FEATURED LINKS: bell ring at Sirius mottling around Merope mottling in Alpha Pegasus halo lop sided Epsilon Eridani off centered radiant elements in Beta Pegasus radiance of our Sun compared to Sirius Dss comments on Dss images dark holes may be dark (silent) galaxies stereo wrapping of light through telescope lenses - important - white flyers in Alpha Andromeda halo may be torn apart star oscillating star lines are irregular, undulating in and out hordes of planetary ovals in giant star halos
coffee accident splash pattern creates island ovals
discovery of how astronomers have codenamed giant stars
family of planets called Ringworld at giant star Alpha Andromeda
Part 1 Part 3 Special
PART 2 - DSS (DEEP SPACE SKY SURVEY) IMAGES REVEAL SOME GIANT STARS ARE OSCILLATING Giant stars featured are: Alpha Andromeda Alpha Peg Beta Peg Epsilon Eridani Epsilon Peg Sun Sirius
GIANT STAR PLANETOIDS |
|
|
(oscillating) |
(oscillating) |
(flyers) |
|
(lopsided radiance) |
(mottling) |
|
(bellring) |
|
|
|
|
|
in Alpha Peg image |
in Epsilon Peg image |
in Epsilon Peg image |
in Epsilon Peg image |
More big star blasts with planet indications in their halos have been found at the Dss site. Five more giant stars are added to the list, making a total of 16 giant with planetary halos reported at the planets page.
Oscillating Stars - three of the giant stars are oscillating, with ripples around and within their circumpherences - the main thrust of this Oscillat.htm page. This brings the total to four stars with visible ding dong bell symptoms.
This is huge, HUGE - Seinfield
Dss (Deep Space Sky Survey) images are turning out to be a motherload of interesting information about giant nearby stars. Four stars, for instance, are seen to be oscillating at the time they were photographed. All of the major stars of interest have planetoid objects around them in, and surrounding, their bright expanded halos. Many of the planetoids are oval shaped, and point to the center of their parent star.
Stars with Peg in their name are different stars. For example, Epsilon, and Epsilon Peg, are two different giant stars, unrelated.
Effects, such as mottling in Beta Peg, vrs oscillations in Beta Peg, are seen in different Dss image plates, for instance oscillations in Beta Peg are seen in the Dss 1st generation image, and mottling is seen in the 2nd generation (blue) image for giant star Beta Peg.
Most of the following images are Dss 1st generation, and 2nd generation (blue).
To be honest, bookkeeping (for these Dss star images in numerous Dss versions plus enhancements and zooms), has been complex enough. I have therefore abandoned attempt to keep track of exactly which view is a Dss 1st generation, which is a 2nd.
I started out with what I thought was a very elegent bookkeeping system for star names. How long do you think it took for the elegent bookkeeping system to completely break down. You out there who has had to try and keep track of dozens of variations of astronomy images - some used in your work, some not - will known exactly what I mean.
Oscillation in giant stars might be recognizable by trace proportionate circumpherence arcs inside their bright telescope rings, and by fluttering fluctuations photographed within the light amplifying outer circumpherence 'telescope' light ring
Correct me if I am wrong and I will be humbled you bet, otherwise I can see only the ripples of oscillating stars, when looking at the following Dss images.
EPSILON PEG
Please note that thin lines showing oscillations are irregular, that is, they can be undulating in and out in small arc segments at different polar alignments one line to another.
Epsilon Peg halo planets are here
BETA PEG
Mottling, and an offcentered Beta Peg.
A strong offsided element is seen in both Dss plates. Each plate is a different Dss view, which implies Beta Peg was offsided at the time these images were taken.
In these Beta Peg images, the light spikes vector behind the floating foreground face and rim of the star, in sharp stereo focus contrast to light spikes which float stereoscopically well above the star disk.
A large long thin cloud drifts beyond the left hemisphere of Beta Peg.
Click for cloud original
Click for cloud histogram
Beta Peg halo planets are here
ALPHA PEG
Major outburst to the North/west in the Dss 1st gen plate.
The crescendo outburst out the left top is suspicious because all stars in this particular Dss frame show the same outburts out their top left.
