout this disclosure
in approximations from one source or another.
3/2+ SIGMA masses are assumed. This may be another
particle's mass.
There are other particles which have masses
in the same range and the socalled SIGMA'S
shown in KAON MULTIPLEX may in fact not be
SIGMAS at all, if in fact, the fluctuations
shown here in KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX might
not be valid.
KAON SCHEMATIC 2

(E x 2 Pi) x FSC = 439.981700508 MeV
+ P+ = 1378.25401050 MeV

 * 3/2+ SIGMA 1378.25401050 MeV
 
 + ================ diff 439.981700508 MeV
 
   PROTON 938.27231 MeV
 
  ================ diff 439.981700508 MeV
 
 * KAON +  498.290609492 MeV

==============
Approximate only, too high for KAON
KAON SCHEMATIC 3

(E x 2 Pi squared) x FSC = 1382.24327803 MeV

 * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.24327803 MeV
 
  ================ diff 443.970968030 MeV
 
   PROTON 938.27231 MeV
 
  ================ diff 443.970968030 MeV
 
 * KAON o 494.301341960 MeV

==============
Approximate only, too high for KAON
This information involving 2Pi squared and the ELECTRON
mass as a power ampilification is cited here and has now
been used elsewhere ... in this disclosure. It is one of
those kinky little bits of lore that just keeps sleazing
around in the consciousness and won't let go.
Meybe it is valid. Meybe not.

KAON SCHEMATIC SUMMARY

In each of the three SCHEMATICS there are no states
which correspond to prior calculated SIGMA or KAON
entities elsewhere in this disclosure, but do come
as close as 5 significant figures here and there.
For instance entity KAON o with a mass of 493.626
turns up several times, which approximates 494.302
minus 4/3 E from KAON SCHEMATIC 2.
===================
KAON GEOMETRY IMAGE
===================
The reason why such searches as the above three
SCHEMATICS is undertaken at all, is the chance
that there are facets of particle factors which
can be pin pointed as fundamentally absolute, a
factor such as (E x 2 Pi squared) x FSC is
totally unambiguous as to what it's mass energy
equivalent should be. On the other hand all the
terms equal to (E x 2 Pi) x FCS are not so
understood in terms of an image in a mechanical
geometry construction, the 2 Pi squared factor
is less easily understood by an image, even tho
it results from geometry concepts by:
PLANE GEOMETRY FEATURES OF A CIRCLE
IN ELEMENTARY PARTICLE CONSTRUCTION
in which the 2 Pi factor interprets in a
geometrical construction as translating a
radius vector into a circumpherence, and
2 Pi squared translates into an area for
a circle with the original circumpherence
expanded by Pi, when the original radius
can be a vector mass equal to E x FSC
for instance. In this case the area will
not be the same as that arrived by radius
squared times Pi, as in Pi R squared when
the 2nd Pi term effectively substitutes a
2nd R radius for Pi R squared.
In the geometry image the expansion factor is
2R (Pi squared), obviously different than the
correct Euclidean geometry's Pi R squared.
Using the real ELECTRON's rest state mass energy
the following derivations for both KAON +  and
KAON o particles seems stablized, in which the
charged PION is tied to the KAON o mass.
The ELECTRON's rest state mass energy is .510999095 MeV
and Pi = 3.141592653 a ratio.
==============================
THE CLASSICAL ELECTRON RADIUS
==============================
KAON SCHEMATIC 4A
kaon geometry image A PLANE GEOMETRY UNDERSTUCTURE

circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA = Diameter x PI squared
expanded by Pi 
 * 1378.88103895 MeV
 
x Pi =============== diff 440.608728950 MeV

 PROTON 938.27231 MeV

Circumpherence ================ diff 440.608728950 MeV


 497.663581050 MeV
x Pi  =============
 KAON +  [497.672] MeV FIT




Diameter * E x FSC x 2  2/3 E = 139.709858968 MeV
Having determined that a KAON MULTIPLEX is orchestrated
according to the mechanical properties of ordinary plane
geometry and parameters of an ordinary circle, albeit in
non standard way here comes the rest of the construction:
KAON SCHEMATIC 4B Classical Electron Radius Mev
kaon geometry image energy equivalent as 'Diameter'

Mid terms are also involved, in which the
'Classical Electron Radius' is featured as
follows:
circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA = Diameter x PI squared
expanded by Pi 
 * 1378.88103894 MeV
 
=============== diff 438.608728949 MeV
 
  PROTON
 
  diff 438.608728949 MeV
 
 * KAON o 497.663581051 MeV
 =============
x PI 


 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


2 x PI  Circumpherence 438.911466569 MeV
circumpherence  = 2 PI radius


Radius * E x FSC  1/3 E = 69.854929484 MeV
'Classical Electron radius'
where the 'radius' is the mass energy equivalent
of the 'Classical Electron Radius' minus 1/3 the
rest state mass of the ELECTRON, = the radius.
KAON SCHEMATIC 5A
kaon geometry image PION mass as 'diameter'

Here goes 2 mechanical derivations, identical to KAON
SCHEMATIC 4A in which the 'Classical Electron radius'
was featured as a masked fundamental factor that came
to light in KAON SCHEMATIC 4B.
This time, the charged PION particle is the
'masked fundamental factor' in the Diameter
and it yields the other KAON.
circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87439160 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
+ =============== diff 444.602081604 MeV

 PROTON 938.27231 MeV

Circumpherence + ================ diff 444.602081604 MeV


 KAON +  493.670228396 MeV


Diameter * PION + 4.5936 MeV + E

divide FSC = 140.114470186 MeV
where 4.5936 MeV is the mass difference between
the charged and neutral stable PION particles for
PION +  = 139.56995 MeV FIT
PION o = 134.9764 MeV FIT
and the DIAMETER of the circle is
used to factor the circumpherence
which determines another mass, of 493.670228396 MeV
which compares favorably with the real KAON o mass
493.677 MeV FIT.
KAON SCHEMATIC 5B
kaon geometry image PION mass as 'diameter'

Mid terms are also involved, in which the
'charged PION particle ' is featured, as follows:
circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87439160 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff 444.602081604 MeV
 
  PROTON
 
=============== diff 444.602081604 MeV
 
 * KAON +  493.670228396 MeV
 =============
x PI 


 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


x PI  Circumpherence 440.182590198 MeV
circumpherence  = 2 PI radius


Diameter * PION + 4.5936 MeV + E

divide FSC = 140.114470186 MeV
in which an ELECTRON mass is added
to an augmented PION mass to yeild
the circle's 'Diameter'
where the PION mass is
for the charged PION +  = 139.56995 MeV FIT
and the TINY mass increment .03352112 MeV
is the PION mass difference
charged PION  neutral pion = 4.5936 MeV
divided by the
Fine Structure Constant
The same structure is itemized
next in a simplified schematic:
KAON SCHEMATIC 5C
kaon geometry image Simplified schematic

circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87439160 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 +
 PROTON diff = 2 x 444.60281604
 

 * for KAON +  493.670228396 MeV
  =============
 
 
x PI ==========

 PROTON 938.27231 MeV

x PI ========== Circumpherence 440.182590198 MeV
 = 2 PI radius


Diameter * PION + 4.5936 MeV + E

FSC = 140.114470186 MeV
where the PION mass is
for the charged PION +  = 139.56995 MeV FIT
KAON SCHEMATIC 6
kaon geometry image

Another, simpler, derivation, comes into the region
of the charged stable KAON's mass and also uses the
charged stable PION mass as 'Diameter' but without
the minute mass increment shown in SCHEMATIC 5B.
The factoring is as follows:
circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.54355140 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 lineal increment + 444.271241400 MeV
 * PROTON
  lineal increment  444.271241400 MeV
 
   2/3 3
 
  approx KAON o = 493.660402556 MeV
  =============
x Pi  
 
==========

 PROTON 938.27231 MeV

Circumphr ========== Circumpherence 440.077280490 MeV
 = 2 Pi radius
x Pi 

Diameter * PION + E = 140.080949065 MeV
139.56995 MeV + .510999065 MeV
in which a KAON o mass is approximated.
KAON REMARK 1

Mathmeticians of the ilk who explore crunch geometry, and
'STRANGE ATTRACTORS' may get a bit of a charge out of the
manner in which the datas depicted in KAON SCHEMATICS 36
were acquired.
It was a process of renormalizing, doing things over and
over again making tiny adjustements to one input value or
another, to see what might result.
Using just the raw KAON data itself as the real mass FIT
values for input did NOT result in anything recognizable.
However a note of interest was witnessed, which is that
data equation strings worked around and around through a
regurgent loop did not close rapidly in onto a constant,
when the intention was to find a mass which had the SAME
value as both input 'Diameter' and resulting difference,
in the lineal INCREMENT above and below the PROTON mass.
Here is what I mean.
A renormalizing technique was started by using the FIT
mass for the neutral KAON, and from that an input mass
Diameter was gained with the value 139.708659432 MeV.
This Diameter mass was then used as input to run the
same equations over and over again, each time coming
back to a Diameter mass, which was always discretely
different. The former, and new, Diameter masses were
added together, and the average taken by dividing by
2. The newest value was then used to run the string
over again.
Surprisingly, it took many loops for the resulting
Diameter mass to start settling into a stable data
form, and many loops taken to derive each next new
significant digit of accuracy. During the closing,
the data results along the way kept bouncing above
then below, input, until input started its sudden
creeping toward closure at an accelarating pace.
Here is an illustration, using the above described
renormalizing technique, and the charged KAON mass
to start the ball rolling.
STAGE 1 startup

Let KAON +  = 497.672 MeV FIT
P+ + (P+  KAON o) = 1378.87262 MeV SIGMA
divided by Pi squared = Diameter
= 139.709005950 MeV
when Pi = 3.141592653 ratio
and P+ = 938.27231 MeV Proton mass energy.
STAGE 2 renormalizing

Then 139.709005950 MeV x Pi
= 438.908786734
+ P+ = 1377.18109673 MeV
divided by Pi squared = 139.537618811 MeV
= new Diameter
added to old Diamter, and divided by 2
= resulting Diameter
= 139.623312380 MeV
which is clearly departed from the initial Diameter
landing noticably BELOW input.
In fact, the resulting Diameters tended to bounce
around quit a bit at the fourth significant digit
until the fourth, then fifth and finally the rest
began to close toward an infinately small remains.
Eventually, INPUT x Pi, and lineal
increment terms arrived closing to a
common value seen as
438.11894 4050 for diameter x Pi
438.11894 6026 for plus.minus increment
when INPUT diameter homed through 139.45791 215 MeV
after dozens of repeated loops
in the renormalization process.
In the end, this renormalizing seems just an excercise
in curiousity, in that the closing term 139.45791 215
MeV does not seem to hook or tie to anything else that
is recognizable in physics. It is just random data.
Even when looped some more to become 139.457590923 MeV
nothing exotic can be seen about it. It just seems to
be noise from the gears of mathematics.
OVERDRIVE
This mathematical short story is presented only in
the interest that someone might want to to add the
renormalizing technique, or the STRANGE ATTRACTOR
behavior, to their collection of math shakers.
I applied this particular overdrive to several things,
including using the NEUTRON mass instead of the PROTON
for the Ping.Pong between the Diameter mass and SIGMA,
but saw nothing usable or definative in terms of mass
increments based on any fundamental particle or parts.
DEFINATIVE
Another test, which DID proove definative, was to use
the augmented E+^ NEUTRINO value for the ELECTRON
mass instead of just E, in the derivatives of masses
for KAONS in the SCHEMATICS, to see what would happen,
and what did happen was surprising: MAJOR departures
resulting from a minor starting mass increment of +^
whose tiny value is just .oooo6887 MeV derived from
N^ x 1/FSC squared, as described elsewhere in this
disclosure under the buzz word NEUTRINO.
It prooved that E, and not E+^ is a valid term.
The intent was to see if things got locked tighter
together, using the E+^ increment. They certainly
didn't.
Here is what resulted when E+^ instead
of E was used in both SCHEMATICS 4 and 5
when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
and NEUTRINO = N^ x 1/FSC
so that
E + NEUTRINO = .511067935 MeV.
KAON SCHEMATIC 7 Circle Geometry

circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA
expanded by Pi 
 * 1379.06688046 MeV
 
=============== diff + 440.794570464 MeV
 
x PI  * PROTON
 
=============== diff  440.794570464 MeV
 
 
 * KAON 497.477739536 MeV
 =============
 no clear tie to
 the charged KAON
 of 497.672 MeV


 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 438.970621760 MeV


Diameter  x 2 = 139.728688650 MeV
Radius *===== E+^ x FSC  1/3 E+^ = 69.864344339 MeV
Circle Geometry KAON SCHEMATIC 8

circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.87507133 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff + 444.602761333 MeV
 
x PI  * PROTON
 
=============== diff  444.602761333 MeV
 
 
 * charged KAON 493.669548667 MeV
 =============
 in this case just a
 minute reduction to
 the KAON +  mass



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 440.182806562 MeV



Diameter ===== PION + 4.5936 MeV + E+^

divide FSC = 140.114539057 MeV
where E+^ is the ELECTRON mass, augmented by N^
divided by FSC (Fine Structure Constant) squared.
KAON BUBBLES REVISITED

Uno momento!
Hold the phone.
Almost forgot, there may be a library of circle
geometries, not just one pair of bubbled PROTON
associates.
Here is a hint, that prods the idea of a 'library.
The HINT is self evident so does not need to be
explained. Except that the NEUTRON instead of the
PROTON is the intervening Ping.Pong character.
NEUTRON Circle Geometry KAON SCHEMATIC 9

circumpherence * 3/2+ SIGMA 1382.24327803 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff + 442.677648030 MeV
 
 
x PI  * NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV
 
 
=============== diff  442.677648030 MeV
 
  = 496.887981970 MeV
 
  + N^  E
 
  = 497.67300905 MeV
 
 
 * neutral KAON 497.672 MeV FIT
 ==================
 in this example a
 reduction to KAON
 mass is N^  E
 = .782318935 MeV


 NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 439.981700508 MeV



Diameter  x 2 = 140.05052501 MeV
Radius *===== E x FSC = 70.025262505 MeV
electron amplitudes
ETA Circle Geometry KAON SCHEMATIC 10

circumpherence *
expanded by Pi 
 * ???? ..... 1332.16367148 MeV
 
=============== diff + 392.598041483 MeV
 
 
x PI  * NEUTRON
 
 
=============== diff  392.598041483 MeV
 
  = 546.967588517 MeV
 
  + E
 
  = 547.478587582 MeV
 
 * stable ETA 547.45 MeV AVERAGE
 =============



 NEUTRON 939.56563 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 424.040866647 MeV



Diameter  = 134.9764 MeV
Radius *=====
neutral PION particle
KAON REMARK 2 Geometry 'Bubbles'

In the circle geometry scene, the PROTON is a constant,
it is just THERE!, and the KAONS form around it, via
circle geometry expansions. The same with the NEUTRON.
Since the diameters can originate from the ELECTRON
itself and the 'Classical Electron Radius', both of
which are not actually constants but mutable altho
derived from other fundamental constants, the KAON
bubbles expanding around the PROTON are variable,
they are not finitely concrete in terms of a single
mass for each state.
Is it possible that different solar systems will
have variably different KAON bubbles than ours ?
KAON REMARK 3

In actual wavelengths that which has been deemed
the circumpherence expanded by Pi, will actually
occur INSIDE a NEUCLEON, not extending to a long
distance beyond the PROTON such as does the PION
charged particle's Compton wavelength.
This is because the Compton wavelength of the SIGMA
is obviously shorter than that of the PROTON, except
in a circle bubble scene the PROTON is as if wrapped
by the other vibrations.
KAON REMARK 4

The concept of plane old fashion circle geometry straight
from the pages of Euclid is intriguing indeed as a method
to generate and control Ping.Pong relationships between
the basic KAON particles, and the PROTON and NEUTRON.
Whether the geometry actually works to
correctly describe understructure is a
mute point in this disclosure.
There are in fact many stable KAONS, not just two.
Is it possible that the others can be scoped into a venue
which has circle gemometry as the principle claim to fame?
This disclosure cannot extablish a proof, ie., nothing
like new fundamdental physical constancy has been seen
in terms as hard copied or stamped in iron, as are the
actual Physical Constants published in tables.
In several other parts in this disclosure a circle
geometry principle is applied as a power amplitude
expansion of the ELECTRON whose rest state mass is
expanded by 1 PI and 2 PI values, yeilding two
circle circumpherences, one when the Radius is E,
via 2 PI R, and the other if the Diameter is E,
via 1 PI R, or else a semi circle circumpherence
is resulted via 1 PI R.
It concludes with a cryptic remark:
Follow the Kaon masses to the outside
day and night.
 end of KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX 
PART 10A 
BANG BUBBLES

===============================
POWER BUBBLES FOR STABLE SIGMAS
===============================
One other bubble has turned up!
A bubble is found that has a non random sense
attached to both the INPUT and END values.
These numbers are LARGE so SMALL changes to INPUT
values results in MAJOR changes to the END VALUES.
In the midst of this, a set of three data links have
a constant symmetrical pattern, in the Bang Bubbles
that describe them.

