DEMONSTRATING BY A MECHANICAL MODEL THAT MASS CAN EXPAND, AND SPACE CONTRACT, IN A FIELD OF GRAVITY, SUCH AS IN A STAR PLEASE NOTE: A Dos viewer has been included for your convenience. To use it, shell out to Dos, and at the Dos prompt type: VIEWER MODEL-1.TXT This document has ascii characters. It reads fine at Dos or in any compatable editor but not in Windows. In Windows the ascii characters are substituted by Ansi surrogates such as capital letters and strange looking symbols. In a Windows Browser you cannot read this document's equations, since the strange codes surround and change the equational content's appearance too drastically. The best view is in any Dos environment such as an editor, or by using the enclosed Viewer.com at the Dos prompt. 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 MODEL.1 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 A DEPICTION WITH IMAGES REGARDS A MECHANICAL DEMONSTRATION OF GRAVITY RELATIVITY INFLUENCE ON space AND mass, USING TWO POCKET WATCHES CALLED 'CLOCKS', AS FOLLOWS: IMAGE 1 End position for CLOCK 3 ..........if its chain Ha is not / contracted into length H �---------------------------� i ba by relativitity. | Length Ha = Hi. | CLOCK 2 b � .... 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴�< c -- CLOCK 2 at c is cloned �  by swinging CLOCK 1 � � from LAB 1 via point � In free space. b to space at point c. � a � CLOCK 1 in LAB 1 Chain ba expands to 旼컴^컴커 length bc when SPACE � � (the length of it) is � earth � now free of gravity's 읕컴컴컴� relativity contraction. The mass of CLOCK 2 at c is now decreased and so is less than that of CLOCK 1 in LAB 1. IMAGE 2 b 蝦컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 c -- CLOCK 2 in free space. � | Free space is removed � | from Earth far enough Moving � | that Earth's relativity CLOCK 2 � | due to gravity has no from its a � CLOCK 1 in LAB 1 | effect. position 旼컴^컴커 | in � � | Points b and d are LAB 1, � earth � | equidistant from main 180 읕컴^컴켸 | point c; and lengths degrees LAB 2 | bc, cd, de, ef, and around g  -- CLOCK 2 is -X- d fg are all equal to the � swung from | free space length bc planet � point e to | (Before Contraction). through � point g, and | free space � now hangs in | From point c, the end of to � space above | CLOCK 2 is swung from pnt the � LAB 2. | b to d. CLOCK 2 is then opposite � | swung from c to e via side of � | pivot point -X-. Then the the Earth. � | end is swung from pnt d � | to f. At point f, CLOCK 2 f 蝦컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 e is then swung from e to g. NOTICE CLOCK 2 actually arrives in space hanging above LAB 2 at point g by a distance equal to 2 units of length Hb of IMAGE 1. This is shown as point g in IMAGE 2, but actually this is not its true position, as shown properly in IMAGE 3, in which three units of Hb are in fact counted. Scaling problems distorting the precise lengths in the images are due to quick sketches not done in 3-D stereo in the computer screen. If drawn on paper then scaling is less of a problem. Of course the Earth's gravity mass is so small that relativistic effects are extemely minor. However, if the Earth mass is increased by a factor of (say) 1,000 then relativity effects due to gravity would be more noticable. Let us assume, then, that the Earth is very heavy, for the moment. In gist, CLOCK 1 cloned as CLOCK 2 is marched around the Earth by 180 degrees, by swinging CLOCK 1 on its chain five times, the chain being at full length in free space free of influences of the Earth's gravity. (Length ab of IMAGE 1 is the length of the chain if contracted by a relativity influence of Earth's gravity. IMAGE 3 CLOCK 1 in LAB 1 | 旼컴^컴커 | Three effects occur to � �.....Earth | bring CLOCK 2 into LAB � LAB 2 � | 2 on Earth. Relative a ^ j k g 읕컴^컴켸 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴�... | gain in MASS is enough � : : : (g) k | CLOCK 2 in LAB 2 � : | to pull the assembly � : : : | � : | fg to pnt Lj. Space � : : : j ^ 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴커 � : | contraction ........... � : : : | � � : | � : : : | Actual position of CLOCK 2 for IMAGE 2 (in more precise b � m n m g ^ -------------------------- -X- d imaging in these | � � � : | rotations). | � � � : | H � L m n �.................�..�..: | ....... � � � | shortens LENGTH Lj to � � � | mj, as ordinary gravity m 냐컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴냐켸 | does the rest, pulling � � | assembly mj to nk. Thus � � | CLOCK 2 lands in LAB 2 L 냐컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴� | exactly on the other � | side of the Earth from � | LAB 1. f 蝦컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴> e HERE IS THE NEWS Suppose CLOCK 2 arriving at position g has just barely dipped into the Earth's range of influence, close enough to Earth that the Earth's gravitational relativity can have an effect on the MASS of CLOCK 2, so as to begin to increase the MASS of CLOCK 2. The relativity increase is just enough to tip the balance, so that Earth gravity can now cause CLOCK 2 to start moving