Mottling in Alpha Peg halo.
In Dss (2nd gen red) mottling riddles the bright area inside the telescope light circle. A large planet might be a dark dot crossing the upper left brightstar face.
Click for large mottling image
Click for large flares image
Alpha Peg major flares are here
Alpha Peg halo planets are here
ALPHA ANDROMEDA
Alpha Andromeda is a big candidate for the novel prize of star interests. The Dss 2nd gen (red) plate shows numerous small white bright flyers in the halo which may be remnants of a dissolved star. A different plate (Dss 1st gen) of the same star shows oscillations.
Dss 1st gen image shows oscillations in Alpha Andromeda halo.
Oscillating traces in Alpha Andromeda
FLYER FRAGMENTS, REMNANTS MAY BE A TORN APART STAR
Dss 2nd gen (red) image has bright flyers.
Small white 'flyers' in the halo of Alpha And. The abundant flyers continue into dimmer regions beyond the brightest light circles so the phenomena creating them is not restricted to, for instance, the corona.
8888
Since nothing elsewhere has been seen like this (flyers) in Dss images, it is possible to speculate a unique case of fragements of a former star, (or large planet), ripped apart and now scattered closely gathered around 'Epsilon And'.
Click for 1st gen original
Click for 2nd gen red) original
LIGHT SPIKES CASTING STEREO SHADOWS UPON LIGHT RINGS
In an eerie effect, the bright telescope lines in the image immediately above are casting dark lines upon the artifact face of the star, the bright lines stereoscopically floating above the star face. This is seen in 3d by merging the two images together by eyesight.
It means that telescope optics (even in the domain of mono focus lenses) is in part involved with stereoscopic optics, the telescope's overbright spike artifacts being raised separated in spacial distance over the telescope's overbright circular light artifacts.
Stereo space displacement distortion then accounts for the widening curvatures formed below the light spikes, the curvatures I am guessing is by wrapping of periferal light around one (or more) of the telescope's curved lens shapes.
Fundamentally, a telescope's bright light spikes in an image, and diffuse halo with widening 4-way dark echo gaps below the spikes, are two entirely separate light reaction phenomena in the telescope.
Circular light rings are yet again a third entirely separate phenomena, the whole composite comprises a three way artificial reaction as bright light moves through the whole of a telescope's focusing and amplifying systems of optics.
A couple of extra stereo views are shown to cast more light on the eerie nature of the telescope's mechanics influencing the resulting composite star image.
RINGWORLD AROUND GIANT STAR ALPHA ANDROMEDA
A peculiar lineup of island ovals near Alpha Andromeda suggests a possibility of a ring disk (herein called a 'ringworld') around 'Alpha And'. The ovals are seen in the Dss 2nd gen (blue) plate.
Click for 2nd gen (blue) original full size image
A FAMILY OF PLANETS IS IDENTIFIED - CALLED 'RINGWORLD'
A line drawn in, shows east-side west-side consistency, that is, ovals on the east side are in place concistent to be in a ring with ovals on the west side. The east side ovals are less bold compared to the lineal progressive order of the west side ovals.
Click for large image with family of planets identified.
In the large image, a small oval at the right within the star's halo is exactly in a lineup position to be a planet dimmed, seen in a rear orbit through the haze of the star's telescope bright light halo.
Because the string of ovals highlighted on the left side are so much bigger, and bolder seen, this suggests that we are looking at the ellipse of the disk, which, on the left side, is closest to the camera and therefore most free of any masking haze.
Click for large study image without highlighted windows
Notice, using the inserted line as an indicator, that the lineal ovals on the west side slope slightly away, toward the star, the same with the ovals on the east side. These slopes are entirely consistent with a ring arcing around the star, seen nearly on edge at a very shallow angle.
In the ring, larger ovals may be nearer in current circling in the disk, smaller ovals may be farther back in the disk, behind the plane of the star. Just a guess, a lucky guess I hope. The point is, nothing described in the above sentences is contradicted by anything seen regarding the east-side, west-side, progressive ovals in the Dss image.