POWER BUBBLE 0 Decuplet mass unit 148.4 MeV

circumpherence * ???? ..... 1727.89610545 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff + 789.623795459 MeV
 
 
x PI  * PROTON 939.27231 MeV
 
 
=============== diff  789.623795459 MeV
 
  = 148.648514541 MeV
  ==================
  END VALUE


 This is h^/(Venus)  moon  P+ x 1/6
 from the Earth Moon Metaphor.


 What about the 1/7 term from the
 Earth Moon Metaphor?
 And YES ! it exists!
 See immediately below.



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 550.006412666 MeV



Diameter  = 175.072478616 MeV
Radius *=====
INPUT Power amplitude of 5/2 E^^ x FSC
when E^^ = E + E x 1/FSC squared
INTRO The prediction

In fact, a prediction came. It came about as a chance
finding that one of the power bubbles went directly to
END VALUE conclusion with the Neutral SIGMA mass. This
was work following on the tail end of the Neutral PION
power bubble detailed above as the last entry in KAON
CIRCLE MULTIPLEX. Spurred on a second bubble was found
in which the INPUT term was 175 MeV.
A third was quickly found after a frantic look around.
'It' proved to be a mother mode.
LET 'it' be the 1/2+ SIGMA o mass energy equivalent.
Since 'it' was discovered in use of N^ x FSC as an
INPUT term, it instantly turned interesting, because
there are two other closely related terms these being
TERMS FACTORS INCREMENTS ENTITIES
   
1 N^ x FSC + 1/3 E + P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA
2 N^ x FSC = NEUTRON  PROTON mass difference
3 N^ x FSC  1/3 E = Link to ELECTRON power amplitude
5/2 E x FSC
It hinted something predictable should occur;
that (N^ x FSC)  1/3 E should have a
relevant END VALUE. It turns out yes it was
the 1/2+ SIGMA  mass.
So it was not surprising, in fact predicted,
that INPUT (N^ x FSC) + 1/3 E should be
that which yeilds an END VALUE equal to the
mass of 1/2+ SIGMA + and it turns out it
did, right on schedule.
There is nothing more pleasantly surprising
than finding something that becomes totally
predictable as a self evident pattern. When
such is seen, doubts just wisk away, as if
let loose into the drifting time lines of a
planet, detached to drift into the seething
red shifts of the evolving universe.
In fact it happened that the power bubble for the 1/2+ SIGMA o
particle was found first, found upon expectation that something
might exist for N^ x FSC, since a power bubble relating to
a SU(3) symmetry term for Decuplet particles had just been seen
as an END VALUE using ELECTRON power amplification 5/2 E x FSC
as INPUT in a power bubble equation.
This 1/2+ SIGMA o find can be called CURIOSITY PREDICTION
from ACTION 1
input N^ x FSC
This surprising find led immediately to PREDICTION
which yeilded 1/2+ SIGMA  ACTION 2
from
input N^ x FSC  1/3 E
which immediately led to the TOTAL PREDICTION
witness of 1/2+ SIGMA + ACTION 3
from
input N^ x FSC + 1/3 E
Thus it was that the information was
found and recorded in a note book by
pencil in the space of a few minutes
doing equations as fast as data can
be entered into a calculator with 12
STORE and RECALL memories.
It was in fact only minutes, from start
to end to factor and record these datas.
It was the fastest explosion of raw new
knowledge in the whole of this disclosure.
How it came unexpectedly; by following
a few CLUES with HUNCHES from INTUITION.
How it came unexpectedly is that these POWER
BUBBLES are tight, and I mean TIGHT. There is
no room anywhere in them to play around, not
even by trivial amounts, such as using E+^ as
an input term for the ELECTRON. Just the tiny
mass difference between E+^ and E can throw
the whole picture right of wack so that all
of its details simply VANISH!
That is how tight these stable SIGMA power bubbles are.
In the nicky dorks a number of different ways to conceive
a starting value for N^ is possible, but only one value
actually results in direct derivations which hit right on
to the three different FIT values for the SIGMAS.
The N^ data thus used comes staight from the orbit of
the EARTH MOON Metaphor, as the (wave/orbit) factor
for
h^/ (Earth) + moon
 P+ divide by 3
in reverse engineering of the bubble equations
= 177.387639343 MeV as an INPUT value.
LET N^ = 177.387639343
Here are the STABLE SIGMA POWER BUBBLES.

POWER BUBBLE 1 1/2+ SIGMA + 1189.37 mEv FIT

circumpherence * ???? ..... 1750.74582596 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff + 812.473515962 MeV
 
 
x PI  * PROTON 938.27231 MeV
 
 
=============== diff  812.473515962 MeV
 
  = 125.798794038 MeV
 
  x 2 + P+
 
  = 1189.86989807 MeV
 
   E
 
  = 1189.3588990 MeV
 
 stable 1/2+ SIGMA + 1189.37 MeV FIT
 =============
 END VALUE



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 557.279045997 MeV



Diameter  = 177.387639343 MeV = N^
Radius *=====
INPUT This term approximates the
LAMBDA  PROTON mass difference.

POWER BUBBLE 2 1/2+ SIGMA o 1192.55 mEv FIT

circumpherence * ???? ..... 1749.06470642 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff + 810.792396422 MeV
 
 
x PI  * PROTON
 
 
=============== diff  810.792396422 MeV
 
  = 127.479913578 MeV
 
  x 2 + P+
 
  = 1193.23213715 MeV
 
   E  1/3 E
 
  = 1192.55080507 MeV
 
 stable 1/2+ SIGMA o 1192.55 MeV FIT
 =============
 END VALUE



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 556.744587629 MeV



Diameter  = 177.21730632 MeV
Radius *=====
INPUT N^  1/3 E

POWER BUBBLE 3 1/2+ SIGMA  1197.436 mEv FIT

circumpherence * ???? ..... 1747.38356881 MeV
expanded by Pi 
 *
 
=============== diff + 809.111276882 MeV
 
 
x PI  * PROTON
 
 
=============== diff  809.111276882 MeV
 
  = 129.161033118 MeV
 
  x 2 + P+
 
  = 1196.59437623 MeV
 
  + E + 2/3 E
 
  = 1197.44604134 MeV
 
 stable 1/2+ SIGMA o 1197.436 MeV FIT
 =============
 END VALUE



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV



Circumpherence 
x PI ================== 556.209470660 MeV


Diameter  = 177.046973300 MeV
Radius *=====
INPUT N^  2/3 E
This term interfaces
with power amplitude
5/2 E x FSC
POWER COMMENT 1

The above three power bubbles have been built upon
the importance attached to the three INPUT terms
INPUT diameter = 177.21730632 MeV
DIFF 1/3 E = .17033302 mEv
INPUT diameter = 177.21730632 MeV
DIFF 1/3 E = .17033302 mEv
INPUT diameter = 177.046973300 MeV
These are all power amplifications of N^ x FSC and
have been identified in several places elsewhere in the
disclosure as links to other fundamental occurrences in
the following ways:
LET N^ = 1.293323416 MeV FIT Neutron  Proton
mass difference
determined in 'Cooking The Books'
under A MASS FOR THE NEUTRINO in
PART 9.
AND SO
N^ x FSC = 177.231854069 MeV
which hooks into the following algorythm:
Math in ascending order
===========================================================
[1115.684] MeV FIT
1/2+ LAMBDA (1115.678) MeV best experiment
==============
= 1115.67452004 MeV
+ P+
= 177.402210047 MeV
+ 1/3 E+^
.......... 177.231854069 MeV ..............
 1/3 E+^
= 177.061498090 MeV
 N^
 E+^
 1/3 E+^
= 175.08670759 MeV
= 5/2 E+^ x FSC
for E+^ = .511067935 MeV
whereas ..........
5/2 E+^ x FSC
is also = 175.08670759 MeV
due to 'Cooking the Books'
under 'A Mass For The Neutrino'.
===========================================================
Math in descending order
The point being made is that the three SIGMA Power Bubbles
are not just there hanging around ringing a few bells with
silly singsongs from the carilons of a national parliament
building during noon hours.
The stable SIGMA's Power Bubbles are a parliament building,
in my opinion.
POWER REMARK 1

This set of 3 stable SIGMA power bubbles, catches the
essence of the EARTH MOON Metaphor in yet another way
through the interdimensional media of N^ x Pi.
As follows:
FLUTTER AND DRIFT
===================
177.387639343 557.279704598 change sign 1/2+ XION range
N^ x Pi  P+  P+  1/3 E = 1319.09458238 MeV
= h^/ 1.495928009 x 10 to 13 cm
Earth  earth radius  moon radius
177.21730632 556.744587630 change sign
N^  1/3 E x Pi  P+  P+  1/3 E  1 E = 1319.11870028 MeV
= h^/ 1.495972451 x 10 to 13 cm
Earth  earth radius + moon radius
177.04697330 556.209470660 change sign
N^  2/3 E x Pi  P+  P+  N^ = 1319.04183133 MeV
= h^/ 1.495987834 x 10 to 13 cm
Earth orbit
 1/2 moon radius to stretch it a bit
POWER REMARK 2

By now, the concept of 'circle geometry' has evolved into
power bubbles, for critical INPUT and END value harmonics.
Those under the KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX
are obvious enough.
But what about others ?
Should there be more ?
How common is this, if it is a phenomenon ?
It turns out that the phenomenon is V E R R R Y uncommon.
In round figures, there are only a few candidates
for INPUT terms able to yield power bubble facts.
Close by the mass of PIONS there is only
the MUON, with a rest mass of 105.6 MeV.
Then of course the KAONS, with rest masses
of 493.7 MeV and 497.7 MeV respectively.
At 175 MeV, is Electron power amplification
175.06 MeV, and NeutronProton mass difference
N^ as a power amplification to 177.23 MeV.
There is also the stable ETA at 547.5 MeV
And finally, there are SU(3) increments
specified elsewhere as
126.5 MeV Octuplet
148.0 MeV Decuplet.
Why spell out these figures now?
Because all of them, turn up in only ONE set of
power bubbles, in which the three charge states
of the stable 1/2+ SIGMA particles are achieved
at once.
The MUON is a no show. The power bubbles start
with the neutral PION mass as illustrated above
in KAON SCHEMATIC 10.
The power bubbles (at least in the phenomena
formulas used in this disclosure) end at the
LAMBDAPROTON mass difference of 177.4 MeV.
=====================
Spoke too S O O N !
=====================
Does doggie want a B O N E ?
Take down the sign in the supermarket which says
'this lane not interactive with cash'.
Here it is !
A bang bubble for the MUON !
Yes it is here. In an unlikely place. Woke up in the morning
with a single simple idea and gave it a try and THERE were
the glad pies.
The seeking peeking mind had figured that .782 MeV should be
holded up in these bang ping.pongs somewhere and it turns out
to be there all along, but not in actual Ping.Pongs. The mass
is so high suddenly that two PROTON masses are now active not
by intervening terms added and subtracted into one PROTON.
The insight was simple enough, coming down the stairs at 9:30 AM
after hard at work until 4:30 AM proof reading the draft all the
way through the MUON CIRCLE GEOMETRY surfing to the end of its
bang bubbles double checking every figure and first thing waking
up, groggily heading down the stairs into the dining room with a
dim idea to try on the calculator beside the computer, and bingo !
The idea was that since (so I have heard) the MUON
always occurs in pairs, why not try TWICE the MUON
mass in a bang bubble and see what happens.
What happened was found the instant
the first equation was tried.
Twice the MUON mass for INPUT, produced
twice a known mass bundle as the END VALUE.
This is an INPUT mass in the order of 211 MeV.
And an END VALUE mass in the order of 209 MeV.
As already said:
The simple idea was in reasoning that the MUON, and two related
power ampilfication (FSC) terms close to its value, should find
room in the balloons of bang bubbles.
These other two are 105 MeV for 3/2 E x FSC, and 107 MeV
for (N^  E) x FSC.
Nothing for these values tried before in
bang bubble format had even come close.
The idea was to try T W O Muons for INPUT and see what
the END result would be. It turned out to be right on the
money. Everything in that price range (106 MeV) fits right.
Here are the price ranges:
1 3/2 E x FSC = 105.037893758 MeV
when E = .510999086 MeV FIT
2 MUON = 105.658389 MeV FIT
3 N^  E = .782318935 MeV
x FSC = 107.205849362 MeV
when N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
In the following algorythms:
1 INPUT yeilds 3 END VALUE
2 INPUT yeilds 1 END VALUE
3 INPUT yeilds 3 END VALUE
in which both the INPUT and END VALUES
are twice the price of one.
Here are the new bang bubble demonstrations:
====================
THE MUON BANG BUBBLE
====================
* = 2085.61300217 MeV
 
   2 P+
 
x Pi  1  = 209.068382172 MeV
 
  = 2 x
  E + (1+1/2 E x 1/FSC) = E+
  E+ x 3/2 x FSC
 
  for E = .511034759 MeV

 END VALUE
 =========




 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


x 2 Pi  2


* MUON = 105.658389 MeV
INPUT
=====
In reverse engineering, starting with E
the reverse bang bubble equation string
When E+ = E + (1+1/2 E x 1/FSC)
then 2 x ((3/2 E+ x FSC)  E+)
+ 2 P+
divide by 2 Pi squared
equals 2 x MUON = 105.658 495681 MeV
 1/99.999 8990 %
105.658 389 MeV FIT
SUMMARY
=======
The MUON and power amplified ELECTRON
are tied together in a bang bubble, but
not the N^ mass difference term for the
Neutron  Proton, it misses the MUON.
This stands to reason in that the ELECTON
and MUON are members of the same particle
family called the LEPTONS.
===================
THE N^ BANG BUBBLE
===================
* = 2093.53835152 MeV
 
   2 P+
 
x Pi  3  = 216.993731528 MeV
 
  = 2 x ((N^  E) x FSC))
 
  equals 2 x (.782302139 x FSC)
 
  + N^
 
  for N^ = 1.293301204 MeV

 END VALUE
 =========



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV


x 2 Pi  1


* 3/2 E x FSC = 105.037893758 MeV + 2 E
INPUT
=====
In reverse engineering, starting with N^
the reverse bang bubble equation string
2 x ((N^ + (N^  E x FSC)) + 2 P+
divide by 2 Pi squared, equals E 'power amplitude'
= 2 E + (3/2 E x FSC)
for (3/2 E x FSC) = .511000199 MeV.
NOTE when the equation string for this bang bubble is
run foward or backward using 2 times the NEUTRON
mass instead of the PROTON, the incremental + N^
term at the END VALUE drops out completely which
is to be expected.
======================================
THE E 'POWER AMPLITUDE' BANG BUBBLE
======================================
Using INPUT term N^ = 1.293301204 factored above in
THE N^ BANG BUBBLE
* = 2090.89541939 MeV
 
   2 P+
 
x Pi  3  = 214.351799394 MeV
 
  = 2 x ((N^  E) x FSC))
 
  equals 2 x (.782302139 x FSC)
 
  for N^ = 1.293099446 MeV

 END VALUE
 =========



 PROTON 938.27231 MeV



x 2 Pi ================

 3 = 211.852100086 MeV
 x 2
  5/2 E
* N^  E x FSC = 107.203547705 MeV
INPUT
=====
In reverse engineering, starting with N^
the reverse bang bubble equation string
when N^ = 1.293301204 MeV
2 x ((N^  E) x FSC) + 2 P+
divide by 2 Pi squared, + 5/2 E = 107.206349034 MeV
x 1/FSC = .78232258 MeV
+ E = 1.293321646
NOTE Implicit in all calculations in which
N^  E is a factor, is that this
term is a mass difference
for the NEUTRON  PROTON
minus the ELECTRON ! and
so is assumed to hold the
NEUTRINO ! somehow hidden.
P.S. The remark about 'this lane not interactive with cash'
happens to be a true story. The local supermarket had
a sign today in one of its cash isles. I wasn't sure
if this is the new age speaking, or that its 2 owners
are French with most of its customers French also but
the whole of its signs are in english.
Sure looked like a weird sign though, sitting upright
at the end of the black rubber drive belt that brings
your groceries forward to the cashier.
Jan. 14/95
 end of PART 10A Bang Bubbles 
PART 11 
DESCRIPTIONS


THE KAON BOX
OF FLUCTUATING WAVELENGTHS

COMMENT This section compliments 'Kaon circle multiplex'
of PART 10 but does not duplicate the derivations.
It is obvious that the following 'derivations' of Charged and Neutral
KAON particle mass states is very simplistic concidering the esoteric
tight mass ranges of the KAONS involving numerous lifetimes and other
variables including parity CPsymmetry violations. Hum Hmmmm.
FRACTURED WAVELENGTHS
In spite of this, the following 'Compton wave' derivations are
shown, expecting that insights may be generated from the IMAGES
of bits and pieces of Compton wavelengths, bound systematically
in precise sets of lineally summed (wave/orbit) harmonics.
Shown are a total of 10 (wave/orbit) harmonics
for KAON states; five Hyperwaves, and 5 subwaves.
HYPERWAVES are SETS, that is, (wave/orbits) which have
symmetrical mechanical operators, for instance; + Moon
and  Moon increments in a revealing image.
SUBWAVES are singles, that is, not embodied in a SET.

