GIC - SPECIAL NEW PAGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIC GALAXIES IN CHAOS |
SPECIAL PLANETS PLANETS1 OSCILLATIONS SUPERFORMS HUBBLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAPID STACCATO EDITORIAL
|
POSSIBLE PROTO DISK NEAR IK 198
This eerie object, in a Dss 2nd gen (blue) plate, has the look and feel of being a proto disk. But of what, a planet?, a star? The Dss image tells us nothing. The object needs to be analyzed to see if the proto is nearby, faraway, or at the same distance as IK 198, in other words, what is its scale relative to any nearby giant star.
A CLOSE ENCOUNTER VISIT TO SIRIUS
Click for extra large colored (warning big image)
Click for extra large black and white
Click for small overview
Click for extra small overview
More Sirius here 1 and here 2 and here 3
This is Sirius, its nearspace peppered with island ovals, many in tidal trios of 3's some of which seem orbitally placed in oppositions on either side of the star, some tidal trios are in 2's, and numerous singles. The number of tidal trios however, is particularly noticable.
More details on a single tiny dot near Sirius (in left image) are below.
The single tiny dot residing in two clusters of tidal trios may be a hard planet, that is, one that is spherical, compact, and round. Solar system planets all fit the catagory of being 'hard planets'.
BOOGEYMEN
The swirling dirvish booyman at Sirius may be a globule large enough to class as a protostar but perhaps one just vague enough of mass not to be able to fully coalesce and flame on.
Other boogeymen occupy vacinities at Vega.
Such boogeymen seem to be being formed as we speak in an active star forming region called MWC 1808.
Opportunity to theorize compels to conjecture that as the mass density becomes dense enough to form a new star coalesced, mass concentrations surrounding the actual 'shrink and ignite' also collapsed toward point source centers, but, there is not enough mass at these other points to yet flame on as more new stars each after each, and so these 'no-flame' stars coalesce enough to form boogeymen 'hurricane' ovals and today are either precursor new stars, or failed new stars.
As I said, opportunity to conject. I took it.
BACK TO BIG SIRIUS
Click this view for large image overview of ovals around Sirius. There does not seem to be any preferential ecliptic axis such as found for planets of our Solar System, nor are they biased in clumps, suggesting, overall, more loosely eccentric orbits such as found in our Solar System's asteroid Belt.
As to an ecliptic plane, the ovals hording around Sirius cannot be said to occupy a range declined as a disk. The image also cannot say if the ovals spherically surround Sirius such as moths whirling around a light bulb in a blither.
An orbital bias indicating a disk inclinated, is actually seen at Arcturus, where hordes of objects occupy an orientation bias running North/west to South/east as indications of an orbital range, probably like an asteroid belt's equivalent, seen inclined partially face on at Arcturus.
THESE TIDES HAVE RESONANCE
The objects at Sirius seem more like a cloud of asteroids in exaggerated eccentric orbits swarming in a meely like moths at every which inclination around a light bulb, which means there could be objects orbiting the poles of Sirius as well as the equator and mid latitude zones.
It is felt in GIC opinion, though not declared by GIC, that these island ovals are gobules of sundry matter blown off by the star and are poorly defined as planets, that is, no steady state daily spins nor proper or sustained North/south poles. The scaling factor of their size in terms of not arcminutes but radii, is not a frothy mouth challenge for myself, but I do believe it would be easy for someone with a simple electronic calculator to determine if the ovals are within planet range or are too large for planets, too small for protostars (perhaps).
There is no doubt in my mind that these ovals are real and that they have taken semi stable positions in orbit around Sirius in particular in tidal groups where gravitational sheer differententials should manufacture different oribital velocities at different orbital distances out from the star, yet, clearly, many are locked in trios along a straight line axis out from the star, sweeping around in lock step as they mutually revolve in orbit, like objects attached to the sweeping second hand of a clock.
Tidal lock indicates a yin/yang force or merry go round, keeping them in lockstep as gravitational tides tend to throw them apart into different sheer velocities persuant to Newtonian gravitational mechanics, and fierce winds and force fields from the star keep them sustained gathered back together in groups in sweeping clock second hand lock step.