The seeming 'ring' is also consistent with planets in a specific ecliptic axis orbiting very near the giant star. One, 'ring disk', or the other, 'tight orbits', system is revealed in the above grey image with the inserted line.
An actual family of planets in tight ecliptic orbit, or else in a ring system containing planets around the star, is seen and described in detail. At least seven planets are firmly identified in this 'family' called Ringworld. There can be no question that this is a family of planets in orbit around giant star Alpha And.
I have made no attempt to name each planet. I simply do not know what conventions astronomers use for instant labelling. I know that comets usually get the name of their first observer. An orbiting family of planets is definately a different view, not a comet.
The Ringworld family of planets can be seen in the Dss 2nd gen (blue) orignal plate. The bright 'flyers' imaged further above are easily seen in the Dss 2nd gen (red) original plate.
Alpha Andromeda halo planets are here
Astronomers have not been looking for planets around giant stars in that the technique being used precludes giant stars. Astronomers look for a star being slightly displaced by the tugging of a giant planet orbiting back and forth around it. Secondly, The shadow of a giant planet crossing a small star can be seen in just the exact right circumstances. Proportionate size means a planet no matter how giant will have little to no effect gravitationally tugging back and forth on a giant star that is truely massive in comparison to the size of the planet. A horde of planets orbiting a giant star precludes visible tugging since all tugs from every orbital direction will tend to iron out to null any star displacement. And giant planet shadows, small across huge fiercly blazing giant star faces, are too faintly difficult to detect.
Extreme enhancing by +230 gamma correction then straight conversion in Histogram Equalize reveals more large ovals and splash gobs in the farther outskirts of the Alpha Andromeda plate.
THE SPLASH IMAGES
Call goes out for friend with digital camera, who drops by late in the evening with small inexspensive camera, no manual, the next morning another with price tag of only $79.00 which snaps pics on front side and video on backside, the first time I tried it I had important looking front side pointed to island ovals on table and taped myself via video intently staring into viewfinder.
Deed done. As said, it could not be more exact to image if oval islands had been painted meticulously one by one by a skilled artist, the oval islands splash resulting when a full coffee cup was accidently sloshed onto the work table, I am sure there are friendly gods up there, looking over shoulders from 4th dimensional TV, who like to help from time to time. What an illustration of illustrations.
Therefore, the GIC idea that oval islands are oval due to strong outpressures from the star is more than likely correct, in that the coffee oval islands were all formed by foreward splash velocity and viscious momentums, the oval islands around stars formed by a different creation having similar mechanical principles, ie, foreward momentum slowed by viscious velocity, the giant star ovals shaped by outward blasting solar winds rather than by the stalling mechanisms of pure surface friction on a work table.
The fact that a coffee splash pattern so remarkably matches island ovals, tilts the leading edge indicator to spurious accidents by Earth handling completely unrealated to star consciouness, except, so many stars have oval islands, with most having their island hordes pointing to the center of the star. This leans the cutting edge back toward the leading theory catagory that these are planets or protoforms around giant stars.
MOTTLING AROUND MEROPE
Merope is one of the biggest, though by no means the biggest, stars of the Pleiades also known as the Seven Sisters star group.
The mottling is puzzling, no doubt. A thought occurs that perhaps it is energetic sundry matter whirled and mixed into hot and cold small globules, the cold globs, being less energetic, appear as small dark mottlings.
Click for mottling large closeup.
When you click the link to mottling in the Pleiades 7 Sisters at large, you will see so much mottling it is not hard to assume another giant star somewhere a long time back got too close to two (or more) other giant stars and was ripped apart by gravitational tides, instantly dissolving its centerpoint cohesive gravitational power, allowing its matter to continue to be shredded and ripped apart, eventually to be strewn more or less evenly distributed in similar sized gobs around the right side of the Pleiades, and to be concentrated in the diaphonous drifts of Moon Clouds, which themselves (the Moon Clouds) may have then been an input contribution from one main star torn apart, rather than gradually captured into intermixing Moon Cloud drifts from sundry space matter at large through which the Pleiades stars are drifting.