HYPERWAVES a SET of (earth/venus) eccentricic
fluctuations for the CHARGED KAON

h^/(1/2 (Earth mean + Venus perihelion) + MOON) yields K1
K1  P+ x 4/3  P+  2/3 E = KAON + 493.679531034 MeV
change sign
h^/ 1/2 (Earth mean + Venus mean) yields K2
K2  P+ x 4/3  P+  1/3 E = KAON + 493.696573681 MeV
change sign
h^/(1/2 (Earth mean + Venus aphelion)  MOON) yields K3
K3  P+ x 4/3  P+  0/3 E = KAON + 493.713575384 MeV
change sign
A slight variable drift in the
MeV masses is very evident due
to the idea that the wave/orbit
factors are 'stamped in iron',
they have been 'used' as fixed
constants.
The above SET of HYPERWAVES have three solar
mechanical (orbit/wave) IMAGES as follow:

IMAGE 1 KAON + 

SUMMER POSITIONS WINTER POSITIONS
Earth 1/2 SUN Venus perihelion
.*.!**
+ moon moon 
*................................................*
** has + Moon
K1 hyperwave
Earth 1/2 SUN Venus mean
.*.!**
+ moon moon 
*....................................................*
**
K2 hyperwave
Earth 1/2 SUN Venus aphelion
.*.!**
+ moon moon 
*.......................................................*
** has  Moon
K3 hyperwave

SUBWAVE 1 KAON +  for VENUS + EARTH

 all in one 
h^/(1/2 (Venus mean + Earth mean  Moon)) yields K4
K4  P+ x 4/3  P+ + 3E = KAON + 493.685467502 MeV

IMAGE 2 KAON + 

Earth 1/2 SUN Venus mean
.*.!**
+ moon moon 
*...,.................................................*
**
K4 subwave

SUBWAVES (wave/orbit) eccentricic fluctuations
for the NEUTRAL KAON state

h^/(1/2 (Earth mean + Venus aphelion) yields K,1
K,1  P+ x 4/3  P+ + E = KAON o 497.639065537 MeV
change sign
h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth perihelion) yields K,3
K,3  1/2 E = KAON o 497.640462396 MeV
note
 all in one 
h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth perihelion + Moon) yields K,2
K,2 + 1/2 E = KAON o 497.669009517 MeV
note
NOTE singular characteristic is
+ and  incremental units
of 1/2 E associated with the two
MARS \ EARTH wave/orbit interlinks.
' all in one ' specifies a particular characteristic
that:
certain wave harmonics are at work when
a moon orbit is incremented upon a FULL
sum wave combination.
In other cases the moon orbit increments
upon the 1/2 wave combination.
This slight seeming difference in mode
of moon orbit incrementalion, can make
or break resulting hit on an exact MeV
per calculated mass state or resonance.

IMAGE 1 KAON o

Earth 1/2 SUN Venus mean
.*.!*.*.
+ moon moon  P A
*,................................*
K,1 subwave
Mars SUN Earth perihelion
.*.*.*.
A P  A P
**
K,2 subwave
Mars SUN Earth perihelion
.*.*.*,.,
A P  A P
 moon + moon
**
K,3 subwave

HYPERWAVES a set of (wave/orbit) eccentricic
fluctuations for both KAON states

 all in one 
h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth aphelion  Moon) yields K,4
K,4 + 3 E = KAON +  493.693301635 MeV
[493.677] FIT
 all in one 
h^/(Mars aphelion + Earth perihelion + Moon) yields K,5
K,5 + 1/2 E = KAON o 497.669009519 MeV
[497.672] FIT

IMAGE 2 KAON SET

SUMMER WINTER
Mars SUN Earth
.*.*.*,.,
A P P A
 moon + moon
aphelion perihelion perihelion aphelion
**
K,4 hyperwave KAON + 493.6933 MeV + 3 E
Mars SUN Earth
.*.*,.,*.
A P P A
 moon + moon
aphelion perihelion perihelion aphelion
**
K,5 hyperwave KAON o 497.6690 MeV  1/2 E

ANOTHER KAON HYPERWAVE PAIR has turned up
involving MARS and MERCURY

1/2
Mars  SUN Mercury
*..**
 moon + moon
..........................
..............................
..................................

 MOON h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) + moon = 1376.92923236 MeV
 3/2+ SIGMA range
 P+  P+  E x Pi  2/3 E = 497.669370680 MeV
= KAON + 
[497.672] MeV FIT

0 MOON h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) = 1380.63252130 MeV
 3/2+ SIGMA range
 P+  P+ + E x Pi + 1/3 E = 497.687782627 MeV
= KAON + 
[497.672] MeV FIT
 P+  P+  E x Pi  4/3 E = 493.625415707 MeV
= KAON o
[497.672] MeV FIT

+ MOON h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury)  moon = 1384.35578415 MeV
 3/2+ SIGMA range
 P+  P+  E x Pi  1/3 E = 493.623853734 MeV
= KAON o
[493.672] MeV FIT
NOTE 1 E difference between + MOON string
and 0 MOON string.
NOTE 1/3 E change from addition to subtraction
between 0 MOON string
and  MOON string.
 end of KAON BOX 
==================================================
MARS PLAYING TUNES WITH THE PROTON
==================================================
Here are three MARS related PROTON (wave/orbit) resonances.
These resonances are PURE. That is there are no +  increments
upon any of the major orbit lineal sums.
One is a direct MARS + VENUS modelled interaction with 5/2 the
ELECTRON mass directly. The other is a 1/2 MARS + EARTH hyperwave
connecting to N^ = the (NeutronProton) mass difference.
The second is the orbit of MARS itself, modelling the 5/2 ELECTRON
power amplitude 5/2 E times the FSC (Fine Structure Constant) and
in oscillation with the PROTON.
The 1/2 MARS + EARTH hyperwave has already been itemized
as HANDSHAKE 4 under THE EARTH MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC
PHENOMENA in PART 9.
The three MARS related PROTON (wave/orbit)
oscillating harmonics can be imaged as follows:

IMAGE 0m MAIN IMAGE Three MARS  PROTON oscillations

1/2 wave

Mars  Sun Venus Earth
* * **

............................! 
  
1m ............................  
2m .................................... 
3m ...................................................

IMAGE 1m PROTON + (N^  E x FSC) OSCILLATION

1/2 wave

Mars  Sun Venus Earth
* * **

.......................... = 1045.33350825 Mev = Mx
which has inner correspondence with the Proton
in the following manner:
1045.33350825 Mev  PROTON = 107.061198257 MeV
107.06119621 MeV divided by FSC = .781263364 MeV
+ ELECTRON = 1.292262429 MeV = N^
where N^ approximates the (Neutron  Proton) mass difference
such that (PROTON + 1.292262420 MeV) = 939.56 4572420 MeV
= approx. NEUTRON
= [939.56563] MeV FIT

IMAGE 2m PROTON  (E x FSC) OSCILLATION MARS ORBIT ITSELF

Mars Sun Venus Earth
* * **
 
....................................
= 865.693492707 Mev = My
which has inner correspondence with the Proton
in the following manner:
h^/ (Mars) = 865.693492707 Mev = My
(My  P+) = 72.578817292 MeV
 5 E = 70.024611967 MeV
x 1/FSC = .5109 88552 MeV
ELECTRON .510999065 MeV
In reverse engineering
h^/ (P+  (E x FSC + 5 E))
= 2.27941186 x 10 to 13 cm
2.279410149
accuracy ratio  99.999 8335 %
2.279413942
mars orbit

IMAGE 3m PROTON  2 x (5/2 E x FSC) OSCILLATION

Mars Sun Venus Earth
* * **
 
...................................................
= 587.020864299 Mev = Mz
which has inner correspondence with the Proton
in the following manner:
h^/ (Mars + Venus) = 587.020864299 Mev = Mz
1/2 (Mz  P+) = 175.625722850 MeV
 E x 1/FSC x 2/5 = .511150740 MeV
ELECTRON .510999065 MeV

HORIZONTAL VRS VERTICAL LINEAL PICTURE


IMAGE 4m SUMMARY IMAGE Three MARS  PROTON oscillations

1/2 wave

Mars  Sun Venus Earth
* * **

............................! 
  
1m ..... wave  PROTON ........  
2m ..... PROTON  wave ................ 
3m ..... PROTON  wave ...............................

PICTURE 41 Rough Drafts


P+ +  N^  E x FSC = h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Earth)


 PROTON


P+   E x FSC + 5 E = h^/ (Mars)

P+   2 x (5/2 E x FSC + E) = h^/ (Mars + Venus)




PICTURE 42


P+ +  107.205849362 MeV = 1045.47894936 MeV


 PROTON


P+   70.024611967 MeV + 5 E = 865.693492707 MeV

P+   2 x (175.063156264 MeV + E) = 587.020864299 MeV



==================================================
MARS GIGGIES CONTINUE
==================================================
MARS IN FACT, IS A REAL BUSY BODY
==================================================
Here is a quick schematic of MARS oscillations and 'flutters'
all of which have been spelled out in details in other parts
of this disclosure

IMAGE 5m MASTER IMAGE

1/2 waves (Mars + Mercury)
 (Mars + Earth) (Mars + Venus)
 (Mars itself) is a full wave
 (Mars + Jupiter)



Mars  SUN Mercury Venus Earth Jupiter
* * .*..*..*. .*.
   +   +   + +  
     
  
m1 .............. ...................................................
m2  ....................................
m3  ................
m4  .....
m5 .................................
m6 ............................................
m7 .....................................................
m8 ......................
Mars itself

MASTER IMAGES 1 MARS FACTORS

====================================================================
where E 1Pi means ELECTRON mass times Pi
and x 1/FSC means divided by the Fine Structure Constant
and  P+  P+ explicitely includes a 'change sign'
because these are PROTON Ping.Pongs.
====================================================================
MARS AND MERCURY yields 1/2+ SIGMA 3/2+ SIGMA KAONS
=================================================================
 moon  P+  P+ + E 2Pi + 5/3 E = 1/2+ SIGMA
1+1/3 E
h^/(Mars + Mercury)  P+  P+ + E 1Pi + 9/3 E = 1/2+ SIGMA
1+1/3 E
+ moon  P+  P+ + E 0Pi + 13/3 E = 1/2+ SIGMA
=================================================================
 moon no factors = 3/2+ SIGMA
h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) no factors = 3/2+ SIGMA
for other Kaon = 3/2+ SIGMA
+ moon no factors = 3/2+ SIGMA
=================================================================
DATAS SHOWN IN TABLES BELOW
 moon  P+  P+ + E 1Pi  1/3 E = KAON o
h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury)  P+  P+  E 1Pi  4/3 E = KAON + 
 P+  P+ + E 1Pi + 1/3 E = KAON o
+ moon  P+  P+  E 1P1  2/3 E = KAON + 
=================================================================
NOTE One E increment separates each of the KAON o and KAON o
and the KAON +  and KAON + 

=================================================================
MARS AND VENUS yields N^
=================================================================
 moon  P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = N^
h^/ (Mars + Venus)  P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi x 1/FSC = N^
+ moon  P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi  2/3 E x 1/FSC = N^
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ 1/2 (wave inputs)
do not yield recognizable terms

=================================================================
MARS AND EARTH yields N^  E
=================================================================
 moon  P+  N^  4/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^
h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth)  P+ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^
+ moon  P+ + N^ + 2 E x 1/FSC + E = N^
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs)
do not yield recognizable terms

=================================================================
MARS AND EARTH yields N^  E with + and  E 1Pi
=================================================================
 moon  P+  E 1Pi + 4/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^
 1 E
h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth)  P+ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^
 2/3 E
+ moon  P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E x 1/FSC + E = N^
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs)
do not yield recognizable terms

=================================================================
MARS itself yields E x FSC power amplitude assocated
with Classical Electron Radius
=================================================================
 moon  P+  E 1Pi + E x 1/FSC = E
h^/ (Mars)  P+  N^  E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = E
+ moon  P+  N^  E 2Pi + E x 1/FSC = E
=================================================================

=================================================================
1/2 MARS itself A SPREAD OF RANGES
=================================================================
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + 2/3 E = PION + 
1/2 (Mars  moon)  P+  P+
h^/ 1/2 (Mars)  P+  P+ See below under data
for this version for
1/2 (Mars + moon)  P+  P+ more details.
1/2 (Mars) + moon  P+  P+
=================================================================
subset 
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + 2/3 E = PION + 
1/2 (Mars  moon)  P+  P+  2 N^ = PION + 
subset 
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + N^  E x 1/FSC x 1/2
= ELECTRON
1/2 (Mars  moon)  P+  P+  N^  5/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2
= ELECTRON
subset 
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2
= ELECTRON
=====================================================================

=================================================================
MARS AND JUPITER yields stable ETA
=================================================================
 moon  P+ + 10/3 E = ETA o
+ 2/3
h^/1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  P+ + 8/3 E = ETA o
+ 2/3
+ moon  P+ + 6/3 E = ETA o
also 
note this is the only derived set which show high Electron sums
this set is included, because of the degree of consistency
in high electron units.
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (inputs) yields recognizable terms in the
form of 1/2 the MeV of strings
of the h^/ 1/2 (inputs) which
means that the ETAS are tightly
boxed in by the PROTON's MeV.

=================================================================
 moon  P+ + N^ + 2/3 E = ETA o
h^/1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  P+ + N^ + 1/2 E  1/3 E = ETA o
+ moon  P+ + N^  1/3 E = ETA o
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter  moon)
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E = ETA o
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E  1/3 E = ETA o
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E  2/3 E = ETA o
=================================================================

See under TOOT! TOOT! the ETA is Missing, in
PART 11, for similar data details.
=================================================================

MASTER IMAGES 2 MARS DATAS

==================================================================
NEXT ARE THE SAME 'FACTS' AS SYMBOLIZED IN MARS FACTORS ABOVE.
==================================================================
IT IS THE SAME INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF DATAS.
==================================================================
where E 1Pi ELECTRON times Pi = 1.605350908 MeV
and 1/FSC for Fine Structure Constant = 1/137.0359895
and  P+  P+ when PROTON mass = 938.27231 MeV
Explicitely includes a 'change sign'
because these are PROTON Ping.Pongs
==================================================================
MARS AND MERCURY yields 1/2+ SIGMA 3/2+ SIGMA KAONS
=================================================================
1/2+ SIGMA ======================================================
 moon  P+  P+ + E 2Pi + 5/3 E = 1189.36116397 MeV
1+1/3 E
h^/(Mars + Mercury)  P+  P+ + E 1Pi + 9/3 E = 1189.36670745 MeV
1+1/3 E
+ moon  P+  P+ + E 0Pi + 13/3 E = 1189.36975420 MeV
3/2 + SIGMA =====================================================
 moon = 1384.35578415 MeV
h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury) = 1380.63252130 MeV
for other Kaon = 1382.91920429 MeV
+ moon = 1376.92923236 MeV
KAONS ===========================================================
 moon  P+  P+ + E 1Pi  1/3 E = 493.623853734 MeV
h^/1/2 (Mars + Mercury)  P+  P+  E 1Pi  4/3 E = 493.625415701 MeV
 P+  P+ + E 1Pi + 1/3 E = 497.689362627 MeV
+ moon  P+  P+  E 1P1  2/3 E = 497.669370680 MeV
=================================================================
NOTE One E increment separates each of the KAON o and KAON o
and the KAON +  and KAON + 

=================================================================
MARS AND VENUS yields N^
=================================================================
 moon  P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293351587 MeV
h^/ (Mars + Venus)  P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi x 1/FSC = 1.293317721 MeV
+ moon  P+ x 1/2 + E 1Pi  2/3 E x 1/FSC = 1.293278254 MeV
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs)
do not yield recognizable terms

=================================================================
MARS AND EARTH yields N^  E
=================================================================
 moon  P+  N^  4/3 E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293418038 MeV
h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth)  P+ + 1/3 E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293505410 MeV
+ moon  P+ + N^ + 2 E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293656045 MeV
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (full wave inputs)
do not yield recognizable terms

=================================================================
MARS AND EARTH yields N^  E with + and  E 1Pi
=================================================================
(Mars + Earth  moon)  P+  E 1Pi + 4/3E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293294269 MeV
 1 E
h^/1/2 (Mars + Earth)  P+ + 1/3E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293505410 MeV
 2/3 E
(Mars + Earth + moon)  P+ + E 1Pi  2/3E x 1/FSC + E = 1.293732366 MeV
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (inputs) do not yield recognizable terms

Tiny downward data drift in
the N^ values is noticed.
=================================================================
MARS itself yields E x FSC = 70.025262505 MeV power amplitude
assocated with Classical Electron Radius
=================================================================
 moon  P+  E 1Pi + E x 1/FSC = .510975906 MeV
h^/ (Mars)  P+  N^  E 1Pi + 2/3 E x 1/FSC = .510966605 MeV
+ moon  P+  N^  E 2Pi + E x 1/FSC = .511130318 MeV
=================================================================
+ moon  P+  2N^  E 1Pi + 1/3 E x 1/FSC = .510921372 MeV
which differes from E FIT .510999065 by roughly N^ x 1/FSC squared
= .oooo77692 MeV which is a power amplitude reduced term suggested
elsewhere as a candidate for a NEUTRINO mass. (Fudged, in that the
NEUTRINO is slightly lower in MeV).

