[.................. THE EXTENCE OF 'FRAMES' |_______________________________________________________| It has to be ahem, well, oops, fuzzy logic. But nonetheless it winds its way through a philosophical arguement regards the fact that INFINITIES don't exist, in that any way required to express an infinity involves the infinity being FRAMED in some kind of artifact in order for the apparent infinity to be identifyable in the first place. Wherein the infinity's apparentness has to vanish, due to the existence of the FRAME in the first place. For instance, Infinities may seem to exist just about anytime you do a mathematical equation, but CAN'T occur unless expressed in some way, such as by a string of digits, or bits of a measure repeated. And yet, the digits are arbitrary to human narrow thought views, and bits of a measure can only occur from one place to another, which is axiomatically within a FRAME. A piece called INTRINSIC STATUS VALUE which follows next, discusses aspects of FRAMES as the embodiment of û2, seemingly Infinite but not, in the diagonal of an ordinary square. Its poetic style gives a sort of Infinite look, to the contents. ============================ INTRINSIC STATUS VALUE ============================ It is futile contemplating images that are impossible. Zen buddists do this Sitting strung out on mountain tops all over the planet puzzling through the next step puzzling how to achieve a handclap with only one hand to make it happen. The Zennist has galled on a concept thinks an eyblink can't happen unless an eyball sees the lid slick over the view and sits on the pinnacles unable what to do to make the fateful wink link to what goes on in Reality. In existence there cannot be anything real without there being at least one real other thing that is different in order to notice the first thing's difference. Thoughts can imagine infinities in endless variety. However there are no real infinities and apparent infinities are re-usable only when embodied in something else. A part might seem infinite when in isolate then becomes a step along the way when structured in other parts that are finite. Root 2 is said to be infinity in number value and irrational though it is not instantly argued if it's infinity is in the number of digits of the number or the length the digits make when strung together in a line. Root 2 is actually a measured hypotenuse found as the finite diagonal of a square of 1 per side. The measured hypotenuse bisected yields two new infinities in isolated parts; the two finite and linked halves of the diagonal seem to become two infinite measured halves that are irrational when taken apart, having infinite digits and infinite length of digits in two strings within the single infinity known as root 2 if each new half is concidered by itself as separate. These infinities in root 2 are actually co-incidences in the base 10 number system used to measure the hypotenuse and two hypotenuse half parts. Given many other number bases those infinities would vanish simply by the miracle of changing the way the thoughts want to count. For instance if the thought base was said to be a hypotenuse equal to 1; then the link that was root 2, and the length of and number of digits in its measure all sum to a 1 with identical link, length, and measure half parts also finite. But watch this, the four equal sides inscribing the hypotenuse now each carry the mark of a measured 1 over root 2 value, ie. the reciprocal of root 2, ie. one half root 2 (no surprise), ie. one minus (1 over root 2) (plus 2), ie. 1 minus (root 2 plus 1 minus 3/2 root 2), etc., (each one constructable each procedure different in plane geometry techniques when you know how to construct reciprocals) since all are a measure value yet appear to be the same number value as the diagonal of 1, ie. 1, since the square root of 1 is 1. But when measured the digits change to those that seem infinite in a variety of trigonometry sources each itself an infinity for each of the count of, the length of, for value of, the digits comprising each side measured, since each digit has to occupy a space, no matter how big or small the size of each digit as the number continues forever to be written out by hand if ever an infinite number is quote: to be written in full. Four sets of infinities? and a multiplex of infinite sources in the sides of a simple square? Not so, and no paradox. It's all in human thought of, but not the Reality of, Creation. The problem is resolved by realizing that measures are arbitrary, selected by choice to note a non dimensional finite diagonal that is already framed by the existence of the finite square that contains it. Even if one measure crossed a universe and is selected as a constant the measure of the diagonal and the measure of the square might seem irrationally infinite in some marker value when scaled to the constant but this is not the case because the square is already a framed finite entity existing in the realm of the universe. The hypotenuse would and the sides would appear as mere parts of the constant; proportionate segments of no other value until a human said measure is given to the constant. The infinities appear only when attempts are made to arbitrarily put a value on the frame itself, using arbitrary secondary techniques such as those sneaking creeping decimals snowballing across the cosmos in someone's thought whim ad infinitum. Savvy? Simple rules for simple messages is the escape from ideas which can never finish because they have no reason for existing other than being buffeting mistakes in lazy thinker's or urgent stinker's promiscuous thought balloons. "This is very surprising"... the person says putting the manuscript down and looking across the coffee table to the associable professor "...how did you get it? "You gave it to me last week at the conference"; says the Professor "Oh," says the person. "Did you get a chance to read it? "No", the professor says. "I'm giving it back to you. After all it must have taken at least a few dollars to make the photo copies and that at the least must mean something "Go ahead kid, lump your swallows, then, swallow your lumps Gustily, with singleword empahsis intended; "EARTH QUAKE" ! "Nonsense, the world is calm "Anybody know what twaddle is well this ain't some of it! Socialite Eagerton 111 the infinity specialist slowly stirs a cup of tea giggling everything in the room but the teacup jiggling "What I want to know is, what is the underlying theory Well, ah, er, gee, shucks, you see, you're twisting my insights deliberately so tight that like right now you can't even think of anything I want to tell you Gravitational Ho Ho? Funny how a single insight can slow the game Come off it you mean blow the mind Disrupt the brain chatter? What? Careful you'll spill your tea if you keep jiggling to avoid the earthquake OOPS Here is an earth joke, or, here's a joke on the planet earth: what is renowned by Hindus is brown, round, and sounds like a bell rung DUNGGG! After a brief lull after a brief murmer of the class in response has subsided the person adds I guess you'd have had to have been there to appreciate the joke on the planet. This time the response is more like it Greydon Moore March 23, 1993 ----------------------------------------------------- Appended February 9, 1999

Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004         form   A & O 3 3

                  Click google logo for site search

For the world's most comprehensive searches use

Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home

Available Downloads

DRUMBALLIA

ODDESSY

CLIFFR

CONTACT