QUALIFICATIONS
All ovals are facing the star, their long axis on a radial to the star center, ruling out any possibility of plate errors or spurious nonesense disturbing the picture with irrational content. The coherency of these center facing objects overwhelms any objections a careless observer or genius cum lauda might have about self evident evidences.
The 'occlusion' is not by the star itself but by the star's extra bright telescope light ring (a false artifact), so that any reflection could be a crescent along the left edge of the 'occluded' sphere in keeping with the fact that Regulus physically is only a dot itself (not seen in the image anyway), offscreen to the left in the grey image.
MIGRATING OBJECTS
It is too bad a 2nd gen (blue) scan of Sirus is not available, since (red) scans often show objects clearly, and in more than one instance a migration of a tidal trio during the time span between one Dss plate and another can be tracked showing the objects moving in an orbit. The Dss 2nd gen (red) plate of Sirius is a lost cause.
For example, in the next image, a tidal trio at Regulus has migrated during the time span between a Dss 2nd gen (red) plate (left) and a Dss 2nd gen (blue) plate (right), the trio moving back, further down, over left toward the star's vertical axis, the objects in the trio have rotated and changed shape, and the objects appear farther apart, all in all tell-tale signs of orbital migration, in this case, flailing away from us into distance behind the star.
Which brings the discussion back to seeming violation of gravitational tides, in that how can a tidal trio stay in the same consecutive lineup in orbital paths in violation of gravitational velocity differentials (tides) in separate orbital sheers via distances out from the star, these are system dynamics well defined by Kepler's Laws and continued in a very serious GIC disclosure (myself) worked out years ago named coupling.txt.
Kepler's Laws demonstrate that orbital velocity is geared in synchronization to orbital distance, the farther the distance the slower the velocity of any object orbiting a star, at least, any object orbiting in our solar system.
ORBITAL VELOCITY REVERSAL
In tidal trio dynamics, the farther member out is obiting faster than the other two objects, the closest member to the star is orbiting the slowest, in complete reversal to normal solar orbital dynamics as we currently understand the dynamics using our solar system as a model.
The answer may be in fierce solar winds (or flares) at Sirius and such stars as Regulus, driving the objects outward in simultaneously counter keeping within reach of gravitational powers of each object seeking to draw such close neighbor objects closer together. A temporary balance in stasis arises, resulting in tidal trios. It can be intuited that such coherent tidal groups do not last long, that is, it is estimated that planets of our Solar System have lasted close to 4 billion years since first forming so our solar planets are lonnng lasting.
TRANSISTORS
It is intuited as likely that the globules, ovals, and dark diffuse dots around giant stars are transitors, changing location or even their existence as the stars contininue to blow and puff intermittent fierce furies.
Tidal trios and duos at Sirius may have formed recently, and may get dissolve within near sight of the future. Since the life span of the tidal groups cannot be learned from the images per se, their coherent lifetimes are a matter of speculation. Immediately above it has been suggested that lifetimes are short lived, the speculation gained from logically intuitive assumptions in concidering the fierce and intensly disturbed environments in which tidal trios must live.
Sirius is reported to be twice as massive as our Sun and about 20 times as bright. Being only 8.5 light years away this makes it the brightest star in Earth's night sky.
It does not seem likely that any gravitational wobble would be detected at Sirius (revealing the existence of planets) if gravitational attractions upon Sirius by objects on either side of Sirius pull against each other. In fact objects surround Sirius on all sides, these have to mutually cancel each other's input in wobble.
The dimness and smallness of objects superimposed over the expanded bright face of Sirius would rule out dimming as a detection means, especially if several objects are transiting the face of Sirius at any given moment such that the starlight would seem more or less constant even though intrinsically dimmed slightly from true brightness by many simultaneously transiting objects.
These reasons (in the above paragraph) may explain why astronomers have not been able to detect planets around nearby giant stars, and so have moved their attentions further and further outward from Earth's egocentric location.
Click for more Sirius details
Click for more Regulus details
Regards the 'extra large' view I have composited of Sirius - my graphic editor seems to have failed at an elemental level (due perhaps to the fact that a 20 Gig hard drive is down to its last few hundred megs still available), such that I cannot cut away the extra black space in the 'extra large' image. I tried everything including latest up to the minute online virus scans, and running the 'Register correcting software' and every other ploy to no avail, my graphic editor suddenly simply will not cut and paste large images anymore.