If you got the above sentence in one, you have got the whole picture regards existence of, and source of, the mottling. Perhaps. I may be not right about the source and success of the mottling. But, then again, I think I am correct. It is a logic problem, A leads to B, which leads to C, which concludes at D, ergo, such wide spread mottling in the Moon Cloud drifts of the Pleiades are a giant star's remnants being well mix-mastered by cross polarization energy blasts from the remaining giant stars, causing matter gobs to be pushed and coherced into the drifts, where the density of the drift's matter causes the pushed gobs to slow down and concentrate. This, is all said in lieu of the another (more lazy) interpretation, that the mottling is nothing else but flaw elements in the photograph.
Both the mottling, and Moon Clouds (diaphanous drifts) peter out abruptly at the right edge of the Pleiades. The same at the left edge. At the outer boundry there is a rapid petering out of glowing materials.
How much mottling occurs in the glowing materials area is more than an academic question. Clicks 3 and 4 next below show traces of mottling in very dim material areas into the right boundry where the Pleiades peters out, for instance. So, how much is there, and how wide spread, in what concentrations of density per single gob, in concidering that the darkest (larger) dots are probably those nearer the camera, or at least less covered by haze.
The Dss 2nd gen (blue) plates of the Pleiades are too large to combine as a composite. Instead, each of three plates is used to identify the Pleiades east-west boundry, clicked next. As well, a fourth plate in composite is used to indicate the lower right boundry.
Click for plate 2
Click for plate 3
Click for plate 4
Click for composite 1
Click for composite 2
The Merope mottling would not be so special without a collaborator in the form of very similar strong mottling, this time within the halo of giant star Beta Peg.
See here for more Pleiades examples.
See here for intense cross polarization in Pleiades Moon Cloud filamentations.
The Dss 2nd generation (red) Merope image shows a slightly off centered star, the offcenteredness probably related per se to the overcover of Moon Clouds.
Merope views in each of the three Dss versions is remarkably different, next, 1st generation, 2nd generation (red), and 2nd Generation (blue). By far the strongest show of Moon Clouds (diaphonous drifting filamentation is in radiance of the (blue) photo.
Click on each of the next three Merope images for full size.
QUICK MEROPE SUMMARY
Remnants of a giant star dissolved by gravitational tides and now populating Merope and all of the Moon Clouds (diaphanous drifts) in the Pleiades seven sisters, and is now in the form of small ubiquitous gobules in the teeming uncounted thousands, is examined for truth or consequence. Mottling in the Moon Cloud diaphanous drifts and planets of the Pleiades is extensively explored, with the point of view of seeing if there is enough evidence to suggest the mottles are gobular residues of a giant star torn apart by fierce gravitational tides from multi-star fender benders with nearby giant stars, the residues now being distributed throughout the halos of the remaining giant stars, and concentrating in the diaphanous haze drifts.
LOPSIDED EPSILON ERIDANI
EPSIL-01.JIF
Epsilon a much smaller star in Dss cross sectional area, shows objects at right, in the telescope light ring halo.
EPSIL-02.JIF
Dss 2nd generation (red) scan shows other strange conglomerates in the upper left amidst major irregularities in the way light reflections bounced around through the lens refractive indexes in the telescope.
Epsilon seems to have a lopsided radiancy. The Dss 1st generation image shows lopsidedness baised to the right. The Dss 2nd generation (red) image shows lopsidedness biased to the left.
Lopsidedness biased to the right.
Lopsidedness Biased to the left.
1ST, 2ND (RED), AND 2ND (BLUE) GENERATION DSS IMAGES
I actually do not actually know what 1st and 2nd generation Dss images are. Picking and poking amongst Dss links (like picking and poking amongst pimples and blackheads) has not told me anything.
Try a Dss site's 'help', and 'faq'. I did, more than once, to see if I had missed something. I did. Dss waves copyright for images used in classroom, teaching, and non-profit, which is me all the way.
I assume (red) has to do with red frequencies, and (blue) has to do with blue frequencies. The only thing I have seen worth comment is that (red) frequency images tend to be blurrier and more fudged, (blue) tend to be more concise and concentrated, whereas 1st itself tends to hold more details even though smaller by almost 1/2 in cross sectional size.