=================================================================
1/2 MARS itself A SPREAD OF RANGES
=================================================================
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + 2/3 E = PION +  = 139.638896610 MeV
1/2 (Mars  moon)  P+  P+ / = 142.234461588 MeV
/
h^/ 1/2 (Mars)  P+  P+ range ..... = 145.159214586 MeV
\
1/2 (Mars + moon)  P+  P+ balloon \ = 148.074119551 MeV
1/2 (Mars) + moon  P+  P+ \ = 150.979226141 MeV
=================================================================
If there is anything here worth keeping. It is a range, between
approximate DECUPLET mass interval unit (147 MeV), and the PION.

Also alludes to BALLOON resonances 147 MeV which come
from 1/6 of h^/ (Venus) +  moon = 3/2 XION
=================================================================
subset 
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + 2/3 E
= PION +  = 139.6 38895510 MeV
1/2 (Mars  moon)  P+  P+  2 N^
= PION +  = 139.6 46245588 MeV
subset 
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + N^  E x 1/FSC x 1/2
= Electron = .5111 08614 MeV
1/2 (Mars  moon)  P+  P+  N^  5/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2
= Electron = .5111 35428 MeV
subset 
1/2 (Mars)  moon  P+  P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E x 1/FSC x 1/2
= Electron = .511004140 MeV
====================================================================

=================================================================
MARS AND JUPITER stable ETA datas
====================================================================
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon = 545.778013142 MeV
 P+ + 10/3 E ...= 547.480553359 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 546.077884092 MeV
 P+ + 8/3 E ...= 547.439758265 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 546.377297181 MeV
 P+ + 6/3 E ...= 547.398505311 MeV
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon = 545.778013142 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 2/3 E ...= 547.411207185 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 546.077884092 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E  1/3 E ...= 547.455578602 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon = 546.377297181 MeV
 P+ + N^  1/3 E ...= 547.499492159 MeV
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter  moon) = 545.778013142 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E ...= 547.476033447 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) = 546.077884092 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E  1/3 E ...= 547.455578602 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon) = 546.227647803 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 1/2 E  2/3 E ...= 547.435009292 MeV
====================================================================
This last set, featuring 1/2 units of E, has been tossed in for
two reasons; to show that randomness may in fact be a fatal flaw
with many of the (wave/orbit) derivations such as this last set, or
that more than one route leads to bonanza due to understructures.

=================================================================
 end of MARS PLAYING TUNES WITH THE PROTON 

The JUPITER balloons for IONS

MARS AND JUPITER yields stable ETA 547.45 Mev range
=================================================================
 moon  P+ + 10/3 E = 547.480553359 MeV
+ 2/3
h^/1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV
+ 2/3
+ moon  P+ + 6/3 E = 547.398505311 MeV
=================================================================
NOTE h^/ (inputs) yields recognizable terms in the
form of 1/2 the MeV of strings
of the h^/ 1/2 (inputs) which
means that the ETAS are tightly
boxed in by the PROTON's MeV.
=================================================================
Also 
Note These are the only derived sets which show high Electron sums.
These sets are included, because of the degree of consistency
in high electron units.
=================================================================
See under TOOT! TOOT! the ETA is Missing, in
PART 11, for similar data details.
=================================================================
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon
 P+ + E 1Pi = 547.382757405 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E = 547.341778957 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + E 1Pi  4/3 E = 547.300526003 MeV
.470859024
subset  P+ + E 1Pi  E = 547.470859024 MeV
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon
 P+ + N^ + 2/3 E = 547.411207185 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + N^ = 547.370412091 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + N^  2/3 E = 547.329159137 MeV
subset  P+ + N^  1/3 E = 547.499492159 MeV
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon
 P+ + 10/3 E = 547.480553359 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + 6/3 E = 547.398505311 MeV
also 
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter  moon)
 P+ + E 1Pi  1/3 E = 547.362233802 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E = 547.341778957 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon
 P+ + E 1Pi  5/3 E = 547.300526003 MeV

h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter  moon)
 P+ + N^ + 1/3 E = 547.390866936 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + N^ = 547.370412091 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + N^  1/3 E = 547.349842781 MeV

h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter  moon)
 P+ + 9/3 E = 547.460213110 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + 7/3 E = 547.419188955 MeV
all tabled together ===================================================
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)  moon
 P+ + E 1Pi = 547.382574051 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 2/3 E = 547.411207185 MeV
 P+ + 10/3 E = 547.480553359 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter  moon)
 P+ + E 1Pi  1/3 E = 547.362233802 MeV
 P+ + N^ + 1/3 E = 547.390866936 MeV
 P+ + 9/3 E = 547.460131100 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter)
 P+ + E 1Pi  2/3 E = 547.341778957 MeV
 P+ + N^ = 547.370412091 MeV
 P+ + 8/3 E = 547.439758265 MeV
h^/ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter) + moon
 P+ + E 1Pi  4/3 E = 547.300526003 MeV
 P+ + N^  2/3 E = 547.329159137 MeV
 P+ + 2 E = 547.398505310 MeV
h^ 1/2 (Mars + Jupiter + moon)
 P+ + E 1Pi  E = 547.321219647 MeV
 P+ + N^  1/3 E = 547.349842781 MeV
 P+ + 7/3 E = 547.419188955 MeV
=================================================================
subset  P+ + E 1Pi  E = 547.470859024 MeV

=================================================================
 end of The JUPITER balloons for IONS 
==========================================
PIONS IN THE SKY AT SATURN
==========================================
+ moon SATURN  moon

radius + SATURN  radius Sun

**
*......................................................*
*................................................................*
h^/(Saturn) + radius + N^ = PION +  = 139. 569420653 MeV
real Pion [139. 56995] MeV FIT
h^/(Saturn) + moon + N^ + E = 2 E x FSC = 140. 049025535 MeV
= ELECTRON = .510993593 MeV
where radius = .ooo6033 x 10 to 13 cm
(the moon of earth orbit) where moon = .oo384401 x 10 to 13 cm
where PION +  = (139. 56995) MeV FIT
where ELECTRON = (.510999065) MeV FIT
where FSC = 137.0359895 RATIO
and where 140.049025535 MeV x 1/FSC x 1/2 = .510993593 MeV
============
BANG IMAGE 1
============
charged PION mass

 Electron Amplitude
SATURN   SUN
.____*____.** // *
+ moon moon 
radius +  radius
The Saturn Bang PION
+ N^ 
.../......................... \\ 
+ N^ + E 2E x FSC
.........../............................. \\ 
That's it.
That's all there is to know.
What else is there to show.
The charged PION mass
and precise power amplified state of the ELECTRON
come from the same resonation Cosmically intuned
harmonically blinking busily at us up in the sky
in the Radius and Colors of SATURN.
 end of PIONS IN THE SKY AT SATURN 
=====================
JUPITER BANG PATTERNS
=====================
Since SATURN seems to punch a solid hole in gravitic space such
that its radius translates from metaphysical amplification state
to an actual charged PION mass it stands to reason that JUPITER
might do something the same its radius contributing to the hyper
space description of some fundamental particle.
Turns out this assumption is TRUE.
The solid mass of JUPITER does articulate
the candy stripes of a particular particle.
The particle is the 1/2+ SIGMA o state
from the SU(3) octuplet group.
= 1/2+ SIGMA [1192.55] mEv FIT
In fact, there are several interactive fluctuations that
contribute, originating from vapor imparting wave stream
vibrations of solid JUPITER.
============
BANG IMAGE 2
============
SUMMER WINTER
1/2
Jupiter Earth  SUN Venus
****
+ radius radius  
.................................................
...........................................
.....................................
The Jupiter Bangs
 3/2 ..............
 3/2+ ........................
1/2+ ....................
The Earth Moon Metaphor
=============
BANG CHARTS 1
=============
LET P+ = 938.27231 mEv
LET N^ = 1.293318 mEv
LET E^ = .510999065 mEv
LET Jupiter RADIUS = .ooo690840 x 10 to 13 cm.
LET Jupiter orbit = 7.783285433 x 10 to 13 cm.
LET Earth orbit = 1.495979270 x 10 to 13 cm.
LET Venus orbit = 1.082089677 x 10 to 13 cm.
THEN
pattern 1
=======================================================================
EARTH MOON METAPHOR state 1/2+ SIGMA o [1192.55] MeV FIT
=======================================================================
h^/ (Venus)  P+ x 2/7
+ P+ + N^ = 1192.508 950191 mEv
h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus)  P+ x 6/4 x 2/7 + 2/3 E
= 1192.558 92078 mEv
h^/ (Earth)  P+ x 2/3
+ P+ + N^  5/3 E
= 1192.565 344941 mEv
=======================================================================
pattern 2
=======================================================================
JUPITER BANG PATTERN state 1/2+ SIGMA o [1192.55] MeV FIT
=======================================================================
the bang 253.549187179
h^/ (Jupiter  RADIUS) + P+ + E + 1/3 E
minus = 1192.502 82926 mEv
253.526682297
h^/ (Jupiter) + P+ + E + 1/2 E
= 1192.565 49089 mEv
plus 253.504181409
h^/ (Jupiter + RADIUS) + P+ + N^  E
the bang = 1192.558 81034 mEv
=======================================================================
pattern 3
=======================================================================
h^/ (Venus)  P+ x 2/7 + N^
= 1192.508 95019 mEv
minus
h^/ (Jupiter  RADIUS) + P+ + 4/3 E
the = 1192.502 82926 mEv
bang
=======================================================================
pattern 4
=======================================================================
h^/ (Earth)  P+ x 2/3 + P+ + N^  5/3 E
= 1192.565 344944 mEv
h^/ (Jupiter) + P+ + 3/2 E
= 1192.565 49089 mEv
=======================================================================
pattern 5
=========================================================================
255.135474621
h^/ (Earth + Venus) divide by 3 + P+  5/3 E
= 1192.55 611951 mEv
plus 253.504181409
h^/ (Jupiter + RADIUS) + P+ + N^  E
the = 1192.55 874688 mEv
bang
=========================================================================
pattern 6
=======================================================================
255.135474620
h^/ (Earth + Venus) divide by 3 + P+  5/3 E = 1192.556 11951 mEv
252.943322190
h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus)  P+ x 6/4
x 2/7 + 2/3 E
= 1192.558 92078 mEv
253.504181409
h^/ (Jupiter + RADIUS) + P+ + N^  E
the = 1192.558 81034 mEv
bang
1192.558 81034
accuracy  99.99999 07 %
1192.558 92078
=======================================================================
POWERFUL CLUE

In BANG IMAGE 2 a 'winter' position shown on the opposite
side of the SUN (an oppositive position with respect to a
laboratory reference's point of center on the 'summer' side
of the image), directly tangles a 3/1 JP state wavelength.
However else this can be interpreted, it is suggested that
if machanics DO describe the innerscenes of particles, that
the mechanics can be seen in the WAVELENGTHS, and can have
mechanical features in SELF EVIDENT DISPLAYS that simply do
not appear when particle masses (mass energy equivalents)
are the only perspective with each particle's mass distinct
and sitting solo, apart from all other particles except via
infe r r r r ed decay modes and cascade showers.
 end of JUPITER BANG PATTERNS
================================
THE JUPITER orbital HEXAGRAM
=========================
JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES
______________________________
full wave esteem

Hyperwave ESTATES for JUPITER features just the entity portion of
Jupiter itself, that part which cycles around the SUN in the Solar
system locked into an equalateral triangle diamond constant with
the Trojans, the diamond itself being but one part of a giant
HEXAGRAM which cyclonnically sweeps around rythmic space, with
one point of the HEXAGRAM being the JUPITER Hyperwave ESTATES,
the other point the SUN.
Energy, and many fundamental vibrations,
can be sensed in this array.
In quick imges, here is what is
going on around the vacinity of JUPITER.

ESTATE HYPERWAVE IMAGE 1

.......The Hyperwave Estate Area......
 
 
 JUPITER 

eccentricty  eccentricty
radius +   radius HEXAGRAM SUN
,*, .............\\..........*
A P
aphelion perhelion
.............  radius
.................. no radius
....................... + radius

ESTATE SCHEMATIC 1

======================================
 radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon ** = 5296.43753280
 
 * diff = (N^  E) x FSC
   N^ + 2/3 E
  for N^ = 1.293457898
 
 
  1.293318
diff  (3/2 E x FSC) + 1/3 E
  into N^ is 1.293672510
 
 radius  
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) .......  * = 5242.34869655
 
 
 * diff 52.995260777
  = 1/2 (3/2 E x FSC)  2/3 E
  + N^
  for E = E+^ .510998947
 
 radius  
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon ** = 5189.35343577
======================================
5278.7 MeV
BOTTOM MESON RANGE
+ radius 
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon ** = 5276.86797899
 
 * diff = (N^  E) x FSC
  + 1/3 E
  for N^ = 1.293373590
 
 
  1.293318
diff  (3/2 E x FSC) + N^ + 2/3 E
  into N^ is 1.293675444
 
+ radius  
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) .......  * = 5223.17607887
 
 
 * diff 52.610280094
  = 1/2 (3/2 E x FSC) + 1/3 E
  for E = E+^ .5110059065
 
+ radius  
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon ** = 5170.56579878
On the very first sighting it is plain to see that
a plethora of involved mass splits is bracketed in
the fences formed in hard copy by the 2 parameters
of the JUPITER Hexagram, the two parameters being
eccentricity, and radius.
There are many more mass splits in this ESTATE area.
The mass splits which have the tightest aspects seem
to close in upon ratio integer variables of the ELECTRON
raised in power amplitude by the Fine Structure Constant.
=====================================================
THE JUPITER HIGH RISE HYPERWAVE ESTATES DEVELOPEMENTS
=====================================================
A Sherlock Holmes investigator might assume that not just a few
nicky dorks should show up in such a foundation arrangement for
the estate plateau's for the solid bang impact of the radius of
Jupiter, added, and subtracted from eccentricity of Jupiter to
yield estate hyperwaves already blueprinted everywhere.
What about cross routing through the spreads, Sherlock asks
pulling on the dutch pipe with deep intuition coloring the
smoke of each draw.
Well, that is easy to check, says Watson, puzzled by hearing
the famed voice musing aloud, just check them, says Watson,
pulling the daily newspaper up under the eyeballs again with
a crinkly sounding shuffle and looking to the headlines again
announcing Sherlock's discovery of Jupiter Hyperwave Estates.
Yes, Yes, exclaims Sherlock bounding upon the instant to the
wall and off it and back to the writing desk I shall do that
at ONCE!
Deep in the dim brain of the pen and paper Sherlock, is an
element of urge forcing a kind of yearn in the brain pan of
this fictional character, to see where the Ballon Bubbles are.
Where is 126 MeV, and the others, the 148 MeV, and 177 MeV?
Well, instead of studying the holy smoke coiling from the unlit
pipe, Sherlock did some homework, actually tried datas in the
machine, which spat out sucrease on the very first equation.
In short order, MORE has been deliniated by the great
preposterous fraud known by the sleuths as Sherlock Holmes.
 radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon ** = 5296.43753280

 diff 125.871834020
+ radius 
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon ** = 5170.56579878
+ radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon ** = 5276.86797899

 diff 1/2 of 175. 029108260
 radius 
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon ** = 5189.35343577
5296.43753288
= 125.871834020 a Balloon which touches
5170.56579878 base with a number of
= B1 things but does not seem
to home in precisesly on
anything.
However, as a Balloon,
there is:
B1 x 5/7 + 2E
= 177.242425758
= N^ x FSC
for 1.29340056
5276.86798891
= 87.514553140
5189.35343577
= 1/2 of 175.029108260
= 5/2 x FSC
for .510899680
========== ELECTRON
+ radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon ** = 5276.86797899

 diff 34.519282440
 radius 
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ...... ** = 5242.34869655
where diff + E is
1/2 E x FSC
for E = .511256665 ELECTRON
 radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon ** = 5296.43753280

 diff 1/2 of 146.522907860
+ radius 
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ...... * = 5223.17607887
LET B2 = 146.522907860
Close in value to Venus 146.522907860
Bubble Balloon
B2 x 6 + P+
= approximately
h^/ (Venus) + moon
for moon orbit = .003670166 x 10 to 13cm
in reverse engineering
h^/ (Venus) + moon  P+
x 1/6
= 146.474417302
==================
HYPERWAVE ESTATES
________________________
1/2 wave esteem
==================
Half waves, moe than doubles the number of hot spots on the
ESTATE property, and takes the landscape right into the realm
of UPSILON and X mesons.
Specifically, just the factors
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon
takes the plateau into direct contact with
two UPSILON states:
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon = S 4 UPSILON
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon = S 3 UPSILON
as already detailed in ITS UP TO THE UPSILON in PART 9.
NOTE Dovetailing in the JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES variables
with the bangs of + and  JUPITER radius will yield
a host of interconnects, most all of them being ratio
inter multiples of the ELECTRON, power amplified by
the Fine Structure Constant.
It seems that the two plateaus, JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES
for FULL WAVES and for 1/2 WAVES, are major platforms
for higher energy collision resonances.
There is so much busy body going on especially in the
1/2 wave areas that no attempt is going to be made to
try and sort them out in definative fashion, herein.
Let's let the sleuths do it, they being those who know how
to properly adjust the many consistent ESTATE variables in
to integrated particle properties.