Sob saheeb how many hours I wasted trying to do one more simple single step in this project. Wieldies such as this are why I keep muttering about retiring from it.
Other tidal trio insights are here 1 here 2
TIDAL TRIO NECKLACES AT VEGA
Click for more Vega details
Vega has two tidal trios in a different array, each trio is strung out along the orbit circumpherence like beads in a necklace, and both trios seem to be holding together in tidal locked orbital velocities.
First thing we do not know is if both trios hold the same velocity. If velocity is different, for instance the inner trio is actually moving faster than the outer trio, so that the inner trio is passing the outer at the moment the photograph was taken, it is possible then that tidal trios passing each other will assume temporary horizontal re-alignements until after the passing where then both trios re-resume vertical lines vectored to the center of the star.
If both Vega trio companions are in similar velocities, so that the two clumps continue to move around in locked necklaces, gravitational mechanics equations keep glimpsing up into mind as to how the two groups can sustain lock-step. This could be by gravity of the outer three objects pulling the inner three outward, at the same time the gravity of the inner three objects are pulling the outer three objects inward, to a point where self sustaining tidal winds made of gravity can hold all six objects in a sustained coherent cluster.
But, then, add the factor of fierce solar forces from the star driving the objects outward, and the seeming simplicity of gravity mechanic equations becomes dramatically more complex.
TINY DOT MAY BE A HARD PLANET, INCLUDED IN TWO PARALLAX TIDAL TRIOS AT SIRIUS
Go slow. Oh awesome is this ever good. Is that a small hard planet sitting there, in position (b3) in the tidal trio.
Another trio with three ovals on a parallax clock wand focused to the star, has next two it two more ovals in identical parallax axis, no third oval is seen.
Go fast. A tiny dark dot is noticed, exactly where oval (b3) is supposed to be. Whatta whopper. This little beauty is sitting right where it is supposed to be to make two complete sets of tidal trio halleluliahs.
Firm or hard planets are anything round, spin like a top, have poles and are gravitationally compact enough to stay in shape for a long time. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, are solar system examples of firm planets.
Solid planets are rock hard, and filled with metal, such as Mars, Earth, Venus, and Mercury.
The tiny dot seen in the above parallax tidal group at Sirius although obviously firm, cannot be declared as either a hard, or soft, planet at this time until scaling factors have been calculated showing the dot's radius. If really small, Earth or moon-like, it is solid, if Jupiter or Saturn-like, it is hard.
UNIFIED FIELD PROPERTY BEHAVIORS
There are tidal trios at Betelgeuse which face each other on opposite sides of the clock, that is, a trio in (say) the two o'clock position is matched by a trio at the 8 o'clock position.
I suggest it might be worth the effort to monitor tidal trio motions with great zeal. A third configuration might be possible for them, which is in a mercedes array, that is, three tidal trios which orbit equidistant from each other around the circumpherence, separated by 120 degree angles.
It is clear from viewing the tidal trio images linked in this page, that each member of a trio is separated by a gap from each other. This is consistent with declared fundamental physics that no two particles can occupy the same place at the same time, in analogy, no two tidal objects can occur together without merging. However, fundamental particles can occupy two separate yet identical states at the same time, for instance two electrons in the shell one with spin up, the other spin down.
In the star system analogy, the two states are found on opposite sides of the star - like a second Earth hidden behind the Sun. In hyperwaves analogies, the radius of one wavelength is like an orbit, linked in a straight line to the radius of another orbit on the far side of the Sun, forming a third wavelength which has a correct fundamental partical value via the combination.
It is possible that many mechanical properties of orbiting entities in star based systems will reveal mechanics already seen in fundamental physics high energy particle theories.
These dynamics will be different than those seen in ordinary Newtonian gravitational physics.
POSSIBLE PLANET AT PROCYON
A possible planet is seen transiting across the face of large nearby star Procyon.
A hard object like this (dark dot on the right side of the starbright center area), is anomalous in this Dss 1st gen plate since its texture seems inconsistent with other anomalous objects which are seen in hordes of dim and mishapen objects surrounding the star.