The Dss help and faq example technical parameters of different photographing techniques at different telescopes in the North and South hemispheres. These parameters were not helpful in deeming (red) as supposedly near the infra red end of the spectrum, and (blue) as near the ultra violet. (Red) more likely seems red emmision spectrums, and (blue) more likely absorption or atomic element spectrums. I honestly can say I honestly do not know. The interest is in why such differences between Dss 1st and 2nd generation plates, visa-a-vis just what exactly was being photographed in, say, (blue), vrs 1st generation. You can see the problem. I retire from the problem without an answer.
There can be major differences occurred between Dss 1st generation, 2nd generation (red), and 2nd generation (blue) plates for a star. (Blue) scans were not available for some of the stars. (Red) was not available in some cases. Most upper generation images showed both similarities and differences varied from 1st generation views, namely, planet islands appear in upper generation views though typically not to the same extent or clarity, on the other hand bold objects, not in the 1st generation views, have appeared.
I do not have the patience to try and trace out specific similarites and differences, view per view. Anyone interested in the subject might do their own tracking, notwithstanding that new photos with new techniques better able to show significant details will be used anyway if the subject is concidered intense enough to warrent extra action.
There are a few obvious plate flaws in the Dss images. For instance several solid black irregular shaped objects of solid size can be seen in the 1st generation Procyon image.
White whiskers are common in Dss images. And smudges of unknown meaning are also seen on occasion. I just ignore what seem plate flaws and look for the planets. I cannot escape the feeling that some objects classed herein in as 'planets' may in fact be proto stars of the smallest kind of star possible.
All of the artifacts seen inside light rings formed by the telescopes around stars had to be delt with on a one to one basis seeing that the artifacts were not falsies created by the telescope but also knowing their true nature has been exaggerated one way or another by the telescopes.
A key player amongst insights is that the arbitary light rings are actually amplifying information seen inside the rings and the amplication can be used to study objects close to the centers of giant stars.
REGARDING SUNSPOTS
None have been seen!
BELL RING OSCILLATIONS AT SIRIUS
In Sirius - major bell ring oscillations so proportionately large compared to the star's overall size, it is possible to picture Sirius being impacted by another star. Of course, theoretical other conciderations can easily account for the bell rings. Is it possible this is what a star might look like when reving up for a major event such as a brief nova.
Click for zoom with planetoids noted
Click for large full size
The inner area has collapsed, at least in brillience, like the dark center area of a super large sunspot.
In 3d stereo, (merge the two images together by eyesight), it can be seen that the thick outer shell is very irregular, undulating in and out, and slightly square rather than perfectly circular, so that the bell ring phenomena is effecting the entire shape of the star in major ways. For example the 'v' lip at the bottom is almost a fold.
Its oscillating scope is best seen instantly, in a histogram equalize rendering of the original image (at right), in which in histogram concentric percusive arcs reaching in major breaches across the star are self evident. If stars oscillate, ringing like a bell, imagine what this must sound like.
The star in fact is mishaped slightly not perfectly circular. How much of the mishape is a contribution of overbright gift from the telescope cannot be decided in this chalky image.
In fact the bellring seems much as seen with our Sun above the horizon at sunrise or sunset where part of the Sun's hem shimmers in layers of atmosphere interference.
To get a good look at the Sirius 'shimmer' (other than by histogram, I had to reduce the image Gamma density with the original onscreen in a graphic editor, by up to 75% then wham the result with very bright color enhancements mainly red and green to give the result the stronge orang hue seen in the next image. The orange has advantage in that used on a poor quality black and white, the orange hue sharply increases ability to see low contrast details, such as the planet islands all pointing toward the center of Sirius, none of which can be seen in the next two bellring images.
More Sirius images are here.
Sirius planetary horde is here.
RADIANCE OF OUR SUN, COMPARED TO SIRIUS ABOVE
For example, our Sun in extreme ultra violet light, presented in a stereo version reguiring red and blue stereo glasses, downloaded from APOD, shows a wholly different Sun.
Click for stereo version large
Click Click for Sun radiance large
Click Click for Sun radiance full size
SILENT GALAXIES
Dark holes near Epsilon Peg may be dark
(silent) galaxy.