closer to Earth. Mass increasing continues until original rest mass and maximum gain in MASS caused by the Earth, pulls CLOCK 2 into LAB 2 at the Earth. At this moment, both CLOCKS 1 and 2 should have identical MASSES, consisting of their original rest masses, plus their extra masses gained by the relativistic effect of Earth's gravity. At the same time, as CLOCK 2 begins to move closer to the Earth, the LENGTH of it's CHAIN begins to contract due to the Earth gravity's relativity effect on SPACE. In effect, g moves to k, and length gm of IMAGE 3 will end up the same as length ab of IMAGE 2, as shown in the line to the left in IMAGE 3. THIS IS THE JIST Suppose the two watches (CLOCK 1 at LAB 1, and CLOCK 2 at position g in IMAGE 3) were connected by a single line, and that all points (b, c, d, e, and f,) were pulleys locked in position in free space by thrusters, so that effectly pulling on CLOCK 2 at position g would result in inertia free movement of the string, such that CLOCK 1 would be pulled out of LAB 1, if CLOCK 2 is pulled into LAB 2. THEN THE FOLLOWING LITTLE STORY COULD HAPPEN .... .... A lab technician reaches up and pulls CLOCK 2 in IMAGE 3 from position g where it hangs in space, down into LAB 2 at position k. Technically the lab technician is adding extra MASS to CLOCK 2 to pull it home in place in the lab. This extra is (FORCE E), which also has to be exerted constantly by the technician to keep CLOCK 2 in place in the lab. The technician notices that this amount of force (FORCE E) can thus be equal to that which would constantly result, if CLOCK 2 became heavier on its own, due to Earth's gravity relativity. However, in order for CLOCK 2 to be pulled into LAB 2, the attraction of all gravity at CLOCK 1 would have to be shut off, so that CLOCK 1 could be pulled into space free from LAB 1. A break in symmetry. On the other hand, (FORCE E) is extra tug needed to pull CLOCK 2 from where it hangs in space into LAB 2, when all gravities for the Earth stay as is. And so the technician reaches up and pulls CLOCK 2 into LAB 2. Since CLOCK 2 is attached to CLOCK 1 by pulleys, CLOCK 1 leaves LAB 1, and its chain expands, as simultaneously its total MASS decreases. What interesting news, exclaims the technician, that (FORCE E) is the net consequence of two effects of a single relativistic ratio which the technician now calls (RATIO E), the two being Mass increase and Space contraction. The technician already knows what (RATIO E) is. The technician knows it by the simple fact that if the relativity effect of Earth's gravity is (EFFECT G), then the time (TIME 1) of CLOCK 1 in LAB 1 of IMAGE 1 has slowed by the factor (TIME 1) x (EFFECT G), such that (RATIO E) is the ratio of times between (CLOCK 1) � (CLOCK 3), since CLOCK 1 runs slower than CLOCK 3, due to relativity in Earth's gravity. And so: (RATIO E) = (EFFECT G). In the mechanical model the technician is playing with, the technician can see right away that the effects of gravity relativity on SPACE and MASS are supportive, rather than singular. That is, that the amount of force expended in pulling CLOCK 2 from position g to position k is accumulatively a two step deal, in which (RATIO E) expands the MASS of CLOCK 2 by: MASS � (RATIO E), and actually contracts the universe which contains the CHAIN of CLOCK 2 by: SPACE x (RATIO E). It is clear that the two steps accumulate together to bring CLOCK 2 into LAB 2 in IMAGE 3. Whereas in IMAGE 1 just by itself, an expansion of MASS at LAB 1 is merely assumed. And the contraction of space in the watch's chain is assumed in the difference between lengths ba and Ha. And both events are singular in keeping with a third singular event which Is the dilation of time for CLOCK 1 when in LAB 1 on Earth. Clearly, increase in MASS and decrease in DISTANCE and dilation (slowing) of TIME due to General Relativity (GRAVITY), is in keeping with the same three effects on (ELECTROMAGNETISM) due to Special Relativity. Hmmmm. Well, actually, it seems in IMAGE 3 that a dilation of time has no direct link with the expansion of MASS and contraction of SPACE involving CLOCK 2. The technician is aware enough to write: HOW DOES IT ALL ADD UP ? Rest TIME x (RATIO E) = gravity effect on TIME at LAB 1. Rest MASS � (RATIO E) = gravity increased MASS = (INFLUENCE 1). Rest SPACE x (RATIO E) = gravity contracted SPACE = (INFLUENCE 2). And so: (INFLUENCE 1) with (INFLUENCE 2) = (FORCE E). Wherein: (INFLUENCE 1) is equal to the effort needed to pull the mass of CLOCK 1 free of LAB 1. And: (INFLUENCE 2) is equal to the effort needed to pull the SPACE of the universe inward toward LAB 2, so that the length of the chain gm of CLOCK 2 in IMAGE 3 is the same as the length of the chain ba of CLOCK 1 when CLOCK 1 was in LAB 1 on Earth. HERE IS A SUMMARY At the onset, CLOCK 2 hangs in space by two units of a 'measure' in space above LAB 2 on Earth. In order for CLOCK 2 to arrive in LAB 2 of IMAGE 3, two events in gravitational relativity HAVE TO OCCUR simultaneously: The MASS of CLOCK 2 has to increase relativistically, and the length of