Furthermore, the dark dot seen as if transiting the face of the star is totally inconsistent with plate flaws which typically are pitch black with sharply demarked edges, in other words, no textures at all, whereas the dark dot seen as if transiting Procyon has texture, which is more reassuring if it is claimed to be a planet.
PROCYON
The environment around Procyon (a nearby large star), is peppered with objects both in island oval form and round. The environment seems too chaotic for any stable coherent forms such as tidal duos or trios. In this case, hordes of objects are out there. It brings back a sense of what can result if Procyon has ever shot splatter guns of material out into space such as seen in images linked in the thumbnails at the top of this page.
More Procyon images are here
PARTIAL OVAL OVERSEES THE COMA GALAXY CLUSTER
The Coma Cluster of galaxies has some very interesting features and special effects as revealed in Dss plates. The 1st gen plate shows substantial deep space rippling, and a giant oval. The 2nd gen (red) plate shows substantial deep space gravitic rippling. And the 2nd gen (blue) plate contains images of numerous dark areas including two dark holes.
BANDWIDTH PROPERTIES
Bandwidth properties comparable to electromagnetic and sonic signals are investigated in blare.htm and waves.htm.
Click for grape enhancement
Click for histogram small
Click for histogram large
Click for red enhanced
Click for original
The Dss 2nd gen (red) plate also shows extensive rippling and coherent patterns, but no show of the large oval rills.
Click for histogram large
Click for original
The Coma cluster is riddled with dark areas, an example is above, others can be seen in the next two click images.
Click for full plate small
Click for full plate large
GIC RELATED LINKS
Click for extensive trilling rill system near Ngc 7673
Click for large partial rill system near Denebola
Click for rills pervading Perseus Galaxy cluster
Click for other rill systems
AN ACTIVE BAND OF BANDWIDTHS NEAR COLLIDING GALAXIES ARP 242
The thumbnail (left) views a small area in which (nearby offscreen) in very deep space resides active colliding galaxies Arp 242.
Not much in bold bright color can be seen in current images of Arp 242 making the rounds on the Internet, available images are of no better quality than seen next under 'original', where Arp 242, (also known as the 'mice' galaxies), can be seen in midscreen.
Click for black and white original
Click for histogram large
Click for small colored
The rills above are not a wash on the film. Lucky strike. The rills might be a local section of temporarily compacted giant gravity waves.
This is the first confirming image seen by GIC (myself) showing rills in a parallel waveband formation. Other parallel rills, or striations, have been detected in nearby space in highly enhanced images of Andromeda in which 'checkerboard rills have also been seen, and both the Large/Small Magellanic Cloud galaxies, however it was not clear as to whether the rills seen were real in deep space, or fluid washes effecting the photograph images during developing processes.
POSSIBLE JUPITER CLASS PLANETS AT 47 UMA
Star light star bright first star I see tonight
I wish I may I wish I might see this star in rich new light.
Two Jupiter sized planets have been reported by astronomers at nearby star 47 UMA, a star like our own Sun. Dss plates do not show planets in any stark clarity. However, the Dss 1st gen plate shows two objects highlighted by the telescope's overbright light halo. Both objects are in position to appear as an anomaly in the light halo's rim, suggesting coherent objects rather than spurious background noise in the Dss plate.
The star at the center of the Dss 60x60 arcminute 1st gen plate is small, even though nearby, therefore not much in the way of enhancement is possible to show more of the two objects. The views above are displayed expanded to more than twice their original size.
Astronomer's report that at 47 UMA one Jupiter class planet orbits at a distance out about equivalent to the Asteroid belt of the solar system, and a second Jupiter class planet orbits further out at a distance roughly equivalent to half way between our Asteroid belt and Jupiter in our Solar Sytem.
The two objects seen in the above Dss photo are not inconsistent with objects of such kind, seen by astronomers at 47 UMA, although, GIC has not means of estimating how far out from the star the two objects are located in the Dss plate, nor, how far apart in terms of realspace the two marked objects are.
Let's say possible. If the two marked objects in the Dss plate are two Jupiter class planets, it means Dss offers a quick way of surveying nearby space looking for planetary candidates.