A turbulence trail from below streaming to it is easily seen.
Stereo discernment in the above two view pairs is so marginal as to
hardly count, nevertheless, some stereo discernment is visible, enough
to show that this dark hole is not simply flatwall spoils in photo
emulsion, that is, these dark holes do have texture and shape entirely
consist with what might be expected if looking at dark silent galaxies
from a long way off.
Remember the first images of Quasars which
started coming down from Hubble and from ground based sources.
At first, these quasar images were so indiscerned against their flat
wall backdrops as to be almost quesswork, except, their exact formula
co-ordinates were known thereby establishing the tiny queezy quasar
shapes as valid. The above dark hole galaxies I put in the same catagory,
real phenomena because of discernable stereo shape, even if not silent
galaxies they are definately something.
A dark hole near Alpha Peg may be a dark (silent) galaxy.
8888
The star seeming to be properly right over midcenter in the dark hole is,
I believe, a co-incidental overlay.
Another dark hole, with gouge, is also seen under enhancement.
There are four, near Alpha Peg, highlighted in colored boxes in
this image and also this
image.
The fact that these dark holes are circular is not surprising, in
that most all large spiral galaxies are circular in their deep space
superforms.
Dark holes are a subject of their own GIC
page.
DISCOVERY OF HOW ASTRONOMERS HAVE CODE NAMED THEIR GIANT STARS
Well well well isn't that nice. Driving to the local outlet for a can
of strong beer to celebrate the discovery of a planet system orbiting
close in around nearby giant star Alpah And, and the little squirrel in
the cage in the brain began to speed up running the wheel faster and
all of a sudden I was wondering if call letter names Alpha Peg, and
Beta Peg, for instance, might mean Alpha Pegasus for a giant star in
the Pegasus constellation. This could mean, then, that Alpha Andromeda was
Alpha Andromeda, for a giant star in the Andromeda constellation.
Back home, a quick bookmark link to the Dss site for Alpha Andromeda
and there!. It was.
Talk about a well thought out little squirrel.
It is also correct, Alpha Peg is Alpha Pegasus for a giant star named
Alpha in the Pegasus constellation. A quick skip back to the still
active Dss site to get co-ordinates for Alpha Pegasus, and there was
the image I have been calling Alpha Peg, since this (Alpha Peg) is
the first name by which I came to know this giant star.
The reason why the joy (the above paragraph) was the sheer ersatze
of trying to describe Alpha Andromeda using a word 'and' that totally
conflicted with english syntax. Now I can recode everything as
Alpha Andromeda, and Alpha Pegasus, and everyone, including me,
will be happy due to no confusion in the giant stars being named.
I am going to continue using Peg for stars, since the shorthand is
convenient, and, there can be no confusion that 'Peg' is intended.
Starnames effected in GIC are:
Alpha Pegasus = Alpha Peg
Gamma Pegasus = Gamma Peg
Beta Pegasus = Beta Peg
But, I have changed all starname references (even though the name is a
space taking lengthy one), from/to:
Alpha And = Alpha Andromeda
INTERFACED PAGES
Images of stars are partially interfaced between Oscillat.htm (this page 2),
and Planets.htm (the mirror twin page 1). Following is a direct link index
to items in the Planets.htm page.
FEATURED LINKS:
comets
stars
bellring shells
uneven luminance
lopsided radiance
Dss images
saga
motive
summary
star maps
paper star
oval islands
planet spins
orbit structures
Ring system around Arcturus
Ringworld disk system populations
PART 1 - DSS (DEEP SPACE SKY SURVEY) IMAGES SEEM TO BE REVEALING PLANETS IN ABUNDANCE
Giant stars featured are:
Aldebaran
Alpha And
Alpha Peg
Altair
Arcturus
Beta Peg
Betelgeuse
Epsilon Eridani
Epsilon Peg
Gamma Peg
Merope
Procyon
Regulus
Rigel
Sirius
plus
Vega
Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004 form A & O 3 3
|
Click google logo for site search
For the world's most comprehensive searches use
|
|---|
Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home
| DRUMBALLIA | ODDESSY | CLIFFR | CONTACT |