CLOCK 2's chain has to contract in SPACE relativistically. Contracting the SPACE of CLOCK 2's chain, by effect of (RATIO E), is enough to move CLOCK 2 from position g of IMAGE 3, to position j of IMAGE 3. And increasing the MASS of CLOCK 2, by effect of (RATIO E), is enough to cause CLOCK2 to dip the final distance into home plate at k in LAB 2. No other operations can work in the model. For instance, a MASS decrease and SPACE increase will not work, nor will simultaneous MASS increase and SPACE increase. Etc. However an increase in the length of the chain of CLOCK 1 when pulled out of LAB 1 could be said to provide the extra unit of length needed to get CLOCK 2 into LAB 2 on the other side of the Earth. Oh well. Worth noting is that polarity of the CLOCKS has not changed, as indicated by the up ^ arrows at point 'a' of IMAGE 1 and point 'k' of IMAGE 3. Whereas the direction of the pull of the Earth's gravity has reversed. Ergo an obvious anomaly (or break) in symmetry. 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 CHAPTER 18 (from: The Farstar Stories) 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 Nancy has left all of this above information recorded in her Farstar Unit in the form of a typewritten travalogue which can stand entirely on its own as a workshop description, plus the visual 2-D non-stereo diagrams left in the screen. Nancy's travelogue otherwise describes a sequential flow of images and reasons for each image, the content of the storage comprising that which was typed, that which is image, and that which happened to get registered from Nancy's private thoughts, in that the stored information also serves as a demonstration of leaks in thought of the kind which can intuitionally stimulates and motivates other people privately. So she sustained the recorded thought leaks, didn't earase them. In other words, there is every reason to believe in the serendipity factor, wherein, in some other minor or major corner of the planet, in consciousness, someone else, or some others, might now be thinking along similar lines to Nancy's. The thinking would be prompted upon illuminations that originate in much higher First Cause levels of reality. (Also, of course, others could be getting merely the thought impulses, and putting onto them false ideas. Witness Sluggo's attempt to use the model of a pully to try to tautologize effects on Space and Mass by gravitational relativity; the very reverse of Nancy's approach to the problem; Sluggo being temporarily motivated by thoughts of reward amongst Earth's famous peers, rather than urges for truth in reality). Whereas, externalized in communications of outer thoughts, through adapted languages via human made equipment on earth, for instance via the Farstar Unit (Nancy had thought in a way that was recorded by Farstar), the described gravity relativistic effects pertaining to Mass and Space (in contrast to radiation and time) are revealed through mechanical principles found in a lineal 2-D space model, as opposed to curved 3-D space (and accelaration) concepts. The two most interesting models so far constructed, thinks Nancy, are assemblies made of mechanical apparatuses, one a staight arrow system, and the other a pulley system. In the pulley model, an end of the apparatus is attached to a point on one side of the earth and connected by a continuous string skirting in a rectangular journey through free space to the other side of the earth. The pulley model is not unlike magnetic lines looping from one pole to the other. For instance there is a string connected to opposite points on the Earth's surface, but no curves in the string, all parts are straight line lineal, (although a giant curve around Earth could also work in the pulley model, but describing THAT would be enough to drive a nut crazy). The action in the pulley model originates with one of the pocket watches at an original point on Earth, called LAB 1. On the far side of the Earth is an identical lab with an identical receptical to recieve the homecoming second pocket watch. As far as Nancy can fathom, the homecoming watch falls short of falling snugly into place into the receptical. The distance of the falling short is proportional to the gravitational relativistic contraction in the link (the chain) between the original watch in the lab on the starting side of the earth (CLOCK 1) and the fixed watch in space (CLOCK 3), also a mass factor. As far as Nancy can deduce, if a small amount of mass weight is added to the homecoming watch it will fall into the second receptical waiting for it in LAB 2. As far as Nancy can deduce, the amount of added mass (over the watch's original rest mass) is exactly proportional to the amount of proportionate contraction in the string linking the fixed watch to the original watch in the original lab, compared to the distance to a corner point position labeled c, gained when the original watch in the lab is cloned then arced out to position c to become the second watch. The rate of proportion in the changed Space and Mass effect are identical to the