SUMMARY

There are 3 fundamental groups in the 1/2 waves
for the JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES, in the High Rise
Developements area which lands amidst UPSILON mesons.
==============================================================
1. 1/2 waves without the BANG of JUPITER's radius
==============================================================
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon = 10683.2919854
eccentricity  moon) = 10573.2692915
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) ..... = 10465.4896516
eccentricity + moon) = 10359.8851633
h^/ 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon = 10256.3906378
==============================================================
2. 1/2 waves with the BANG of JUPITER's radius subtracted
==============================================================
 radius
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon
 radius
eccentricity  moon) x 2
 radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) .... x 2
 radius
eccentricity + moon) x 2
 radius
h^/ 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon
==============================================================
3. 1/2 waves with the BANG of JUPITER's radius added
==============================================================
+ radius
h^/1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity)  moon
+ radius
eccentricity  moon) x 2
+ radius
h^/ (Jupiter eccentricity) .... x 2
+ radius
eccentricity + moon) x 2
+ radius
h^/ 1/2 (Jupiter eccentricity) + moon
==============================================================
In the three groups, the radius of JUPITER has been added
and subtracted to the ECCENTRICTY of JUPITER, before any
MOON terms are factored into the strings.
It is possible that other variables of discrete real kind
may also turn up within the ESTATES, by subtracting and
adding JUPITER's radius, after the fact of the MOON orbit
plus and minus increment; in other words, at the end of
each possible string.
The main point is that the JUPITER HEXAGRAM in space which
houses the JUPITER estates right at one of the end points
of the HEXAGRAM is actually a small wavelength (Compton),
there in the tiny end point area, resulting in large leaps
in energy equivalents when very small increments are made
upon any source wave from the HEXAGRAM end point area.
The fact that so many direct hits occur in the differences
between data points across the total spread is way out of
the spectre of coincidence.
Too many solid H I T S ! No, can't be coincidence
mutters Watson in silence
distracted by the strident
piercing voice of Professor
Moriarty who has come racing
to the home of Holmes in answer
to the shouts of acclaim Holmes
was already giving himself, once
again, as every story reader knows.
These large leaps in energy fit fall within the bracketed
energy states already identified as first cause principles
under the BANG BUBBLES of PART 10A.
It is information which all falls within the range of
(E x FSC) = 70.03 MeV and no lower, to 1 and 2
times a set of precise variables ranging up to 177.6
MeV, but no higher.
as already identified in first cause principles
under BANG BUBBLES of PART 10A.
Professor Moriarty departs the scene, foiled once again.
==============================================================
ESTATES SUMMARY
There are in toto, 21 mechanical sub units many
of which are direct HITS as particle resonances
as both physical particles per se, and as units
of DIFFerence between arms in the spread, which
are 7 main nodes in the form of a master line
and six child groups, whose codes are:

FULL PICTURE Highrise Developements Area

10723.3997483
 radius ....... most MeV
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity)  MOON ......
+ radius .....
 radius) ........
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity ( MOON .......
+ radius) ......
 radius ......... child
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity  moon) ........ 10573.2692915
+ radius ....... S 4 UPSILON
 radius ...........
h^/ 1/2 (JUPITER ECCENTRICITY) ........... master 10465.4896516
+ radius ..........
 radius ......... S 2 UPSILON
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity + moon) ........ 10359.8851633
+ radius ....... child
 radius) .........
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity (+ MOON ........ X MESON
+ radius) ....... (10231)
 radius ........
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity)  MOON .......
+ radius ...... least MeV
10219.6942513
============================================================
TAKE NOTE OF THIS HYPERWAVE TUNING FORK, JUST AS AN EXAMPLE
============================================================
 radius ....... most
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity)  MOON ......
+ radius .....  10643.4831274


h^/ 1/2 (JUPITER ECCENTRICITY) ... 10465.4896516 DIFF  350.131618090


 radius .......  10293.3515093
1/2 (JUPITER eccentricity) + MOON ......
+ radius ...... least
DIFF is
two units of (5/2 E x FSC) = 350.126312529
SO THAT DIFF 1/2 (350.131618090) x 2/5 x 1/FSC
= .511006808 MeV
WHERE 2 (5/2 E x FSC) = 350.126312529
THEN (350.131618090)  (350.126312529)
= .oo5305560
x FSC
which may be fluff .... = 3/2 E = .484701849 MeV
but, still, it comes
from a tightly compiled
infrastructure with very
large fluctuations, between
single parts comprising 7 group
sets of 21 (wave/orbit/radius/mass)
mechanically distinct parts.
ESTATES observed and included at the very last minute
January 20, 1995.
 end JUPITER HYPERWAVE ESTATES 
===============================================
The MUON and NEUTRON sing the same song
===============================================
The LAMBDA mass increment for the PROTON and the MUON do not
seem to be singing from the same sheet of music. The NEUTRON
seems to be the true RESONANCE factor attached to the MUON.
One can deduce the other to 8
significant digits of accuracy.
Concider the following intones:
It involves the MUON and LAMBDA,
with the NEUTRON conducting.
Since only three fundamental particle masses are
know with constant accuracy only these three are
used to conduct the data.
The three are PROTON = 938.27231 MeV
MUON = 105.658389 MeV
ELECTRON = .510999065 MeV
N^ value used below
= 1.2933 27903 MeV
was turned up in sources somewhere in
the wilds, now forgotten. Why not use
it to start anyway in the following.
A simple flow chart will explain what can be played in
this melody, at least, enough for a first page, before
the symphany orchestra gets tuned up, before the house
lights change intensity.
Since the mass of the MUON is one of the
best know fundamental particle masses it
stands as a good place to start the chart.
Here is the chart.
MUON CHART Its as simple as A B C

A * LAMBDA [1115.67 8] MeV EXPRMT
  1/99.999 7411 %
* + P+ + 1/3 E = 1115.67 511205 MeV


** N^ x FSC = 177.232469038 MeV
 
 
B *  NEUTRON = [939.5656 3] MeV FIT
    99.999999 1 %
  + P+ = 939.5656 37903 MeV
 
 
C ** + E = N^ = 1.2933 27903 MeV
   99.999 2343 %
 [1.2933 18] MeV FIT


** divide by FSC = .782328838 MeV


MUON + N^ + 1/2 E = 107.207206532 MeV

when MUON = [105.658389] MeV FIT
and P+ = PROTON = [938.27231] MeV FIT
MUON CHART 1

POWER CASCADE Classical Electron Radius

There is another way of percieving the MUON CHART
at a single glance. This time a hidden feature is
exposed in the open.
The hidden feature points to the Classical Electron Radius,
as follows:
MUON CHART 2

energy equivalents
LAMBDA
MUON .........../
/ + 1/3 E /
\\\\\\ / .........../
\\\\\ / /
\\\\ Classical Electron Radius / N^ x FSC /
................ \\\ ......................... / .............
107.207206532 \\ 70.025262505 / 177.232469038
\ / /
\ / /
.............. \ / /
105.913888532 \ \ / /
\ \ / /
 1/2 E ..........\ \ / /
= 105.658389 mEv \ \ / /
\ \ / /
\ x /
NEUTRON .............. PROTON
1.293327903
NEUTRON  ...............  PROTON
N^
MUON CHART 3

LAMBDA ARM
MUON ARM /
/
\ /
\ / + 1/3 E
\ / ........
\ /
(N^  E) x FSC \ E x FSC / N^ x FSC
<.............. \ <..................... .... / <.............
107.207206532 \ 70.025262505 / 177.232469038
diff = N^ \ /
..........................\ /
105.912888532 \ /
diff = 1/2 E \ /
............. \ /
105.658389 MUON NEUTRON PROTON
.............
in which N^ is hidden 1.293327903
and the NEUTRON is exposed
as well as the MUON.
DRIFT AND FLUTTER Digital disharmony

In MUON CHART 3, the MUON is calculated from FSC
(Fine Structure Constant) factors, starting with N^.
Yet the strings can also be run in any of several directions,
including starting with the NEUTRON mass, or LAMBDA mass, or
MUON mass.
The calculation of the masses of other fundamental particles,
with just masses of ELECTRON, PROTON, NEUTRON known, is to
near precision but not quite. Depending on which direction a
string is run to calculate, the resulting mass varies at the
N^ digits, due to trunkation arrising from limitations of
input term's accuracies. Or so it seems.
For instance, note the way the calculated N^ masses
turn a bit, when the following calculation method is
used:
MUON CHART 4

MUON N^ 1/2 E E x FSC
105.658389 + 1.293327903 + .255499532 + 70.025262505
+ 1/3 E = 177.402811962
+ P+ = 1115.67512196 MeV

LAMBDA

WHEREAS The French Horn version

MUON N^ 1/2 E N^  E x FSC
...........
105.658389 + 1.293327903 + .255499532 = 107.207216435
was hidden ........... divide by FSC = .782328911
now revealed
+ E = 1.293327976 = N^
............
x FSC + 1/3 E + P+ = 1115.67512196 MeV

LAMBDA
where the two shown N^ are discretely different.
..........
This sounds like a job for RENORMAL PERSON to stand
on stage and conduct orchestra tuneup, until ........
N^ is stablized and becomes constant, with a value of
........
The two french horn tones N^ are
added together and divided by two.
The DRIFT and FLUTTER of MUON CHART 4
are played again and a new N^ is added
to N^ and again divided by two.
The results are blended with the violas
and flute with kettle drums holding the
bottom line.
The same is repeated several times as RENORMAL PERSON
watches the score and studies the musicians with a
raised left, then right, eye.
Well what do you know. RENORMAL PERSON taps the podium
and gets the 1st french horn player to wipe some valve
on rough lips to soften the FLUTTER pursed against the
blowhole, so that now the less rubbery lips play exactly
the same sound as french horn number 2, who is instructed
not to puff so hard on the initial attack of sound and so
eliminate DRIFT, so now when performed by the two french
horn players in total synch, the two sounds reverberate
as one pure vibration heard in the music.
RENORMAL PERSON, capably adapting the score
to eliminate sour notes, does the job with
only a few turns through the passages. That
results in perfect tones sounding through
the philharmonic.
The perfect pitch has been found.
With profession skill, RENORMAL PERSON leans
over the podium and writes in the annotation.
The score has been changed. The new N^ is
...............
1.2933279761
...............
When substituted in the scales of MUON CHART 4
all parts of the score become constant.
Nothing like a miracle.
Just another everyday occurrence
in getting a Cosmic concert ready.
Why the orchestra metaphor ?
Havin' fun. Just havin' fun.
 Finished 
 end of MUONS AND NEUTRON
 end of PART 11
PART 12 
FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON

Featuring: Amplitudes with the Fine Structure Constant
==================================================
ELECTRON ratios
==================================================
There is an intriguing set of ELECTRON related figures
which keep turning up on their own throughout this
disclosure. These figures are not randomly sourced
but are heart and parcel of fundamental structures.
1/2 E Electron mass units

Specifically, a 1/2 ELECTRON mass equivalent term is
common as are 3/2 and 5/2 ELECTRON mass equivalents
times the Fine Structure Constant. 2 ELECTRON masses
times the FSC is also common.
There are pictures inherent in this.
Since the ELECTRON's atomic binding energy, the
Rydber Energy Constant, is a fundamental ratio
to the ELECTRON mass, it provides a picture for
perceiving ELECTRON mass ratios.
A second picture can be provided by the
socalled Classical Electron Radius.
And a third picture can be provided
by the Bohr diameter of an atom.
ELECTRON SCALE 1

FSC * = 9595.98113748 MeV
  UPSILON range
 
 
+ 1/2 E x FSC   = 175.063156264 MeV 5/2 E
  N^ x FSC range
 
 
x 2  = 140.05052501 MeV 2 E
  charged PION range
 
 
 1/2 E x FSC   = 105.037893758 MeV 3/2 E
  MUON range
 
 
Classical Electron Radius FSC  = 70.025262505 MeV 1 E
 
 
FSC   = 35.012631252 MeV 1/2 E
  
  
  
wave ................ ELECTRON ........... mass equivalent
  
  
2 x Electron Compton * FSC  = .255499532 MeV
wavlength   
Bohr orbit (radius) * x 2  = .oo3728940 MeV
  
Bohr diameter * FSC  = .001864470
  
 x 2 * = .oooo27211396 MeV
 
*  = .oooo13605698 MeV

electron
Rydberg constant binding energy .oooo13605698 MeV
It is felt that the 1/2 units of E mass represent momentum,
or gamma photon quantities, rather than fractal units of an
electron per se, since .511 MeV is commonly associated as
the momentum of an ejected decay particle from atoms.
In ELECTRON SCALE 1 shown above the 1/2 units of E are all
power amplified by the FSC. Each FSC amplitude is met with a
physical entity. And thus factors of FSC squared are not of
themselves the whole story.
The one entity not entirely self evident in terms of a physical
picture is the Classical Electron Radius, by itself. It is not
seen in an instant just what it is being crafted by the measure
in that it is not a diameter or orbit, and not a Compton wave
length in association with a physical particle.
What is the Classical Electron Radius ? No answer comes
from these tips
except it is the Bohr orbit divided by the FSC squared.
The use of the 'Classical Electron Radius' does find some
physically sensed meaning within structures called 'Circle
Geometry' in association with the KAON CIRCLE MULTIPLEX of
PART 10; a fundamental structuring scheme which expands to
include a finite set of mass integer units summarized under
BANG BUBBLES of PART 10A.
==================================================
ELECTRON fractions
==================================================
1/3 E Electron mass units

Units of 1/3 and 2/3 the mass of the ELECTRON are a main
feature throughout this disclosure. Many times ELECTRON mass
units comparable to ratio integer sum units which define a
QUARK, have been proposed as also definitional for ELECTRONS.
However such theoretical proposals have never had sufficient
favor to be worked into the basics of CHROMODYNAMIC theories.
Here in this disclosure, most all of the images and pictures
would simply vanish from view if ratio integer ELECTRON mass
1/3 units were not allowed, and not taken for granted. These
1/3 and 2/3 ELECTRON mass units turn up everywhere in galore.
There are places where adding and subtracting multiples of 1/3 units
of the Electron seems to be just play acting, just jerry rigging, to
make things happen, and this is probably true.
There are other places, however, where adding and subtracting multiples
of 1/3 units of the Electron operate in such tight constraints, that it
is not possible to dismiss the activity as just, merely, coincidence in
particular where decay modes are correct, and where, when the pencil is
sharpened, and careful note is taken as to how charges add up, and flip
around, switching back and forth, to come out on the main cross country
highway still in the correct lanes, then the concept of crash fades in
the face by gigantic flashing green lights on the freeway.
Number 1 below:
Amplitude resonances, works well to approximate
particle mass states, and ELECTRON amplitude
resonances, based on whole ratio multiples of
E x FSC.

1. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES ball park figures

When FSC is the Fine Structure Constant = 137.0359895 ratio
E x FSC squared
= Upsilon electron amplitude 9595.6 MeV
5/2 E x FSC
+ N^
+ 2 E = (Lambda  Proton) mass difference 177.3 MeV
NOTE (5/2 E x FSC) is an
approximation of the
(Neutron  Proton) mass difference
which is more accurately
gained when the MUON mass
is the starter MeV rather
than 5/2 E x FSC.
Here are basic ELECTRON 'power amplitude' correspondences
 
2 E x FSC
 1 E = Pion (charged) electron amplitude 139.5 MeV
3/2 E x FSC
+ 1 E = Muon electron amplitude 105.5 MeV
1 E x FSC = mess energy, er, mass energy 70.02 MeV
of classical electron radius
1/2 E x FSC = mass energy of a 'classical electron diameter'
= 35.01 MeV
= (rather than the 'Classical Electron Radius').

2. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES for adjusted electron mass
using (NeutronProton) mass difference FIT for control.

when NeutronProton
mass difference = N^ = [1.293318] MeV FIT
N^ x FSC = L^ = 177.231111868 MeV
+ Proton = 1115.50342186 MeV
Lambda mass = [1115.684] MeV FIT
LAMBDA mass [1115.684] MeV FIT
 P+ = 177.411689947 MeV
divide by FSC = N^ = 1.294635742 MeV
Another LAMBDA mass is listed in the
Review of Particle Properties of /95.
It is a main experiment value of (1115.678) MeV EXPRMT
LET
LAMBDA mass = (1115.678) MeV
 P+ = L^
L^  N^
 2 E
divide by 5/2 = Ex = .175.090373869 MeV
divide by FSC
reduces to Ey = .5110785111 MeV
Let the imagination take hold, to find that
Ey  E = .oooo79446 MeV
times FSC squared = 1.49196538 MeV
which approximates
N^ + 1/2 E x 1/FSC squared
which in reverse enginering yeilds
= 175.091411935 MeV
+ N^ + 2 E + P+ = 1115.679 03806 MeV *

1115.678 Lambda Exp
* This demonstration is shown as an example
of how a particle mass such as the LAMBDA
can be approximated to near exactitude by
integer unit massconstant factoring.
The actual LAMBDA FIT mass [1115.684] MeV
is not seen by any such factoring whereas
the EXPERIMENTAL value (1115.678) MeV
or close variations, turns up easily.

3. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES try adjusted electron mass

using (LambdaProton) mass difference FIT for control.
when Lambda mass = (1115.684) MeV FIT
then LambdaProton
mass difference = L^ = 177.411690 MeV FIT
L^ divide by FSC = N^+ = 1.294635742 MeV
mass factor
L^  N^
 2 E
divide by FSC
divide by 5/2 = Ex = .511096025
L^  N^
 2 Ex
divide by FSC
divide by 5/2 = Ex = .511095459 * *
N^ x FSC = L^ = 177.23028965 MeV
+ Proton = 1115.50259965 MeV
Lambda mass = (1115.684) MeV FIT
Drift and Flutter are noticed, depending
on which factors are deemed as inputs, it
is not readily seen which inputs are valid.
* * See below.

4. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES
Particles and amplitudes fall into place?

An intuitive assumption is that all datas cannot be resolved
into one single set of pure form constants due to the existence
of charge/mass and magnetic influences on actual particle masses
which discretely effect experimental determinations out of focus
from pure form.
The spectum of light in atomic shells is influenced out of beat
to the pure form of Rydberg values by, for instance in the case
of the simple hydrogen atom, by the mass to charge interference
ratio between the Electron and Proton, the Electron having only
1/1836.1527 the mass of the Proton and yet the power of 1 full
charge unit to effect the central Proton's position offcentered
by minute amounts, which effects the result spectrum of photons.
But the measured spectrum, compared to pure form spectra can be
adjusted (and routinely is in physics), by a single small ratio.
It is possible that elementary particle masses also have a pure
form, and that the pure form arises from ratio inter multiples
of the Electron in amplitudes of the Fine Structure Constant.
However the pure is modified by mechnical interferences that
hide the pure form from full view. At least, this is an idea
which has the words 'speculation ... perhaps' attached.


5. ELECTRON AMPLITUDE RESONANCES try adjusted electron mass
using MUON FIT for controls, not so good. Demonstration of
frustration.

when MUON mass = [105.658389] MeV FIT
 1 E
divide by 3/2
divide by FSC = .511531753 MeV = Ex
substitute for
 1 Ex
then ELECTRON becomes = .511529161 MeV = Ey
substitute for
 1 Ey
renormalize again
then ELECTRON becomes = .511529174 MeV = Ez
And so, using Ez as Electron mass substitute, the following
Electron mass amplitudes occur.
5/2 E x FSC
+ N^ = 1.293312 MeV
+ 2 E = (Lambda  Proton) mass difference 177.043 MeV
**** blahh
NOTE (5/2 E x FSC) itself
+ N^ + 2 Ez  1/3 Ez
divided by FSC still
merely approximates the
(Neutron  Proton) mass difference 1.293237780
[1.293312] MeV FIT
and such renderings lead nowhwere.
For instance,
when ELECTRON = .511529174 MeV = Ez
2 Ez x FSC
 1 E = PION (charged) electron amplitude 139.6842703 MeV
[139.56995] MeV FIT
blahh ****
3/2 Ez x FSC
+ 1 Ez = MUON electron amplitude 105.6583896408 MeV
[105.658389] MeV FIT
A perfect fit, which
since Ez was gained
from the MUON, is a
perfect coincidence.
Nothing else. The Ez
does not link to any
other fact. It is a
false positive.

 end of FACTORS OF THE ELECTRON 
PART 13 
CRITICAL ACCURACY

Equations that are perfect and symmetrical should yield identical
results when run forward, and backwards. In most cases within the
limits and disclosure in particular where solar wave (orbits) are
included, a forward result to give the starting term for reverse
derivation, yields a slight departure from the starting data when
variable input taken from solar orbit tables or from the Particle
data tables is substituted for the end term to become the starter
in running an equation backwards.
Fortunately these discrepencies (departures) are very slight,
suggesting that MeV and/or Solar orbit datas as published in
data tables are off the real mark in small, not major, ways.
Attempts have been made to derive 'perfect' constant result when
running equations both forward and backwards. It seems possible
that perfect results might be achieved by reguritating; running
the equations over and over again to home in on 'constants' from
both directions. Renormalizing attempts were not norm for the
currently disclosed datas. The results of running the equations
both forward and backwards were close enough that renormalizing
was concidered not crucial, for the present time. Also, some MeV
particle masses achieve a subtle revision when an experiment has
new accuracy, and extremely discrete revisions to values of the
Physical Constants continue to occur as physics experiments show
new accuracies in the lab. Particle physics MeV datas that are
used in this disclosure came from 1994 (August). The last prior
attempt on this project was put on the back shelf in February of
1986, using Particle physics MeV datas published in April, 1984.
The projected was originated in the summer of 1967.
Significantly, all parts in the big picture under concideration
as derivable Mass calculations, improved discretely rather than
diminishing in accuracy, when inputting 1994 datas for physical
constants, when comparing derivation results to those that were
last looked at in 1986 using the April 1984 data tables for the
Physical Constants and Particle masses.
The solar datas came from tables published in 1981 from datas
supplied at the time by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, having
Planetary Constant changes from previous long standing datas
due to new measures coming in from the satellites to Mars and
cruising past Jupiter and Saturn.
More recent Physical Constant datas for the Solar System are
slightly out of whack compared to the 1981 stuff, so the '81
Solar datas have been used since the '81 values seem more to
the point of accuracy in demonstrating (wave/orbit) energy
harmonics models among the fundamental particles.
 end of CRITICAL ACCURACY 
PART 14 
SYMMETRY RATIO GROUPS

INTEGER RATIOS
There is a 'Law and Order' to the integer ratios which
govern the construct states of the XION particles deemed
defined by the 'Earth Moon Metaphor', the integers being:
XION  P+ = V? = a BALLOON state
AND
V? / 7 x X? = P+ = another particle
V? / 6 x X? = P+ = another particle
V? / 5 x X? = P+ = another particle
WHERE X? is another whole integer ratio
AND P+  V?/X? x X? = another particle
WHERE X? can be any integer,
typically 1 2 3 4 5.
WHEN for example
V? = 3/2 XION isospin.
And so, for instance, ball park associations with
the OCTUPLET SU(3) group of particles is had by
the whole integer ratios, taken for example, from
the 3/2 XION group:
 moon
WHERE isospin state = h^/ (VENUS)
+ moon
AND V? = 3/2 XION isospin state  P+
THEN
OCTUPLETS
3/7 + P+ = 1/2+ XION
2/7 + P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA
1/7 + p+ = unknown
DECUPLETS
5/6 + P+ = 3/2+ OMEGA
4/6 + P+ = 3/2+ XION
3/6 + P+ = 3/2+ SIGMA
2/6 + P+ = 3/2+ DELTA
V? x 1/? + P+ = unknown
LAMBDA
V? x 1/5 + P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA
But also, other XION families also enjoy the
same fundamental whole integer ratio numbering
system, for example the 3/2+ XION group will
generate SU(3) sets as follows:
 moon
WHERE isospin state = h^/ 1/2(VENUS + EARTH)
+ moon
AND V? = 3/2+ XION isospin state  P+
THEN
OCTUPLETS
6/4 x 3/7 P+ = 1/2+ XION
6/4 x 2/7 P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA
6/4 x 1/7 P+ = unknown
DECUPLETS
5/4 + P+ = 3/2+ OMEGA
4/4 + P+ = 3/2+ XION
3/4 + P+ = 3/2+ SIGMA
2/4 + P+ = 3/2+ DELTA
V? x 1/? + P+ = unknown
LAMBDA
V? x 6/4 x 1/5 P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA
The fundamental stable 1/2+ XION particle has
shown up in the other two groups of whole ratio
numbering system, and it too has its own space
generating SU(3) sets as follows:
 moon
WHERE isospin state = h^/ (EARTH)
+ moon
AND V? = 1/2+ XION isospin state  P+
THEN
OCTUPLETS
3/3 P+ = 1/2+ XION
2/3 P+ = 1/2+ SIGMA
1/3 P+ = unknown
DECUPLETS
7/3 5/6 + P+ = 3/2+ OMEGA
7/3 4/6 + P+ = 3/2+ XION
7/3 3/6 + P+ = 3/2+ SIGMA
7/3 2/6 + P+ = 3/2+ DELTA
V? x 7/3 x 1/6 + P+ = unknown
LAMBDA
V? x 1/3 x 7/5 + P+ = 1/2+ LAMBDA
=========================================
BALLOON MASS STATES
=========================================
A new term is being introduced. ! BALLOON !
Certain masses are going to be called 'BALLOON' mass
states, and refers to special variable units of mass
which come directly from WAVELENGTH factoring.
For example, the equivalent mass energy for Venus orbit
in a solar (wave/orbit) model, is 1823.57393767 MeV
and comes from
h^/ (Venus) = 1823.57393767 MeV = 3/2 XION
 P+ = 885.301594354 Mev = V0
= the BALLOON mass state for 3/2 XION
Generically, any V? is a BALLOON mass state.

HERE COMES THE MUON

The OCTUPLET and DECUPLET groups each have
a unit mass associated. The unit masses are:
LAMBDA = 177 MeV
DECUPLET = 147 MeV
OCTUPLET = 126 MeV
In general, there is a common interval of mass between
an OCTUPLET unit (126 MeV) and DECUPLET unit (147 MeV).
The interval is in the range of
21.1 MeV = i?
which has whole integer correspondences to
the OCTUPLET and DECUPLET unit masses, as
follows:
i? x 8 = LAMBDA mass range not included
i? x 7 = DECUPLET mass range 147 MeV
i? x 6 = OCTUPLET mass range 126 MeV
i? x 5 = MUON mass range [105.658389] MeV FIT
For instance, for any DECUPLET mass subtracted from any
OCTUPLET mass, there will be a common mass interval in
ratio integer multiples of 2 units of i?
that is, of
42.2 MeV = 2 x i?
SO THAT 42.2 MeV x 5/2 = the MUON range 105.6 MeV.
But another way of seeing this is for instance
in the V? isospin state of 3/2 XION, where
(Vo x 11/42)  (Vo x 1/7) = 105.3 MeV range.
WHERE Vo x 1/42 = 21.1
x 11 = 232
 Vo x 1/7 = 105.3
but this is pushing hard on the limits of credibility,
the point being that terms 42.2 and 21.1 are many
gap fillers in a lineal sum fashion, if just the sums
are explored.

EXAMPLE 3/2 XION

In actual digits, the BALLOON mass state for
h^/(Venus)  P+ = Vo is 885.301594354 MeV
Vo x 2/7 = 252.943312672 MeV
diff = 105.393046946 MeV * in MUON range.
Vo x 1/6 = 147.550265725 MeV 

where Vo x 11/42  (Vo x 1/7) 

= 105.393046946 MeV *
so that higher digit BALLOON ratios do accue
within the mist of much lower ratio integers.
COMMENT In fact, unless hallucinations are occuring in
widths staring at the calculator, just about any width
mass difference for particles can be conconted
in accord agreement by using the higher integer
BALLOON ratios based on multiples of mass units
21 Mev and 42 MeV to knit together the width
amounts. This is in particular reference to the
widths listed in abundance in 1984 data table
Particle Reviews, now only in brief in the '94
tables.

EXAMPLE 3/2+ XION

In actual digits, two BALLOON mass states for
h^/ 1/2 (Earth + Venus)
 P+ = Vev0 is 592.540537729 MeV
Vev0 x 6/4 x 2/7 = 253.945944741 MeV
diff = 105.810810308 MeV in MUON range.
Vev0 x 1/4 = 148.135134432 MeV

EXAMPLE 1/2 XION

In actual digits, the BALLOON mass state for
h^/ (Earth)  P+ = Ve0 is 380.776283084 MeV
Ve0 x 2/7 = 253.850855389 MeV
diff = 105.771189745 MeV in MUON range.
Ve0 x 1/6 = 148.079665643 MeV

EXAMPLE generic

In the whole scope of the viewscene, there are BALLOONS
for every one of the states specified by the parameters
of THE EARTH MOON METAPHOR FOR SUBATOMIC PHENOMENA.
This in total comprises 9 different collections of BALLOONS,
12 BALLOONS if the ?/? (2250) XION state is also concidered
as being legitimate.
?/? (2250) XION is pointed out as holding
a possible predicted mass
resonance, under PARTICLE
PREDICTION at the end of
PART 3.
PROVISO

All of these BALLOON states will have corresponding
MUON range entities, B U T there is no guarantee,
no unmistakable sign that these entities are indeed
MUON occurrences.
For a fact of interest, a BALLOON's
3/2+ XION (decuplet) state
mass, minus the mass of the BALLOON's
1/2+ XION (octuplet) state
is twice the MUON mass range interval.
For example, for: h^/Venus  P+ = BALLOON Vv0
AS BALLOON RATIOS
BALLOON Vv0 x 4/6 = 590.201085114 MeV
 BALLOON Vv0 x 3/7 = 379.414983287 MeV
diff = 210.786101826 MeV
x 1/2 = 105.393050913 MeV
AS XION PARTICLE STATES
BALLOON Vv0 + P+ = 1823.57393767 MeV 3/2 XION
BALLOON Vv0 x 4/6 + P+ = 1528.47339511 MeV 3/2+ XION
 BALLOON Vv0 x 3/7 + P+ = 1317.68729328 MeV 1/2+ XION
diff = 210.786101827 MeV
x 1/2 = 105.393050913 MeV

BALLOON vocabulary

Buzz words in onthespot dialogue can include
BALLOON harmonics
BALLOON resonances
BALLOON oscillations
BALLOON numbers
BALLOON states
BALLOON ratios
BALLOON powers
Wishful thinking

BALLOONS ratios, vrs the RYDBERG ratios

The whole hiarchy of BALLOON whole inter units of mass
are a system that is converse to the RYDBERG system
of whole integer ratios which comprise spectrum lines
and energy equivalents in atoms, for instance Hydrogen.
In the RYDBERG system, the SQUARES of whole integers
combine in ratios to yield spectrum quantities.
There are two distinct differences between this, the ATOMIC
regime, and the BALLOONS, the partical (wave/orbit) regime:
1. Only whole integers, not square powers,
appear in the BALLOON regime.
2. In the BALLOON regime, a smaller integer is
over a larger integer to produce a ratio,
whereas in the RYDBERG regime, the square
of a higher integer is over the square of a
lower integer.
FOR INSTANCE
RYDBERG ratios include, for example
25/16 25/9 25/4
which are 5 squared, 4 squared, 3 squared etc.
BALLOON ratios include, for example
5/6 4/6 3/6 2/6 1/6
and 3/7 2/7 1/5
etc.