CONDITIONS
The first condition is that the above 47 Uma image itself is less than quality significant, that is, that the two objects pointed out in the star's telescope light halo are not pristine or perfect, and could be blobs made of flaws having nothing to do with two planets.
On the other hand, they seem (from an amateur observer's point of view) to be two objects which could class as Jupiter sized planets. If these are planets, there can not be an easier way to monitor their movements and learn their orbits than using astronomy techniques similar to those used by Dss to photograph.
This would be far easier than trying to monitor wobbles with powerful telescopes and technologies trying to deem the slightest fractional wavelength phase shifts in comparative spectra lines showing back and forth wobbling of the star. Watch the planets themselves. It cannot get easier.
The bottom line is to reclone the photo plates and media, on the same (or equivalent) telescope as was used for the Dss original, and keep a track on the two object's movements. This will be far easier than the more incredibly difficult data dense method of tracking the planets using the Star's wobbling as each planet pulls great star slightly offbase as each planet orbits, to monitor planet gravitational effects. Simply watching the two objects in Dss class circumstances could not be easier.
A round of quick experiments, of course, might produce a better view of the two objects, first to deem if or if not they are planets, then monitor them. The bottom line restated is there is already a means to learn about the two objects by monitoring them in a Dss class situation. First to be learned is if they stay coherent over time thus are in orbit, thus are planet objects not spurious nonesense.
Click for view of 47 Uma with several marked anomalies
Click for view of 47 Uma with a large dark area nearby (1st gen)
Click for view of 47 Uma with another large dark hole in a different position (2nd gen (blue))
WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS
Via enhancements, we can see how clearly the spiral galaxy is withdrawing from the elliptical, an upper arm, plus central arms, are still tethered and being drawn out, as well, rubble between the lower right of the spiral and the elliptical center reveal a path of motion as one galaxy sails past the other in a fender bender.
Since the image itself is of poor quality, two enhancements slightly varied are used above to show different finer details such as can be seen.
STEREO REVEALS THE TRUTH OF THIS COLLISION
The images in stereo (merge two images together by eyesight to see 3D) show that the spiral galaxy is slewing in a tumbling rotation as it slices foreward from behind the elliptical.
The outer left limb of the spiral galaxy has sailed past more or less intact, the intactness lasting to the right of the inner core which juts forward, the rest of the right side is in a strew of rubble streaming back to the elliptical galaxy. Since the strew is slightly arced inward back toward the elliptical galaxy, it shows there are more than one motion in the spiral galaxy's foreward path.
Click for original
Click for enhanced 1
Click for enhanced 2
LONG ANTENNA ARMS LIGHT UP BRIGHTLY IN RADIO SIGNALS
Radio VLT imaging reveals a long arm ending (or rather beginning) in a blunt nub. The long arm and nub are faintly visible in optical light images under very high enhancement. Radio image advantages are investigated here.
Small dark areas of radio silence can be seen along the arm when the original image (first above) is very highly enhanced (second above).
The radio arm extends strongly on a horizontal slant toward the camera. In fact the whole apparition is stretched out along a noticably horizontal plane, the nub at the lower right is the closest part to us.
A faint extension (in green which is a visible light overlay) is seen beyond the main active bulb. This is a region of dimly radiant visible light matter, which is not seen in the infrared frequencies used for the next image.
Click for large radio original
Click for large radio enhanced 1
Click for large radio enhanced 2
Click for large infrared original
Click for large infrared enhanced
Greater expanses of dimly luminant matter are seen in this AAT image when highly enhanced using 'gamma correction' (not image adjusting 'contrast') in a desktop PC graphics editor.
Click for original
Click for enhanced 1
Click for enhanced 2
TWO ANTENNA IMAGE SOURCES - RADIO - INFRARED
Antenna radio image
Radio astronomy images main site
Antenna infrared
Optically visible expanses seen primarily in radio frequencies are not that uncommon, in galaxy images. The best examples I can show are a Dss image of Bodes galaxy, which swells into enormous expanses of extra mass when very abruptly enhanced.