proportionate change in the rate of Time between CLOCK 1 and CLOCK 3 due to the relativistic effect of Earth's gravity. In this model which includes pulleys, (Nancy for the moment has come to call it the 'freespace pulley model'), the point on the back side of the earth is connected to a mass which is sustained out in free space. The result is that a rotation around the Earth leads to a local break in symmetry. And a relativistic increase in mass weight in gravity is revealed. Connections in all of the models are made of a constant 'measure' repeated. But the lengths of the 'measure' vary, depending on whether the 'measure' ends in space, or one end ends in gravity. Another string-like assembly, which Nancy has called the 'straight arrow' model, has a center point fixed in space, and the two ends ending in gravity between two identical planets with identical labs on their surfaces facing each other, and this is without a symmetry breaking rotation. Identical pocket watches are located in the identical labs at each end of the string. And what is different about the 'straight arrow' model? Well, (Nancy has recorded), the 'freespace pulley' model is a stationary one. The images stand still as constant in space until I do something to change the image, such as add a little mass to the second pocket watch, causing it to drop homecoming into the second lab, changing the image at the original end by means no more esoteric than pulling on a string. Wherein the 'straight arrow' model demonstrates, why, haven't you guessed? In its parameters the observable dimensions of space in a straight line between the two bodies in the 'straight arrow' model begins to inexorably CONTRACT (alter in outer appearance) due to relativity, leading to motive power. An accelaration in gravity has been laid bare. In her simulations, Nancy has presummed the understanding that effects in local fields of gravity of Earth size are so slight as to be hardly discernable, nevertheless, inexorably, there. Not to mention those ultra feeble tugs imparted by the masses of the two pocket watches. Whereas, in fields of powerful gravity the actual effects would be obvious. The contracting of space leads to motive power witnessed as mutual gravitational attraction. Oh but wait. Not quite correct. The contraction would stop unless something else besides space alone also relativistically changed. Ahah, (Nancy is deducing). The apparent weight (rest mass) grows proportionately greater as the two objects gather closer together through the contraction of space, the greater rest masses having the effect of increasing the degree of collapse. Since the effect of collapse in space is identically proportional to the increase in rest mass per given distance separating the bodies, the actual rate of closure between them accelarates as a squared factor, rather than merely continuing at a fixed rate determined by the 'quote' gravity of their combined original masses over an original distance apart. In any case, irrespective of the magnetude of the gravity field, the understanding of existent mechancial properties that demonstrate gravitational relativistic effects involving SPACE and MASS, are easily intuited via the models. The models logically connect when gravity relativisically contracts space surrounding a gravitational source in a halo of diminishing effect further from the source, and relativistically increases the rest mass proportionally, of the gravitational objects per se. In this case, greater rest mass field density in the two planet masses means greater overall relativistic effect, an overall effect greater than just the factor of the two rest masses by themselves. Its no wonder that gravity pulls gravity. Its not the two gravities at all. Its one thing only, it being the relativistic effects of the changing contraction of SPACE and changing GAINS in rest masses mutually doing their thing in real time. The universal gravitational constant is simply the measure of the resulting observable effect. Eerie. Elegant. Think of it (Nancy revieries toward the departed Sluggo), the constant crunching of relativistic space per unit distance apart, coupled with the contant relativistic gain in rest mass per unit distance apart, combines to create accelaration in the net effect continuing to grow more powerful as the physical distance between the gravitation sources is inexorably deleted, seen most ideally when the two bodies are moving straight toward each other. Not to mention a slowing of time, which means the actual effect is a CUBE FACTOR in the gravity between the bodies. This is not to say that such effects can be more truthfully understood by means other than such models. Whoa wait a minute. The relativity actions could contribute to, but not be the source of, the force of gravity. Hmm and hmmmm. Oh oh! It is at this point that Nancy's Farstar Unit was switched off at the end of the test and powered down to zero. - IN DIVINE ORDER - GREYDON MOORE JULY, 1990 REVISED, JUNE, 1992. Copywrite: Greydon Moore March 16, 1991. All Rights Reserved. greydon@look.com