COMMENT

From somewhere in the inner consciousness comes the term
MAGNETIC STRAND
and with it an association to BALLOON mass ratios.
What this could possibly mean is not even questionable
from the point of view of nothing else associated with
those words from the inner consciousness, except for a
line of poetry:
7 rings around the magnetic strand .
The allusion is to magnetic strands being involved in
the interknitting wavelength/mass harmonic resonance
areas.
Is this possible ?

 end of BALLOON mass states (and ratios) discussions 
PART 15 
KEYBOARD Read If Interested

Since use of a simple multi register Calculator device
is cited throughout this disclosure; in fact is used as
the basis of formulating a new approach in addressing a
'Philosophy of Science' as an alternative mathematical
means of factoring and organizing myriad data variables
in systematic ways, using an invented 'Symbollic Logic'
as a means of depicting operations of the Philosphy; an
example of the 'derivation' of several key fundamental
particle masses, plus exact particle mass differences,
is shown, achieved by the Philosophy means in using the
actual Calculator device's capacity to allow 'INTRINSIC
CALCULATOR LOGIC' as a criteria for handling the math.
Discerning the symmetries yielding the particle masses
is as much a success of the 'Calculator Logic' as it is
a matter of creative intelligence, in that thousands of
calculations could be handled during given work sessions
in which changing of direction in mid stride was normal,
as the large picture gradually unfolded piece by piece.
If you think the discerning of useful patterns out of the
myria of possibilities was a 'piece of cake', think again.
Even proof reading the draft copy of this disclosure was
a slow motion process to ensure that the + and  signs
were correct, not to mention errors in data inputs and so
on one digit at a time ad infinitum.
Only the acceptance of the tedium of writing and retyping
data entries was in demand. Computer programming was not
in any way there to interfere with the clear mind.
This extra splice of disclosure is included here, because
it is very revealing as to how all of the factors of this
disclosure were intuited, tested, and resolved using just
fundamental operators in basic mathematics, skipping past
any of the formal mathematics usually associated with the
physics of fundamental particles.
Here is a schematic of the calculator's keyboard registers,
which are also its digit keys. The calculator is Monroe 326
scientist, circ 1971, originally marketed under the name of
Compucorp. It has 12 STORE and RECALL memory registers.
   
 STORE   7   8   9 
   
   
 RECALL   4   5   6 
   
  
 1   2   3 
  
  
 0   .   *  < change sign key
  
EXAMPLE  STORE registers used for CONSTANT datas
Store 9 Proton mass
Store 7 h^ digital value of Plank's converter constant
Store 6 Moon mean of orbit
Store 5 Fine Structure Constant
Store 2 Electron mass
Store * N^ (Neutron  Proton) mass difference.
EXAMPLE  STORE registers used for VARIABLE datas
Store 8 Usually a solar orbit MeV in temp concideration
Store 4 A solar orbit, usually the Earth mean of orbit
Store 3 Temp data, typically 1/3 the electron mass
Store 1 A second solar orbit, for example Venus mean of orbit
Store 0 Typically the result of Store 7 divided by Store 1
or Store 2, or their sum
Store 8 The final results
Store . A another final result, for comparison or temp use.
EXAMPLE  How STORE and RECALL registers can aid in the quick
computation of a particle mass, or solar wave (orbit)
equivalent. This illustrates the fundamental simplicity
of 'INTRINSIC CALCULATOR LOGIC' as a functionally
useful mathematics philosophy.
SIMPLE  Deriving the 1/2+ XION (1321.87) status **** neg state
Let STORE 4 contain the digits for VENUS mean of orbit
Let STORE 6 contain the digits for MOON mean of orbit
(RECALL 4  RECALL 6) and STORE in 0
(RECALL 7 divide RECALL 0) = 1830.07505377
= [1830] EXPMT 3/2 XION
Store in 8
when STORE 7 contains h^
when h^ = 1973.2705332
when Venus mean of orbit = 1.082089677
when Moon mean of orbit = .00384401
when Electron mass = .510999060
EXPMT means a resonance state from an individual experiment.
COMPLEX  Deriving the 1/2+ LAMBDA (1115.684) neutral, stable
RECALL 8  RECALL 9 = 891.802743777
DIVIDE BY 5  N^ + 2/3 E = L^
STORE .
DIVIDE L^ BY RECALL 5 = N^
STORE 3
ALSO
RECALL . + RECALL 9 = (1115.68 026976) MeV
LAMBDA [1115.684] MeV FIT
when STORE 9 contains Proton mass = 938.27231
when STORE 5 contains Fine Structure Contant
= 137.0359850
where N^ means mass difference between Neutron and Proton.
where L^ means mass difference between Lambda and Proton.
DERIVE  Deriving the stable charged PION using N^ in STORE 3
Recall 3  1/3 E
divide by Recall 5
Store 3 = N^
RECALL 7 / enter Saturn mean of orbit + Saturn radius
= 14.27051099
when Saturn orbit = 14.269906899
when Saturn radius = .ooo60330
plus RECALL 3 = 139.569 467735
where PION mass = [139.569 95) MeV
when STORE 3 contains N^ as derived above
OTHER DERIVATIONS  Using the 'Calculator Logic' setup
now in place as a DEMO. Speculation.
Obviously, if more STORE and RECALL registers are available
in a Calculating device, all of the above demonstrated derivations
can be achieved without having to write down any derived datas,
then doing a typed entery (retyping) the data for use in another
step.
A key named SET would allow multiple digit entry for STORE and
RECALL registers. For example STORE then two or three digits
tappeed, then SET is the register number which has the data.
The advantage is that LEARN and PLAY routines can be STORED
intact in memory registers directed through the STORE SET,
and RECALL SET combination. The SET key is almost like a
2nd FUNCTION, except it opens up the use of any number of
memory registers.
In fact, if the Calculator device also had LEARN and PLAY
functions, (coupled to registers just as are STORE and RECALL)
so that every key pressed, and all datas entered, are stored in
sequence in a register, exactly as entered, then PLAY would
automatically redo all of the steps one after the other to
arrive at the same result, each time that same PLAY register
was evoked by a keypress.
To make the fantasy complete, the Calculator device also has to
have a WALK key, which when pressed prior to a PLAY register,
causes the LEARNED steps to proceed step by step with a pause
after each step, so that variable datas can be introduced in the
middle of a sequence whenever wanted, and resuming to the next
step is by pressing PLAY again.
The fantasy ends with a laugh. No such Calculator device with
such simple and rote keystroke functions, exists. The fantasy
concludes by wiping away the existence of programmable logic
currently in use in solid state calculators, with one quick
but mighty sweep of a hand, with God attached to the elbow.
In its place, grinning entities arrive with arms loaded with
programmable calculators and computers with mighty complex
algebra algorythm softwares, a couple of hours spent to
enter one step, with 34 more steps to go, to do one factor
done in 30 seconds flat by the 'Simple Calculator Logic' as
in the above DEMO. The grinning entities take over. That is
what you've got to work with. I stayed with the Monroe 326.
 end of KEYBOARD 
PART 16 
CANDIDATE FOR THE ILLUSIVE 'HIGGS' BOSON

In the images, a + and  factor alluding to the mean orbit of
the Earth's MOON has been used throughout, in producing exact
states of Charge, and whole integer 1/3, 2/3, and 4/3 units
of the Electron mass.
If the Moon + feature has a (mass/wave) equivalent mass, its
wave (Compton) will be in the order of 3.84401 x 10 to 17 cm
and is equivalent mass energy will be
[513,336] MeV +
or roughly about 6 times the mass energies of the W and Z
Weak Vector Bosons.
At that mass there will be some +  fluctuation due to
variable drifts when
factoring particle
masses in eccentric
sets with orbit/wave
datas stamped in iron
(as fixed constants).
For instance the slightest discrete
change in estimate upon the size of
Earth's eccentricity will result in
noticable drift in derived mass for
the W and Z bosons. Tiny changes in
the assumed orbit of the Moon, will
have major changes upon a resulting
mass for a fundamental entity mass.
EARTH ECCENTRICITY

Z o = h^/(Earth eccentricity) = 78,881.0757663 MeV
W +  = h^/(Earth eccentricity)  moon = 93,202.9697111 Mev
ACCELARATOR SMASHES Weak Vector Bosons

Z o = [91,187] MeV FIT
W +  = [80,220] MeV FIT
 end of HIGGS 
PART 17 
MOVE THE OUTER PLANETS OVER TO THE ELECTRON

Sun  Point of Center


Mercury  Playing with Mars

Venus  Host to 3/2 XION harmonics

Earth  Host to 1/2+ XION harmonics

Mars  Playing with the Proton


 4 planets 
 JUPITER  Hanging around mediating
+ 4 planets  7/2 x 1/FSC = N^


Saturn  Host to the PION
 2 E x FSC

Uranus  Electron power amplification
 1 E x FSC

 The energy equivalent of the
 Classical Electron Radius

Neptune  Electron power amplification
 2/3 E x FSC

Pluto  Electron power amplification
 1/2 E x FSC


=====================================================================
Here are factored (wave/orbit) datas for the outer planets,
based on approximations to a power amplitude unit comprising
the ELECTRON (E) times the FSC.
=====================================================================
for  E x FSC = 70.025262505 MeV
when  E = .510999065 MeV




7/2 E x FSC factor JUPITER  h^/Jupiter = 253.526682297 MeV
 x 2/7 = 72.436199942 MeV
  2 N^ + 1/3 E
 = 70.019891963 MeV
 

2 E x FSC factor SATURN  h^/Saturn = 138.281948660 MeV
 + N^ + E = 140.086265725 MeV
 x 1/2 = 70.025262505 MeV
 

1 E x FSC factor URANUS  h^/Uranus = 69.628291267 MeV
 + N^  2/3 E
 = 70.069944159 MeV
 

2/3 E x FSC factor NEPTUNE  h^/Neptune = 43.883763386 MeV
  N^ + 8 E x 3/2
 = 70.017656859 MeV
 

1/2 E x FSC factor PLUTO  h^/Pluto = 33.445304979 MeV
 + 2 N^  4 E
 = 70.019885699 MeV
 

=====================================================================
Except for the SATURN (wave/orbit) data there is nothing
definative about these derivations. It is just that there
are no other elements of energy in the physics of particle
mass that occurs in the region 1.293318 MeV right up to
mass of the MUON at 105.658 MeV, except for the ELECTRON
times FSC (the Fine Structure Constant) at 70.02526250 MeV.
And here is it in basic whole integer ratio approximations
to the outer planets by coincidence or not via the digits
of the outer planet's orbits in the CGS system.
=====================================================================
Planet orbits are not known to be in any lineal summed order, other
than in an approximating geometric progression known as Bode's Law
in which AU (Astronomical Unit) orbits loosely follow the digital
numbers of the Fibonnaci series of golden ratio harmonics.
Bode's Law was sucessful in suggesting approximate orbital distances
for Uranus and Pluto, which were later found, but did not include an
orbit for Neptune.
In light of this, Bode's Law is concidered
by many to be an act of coincidence.
SOLAR (WAVE/MASS) HARMONICS coincidence?
Another coincidence (or not) involved ratio units of
E x FSC and includes Neptune, but is only good for
the outer planets Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto.
The coincidence side is that inner planet orbits do not fall into
line in any clear cut fashion as do the outer four orbits. On the
other side, the non coincidence side is due to fact that there are
no possible candidates for (wave/mass) interactions for mass energy
equivalents for the outer planets, except for only four mass energy
equivalents which actually do occur in the mass range of particle
physics in the range from the Electron through to the Pion particle.
The muon is within this range, but is not seen in the (orbit/mass)
correspondences of the planets. What are seen are amplified Electron
mass units. Specifically, the mass energies of
1/2 E x FSC, 2/3 x E, 1 E x FSC,
and 2 E x FSC,
(where E is Electron mass). These fall directly in line as
(orbit/wave) correspondences for the outer four planet orbits.
Saturn h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 2 E x FSC
Uranus h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 1 E x FSC
Neptune h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 2/3 E x FSC
Pluto h^/(orbit/mass) approximates the MeV of 1/2 E x FSC
1 E x FSC is a mass energy equivalent for the classical Electron
Radius, and 1/2 E x FSC is a mass energy equivalent if the Electron
Radius was concidered instead an Electron Diameter, so that the term
2 PI instead of 4 PI turned up in derivations of certain fundamental
constants.
Mercury
Venus
 Earth  h^ /(orbit/mass) = 1319.04938308
Mars
 4 PLANETS
 JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV
x 3/2
+ 1 Electron
+ 1 Proton = 1319.07333250 MeV
h^ /(mass/orbit) 1319.07333250 MeV
= Earth mean orbit = 1.4959 52108
divide by 1.4959 7928
= 99.9981843 %
 JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV
+ 4 PLANETS
Saturn h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 2 E x FSC
Uranus h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 1 E x FSC
Neptune h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 2/3 E x FSC
Pluto h^/(orbit/mass) = MeV of 1/2 E x FSC
NOTE 1 Electron x FSC is the MeV mass energy equivalent
for the classical Electron radius
one of the most fundamental among
the physical constants.
SMOKE FROM THE GREAT PYRAMID

wiring the sky with fancy logic
In which 70.02 MeV factors were already
readily at hand for the four outer planets,
the question a challenge it being is there
a similar unit to be found in inner planet
factors....
The answer is yes, if you restore the Hubble
telescope to its original condition, and go
back to the days when the best astronomers
described canals on MARS in detail.
 MERCURY h^ /(mean orbit) = 3456.36490683
reduce by 49
 E
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.027060258 MeV
============
 VENUS h^ /(mean orbit) =
 6 Electron
reduce by 26
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.019534998 MeV
============
 EARTH h^ /(mean orbit)
+ 3 Electron
reduce by 19
+ 1 Electron
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.015334863 MeV
============
 MARS h^ /(mean orbit) = 865.693492707
reduce by 12
 4 E
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.097128132 MeV
============
also
 MARS h^ /(mean orbit) = 865.693492707
 Proton mass
= 72.578817292
 5 electron
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.023821967 MeV
============
for E = .510988552 MeV

.510999065 MeV FIT
 4 PLANETS
 JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV
+ 4 PLANETS  N^ MeV
reduce by 7/2
 4 Electrons
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.026691593 MeV
============
also
 JUPITER h^ /(mean orbit) = 253.526682297 MeV
times 3/2
+ 1 Electron
+ 1 Proton = 1319.07333250 MeV
h^ /(mass/orbit) 1319.07333250 MeV
= Earth mean orbit = 1.495952108

1.49597928
= 99.9981843 %
 SATURN h^ /(mean orbit) = 138.281948660 MeV
+ N^
+ 1 Electron
reduce by 4/2
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.025261820 MeV
============
 URANUS h^ /(mean orbit) = 68.765314337 MeV
+ N^
reduce by 2/2
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.058632337 MeV
============
here comes neptune
 NEPTUNE h^ /(mean orbit) = 43.883763377 MeV
+ N^
+ 3 Electron
raise by 3/2
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.065117871 MeV
============
 PLUTO h^ /(mean orbit) = 33.445304979 MeV
+ N^
+ 1/2 Electron
raise by 4/2
 1/3 Electron
= 1 Electron x FSC = 70.041770860 MeV
============
NOTE 33.445603300 also approximates the
(Pion  Muon) mass difference
PION MUON
(139.56995) FIT  (105.658389) FIT
= 33.400561940 + 1 Electron
 end of PART 17: MOVE THE OUTER PLANETS OVER TO THE ELECTRON 
PART 18 
GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT SPECULATION

It can be suggested that a monumental project can be undertaken
in which planetary orbits are derived from particle (mass/wave)
harmonics to as high an accuracy as deemed fitting wherein the
derived (wave/orbit) planet values are then used in a discrete
reverse engineering, to derive the gravitational constant, all
planets as individually derived from (wave/orbit)) values, all
hustled to extract a singlular gravitational constant for each
including each derived eccentricity.
The project will succeed if the derived Universal Gravitational
constant comes the same to high digital accuracy for all of the
planets involved.
PART 19 
BOOMS FROM THE ROOMS OF JUPITER

A question has been hanging tough since day one. If SATURN
holds a metaphorical/modelling image for the PION, what does
JUPITER have to offer. Well, actually, not much, it seems, in
any stark fashion. No PROTON standing naked here, for instance.
Instead, JUPITER's contribution is a balloon unit, to wit:
h^/(Jupiter) = 253.526682297 MeV
which is the lineal sum mass unit increment for the
1/2+ SIGMA o stable octuplet particle
(1192.55) MeV FIT
when 253.526682297 MeV + P+ + N^  E
= 1192.58131123 MeV
This is very close to the 1/2+ SIGMA o
mass gained from VENUS, via the string:
h^/(Venus)  Moon  P+ x 2/7 + P+ + E
= 1192.56210445 MeV
which is identical to the 1/2+ SIGMA o
mass gained from EARTH, via the string:
h^/(Earth)  P+ x 2/3 + P+ + N^  5/3 E
= 1192.56534494 MeV
Otherwise, hohum, hacking could seem to produce
just about any desired relationship.
And then a B O N A N Z A !
When the eccentricity of JUPITER is explored,
(Jupiter mean of orbit  perihelion), the 1/2 wave value
is a mass that lands in the midst of UPSILON particle masses
but is not matched by any experiment. However, when the moon of
Earth's orbit is added and subtracted to the Jupiter eccentricity
factor, in a simple lineal sum array, two precise UPSILON states are
seen in an instant, these being the S 3 and S 4 masses.
The wide arm embrace offered by the wave (Compton) values
for these states is so exact that over a dozen other
particle masses can be determined as a direct
consequence of the two mass's resonances.
The fact that the two mass resonances have two
Compton wavelengths which are matched by the wide
arms of Jupiter's eccentricity is astonishing, when
it is concidered that there is no deviation from solar
orbital data, except for a tiny discrete downshift in the
value assigned for the orbit of the moon of Earth, which then
results in a seeming set of CONSTANT values for the S 3 and S 4
UPSILON mass states of such accuracy that dozens of particle masses
can be linked together in a running cascade of interlinked masses
spanning a range beginning from the start of J/PSI charmed
particle occurrences to high in the upper range of
UPSILONS, with all masses calculated, and
all mass/energies used as intervals
between, lock stepped together
in accuracies to 6 and 7
significant digits
for their masses.
Unquestionable
eccentricity
fundamental.
Hence the word B O N A N Z A !
Jupiter was then also found later to be parading around the
giant hexagram which holds the Trojans arm in arm with MARS
leaving a trail of stable ETAs at every gravitational whump
and conjunction.
IN OSCILLATING ENGINEERING