I used this enhancing ability to try and actualize proof that Bodes (M81) and nearby winged galaxy M82 had collided, the proof mainly that Bodes when given techniques to bring out hidden mass in images, showed every kind of sign of collision, including jets, intruders, giant tympanic formation (next image), and extra arms.
Next, this stupendous formation made of dark matter (silent) is off the right end of Bodes galaxy. It is the result of a mainframe collision in Bode's recent past.
A great deal of inferrence and speculative brain heavy work (heavy for me - not so hard on the brain) was eclipsed by the chance find of a radio image of Bodes, found late one night surfing the web, which shows radio extensions clearly linking Bodes with several other nearby small irregular galaxies, including M82. I was happy that I was right about Bodes (after all that work), and even happier to see in a glance that vast radio ranges surround Bodes.
TIME FOR A BRIEF BLOWOUT
I think astronomers are wasting their time, speculating. Radio range images such as used for Bodes in full deep space surroundings, and using radio ranges finding as much as possible - not squeezed into a single astronomer's peculiar particular theory - will show much, if not most, if not 'indeed' all, of that there difficult 'missing mass' - its gotta be there - its just gotta - so says everybody - to be found in abundance in astronomy images using techniques in common use today.
For instance, radio images of Bodes galaxy and the Antenna galaxy both reveal major swaths of wide spread information which is part of their cosmic picture. Radio images are out there in the wild, for instance here, but do not seem to be of widespread interest without contour lines showing the hydrogen, or showing the morning mists and temperatures at daybreak.
For that matter, Malin of Australia has explored high contrast in photo plates and found clumps of strong matter around galaxies which seem just floating on their own, and much smaller, in deep space.
GIC (myself) has explored extra matter ranges and has five main pages of it, in galaxy superforms, missing mass 1, missing mass 2, also anomalies, and in a selection of Hubble images.
All that is needed is for astronomers to loose their circling paranoias about peer pressures, and crank their images to the hilt in high gain enhancers to see what their photo shoot projects actually captured in cruising a new image, and to use techniques actually designed to photograph dim and hidden medias, these are medias whose differences are too faint to be discerned by naked eyesight and cannot be seen at all ever if astronomers continue to expect that their best images can only be shown on pitch black backgrounds such as seen by humans looking at the nightsky at midnight.
A pitch black background is an aberrated mindset used by humans, even very intelligent ones, to accord what they see looking at the black nightsky at midnight. Priests used to do this, back in the days when their leaders ruled several universes.
This is when earlier very intelligent humans who looked into the heavens decided that the whole of their universe, including the Sun, revolved around the Earth, because that is what these very intelligent humans saw with naked eyesight.
The whole-earth universe is a condition that lasted not years, decades, or centuries, but milliniums. How long will it take for today's posse of very intelligent humans to throw away the mindset that pitch black midnight skys are the only correct view of the universe. This mindset has already lasted centuries longer since Galileo first began using a hand made telescope.
When oh where has that little star gone, oh where oh where can it be. Right there in front of you - even dim brown stars are being imaged in telescopes only you the midnighters don't know this yet because you believe everything possible has to be valid when only viewed against a pitch black sky at midnight. Pretty pictures cannot make a universe laugh.
Granted, gradually creeping foreward are images cranked to the hilt showing heavily mottled backgrounds and a tiny object indicated by an arrow.
The plain fact is that the heavens are rich, rich, rich, and I mean rich, with lights of all kinds whose luminosity elevates excitements in film medias and camcorders slowly, not in one big flash. Go to it, you guys and girls. Missing mass is everywhere. And I have found some of it. Perhaps you can find more, if not all the rest, just by looking again at your best and most favorite images, plus new ones the existing images encourage.
You have heard the expression 'old fart'. What about an old fart who laughs a lot, has lots of friends, and will do anything to shut down or destroy the career of a young startup who does not further the news and beliefs of the old fart. Am I talking about the profession of astronomy? You bet your ass.
Web site/display/designs/image enhancements - Greydon Moore World's largest cosmic teaching site - Ottawa 2001/2004 form A & O 3 3
|
Click google logo for site search
For the world's most comprehensive searches use
|
|---|
Fast crash course in astronomy
More advanced at top of home
| DRUMBALLIA | ODDESSY | CLIFFR | CONTACT |