Initial Plank's converting Final Plank's converted
h^/(Jupiter) x 3/2 + P+ + E x 1/h^
gains an EARTH orbit as 1.4959 51208 x 10 to 13 cm
compared to the real EARTH 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm
In the calculator logic system used for these derivations
the term 1/h^ is impractical, due to digital truncation
inherent in the reciprocal of 1/h^ = 1/1973.27053320
= .ooo506772
and so the 'oscillating engineering'
string is factored in two parts, as:
Initial Plank's converting

h^/(Jupiter) x 3/2 + P+ + E = Initial MeV
_
= 1319.07412251 MeV
Final Plank's converted

h^/(Initial) = 1.4959 51208 x 10 to 13 cm
where EARTH orbit is 1.4959 7927 x 10 to 13 cm
and
_
h^/(Earth) = 1319.04938308 MeV
ANOTHER 'OSCILLATING ENGINEERING' EXAMPLE FOR JUPITER

h^/(Jupiter) x 3  P+ change sign  N^ + 5/3 E
_
= 177.250610216 MeV
_
which approximates N^ x FSC for N^ = 1.293460286 MeV
The REAL N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
and closely approximates an EARTH orbit derivative as:
h^/(Earth)  P+ x 7/3 x 1/5  N^ + 5/3 E
_
= 177.254314547 MeV
_
which approximates N^ x FSC for N^ = 1.293487318 MeV
Actually, this N^ extraction from JUPITER is just another
of the BALLOON numbers in hiding, written a different way.
The main BALLOON numbers for N^ oscillations are spelled
forth in Yin Yang PROTON Ping.Pongs involving EARTH
orbit under 'PROTON (plus.minus) PING.PONGS' in PART 10.
in conjunction with 'THE YIN YANG AMPLITUDES' in PART 9.
 end PART 19 
PART 20 
The Theory of Flutters

An increasing impression is that when particles collide at
high speed to produce energetic reactions which then decay
the choice of decays may be due to flutters in the form of
minor variants in resulted wavelengths due to variances in
the major (wave/orbit) components if the components happen
to comprise (plus.minus) factors in the (wave/orbit) terms
which are further discretely modified by (plus.minus) moon
terms.
Since, for instance a whole number of KAONS of both charges
seem to be cropping up, each with tiny variances in resulting
mass but major differences in their component constructs, the
flutter idea may be involved.
ULTRA SMALL VARIABLES

In going for the final iotas, it has been noticed with routine
regularity that ultra small units of mass can seem to abound in
clicking together hooks and links to comprise particles.
Question is are these ultra tiny units of mass, mirages, or real.
In the main, the ultra tiny units of mass can comprise the Electron's
Rydberg Energy Constant (binding energy); the socalled NEUTRINO used
in this disclosure as N^ x 1/FSC squared; or also, a 1/3 unit of
Electron mass x 1/FSC; and 2/3 E x 1/FSC, and so on.
On the planetary side, a planet (wave/orbit) augmented by the planet's
radius in plus or minus fashion, usually plus, can seem to cause certain
things to line up winch fashion. The problem is, that a minute change in
one variable (input for instance), can result in minute changes in other
variables (end product of a string) for instance, where any ultra small
units of mass seemingly inherent will be different. Wooooh !
So, the sting is in place; if ultra small units of
mass are valid, just what actual ultra smalls the
units are, is up for grabs.
If you want ultra smalls you've got to hard
wire the equations to eliminate ambiguities.
An example of ambiguity (due to inability to Hard Wire at this time)
is next included just to show what is meant by 'Ultra Smalls' and
to show just what can be meant by 'ambiguity'.
ULTRA SMALL EXAMPLE 1

How far to push the limit ?
ultra small ultra small
 
h^/ 1/2 (Earth + radius) + (Mars + radius)  P+ + 1/3 E
= N^  E x FSC for
N^ = 1.293308153
when N^ = [1.293318] MeV FIT
Mars radius = .oooo33966 x 10 to 13 cm
Earth radius = .000063675 x 10 to 13 cm
ULTRA SMALL EXAMPLE 2

ultra small ultra small ultra small
  
h^/ (Mars + radius)  P+ = (E++^ x FSC) + 5 E++^
when E++^ = E + 1/2 (E x 1/FSC squared)
which is E plus its own binding energy.
The mirage occurs when something ultra small is changed,
for instance minus the radius, instead of plus. Then
the stuff at the end can be quite different ultra small
wise.
 end of Theory Of Flutters 
PART 21 
INTRINSIC SYMBOLIC LOGIC

NEWTONIAN LOGIC
If A B C are acted upon by D, they become new A B C.
If new A B C are acted upon by another D, they become
another A B C. Therefore the differences between original
D and new D are new variables A and B.
12 difference insights in 4 different concept sets
are symbolized by just 4 characters. Wrapped up
nice and neat. No wasted headroom.
As you can see, distinguished scholarship will be needed
to ferrit insights from that kind of logical mess, which
is a logic that acts like an anenome snuffing up to keep
all of its body parts hidden.
Reality does not work that way. Everything has a name or
label or symbol to keep multiple insights uniquely apart
and clearly out in the open.
In this disclosure an exacting attempt has been made to keep
image methods, picture means, and symbols, as consistent as
possible from one step to the next, in accumulating details
throughout the disclosure.
DISCLOSURE LOGIC
If A B C are acted upon by D, they become E F G.
If E F G are acted upon by H, they become I J K.
Therefore the differences between D and H are variables
L and M. And so on.
In other words, each kind of data, or consistent variable,
has its own name or symbol. There is no reduction to the
lowest possible terms in this disclosure.
You cannot reduce a deck of cards to boolean symbols, and
win at pocker that way. The names and digits of the cards
are what are factored to produce winning hands.
PART 22 
RIFF RAFF

==========================================================
Riff Raff stuff that may or may not hold keys to intuition
==========================================================
Planets JUPITER and SATURN, with the orbit of the
EARTH added, produce harmonic wave/energy strings
that come close to, but do not close in on, other
energy units which bridge between particle states
in the manner of BALLOONS cited elsewhere.
The same is true for JUPITER and SATURN, with VENUS added.
In these RIFF RAFF arrangements, no exactitudes
are seen, agreements resulting allude to, but do
not equal, datas from other derived sources. The
RIFF RAFF stuff has been included for two reasons.
1. They may be relevant, with some small
adjustment factors, nature unknown at
the moment.
2. They may relate to 'widths' cited in
the data tables in MeV units many of
which have MeV values ranging within
the RIFF RAFF values.

COMMENT ABOUT RIFF RAFF's

PLUS
Only Planet + Planet factors
seem to involve any interest.
MINUS
Planet  Planet factors produce terms that seem
to connect to nothing, all of the  terms are
out in the wilderness on their own.

HERE ARE THE RIFF RAFF VALUES


h^/ JUPITER = 253.526682297 MeV
 approximates basic OCTUPLET mass
unit of 126 Mev = (1/2 x 253.5 MeV)
===================
h^/ JUPITER + venus = 222. 581730464 MeV
x 2  P+ + E = 493.619848136 MeV
 approximates KAON o mass
= [493.677] FIT
h^/ JUPITER + earth = 212.65760439 MeV
=================== x 1/2  N^ = 105.033562219 MeV
approximates 3/2 E x FSC
for E = .5109 77992 MeV
when E = [.510999065] FIT
===================
h^/ SATURN + venus = 128.535107693 MeV
x 2  2 N^ + P+  1/3 E
 = 1192.58555636 MeV
when 1/2+ SIGMA o = [1192.55] FIT
h^/ SATURN + earth = 125.160775109 MeV
=================== x 2 + P+ + N^  E
= 1189.37617915
when 1/2+ SIGMA + = [1189.37] FIT
also approximates 1/2 of h^/(Jupiter)
= 126.763341148 MeV
the difference = 1.6025660339 MeV
approximating
E x Pi
when E x Pi = 1.605350908 MeV
==================================
h^/ JUPITER + 1/2 (earth + venus)

= 217.504514119 MeV
x 1/2
= 108.752257059 MeV
 1/2 E
= N^  E x FSC
for N^ = 1.293300414 MeV
when N^ = 1.193318 FIT

h^/ SATURN + 1/2 (earth + venus)
==================================
= 126.825500910 MeV
x 2
= 253.651001820 MeV
which is the BALLOON
resonance of
h^/(jupiter) + moon = 253.651955957 MeV
253.651001820
accuracy ratio  99.9996238 %
253.651955957
 end of RIFF RAFF 
PART 23 
ERRATA

===============================================
The MUON and NEUTRON they sang offkey
===============================================
> SHORT STORY Read if Interested.
 Or skip below to STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION.
 

skip

 Hold the phone! Something has just come up about the NEUTRON.

 In all other places in this disclosure, a NEUTRON's presence is
 implicitely implied whenever entity N^ is cited in a derivation
 since N^ is deemed the (NeutronProton) mass difference, given
 as 1.293318 MeV FIT in the 1994 Particle Data Tables.

 There is a slight ambiguity as to this value being the actual
 (NeutronProton) mass difference, since the real NEUTRON mass
 is given as 939.56563 MeV FIT, in which the (NeutronProton)
 real mass difference is then 1.292530 MeV, which is less by
 a few pennies then the FIT value of 1.293318 MeV FIT.

 What does all this mean, says the guru. Nothing, says
 the astronomer. Discredit! says the particle physicist.

 Wrong! says the examination inspector!

 The problem turns out to be bogus.
 Just an ordinary little oversight.

 The wrong mass was being used for the PROTON for a
 couple of weeks. It was 938.2731 MeV. The correct
 mass is 939.27231 MeV. When the correct P+ mass
 is used, then P+ + N^(1.293318 MeV) does in fact
 equal the Neutron FIT mass of 939.56563 MeV.

 Sorry. Add it to the list of doable don'ties.

 This little episode has been included here, as an
 illustration of how crank concepts arise from too
 little intelligence, too much haste, and too much
 smirk.

 Let's carry on as if the crank and the
 fatal flaw adventure, never happened.



begin
A STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION Beyond Coincidence

The PROTON mass used in the following
is the bogus value; 938.2731 MeV.
The LAMBDA mass increment for the PROTON and the MUON do not
seem to be singing from the same sheet of music. The NEUTRON
seems to be the true RESONANCE factor attached to the MUON.
One can deduce the other to 7
significant digits of accuracy.
Concider the following intones:
When
MUON mass = 105.658389 MeV FIT
E x 1Pi = 1.60350908 MeV = E 1Pi
when Pi = 3.141592653 ratio
then
MUON + (E 1Pi)  1/3 E all divided by the FSC
+ E = 1.292497467 MeV
+ P+ = 939.56 4807467 MeV
 99.99 8624365 %
yields the real NEUTRON = 939.56 563 MeV
In fact, tying the above to the N^ FIT value,
N^ = 1.293318 MeV FIT
 2/3 E divided by 1Pi divide by FSC =
.ooo791303 MeV
= 1.292526694 MeV
+ P+ = 939.5656 26694 MeV
 99.99999 89 %
yields the real NEUTRON = 939.5656 3 MeV
And so the MUON and LAMBDA seem to be cousins after all.
Does this mean, dare it be said,
that E 1Pi divided by FSC is
a candidate for a MUON neutrino
mass ? or is somehow related ?
For instance, more than one state ?
1 E divided by Pi divided by FSC
2/3 E divided by Pi divided by FSC
WITNESS
MUON + (E 1Pi)  1/3 E all divided by the FSC
+ E = 1.292497467 MeV
+ 2/3 E divided by 1Pi divide by FSC
= 1.293288773 MeV
x FSC + 1/3 E = 177.39439783 MeV
+ P+ = 1115.67053978 MeV
 99.999 3313 %
1/2+ LAMBDA = 1115.678 MeV EXPRMT

REACCELARATE GO TO THE LAMBDA from the NEUTRON

real NEUTRON  PROTON = 1.292530 MeV
939.56563  938.2731 = 1.292530 MeV
+ 2/3 E divided by 1Pi divide by FSC = .ooo791303 MeV
= 1.293321305 MeV
x FSC = 177.231564877 MeV
+ 1/3 E + P+ = 1115.67499789 MeV
 99.999 7309 %
1/2+ LAMBDA = 1115.678 MeV EXPRMT
and/or 1115.67499789 MeV
 99.999 1931 %
1/2+ LAMBDA = 1115.684 MeV FIT

DEACCELARATE GO TO THE MUON from the NEUTRON

the real NEUTRON = 939.565 63 MeV FIT
real PROTON = 938.2731 MeV FIT
diff = 1.292530 MeV
 E
x FSC
 E 1Pi
+ 1/3 E
MUON = 105.662847115 MeV FIT
real MUON 105.658389 MeV FIT
Notice a slight 'drift' when derived
in this direction NEUTRON > MUON.

REVERSE ENGINEERING GO TO THE NEUTRON from the MUON

real MUON = 105.658389 MeV FIT
real MUON + (E 1Pi)  1/3 E and all divided by FSC
+ E = 1.292497467 MeV
+ P+ = 939.565 597467 MeV
 99.99999 65 %
yields the real NEUTRON = 939.565 63 MeV FIT
A STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION beyond Coincidence.
PICTURE 1 NEUTRON

MeV

 LAMBDA  1115.684
+ x FSC
  E
 1.292530 + 2/3 E divided by Pi
 divided by FSC
 MUON  105.658389
 1.292530 x FSC  E 1Pi + 1/3 E
 NEUTRON  939.56563
+ 1.292530
 PROTON  938.2731

A tiny bit of mass 'flutter'
will be noticed when using
1.292530 MeV for all
derivations.
 End of The MUON and NEUTRON they sang offkey 
PART 24 
THE MARRIAGE

A marriage of SOLAR DYNAMIC and CHROMO DYNAMIC physics:
There seems to have been a recent serendipitous moment in time,
when astronomers proceeding foward with revising the value of
the gravitational constant, and physicists proceeding foward
with values of fundamental particles and progressing at a
different speed, produced results which momentarily
collided.
The collision occurred with the gravitational Solar statistics
of 1981, and the Particle experimental statistics of 1994.
New solar astrophysical datas and Planetary Constants have
moved the planet orbits up in size in discrete ways, such
that clear cut images in the form of SOLAR models for a
host of elementary particle masses, do NOT agree with
any self evident regularity, nor without ambiguity.
In the unique instance of a marriage between 1981
solar datas, and 1994 particle datas, there is no
ambiguity, and regularity is abundant in clearly
self evident ways.
This disclosure is a snap shot of that marriage.

 end of disclosure 
FINISHED 10:10 PM Friday, January 20, 1995.
REVISED 10:20 PM Thursday, January 26, 1995.
Greydon Moore
Ottawa, Canada.
I wish to thank Dr. Cliff Hargrove of the National
Research Council attached to Carlton University, for
kindly allowing photocopies of pages of data, from a
personal chairman's copy of the thick thome known as
the 1994 Particle Data Reviews.
I also wish to thank artist and author Don Dixon who
apparently went to conciderable extremes compiling the
last minute uptodatebeforepresstime solor Planetary
Constants and datas with complete cooperation from the Jet
Propulsion Laboratories, for a 1981 volume of Dixon astronomy
paintings named UNIVERSE text and paintings by Don Dixon. It
was these efforts by Dixon and the JPL, that provided the
1981 datas referenced immediately above in THE MARRIAGE.
Of course there are also thanks expressed straight to the
Supreme Creators Alpha and Omega for firing down the pipe
the Will Action and Desire to muscle through the homework
and learning curves for this project. It took, in total,
thousands of hours, by one individual in the flesh, me.

 END OF DISCLOSURE 